Tag: 2024 election

  • The Mysterious Case of the Fizzled Trump Trial Ransomware Leak

    The Mysterious Case of the Fizzled Trump Trial Ransomware Leak

    [ad_1]

    The LockBit hackers also posted some convincing sample documents that appeared to have been stolen from the Fulton County court systems prior to the takedown last week, according to Georgia-based reporter George Chidi, who wrote about the incident earlier this month. Chidi reported seeing documents that included court files and even documents under seal in specific cases, though none appeared to be related to Donald Trump’s prosecution.

    Then on Wednesday, just hours before LockBit’s deadline for the county to pay its ransom expired, the countdown timer for that leak on Lockbit’s website froze, with an added line of text that read, “Timer stopped.” At the promised time of 1:49 PM UTC Thursday, the leak failed to materialize. Instead, all mention of Fulton County was removed from LockBit’s extortion threat site.

    That mysterious disappearance leaves the looming question of whether Fulton County paid LockBit’s ransom. The Fulton County officials didn’t respond to multiple inquiries from WIRED asking whether it had paid the hackers, or how much.

    Just as likely, however, is that LockBit is bluffing in some sense—that it either doesn’t have the goods it claims or isn’t yet ready to give up on its extortion demand. Robert McArdle, a researcher who leads a cybercrime-focused research team at security firm Trend Micro and was involved in the law enforcement operation against LockBit, says the group’s thus-far empty threat is a sign that it was likely more disrupted by the bust than it wants to admit.

    “This appears to be further evidence of the difficulties facing LockBit ever since Op Chronos took place, and should be considered as a sign they are unable to reliably follow through on their statements,” says McArdle. He points out that the victims listed on the group’s new dark web site were all compromised prior to Operation Chronos, and that continuing to threaten them is the group’s attempt to “appear as if everything is normal when most evidence points very much to the contrary.”

    There remain other theories, however, that Lockbit might still possess the court’s data, but be seeking to use it in some other way. “They generally don’t lie about victims because they’re so worried about their reputation,” says Analyst1’s DiMaggio. He notes that the decision to take down the leak threat may have been the decision of the “affiliate” hackers who partner with LockBit to penetrate victims like Fulton County and may have different motivations from LockBit itself.

    If Fulton County documents do remain in the hands of hackers, and if any of them relate to the Trump case, they could further complicate an already deeply messy trial. The state’s case already been rocked by allegations that the prosecutor in the case, Fulton County district attorney Fanni Willis, had an improper affair with another prosecutor involved in Trump’s prosecution, which the defense has argued should require her dismissal. The compromise of non-public documents in the case could make the proceedings—and the upcoming US presidential elecion—even more chaotic.

    “We’re watching with interest to see how the Fulton leak develops,” McArdle’s Trend Micro says. So, no doubt, will the US political sphere—including a certain former president.

    Additional reporting by Matt Burgess.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • How a Right-Wing Controversy Could Sabotage US Election Security

    How a Right-Wing Controversy Could Sabotage US Election Security

    [ad_1]

    It remains unclear how many of Warner’s colleagues agree with him. But when WIRED surveyed the other 23 Republican secretaries who oversee elections in their states, several of them said they would continue working with CISA.

    “The agency has been beneficial to our office by providing information and resources as it pertains to cybersecurity,” says JoDonn Chaney, a spokesperson for Missouri’s Jay Ashcroft.

    South Dakota’s Monae Johnson says her office “has a good relationship with its CISA partners and plans to maintain the partnership.”

    But others who praised CISA’s support also sounded notes of caution.

    Idaho’s Phil McGrane says CISA is doing “critical work … to protect us from foreign cyber threats.” But he also tells WIRED that the Elections Infrastructure Information Sharing and Analysis Center (EI-ISAC), a public-private collaboration group that he helps oversee, “is actively reviewing past efforts regarding mis/disinformation” to determine “what aligns best” with CISA’s mission.

    Mississippi’s Michael Watson says that “statements following the 2020 election and some internal confidence issues we’ve since had to navigate have caused concern.” As federal and state officials gear up for this year’s elections, he adds, “my hope is CISA will act as a nonpartisan organization and stick to the facts.”

    CISA’s relationships with Republican secretaries are “not as strong as they’ve been before,” says John Merrill, who served as Alabama’s secretary of state from 2015 to 2023. In part, Merrill says, that’s because of pressure from the GOP base. “Too many conservative Republican secretaries are not just concerned about how the interaction with those federal agencies is going, but also about how it’s perceived … by their constituents.”

    Free Help at Risk

    CISA’s defenders say the agency does critical work to help underfunded state and local officials confront cyber and physical threats to election systems.

    The agency’s career civil servants and political leaders “have been outstanding” during both the Trump and Biden administrations, says Minnesota secretary of state Steve Simon, a Democrat.

    Others specifically praised CISA’s coordination with tech companies to fight misinformation, arguing that officials only highlighted false claims and never ordered companies to delete posts.

    “They’re just making folks aware of threats,” says Arizona’s Democratic secretary of state, Adrian Fontes. The real “bad actors,” he says, are the people who “want the election denialists and the rumor-mongers to run amok and just spread out whatever lies they want.”

    If Republican officials begin disengaging from CISA, their states will lose critical security protections and resources. CISA sponsors the EI-ISAC, which shares information about threats and best practices for thwarting them; provides free services like scanning election offices’ networks for vulnerabilities, monitoring those networks for intrusions and reviewing local governments’ contingency plans; and convenes exercises to test election officials’ responses to crises.

    “For GOP election officials to back away from [CISA] would be like a medical patient refusing to accept free wellness assessments, check-ups, and optional prescriptions from one of the world’s greatest medical centers,” says Eddie Perez, a former director for civic integrity at Twitter and a board member at the OSET Institute, a nonprofit group advocating for improved election technology.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The Biden Campaign Is Officially Trolling on TikTok Now

    The Biden Campaign Is Officially Trolling on TikTok Now

    [ad_1]

    President Joe Biden is officially on TikTok.

    In the middle of the Super Bowl on Sunday, the Biden campaign announced that it had joined the platform. In Biden’s first post, he’s asked a series of questions, like whether he prefers the Kansas City Chiefs or the San Francisco 49ers. At the end, a staffer jokingly references the strange conspiracy theory that the White House rigged the game in the Chiefs’ favor to get Taylor Swift’s endorsement.

    “Deviously plotting to rig the season so the Chiefs would make the Super Bowl or the Chiefs just being a good football team?” Biden is asked by the staffer.

    “I’d get into trouble if I told you,” Biden replied.

    Biden campaign advisers cite an increasingly fragmented media ecosystem as one of the main reasons the campaign finally joined the platform.

    “A few years ago, young voters were all but ignored. Now, we have political power like never before, and the incumbent president’s campaign is on TikTok,” Jack Lobel, national press secretary for Voters of Tomorrow, tells WIRED. “On TikTok, the Biden campaign will reach millions of young people, some of whom otherwise might not hear about the president’s accomplishments on issues from climate action to education.”

    Under the handle @BidenHQ, the campaign says that it will start posting on TikTok regularly like it does on Facebook, Instagram, and X, formerly Twitter.

    Before joining TikTok on Sunday, the Biden team appeared happy to avoid it and the politicization of its Chinese owner, ByteDance. As recently as last summer, a Biden staffer told NBC News that it would not be joining the platform for the 2024 election cycle. Instead, the Biden team has opted to work with a slate of young influencers to spread its message over the past few years, and the Democratic National Committee operated an account supporting Biden and other down-ballot Democrats. Now that the campaign has its own account, it still plans to work with the influencer network throughout the election, Biden campaign advisers said on Sunday.

    Since about 2018, Congress has tried to ban TikTok in the US, despite many lawmakers using the app themselves. TikTok’s opponents argue that the app spies on American users on behalf of the Chinese government, providing Beijing with a secret backdoor to US data. Last spring, the Biden administration gave ByteDance, TikTok’s owner, an ultimatum of either selling the app to a US company or facing an outright ban.

    Biden campaign advisers said that they’re taking enhanced security measures to protect their data and devices. TikTok is currently banned on most federal devices, and a Biden spokesperson said that the team is logged in to TikTok on a separate device used specifically for using the app.

    Biden’s campaign has already leaned into referencing the right-wing memes about his presidency: Shortly after the Chiefs won the Super Bowl on Sunday night, the campaign published a photo on X that was also featured in Biden’s first TikTok video, of the president smiling with laser eyes—an image that has become synonymous with the “Dark Brandon” meme.

    The image was captioned saying “Just like we drew it up,” invoking the Swift conspiracy once more.



    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • AI-Generated Voices in Robocalls Are Now Illegal

    AI-Generated Voices in Robocalls Are Now Illegal

    [ad_1]

    It’s now illegal for robocallers to use AI-generated voices thanks to a new ruling by the Federal Communications Commission on Thursday.

    In a unanimous decision, the FCC expands the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, or TCPA, to cover robocall scams that contain AI voice clones. The new rule goes into effect immediately, allowing for the commission to fine companies and block providers for making these types of calls.

    “Bad actors are using AI-generated voices in unsolicited robocalls to extort vulnerable family members, imitate celebrities, and misinform voters,” FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel said in a statement on Thursday. “We’re putting the fraudsters behind these robocalls on notice.”

    The move comes a few days after the FCC and New Hampshire Attorney General John Formella identified Life Corporation as the company behind the mysterious robocalls imitating President Joe Biden last month before the state’s primary election. At a Tuesday press conference, Formella said that his office had opened a criminal investigation into the company and its owner, Walter Monk.

    The FCC first announced its plan to outlaw AI-generated robocall scams by updating the TCPA last week. The agency has used the law in the past to go after junk callers, including the conservative activists and pranksters Jacob Wohl and Jack Burkman. In 2021, the FCC fined them more than $5 million for conducting a massive robocalling scheme to discourage voters from voting by mail in the 2020 election.

    “While this generative AI technology is new, and it poses a lot of challenges, we already have a lot of the tools that we need to grapple with that challenge,” Nicholas Garcia, policy counsel at Public Knowledge, tells WIRED. “We can apply existing laws like the TCPA and a regulatory agency like the FCC has the flexibility and the expertise to go in and respond to these threats in real time.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Russia Is Boosting Calls for ‘Civil War’ Over Texas Border Crisis

    Russia Is Boosting Calls for ‘Civil War’ Over Texas Border Crisis

    [ad_1]

    “When I’m trying to identify disinformation operations in the wild I need to understand the initial signals and ideas that Russian state media and influencers are sharing,” Walter tells WIRED. “Russian Telegram channels just blew up overnight, and started really dialing into messaging specifically about the possibility that Texas could be an independent state, the possibility that there could be a US civil war.”

    Russian state-media echoed these claims, and published a flood of articles with headlines featuring phrases like “Civil war 2.0.” They also spread conspiracies claiming that “US elites will keep the border wide open.”

    Last week, the Russian Telegram channels and state media also began to boost the ‘Take Our Border Back’ convoy led by far right extremists, sovereign citizens, QAnon adherents, and anti-vaccine conspiracists who traveled from Virginia to the border in Texas in support of Abbott. “Fears of FBI Spying on ‘Take Our Border Back’ Convoy Show US Democracy Dying,” one Sputnik headline read last week.

    The convoy’s official channels on Telegram were also infiltrated by Russian accounts, though some were removed or called out by the US-based members of the group. “They are in every single group on any social media,” one member calling themselves ‘Eat Putin’s Heart’ wrote on Telegram in response to a question about why Russians were members of the group. “They want a civil war/ chaos more than anything. What’s bad for America is great for Russia.”

    Researchers at Antibot4Navalny, a Russian anti-disinformation research group that has been closely tracking a Russian disinformation network known as Doppelganger on X, shared data exclusively with WIRED that shows a network of bot accounts previously linked to the Doppelganger campaign have been deployed in the last week online to discuss the Texas issue.

    The campaign, like previous Doppelganger campaigns, shared links to fake websites which are designed to look legitimate but actually contain fake articles designed to undermine the US. One article, for example, appeared on a fake site called Warfare Insider and stated that Texas “has become a battleground symbolizing the clash between state and federal authorities.”

    In recent days, the bots have also been responding to posts unrelated to Texas by referencing the situation at the border.

    Some experts have been linking this campaign to previous Russian disinformation campaigns. Already, it echoes the incident when Russian operatives were accused of organizing an anti-immigrant rally, and a counter protest event to their own rally, in Texas ahead of the 2016 election.

    Caroline Orr, a behavioral scientist and postdoctoral researcher at the University of Maryland who tracks disinformation online, wrote in her newsletter Weaponized that the term “Free Texas” in Russian was being “used extensively [on X], and nearly exclusively, by Russian accounts associated with the notorious Internet Research Agency, which housed the 2016 election interference operation.”

    The IRA was a Kremlin-linked troll farm launched in St. Petersburg that gained notoriety for its role in attempting to interfere in the 2016 US presidential election. It was run by Yevgeny Prigozhin, a close ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin who also ran the Wagner mercenary group until he died in a mysterious helicopter crash last year.

    There also appear to be a number of Russian accounts on X posing as pro-Texas groups, in another echo of 2016 when an account that claimed to be run by Tennessee Republicans was outed as Russian-run.

    One of the suspect accounts is the Texan Independence Supporters, which has already been called out for spelling errors and constantly referencing Ukraine and Russia. On Sunday, the account claimed “we are a Texan organization, not Russian. We can definitely assure ya’ll [sic] that we’re not Russian.”

    Before this, Russia had already been accused of dipping its toe in the 2024 US presidential election—including boosting Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s campaign—but Walters says the effort to push the Texas crisis narrative marks an escalation in the Kremlin’s efforts.

    “This is the first thing that I see as a potentially significant concern to look out for, because I think it is an area [where] they could fairly easily cause more divide in the US,” he says.



    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Why RFK Jr. Is Suddenly Everywhere Online

    Why RFK Jr. Is Suddenly Everywhere Online

    [ad_1]

    The internet has become RFK Jr.’s campaign headquarters, where likes and shares have replaced more traditional election outreach.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Mystery Company Linked to Biden Robocall Identified by New Hampshire Attorney General

    Mystery Company Linked to Biden Robocall Identified by New Hampshire Attorney General

    [ad_1]

    On Tuesday, New Hampshire Attorney General John Formella said that a Texas-based telecom company was behind the reportedly AI-generated robocalls impersonating President Joe Biden that went out ahead of the state’s presidential primary last month.

    At a press conference on Tuesday, Formella announced that he had identified Life Corporation and its owner, Walter Monk, as the source behind the thousands of calls, and announced that his office issued a cease-and-desist letter to the company and had opened a criminal investigation into the matter. The Federal Communications Commission sent its own cease-and-desist letters to Life Corporation, as well as another Texas company, Lingo Telecom, the alleged voice service provider of the calls.

    “Ensuring public confidence in the electoral process is vital,” Formella said at the Tuesday press conference. “We’re providing this update and information today to assure the public that we take this seriously and that this is one of our most important priorities. We are also providing this update and information to send a strong message of deterrence to any person or entity who would attempt to undermine our elections through AI or other means.”

    Formella said that anywhere from 5,000 to 25,000 of these robocalls were placed ahead of the New Hampshire primary to mimicked Biden and discourage voters from voting. “Your vote makes a difference in November, not this Tuesday,” the robocall said.

    In January, WIRED reported that two teams of researchers had determined that the call was created with voice-cloning software from the AI startup Eleven Labs. The company declined to take responsibility for the Biden clone, telling WIRED that it was “dedicated to preventing the misuse of audio AI tools.”

    Last week, the FCC put out a new proposal to ban robocalls that used AI-generated voices by updating the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, or TCPA, a 1991 law that regulates telemarketers. The FCC has used the TCPA in the past to go after junk callers, including conservative activists Jacob Wohl and Jack Burkman. In 2021, the FCC fined the pair more than $5 million for violating the law after they placed calls threatening to release the personal information of voters if they voted by mail in the 2020 election.

    “Consumers deserve to know that the person on the other end of the line is exactly who they claim to be,” FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel said in a statement on Tuesday.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • RFK Jr and the Golden Bachelor Used the Same Stylist, FEC Filings Show

    RFK Jr and the Golden Bachelor Used the Same Stylist, FEC Filings Show

    [ad_1]

    What does Robert F. Kennedy Jr. have in common with The Golden Bachelor?

    According to Federal Election Commission records, the longshot presidential candidate shared the same stylist as Gerry Turner of the popular ABC dating series.

    In Kennedy’s most recent financial filing with the FEC posted last week, his campaign disclosed that it had paid stylist and costume designer Tom Soluri $6,178 for style consulting back in October. On his Instagram last June, Soluri announced his work with Kennedy, sharing an image of the candidate dressed in a dark blue suit and matching tie alongside his wife, Cheryl Hines.

    “I had the privilege of working with Robert F. Kennedy Jr on his Presidential announcement and run,” Soluri said on Instagram. It was an amazing experience to style such an influential figure in American politics.”

    Weeks later, Soluri posted a photo of Turner, writing that he had also helped style the oldest Bachelor star in the history of the series. A spokesperson for Disney confirmed that Soluri styled Turner in promotional material for the show. Soluri did not respond to a request for comment from WIRED.

    Soluri’s costuming portfolio touts work on films like Steven Spielberg’s West Side Story and the TV series Gossip Girl, dressing both Blake Lively and Leighton Meester throughout the years 2007 and 2008.

    Kennedy’s foray into celebrity styling comes as the vaccine skeptic has seemingly ramped up efforts to leverage his name recognition and Hollywood connections to bolster his presidential bid. In the last few weeks alone, Kennedy has posted photos and videos with famous figures like life coach Tony Robbins and professional surfer Kelly Slater. Still, many politicians have ventured into professional styling throughout history, often spending far more than Kennedy for the help. While running as John McCain’s vice president in 2008, Sarah Palin’s team hired stylist Lisa A. Kline and spent $150,000 on a brand new wardrobe (much of which Kline said was returned).

    The Kennedy campaign is also facing some tough headwinds when it comes to even getting on the general election ballot. After announcing his bid for president as a Democrat in April, Kennedy decided to run as an Independent in October. The requirements for Independent candidates to gain ballot access vary across states, making it difficult for anyone outside of the Democratic and Republican parties to run a promising general election campaign. Kennedy’s team is reportedly struggling to find all the signatures necessary to get on state ballots and has considered launching its own “We the People” party or linking arms with the Libertarian party to prop up his chances.

    Even if Kennedy’s campaign faces an uphill battle on ballot access, his team and pro-Kennedy super PACs are continuing to grow his network of supporters. In recent months, he’s travelled across the country, holding galas and meeting influencers with both large and small followings to keep his candidacy afloat.



    [ad_2]

    Source link