Demir, K. A., Döven, G. & Sezen, B. Industry 5.0 and human-robot co-working. Procedia Comput. Sci. 158, 688–695 (2019).
Article
Google Scholar
Farina, D. et al. Toward higher-performance bionic limbs for wider clinical use. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 7, 473–485 (2023).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Sawicki, G. S., Beck, O. N., Kang, I. & Young, A. J. The exoskeleton expansion: improving walking and running economy. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 17, 25 (2020). This review presents a timeline of lower-limb exoskeleton development and performance enhancements.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Crea, S. et al. Occupational exoskeletons: a roadmap toward large-scale adoption. Methodology and challenges of bringing exoskeletons to workplaces. Wearable Technol. 2, e11 (2021).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Uchida, T. K. & Delp, S. L. Biomechanics of Movement: The Science of Sports, Robotics, and Rehabilitation (MIT Press, 2021).
Ghez, C. & Krakauer, J. in Principles of Neural Science 4th edn (eds Kandel, E. R., Schwartz, J. H. & Jessell, T. M.) 653–673 (McGraw-Hill, 2000).
Halilaj, E. et al. Machine learning in human movement biomechanics: best practices, common pitfalls, and new opportunities. J. Biomech. 81, 1–11 (2018).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Alili, A. et al. A novel framework to facilitate user preferred tuning for a robotic knee prosthesis. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 31, 895–903 (2023).
Article
Google Scholar
Franks, P. W. et al. in Proc. 2020 8th IEEE RAS/EMBS International Conference for Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob) 700–707 (IEEE, 2020). This study demonstrates the shortcomings of simulation-based optimization of human–robot interactions.
Diaz, M. A. et al. Human-in-the-loop optimization of wearable robotic devices to improve human–robot interaction: a systematic review. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 53, 7483–7496 (2022).
Article
Google Scholar
Zhang, J. et al. Human-in-the-loop optimization of exoskeleton assistance during walking. Science 356, 1280–1284 (2017). This study highlights the effectiveness of human-in-the-loop optimization for increasing the benefits of an exoskeleton.
Article
ADS
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Poggensee, K. L. & Collins, S. H. How adaptation, training, and customization contribute to benefits from exoskeleton assistance. Sci. Robot. 6, eabf1078 (2021). This study highlights the importance of human adaptation in achieving effective human–robot interaction.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Witte, K. A., Fiers, P., Sheets-Singer, A. L. & Collins, S. H. Improving the energy economy of human running with powered and unpowered ankle exoskeleton assistance. Sci. Robot. 5, eaay9108 (2020).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bryan, G. M. et al. Optimized hip–knee–ankle exoskeleton assistance reduces the metabolic cost of walking with worn loads. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 18, 161 (2021).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Song, S. & Collins, S. H. Optimizing exoskeleton assistance for faster self-selected walking. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 29, 786–795 (2021).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Ding, Y., Kim, M., Kuindersma, S. & Walsh, C. J. Human-in-the-loop optimization of hip assistance with a soft exosuit during walking. Sci. Robot. 3, eaar5438 (2018). This study illustrates the use of Bayesian optimization for human-in-the-loop optimization.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kim, J. et al. Reducing the energy cost of walking with low assistance levels through optimized hip flexion assistance from a soft exosuit. Sci. Rep. 12, 11004 (2018).
Article
ADS
Google Scholar
Haufe, F., Wolf, P. & Riener, R. Human-in-the-loop optimization of a multi-joint wearable robot for movement assistance. Proc. Autom. Med. Eng. 1, 023 (2020).
Google Scholar
Slade, P., Kochenderfer, M. J., Delp, S. L. & Collins, S. H. Personalizing exoskeleton assistance while walking in the real world. Nature 610, 277–282 (2022). This study demonstrates a data-driven method for human-in-the-loop optimization and provides an example of optimization under naturalistic conditions.
Article
ADS
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Ingraham, K. A., Remy, C. D. & Rouse, E. J. The role of user preference in the customized control of robotic exoskeletons. Sci. Robot. 7, eabj3487 (2022).
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Lee, U. H. et al. User preference optimization for control of ankle exoskeletons using sample efficient active learning. Sci. Robot. 8, eadg3705 (2023).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kantharaju, P. et al. Reducing squat physical effort using personalized assistance from an ankle exoskeleton. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 30, 1786–1795 (2022).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Pang, M. et al. Stiffness optimization based on muscle fatigue and muscle synergy for passive waist assistive exoskeleton. Robotic Intell. Autom. 43, 209–224 (2023).
Article
Google Scholar
Koginov, G. et al. Human-in-the-loop personalization of a bi-articular wearable robot’s assistance for downhill walking. IEEE Trans. Med. Robot. Bionics 6, 328–339 (2023).
Article
Google Scholar
Hamaya, M., Matsubara, T., Noda, T., Teramae, T. & Morimoto, J. Learning task-parameterized assistive strategies for exoskeleton robots by multi-task reinforcement learning. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 5907–5912 (IEEE, 2017).
Liu, R. et al. Adaptive symmetry reference trajectory generation in shared autonomy for active knee orthosis. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 8, 3118–3125 (2023).
Article
Google Scholar
Li, Z., Li, Q., Huang, P., Xia, H. & Li, G. Human-in-the-loop adaptive control of a soft exo-suit with actuator dynamics and ankle impedance adaptation. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 53, 7920–7932 (2023).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kantharaju, P. et al. Framework for personalizing wearable devices using real-time physiological measures. IEEE Access 11, 81389–81400 (2023).
Article
Google Scholar
Wen, T. C., Jacobson, M., Zhou, X., Chung, H. J. & Kim, M. in Proc. 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 3431–3436 (IEEE, 2020).
Wen, Y., Si, J., Brandt, A., Gao, X. & Huang, H. H. Online reinforcement learning control for the personalization of a robotic knee prosthesis. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 50, 2346–2356 (2019).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Tankink, T., Carloni, R. & Hijmans, J. M. & Houdijk, H. Human-in-the-loop optimization of rocker shoes via different cost functions during walking. J. Biomech. 166, 112028 (2024). This study provides an example of human-in-the-loop optimization of a non-robotic device.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Tankink, T., Houdijk, H. & Hijmans, J. M. Human-in-the-loop optimized rocker profile of running shoes to enhance ankle work and running economy. Eur. J. Sport Sci. 24, 164–173 (2024).
Article
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Huang, G., Lin, S. & Xie, L. Human-in-the-loop optimization of knee-joint biomechanical energy harvester to maximize power generation with minimal user effort. Energy Convers. Manage. 283, 116913 (2023).
Article
Google Scholar
Felt, W., Selinger, J. C., Donelan, J. M. & Remy, C. D. “Body-in-the-loop”: optimizing device parameters using measures of instantaneous energetic cost. PLoS One 10, e0135342 (2015). This study provides an example of an early, gradient-based approach to human-in-the-loop optimization.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Garcia-Rosas, R., Tan, Y., Oetomo, D., Manzie, C. & Choong, P. Personalized online adaptation of kinematic synergies for human-prosthesis interfaces. IEEE Tran. Cybern. 51, 1070–1084 (2019).
Article
Google Scholar
Catkin, B. & Patoglu, V. Preference-based human-in-the-loop optimization for perceived realism of haptic rendering. IEEE Trans. Haptics 16, 470–476 (2023).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Fauvel, T. & Chalk, M. Human-in-the-loop optimization of visual prosthetic stimulation. J. Neural Eng. 19, 036038 (2022). This study provides an example of user preference as an optimization objective, in this case applied to a retinal prosthesis.
Article
ADS
Google Scholar
Sánchez, N. et al. Multi-site identification and generalization of clusters of walking behaviors in individuals with chronic stroke and neurotypical controls. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 37, 810–822 (2023).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Lamers, E. P., Yang, A. J. & Zelik, K. E. Feasibility of a biomechanically-assistive garment to reduce low back loading during leaning and lifting. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 65, 1674–1680 (2017).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Nuesslein, C. et al. Comparing metabolic cost and muscle activation for knee and back exoskeletons in lifting. IEEE Trans. Med. Robot. Bionics 6, 224–234 (2023).
Article
Google Scholar
Kazerooni, H., Racine, J.-L., Huang, L. & Steger, R. in Proc. 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 4353–4360 (IEEE, 2005). This study describes an early exoskeleton that did not improve user performance despite extensive investment, illustrating the risks of a traditional development approach.
Garcia, M., Chatterjee, A., Ruina, A. & Coleman, M. The simplest walking model: stability, complexity, and scaling. J. Biomech. Eng. 120, 281–288 (1998).
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Dembia, C. L., Silder, A., Uchida, T. K., Hicks, J. L. & Delp, S. L. Simulating ideal assistive devices to reduce the metabolic cost of walking with heavy loads. PLoS One 12, e0180320 (2017).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Siviy, C. et al. Offline assistance optimization of a soft exosuit for augmenting ankle power of stroke survivors during walking. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 5, 828–835 (2020).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Jackson, R. W. & Collins, S. H. An experimental comparison of the relative benefits of work and torque assistance in ankle exoskeletons. J. Appl. Physiol. 119, 541–557 (2015).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Caputo, J. M. & Collins, S. H. A universal ankle–foot prosthesis emulator for human locomotion experiments. J. Biomech. Eng. 136, 035002 (2014).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Witte, K. A., Zhang, J., Jackson, R. W. & Collins, S. H. in Proc. 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 1223–1228 (IEEE, 2015).
Anderson, A. et al. A robotic emulator for the systematic exploration of transtibial biarticular prosthesis designs. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.36227/techrxiv.24417310.v1 (2023).
Portnova, A. A., Mukherjee, G., Peters, K. M., Yamane, A. & Steele, K. M. Design of a 3D-printed, open-source wrist-driven orthosis for individuals with spinal cord injury. PLoS One 13, e0193106 (2018).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Severin, A. C. et al. Case report: adjusting seat and backrest angle improves performance in an elite paralympic rower. Front. Sports Act. Living 3, 625656 (2021).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Sanz-Pena, I., Jeong, H. & Kim, M. Personalized wearable ankle robot using modular additive manufacturing design. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 8, 4935–4942 (2023).
Article
Google Scholar
Sloot, L. H. et al. Effects of a soft robotic exosuit on the quality and speed of overground walking depends on walking ability after stroke. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 20, 113 (2023).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Walsh, C. Human-in-the-loop development of soft wearable robots. Nat. Rev. Mater. 3, 78–80 (2018).
Article
ADS
Google Scholar
Xu, L. et al. Reducing the muscle activity of walking using a portable hip exoskeleton based on human-in-the-loop optimization. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 11, 1006326 (2023).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Kong, H. M. A Personalized Quasi-passive Ankle Exoskeleton Using Human-in-the loop Optimization Approaches Doctoral dissertation, KTH Royal Institute of Technology (2023).
Hybart, R., Villancio-Wolter, K. S. & Ferris, D. P. Metabolic cost of walking with electromechanical ankle exoskeletons under proportional myoelectric control on a treadmill and outdoors. PeerJ 11, e15775 (2023).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Kinsey, H., Upton, E. & Young, A. Towards meaningful community ambulation in individuals post stroke through use of a smart hip exoskeleton: a preliminary investigation. Assist. Technol. 36, 198–208 (2023).
Google Scholar
Fang, Y., Orekhov, G. & Lerner, Z. Improving the energy cost of incline walking and stair ascent with ankle exoskeleton assistance in cerebral palsy. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 69, 2143–2152 (2021).
Article
Google Scholar
Caputo, J. M. et al. Robotic emulation of candidate prosthetic foot designs may enable efficient, evidence-based, and individualized prescriptions. J. Prosthet. Orthot. 34, 202–212 (2022).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Welker, C. G., Voloshina, A. S., Chiu, V. L. & Collins, S. H. Shortcomings of human-in-the-loop optimization of an ankle-foot prosthesis emulator: a case series. R. Soc. Open Sci. 8, 202020 (2021).
Article
ADS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Arelekatti, V. N. M. & Winter, A. G. V. in Proc. 2015 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR) 350–356 (IEEE, 2015).
Mattson, C. A. & Winter, A. G. Why the developing world needs mechanical design. J. Mech. Des. 138, 070301 (2016).
Article
Google Scholar
Eikevåg, S. W., Erichsen, J. F. & Steinert, M. in Proc. The Engineering of Sport 14 1–2 (International Sports Engineering Association, 2022).
Quintero, D., Villarreal, D. J., Lambert, D. J., Kapp, S. & Gregg, R. D. Continuous-phase control of a powered knee–ankle prosthesis: amputee experiments across speeds and inclines. IEEE Trans. Robot. 34, 686–701 (2018).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Geyer, H. & Herr, H. A muscle-reflex model that encodes principles of legged mechanics produces human walking dynamics and muscle activities. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 18, 263–273 (2010).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Varol, H. A., Sup, F. & Goldfarb, M. Multiclass real-time intent recognition of a powered lower limb prosthesis. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 57, 542–551 (2009).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Simon, A. M. et al. Configuring a powered knee and ankle prosthesis for transfemoral amputees within five specific ambulation modes. PLoS One 9, e99387 (2014).
Article
ADS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Tran, M., Gabert, L., Cempini, M. & Lenzi, T. A lightweight, efficient fully powered knee prosthesis with actively variable transmission. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 4, 1186–1193 (2019).
Article
Google Scholar
Song, Y., Romero, A., Müller, M., Koltun, V. & Scaramuzza, D. Reaching the limit in autonomous racing: optimal control versus reinforcement learning. Sci. Robot. 8, eadg1462 (2023).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Slade, P., Kochenderfer, M. J., Delp, S. L. & Collins, S. H. Sensing leg movement enhances wearable monitoring of energy expenditure. Nat. Commun. 12, 4312 (2021).
Article
ADS
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Revi, D. A., Alvarez, A. M., Walsh, C. J., De Rossi, S. M. & Awad, L. N. Indirect measurement of anterior-posterior ground reaction forces using a minimal set of wearable inertial sensors: from healthy to hemiparetic walking. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 17, 82 (2020).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Ramadurai, S., Jeong, H. & Kim, M. Predicting the metabolic cost of exoskeleton-assisted squatting using foot pressure features and machine learning. Front. Robot. AI 10, 1166248 (2023).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Flach, P. & Matsubara, E. in Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings Vol. 7161 1–10 (Schloss Dagstuhl–Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2008).
Wang, W., Raitor, M., Collins, S., Liu, C. K. & Kennedy, M. in Proc. 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 10483–10489 (IEEE, 2023).
Eveld, M. E., King, S. T., Vailati, L. G., Zelik, K. E. & Goldfarb, M. On the basis for stumble recovery strategy selection in healthy adults. J. Biomech. Eng. 143, 071003 (2021).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Chasnov, B. J., Ratliff, L. J. & Burden, S. A. Human adaptation to adaptive machines converges to game-theoretic equilibria. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.01124 (2023).
Snaterse, M., Ton, R., Kuo, A. D. & Donelan, J. M. Distinct fast and slow processes contribute to the selection of preferred step frequency during human walking. J. Appl. Physiol. 110, 1682–1690 (2011).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Finley, J. M., Bastian, A. J. & Gottschall, J. S. Learning to be economical: the energy cost of walking tracks motor adaptation. J. Physiol. 591, 1081–1095 (2013).
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Nikolaidis, S., Nath, S., Procaccia, A. D. & Srinivasa, S. in Proc. 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction 323–331 (IEEE, 2017).
Medrano, R. L., Thomas, G. C., Margolin, D. & Rouse, E. J. The economic value of augmentative exoskeletons and their assistance. Commun. Eng. 2, 43 (2023).
Article
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Brown, G. L., Seethapathi, N. & Srinivasan, M. A unified energy-optimality criterion predicts human navigation paths and speeds. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 118, e2020327118 (2021).
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
IJmker, T., Lamoth, C. J., Houdijk, H., van der Woude, L. H. & Beek, P. J. Postural threat during walking: effects on energy cost and accompanying gait changes. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 11, 71 (2014).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Park, K. W., Choi, J. & Kong, K. Iterative learning of human behavior for adaptive gait pattern adjustment of a powered exoskeleton. IEEE Trans. Robot. 38, 1395–1409 (2022). This study illustrates the potential for human–robot interaction to improve mobility for individuals with severe impairments.
Article
Google Scholar
Antos, S. A., Kording, K. P. & Gordon, K. E. Energy expenditure does not solely explain step length–width choices during walking. J. Exp. Biol. 225, jeb243104 (2022).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
McDonald, K. A., Cusumano, J. P., Hieronymi, A. & Rubenson, J. Humans trade off whole-body energy cost to avoid overburdening muscles while walking. Proc. R. Soc. B 289, 20221189 (2022).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Mombaur, K., Truong, A. & Laumond, J. P. From human to humanoid locomotion—an inverse optimal control approach. Auton. Robots 28, 369–383 (2010).
Article
Google Scholar
Tucker, M. et al. in Proc. 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2351–2357 (IEEE, 2020).
Ingraham, K. A., Tucker, M., Ame, A. D., Rouse, E. J. & Shepherd, M. K. Leveraging user preference in the design and evaluation of lower-limb exoskeletons and prostheses. Curr. Opin. Biomed. Eng. 28, 100487 (2023).
Article
Google Scholar
Brunner, C., Fischer, A., Luig, K. & Thies, T. Pairwise support vector machines and their application to large scale problems. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 13, 2279–2292 (2012).
MathSciNet
Google Scholar
Astudillo, R. et al. in Proc. ICML 2023 Workshop The Many Facets of Preference-Based Learning (ICML, 2023).
Hansen, N. in Towards a New Evolutionary Computation. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, Vol. 192 (eds Lozano, J. A., Larrañaga, P., Inza, I. & Bengoetxea, E.) 75–102 (Springer, 2006).
Kochenderfer, M. J. & Wheeler, T. A. Algorithms for Optimization (MIT Press, 2019).
Lakmazaheri, A. et al. Optimizing exoskeleton assistance to improve walking speed and energy economy for older adults. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 21, 1 (2024).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Han, H. et al. Selection of muscle-activity-based cost function in human-in-the-loop optimization of multi-gait ankle exoskeleton assistance. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 29, 944–952 (2021).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kutulakos, Z. & Slade, P. Simulating human-in-the-loop optimization of exoskeleton assistance to compare optimization algorithm performance. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.05.587982 (2024).
Antonova, R., Rai, A. & Atkeson, C. G. in Proc. 2016 IEEE-RAS 16th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids) 22–28 (IEEE, 2016).
Kim, M. et al. Human-in-the-loop Bayesian optimization of wearable device parameters. PLoS One 12, e0184054 (2017).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Kim, M. et al. in Proc. 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 9173–9179 (IEEE, 2019).
Denning, P. J. Working sets past and present. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 1, 64–84 (1980).
Article
ADS
Google Scholar
Franks, P. W. et al. Comparing optimized exoskeleton assistance of the hip, knee, and ankle in single and multi-joint configurations. Wearable Technol. 2, e16 (2021).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Vasudevan, E. V., Torres-Oviedo, G., Morton, S. M., Yang, J. F. & Bastian, A. J. Younger is not always better: development of locomotor adaptation from childhood to adulthood. J. Neurosci. 31, 3055–3065 (2011).
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Macready, W. G. & Wolpert, D. H. Bandit problems and the exploration/exploitation tradeoff. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 2, 2–22 (1998).
Article
Google Scholar
McAllister, M. J., Blair, R. L., Donelan, J. M. & Selinger, J. C. Energy optimization during walking involves implicit processing. J. Exp. Biol. 224, jeb242655 (2021).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Hybart, R. & Ferris, D. Gait variability of outdoor vs treadmill walking with bilateral robotic ankle exoskeletons under proportional myoelectric control. PLoS One 18, e0294241 (2023).
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Waldherr, S., Romero, R. & Thrun, S. A gesture based interface for human-robot interaction. Auton. Robots 9, 151–173 (2000).
Article
Google Scholar
Landi, C. T., Ferraguti, F., Fantuzzi, C. & Secchi, C. in Proc. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 3279–3284 (IEEE, 2018).
Xiao, X. et al. APPL: adaptive planner parameter learning. Robot. Auton. Syst. 154, 104132 (2022).
Article
Google Scholar
Kristoffersen, M. B., Franzke, A. W., van der Sluis, C. K., Murgia, A. & Bongers, R. M. The effect of feedback during training sessions on learning pattern-recognition-based prosthesis control. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 27, 2087–2096 (2019).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Wong, J. D., Selinger, J. C. & Donelan, J. C. Is natural variability in gait sufficient to initiate spontaneous energy optimization in human walking? J. Neurophysiol. 121, 1848–1855 (2019).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Abram, S. J. et al. General variability leads to specific adaptation toward optimal movement policies. Curr. Biol. 32, 2222–2232 (2022).
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Song, S., Haynes, C. A. & Bradford, J. C. Human cortical, muscular, and kinematic gait adaptation with novel use of an ankle exoskeleton. Preprint at Research Square https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2675191/v1 (2023).
Jacobsen, N. A. & Ferris, D. P. Electrocortical activity correlated with locomotor adaptation during split‐belt treadmill walking. J. Physiol. 601, 3921–3944 (2023).
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Mu, T., Goel, K. & Brunskill, E. in Proc. 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2017) (Curran Associates, 2017).
Ghonasgi, K. et al. in Proc. 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 771–776 (IEEE, 2021).
Byeon, S., Choi, J., Zhang, Y. & Hwang, I. Stochastic-skill-level-based shared control for human training in urban air mobility scenario. ACM Trans. Hum.-Robot Interact. (in the press).
Srivastava, M., Biyik, E., Mirchandani, S., Goodman, N. & Sadigh, D. Assistive teaching of motor control tasks to humans. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 35, 28517–28529 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kim, M. et al. Visual guidance can help with the use of a robotic exoskeleton during human walking. Sci. Rep. 12, 3881 (2022).
Article
ADS
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Madden, J. D. Mobile robots: motor challenges and materials solutions. Science 318, 1094–1097 (2007).
Article
ADS
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Burden, S. A., Libby, T., Jayaram, K., Sponberg, S. & Donelan, J. Why animals can outrun robots. Sci. Robot. 9, eadi9754 (2024).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Riener, R., Rabezzana, L. & Zimmermann, Y. D. Do robots outperform humans in human-centered domains? Front. Robot. AI 10, 1223946 (2023).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Collins, S. H., Wiggin, M. B. & Sawicki, G. S. Reducing the energy cost of human walking using an unpowered exoskeleton. Nature 522, 212–215 (2015).
Article
ADS
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Lee, H. J. et al. A wearable hip assist robot can improve gait function and cardiopulmonary metabolic efficiency in elderly adults. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 25, 1549–1557 (2017).
ADS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Mooney, L. M., Rouse, E. J. & Herr, H. M. Autonomous exoskeleton reduces metabolic cost of human walking during load carriage. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 11, 80 (2014).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar