Category: Science & Tech

Etiam vitae dapibus rhoncus. Eget etiam aenean nisi montes felis pretium donec veni. Pede vidi condimentum et aenean hendrerit. Quis sem justo nisi varius tincidunt nec aliquam arcu tempus vel laoreet lorem.

  • This manga publisher is using Anthropic’s AI to translate Japanese comics into English

    This manga publisher is using Anthropic’s AI to translate Japanese comics into English

    [ad_1]

    Orange distributes its translations via an app called emaqi (a pun on “emaki,” the ancient Japanese illustrated scrolls that are considered a precursor to manga). It also wants to be a translator-for-hire for US publishers.

    But Orange has not been welcomed by all US fans. When it showed up at Anime NYC, a US anime convention, this summer, Japanese-to-English translator Jan Mitsuko Cash tweeted: “A company like Orange has no place at the convention hosting the Manga Awards, which celebrates manga and manga professionals in the industry. If you agree, please encourage @animenyc to ban AI companies from exhibiting or hosting panels.”  

    Brienza takes the same view. “Work in the culture industries, including translation, which ultimately is about translating human intention, not mere words on a page, can be poorly paid and precarious,” she says. “If this is the way the wind is blowing, I can only grieve for those who will go from making little money to none.”

    Some have also called Orange out for cutting corners. “The manga uses stylized text to represent the inner thoughts that the [protagonist] can’t quite voice,” another fan tweeted. “But Orange didn’t pay a redrawer or letterer to replicate it properly. They also just skip over some text entirely.”

    App that offers distribution service that will provide translated manga
    Orange distributes its translations via an app called emaqi (available only in the US and Canada for now)

    EMAQI

    Everyone at Orange understands that manga translation is a sensitive issue, says Kuroda: “We believe that human creativity is absolutely irreplaceable, which is why all AI-assisted work is rigorously reviewed, refined, and finalized by a team of people.”  

    Orange also claims that the authors it has translated are on board with its approach. “I’m genuinely happy with how the English version turned out,” says Kenji Yajima, one of the authors Orange has worked with, referring to the company’s translation of his title Neko Oji: Salaryman reincarnated as a kitten! (see images). “As a manga artist, seeing my work shared in other languages is always exciting. It’s a chance to connect with readers I never imagined reaching before.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • What the departing White House chief tech advisor has to say on AI

    What the departing White House chief tech advisor has to say on AI

    [ad_1]

    If consumers don’t have confidence that the AI tools they’re interacting with are respecting their privacy, are not embedding bias and discrimination, that they’re not causing safety problems, then all the marvelous possibilities really aren’t going to materialize. Nowhere is that more true than national security and law enforcement. 

    I’ll give you a great example. Facial recognition technology is an area where there have been horrific, inappropriate uses: take a grainy video from a convenience store and identify a black man who has never even been in that state, who’s then arrested for a crime he didn’t commit. (Editor’s note: Prabhakar is referring to this story). Wrongful arrests based on a really poor use of facial recognition technology, that has got to stop. 

    In stark contrast to that, when I go through security at the airport now, it takes your picture and compares it to your ID to make sure that you are the person you say you are. That’s a very narrow, specific application that’s matching my image to my ID, and the sign tells me—and I know from our DHS colleagues that this is really the case—that they’re going to delete the image. That’s an efficient, responsible use of that kind of automated technology. Appropriate, respectful, responsible—that’s where we’ve got to go.

    Were you surprised at the AI safety bill getting vetoed in California?

    I wasn’t. I followed the debate, and I knew that there were strong views on both sides. I think what was expressed, that I think was accurate, by the opponents of that bill, is that it was simply impractical, because it was an expression of desire about how to assess safety, but we actually just don’t know how to do those things. No one knows. It’s not a secret, it’s a mystery. 

    To me, it really reminds us that while all we want is to know how safe, effective and trustworthy a model is, we actually have very limited capacity to answer those questions. Those are actually very deep research questions, and a great example of the kind of public R&D that now needs to be done at a much deeper level.

    Let’s talk about talent. Much of the recent National Security Memorandum on AI was about how to help the right talent come from abroad to the US to work on AI. Do you think we’re handling that in the right way?

    It’s a hugely important issue. This is the ultimate American story, that people have come here throughout the centuries to build this country, and it’s as true now in science and technology fields as it’s ever been. We’re living in a different world. I came here as a small child because my parents came here in the early 1960s from India, and in that period, there were very limited opportunities [to emigrate to] many other parts of the world. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The Download: Bird flu, and waterless concrete for the moon

    The Download: Bird flu, and waterless concrete for the moon

    [ad_1]

    How worried should we be about bird flu? The past few months have seen some potentially worrisome developments in the US, including the continued spread of the virus among dairy cattle, the detection of the virus in a pig as well as cow’s milk, and—most concerning of all—the growing number of human infections.

    We don’t yet have any evidence that the virus is spreading between people, but the risk of a potential pandemic has increased since MIT Technology Review last covered this topic a couple of months ago.

    The good news is we are in a much better position to tackle any potential future flu outbreaks than we were to face covid-19 back in 2020, given that we already have vaccines. But, on the whole, it’s not looking great. Read the full story.

    —Jessica Hamzelou

    This story is from The Checkup, our weekly newsletter giving you the inside track on all things health and biotech. Sign up to receive it in your inbox every Thursday.

    The moon is just the beginning for this waterless concrete

    If NASA establishes a permanent presence on the moon, its astronauts’ homes could be made of a new 3D-printable, waterless concrete. Someday, so might yours. By accelerating the curing process for more rapid construction, this sulfur-based compound could become just as applicable on our home terrain as it is on lunar soil.

    Traditional concrete requires large amounts of water, a commodity that will be in short supply on the moon, and sending just 1 kilogram of it to the moon costs roughly $1.2 million.

    Instead, NASA hopes to create new materials from lunar soil and eventually adapt the same techniques for building on Mars. But creating the perfect waterless “lunarcrete” is easier said than done. Read the full story.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The moon is just the beginning for this waterless concrete

    The moon is just the beginning for this waterless concrete

    [ad_1]

    Building a home base on the moon will demand a steep supply of moon-based infrastructure: launch pads, shelter, and radiation blockers. But shipping Earth-based concrete to the lunar surface bears a hefty price tag. Sending just 1 kilogram (2.2 pounds) of material to the moon costs roughly $1.2 million, says Ali Kazemian, a robotic construction researcher at Louisiana State University (LSU). Instead, NASA hopes to create new materials from lunar soil and eventually adapt the same techniques for building on Mars. 

    Traditional concrete requires large amounts of water, a commodity that will be in short supply on the moon and critically important for life support or scientific research, according to the American Society of Civil Engineers. While prior NASA projects have tested compounds that could be used to make “lunarcrete,” they’re still working to craft the right waterless material.

    So LSU researchers are refining the formula, developing a new cement based on sulfur, which they heat until it’s molten to bind material without the need for water. In recent work, the team mixed their waterless cement with simulated lunar and Martian soil to create a 3D-printable concrete, which they used to assemble walls and beams. “We need automated construction, and NASA thinks 3D printing is one of the few viable technologies for building lunar infrastructure,” says Kazemian. 

    curved wall being built in a lab by a 3D printing arm withwaterless concrete
    A curved wall is 3D printed from waterless concrete.

    COURTESY OF ALI KAZEMIAN

    Beyond circumventing the need for water, the cement can handle wider temperature extremes and cures faster than traditional methods. The group used a pre-made powder for their experiments, but on the moon and Mars, astronauts might extract sulfur from surface soil. 

    To test whether the concrete can stand up to the moon’s harsh environment, the team placed its structures in a vacuum chamber for weeks, analyzing the material’s stability at different temperatures. Originally, researchers worried that cold conditions on the dark side of the moon might cause the compound to turn into a gas through a process called sublimation, like when dry ice skips its liquid phase and evaporates directly. Ultimately, they found that the concrete can handle the lunar South Pole’s frigid forecast without losing its form. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The risk of a bird flu pandemic is risingHow worried should we be about bird flu? It’s a question that I’ve been asked by friends and colleagues several times over the last couple of weeks. Their concerns have been spurred by some potentially worrisome developments in the US, including the continued spread of the virus among dairy cattle, the detection of the virus in a pig as well as cow’s milk, and—most concerning of all—the growing number of human infections.

    The risk of a bird flu pandemic is risingHow worried should we be about bird flu? It’s a question that I’ve been asked by friends and colleagues several times over the last couple of weeks. Their concerns have been spurred by some potentially worrisome developments in the US, including the continued spread of the virus among dairy cattle, the detection of the virus in a pig as well as cow’s milk, and—most concerning of all—the growing number of human infections.

    [ad_1]

    Virologists have been especially worried about the virus making its way into pigs, because these animals are notorious viral incubators. “They can become infected with swine strains, bird strains and human strains,” says Brinkley Bellotti, an infectious disease epidemiologist at Wake Forest University in North Carolina. These strains can swap genes and give rise to new, potentially more infectious or harmful strains.

    Thankfully, we haven’t seen any other cases in pig farms, and there’s no evidence that the virus can spread between pigs. And while it has been spreading pretty rapidly between cattle, the virus doesn’t seem to have evolved much, says Seema Lakdawala, a virologist at the Emory University School of Medicine in Atlanta, Georgia. That suggests that the virus made the leap into cattle, probably from birds, only once. And it has been spreading through herds since.

    Unfortunately, we still don’t really know how it is spreading. There is some evidence to suggest the virus can be spread from cow to cow through shared milking equipment. But it is unclear how the virus is spreading between farms. “It’s hard to form an effective control strategy when you don’t know exactly how it’s spreading,” says Bellotti.

    But it is in cows. And it’s in their milk. When scientists analyzed 297 samples of Grade A pasteurized retail milk products, including milk, cream and cheese, they found viral RNA from H5N1 in 20% of them. Those samples were collected from 17 states across the US. And the study was conducted in April, just weeks after the virus was first detected in cattle. “It’s surprising to me that we are totally fine with … our pasteurized milk products containing viral DNA,” says Lakdawala.

    Research suggests that, as long as the milk is pasteurized, the virus is not infectious. But Lakdawala is concerned that pasteurization may not inactivate all of the virus, all the time. “We don’t know how much virus we need to ingest [to become infected], and whether any is going to slip through pasteurization,” she says.

    And no reassurances can be made for unpasteurized raw milk. When cows are infected with H5N1, their milk can turn thick, yellow and “chunky.” But research has shown that, even when the milk starts to look normal again, it can still contain potentially infectious virus.

    The most concerning development, though, is the rise in human cases. So far, 55 such cases of H5N1 bird flu have been reported in the US, according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Twenty-nine of those cases have been detected in California. In almost all those cases, the infected person is thought to have caught the virus from cattle or poultry on farms. But in two of those cases, the source of the infection is unknown.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The Download: Uncertainty over NASA’s moon rocket, and what’s next for nuclear

    The Download: Uncertainty over NASA’s moon rocket, and what’s next for nuclear

    [ad_1]

    2 The FTC is probing Microsoft
    It’s a wide-ranging antitrust investigation into its cloud computing, AI and security arms. (NYT $)+ The FTC has been preparing for this for a full year. (WP $)
    + It’s notable it’s been signed off in the Biden administration’s dying days. (The Information $)
    + Meanwhile, Google is hoping to have its recent antitrust ruling thrown out. (Bloomberg $)

    3 RFK’s ‘Make America Healthy Again’ movement is in trouble
    Just days into the project, cracks are already beginning to show. (FT $)
    + The MAGA policy agenda is extremely skeptical of actual scientific evidence. (NYT $)+ America’s opioid crisis probably played a role in Trump’s reelection. (New Yorker $)

    4 TikTok is blocking beauty filters for teenagers
    But the restrictions aren’t exactly difficult to circumvent. (The Guardian)
    + Filters will be required to specify the nature of the tweaks they make, too. (The Verge)
    + The fight for “Instagram face.” (MIT Technology Review)

    5 Who is applying to join Elon Musk’s DOGE?
    Everyone from students to tech CEOs, apparently. (Forbes $)
    + The division is highly likely to clash with the US government’s budget office. (WSJ $)

    6 Interpol has arrested 1,000 potential cyber criminals across Africa
    They’re suspected of extorting victims using ransomware, phishing schemes and scams. (WP $)

    7 Here’s all the tariffs China’s tech industry is facing
    It’s not just the US that’s increasing its restrictions. (Rest of World)+ Buckle up: China is likely to face even greater chip restrictions from next week. (Wired $)
    + How Trump’s tariffs could drive up the cost of batteries, EVs, and more. (MIT Technology Review)

    8 Mark Zuckerberg has been hobnobbing with Donald Trump at Mar-a-Lago
    Which is interesting considering that Trump has threatened him with life imprisonment. (The Information $)
    + Zuckerberg has been on a charm offensive to repair their relationship for almost two years. (NYT $)
    + But the President-elect has a history of holding grudges. (NY Mag $)

    9 Distributed computing is the next big thing
    We can achieve more when we work together, after all. (Quanta Magazine)

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Accelerating generative AI deployment with microservices

    Accelerating generative AI deployment with microservices

    [ad_1]

    In this exclusive webcast, we delve into the transformative potential of portable microservices for the deployment of generative AI models. We explore how startups and large organizations are leveraging this technology to streamline generative AI deployment, enhance customer service, and drive innovation across domains, including chatbots, document analysis, and video generation.

    Our discussion focuses on overcoming key challenges such as deployment complexity, security, and cost management. We also discuss how microservices can help executives realize business value with generative AI while maintaining control over data and intellectual property.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The Download: Rethinking AI benchmarks, and the ethics of AI agents

    The Download: Rethinking AI benchmarks, and the ethics of AI agents

    [ad_1]

    Every time a new AI model is released, it’s typically touted as acing its performance against a series of benchmarks. OpenAI’s GPT-4o, for example, was launched in May with a compilation of results that showed its performance topping every other AI company’s latest model in several tests.

    The problem is that these benchmarks are poorly designed, the results hard to replicate, and the metrics they use are frequently arbitrary, according to new research. That matters because AI models’ scores against these benchmarks determine the level of scrutiny they receive.

    AI companies frequently cite benchmarks as testament to a new model’s success, and those benchmarks already form part of some governments’ plans for regulating AI. But right now, they might not be good enough to use that way—and researchers have some ideas for how they should be improved.

    —Scott J Mulligan

    We need to start wrestling with the ethics of AI agents

    Generative AI models have become remarkably good at conversing with us, and creating images, videos, and music for us, but they’re not all that good at doing things for us.

    AI agents promise to change that. Last week researchers published a new paper explaining how they trained simulation agents to replicate 1,000 people’s personalities with stunning accuracy.

    AI models that mimic you could go out and act on your behalf in the near future. If such tools become cheap and easy to build, it will raise lots of new ethical concerns, but two in particular stand out. Read the full story.

    —James O’Donnell

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • We need to start wrestling with the ethics of AI agents

    We need to start wrestling with the ethics of AI agents

    [ad_1]


    Deeper Learning

    Inside Clear’s ambitions to manage your identity beyond the airport

    Clear is the most visible biometrics company around, and one you’ve likely interacted with already, whether passing security checkpoints at airports and stadiums or verifying your identity on LinkedIn. Along the way, it’s built one of the largest private repositories of identity data on the planet, including scans of fingerprints, irises, and faces. A confluence of factors is now accelerating the adoption of identity verification technologies—including AI, of course, as well as the lingering effects of the pandemic’s push toward “contactless” experiences—and Clear aims to be the ubiquitous provider of these services. In the near future, countless situations where you might need an ID or credit card might require no more than showing your face. 

    Why this matters: Now that biometrics have gone mainstream, what—and who—bears the cost? Because this convenience, even if chosen by only some of us, leaves all of us wrestling with the effects. If Clear gains ground in its vision, it will move us toward a world where we’re increasingly obligated to give up our biometric data to a system that’s vulnerable to data leaks.  Read more from Eileen Guo.

    Bits and Bytes

    Inside the booming “AI pimping” industry

    Instagram is being flooded with hundreds of AI-generated influencers who are stealing videos from real models and adult content creators, giving them AI-generated faces, and monetizing their bodies with links to dating sites, Patreon, OnlyFans competitors, and various AI apps. (404 Media)

    How to protect your art from AI

    There is little you can do if your work has already been scraped into a data set, but you can take steps to prevent future work from being used that way. Here are four ways to do that. (MIT Technology Review)

    Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy have offered details on their plans to cut regulations

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The way we measure progress in AI is terrible

    The way we measure progress in AI is terrible

    [ad_1]

    One of the goals of the research was to define a list of criteria that make a good benchmark. “It’s definitely an important problem to discuss the quality of the benchmarks, what we want from them, what we need from them,” says Ivanova. “The issue is that there isn’t one good standard to define benchmarks. This paper is an attempt to provide a set of evaluation criteria. That’s very useful.”

    The paper was accompanied by the launch of a website, Better Bench, that ranks the most popular AI benchmarks. Rating factors include whether or not experts were consulted on the design, whether the tested capability is well defined, and other basics—for example, is there a feedback channel for the benchmark, or has it been peer-reviewed?

    The MMLU benchmark had the lowest ratings. “I disagree with these rankings. In fact, I’m an author of some of the papers ranked highly, and would say that the lower ranked benchmarks are better than them,” says Dan Hendrycks, director of CAIS, the Center for AI Safety, and one of the creators of the MMLU benchmark.  That said, Hendrycks still believes that the best way to move the field forward is to build better benchmarks.

    Some think the criteria may be missing the bigger picture. “The paper adds something valuable. Implementation criteria and documentation criteria—all of this is important. It makes the benchmarks better,” says Marius Hobbhahn, CEO of Apollo Research, a research organization specializing in AI evaluations. “But for me, the most important question is, do you measure the right thing? You could check all of these boxes, but you could still have a terrible benchmark because it just doesn’t measure the right thing.”

    Essentially, even if a benchmark is perfectly designed, one that tests the model’s ability to provide compelling analysis of Shakespeare sonnets may be useless if someone is really concerned about AI’s hacking capabilities. 

    “You’ll see a benchmark that’s supposed to measure moral reasoning. But what that means isn’t necessarily defined very well. Are people who are experts in that domain being incorporated in the process? Often that isn’t the case,” says Amelia Hardy, another author of the paper and an AI researcher at Stanford University.

    There are organizations actively trying to improve the situation. For example, a new benchmark from Epoch AI, a research organization, was designed with input from 60 mathematicians and verified as challenging by two winners of the Fields Medal, which is the most prestigious award in mathematics. The participation of these experts fulfills one of the criteria in the Better Bench assessment. The current most advanced models are able to answer less than 2% of the questions on the benchmark, which means there’s a significant way to go before it is saturated. 

    “We really tried to represent the full breadth and depth of modern math research,” says Tamay Besiroglu, associate director at Epoch AI. Despite the difficulty of the test, Besiroglu speculates it will take only around four or five years for AI models to score well against it.

    [ad_2]

    Source link