Tag: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

  • Anxiety therapy prior to COVID-19 pandemic shields against increased stress

    Anxiety therapy prior to COVID-19 pandemic shields against increased stress

    [ad_1]

    The start of the COVID-19 pandemic led to unprecedented exposure to stressors driven by fears of a novel and deadly disease, intense uncertainty, and resulting isolation measures, which in turn resulted in increases in anxiety for many. According to new research however, individuals who were in therapy for anxiety prior to the start of the pandemic did not experience upticks in their symptoms throughout this exceptionally challenging time.

    The new research suggests that cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) provided tools to help individuals with anxiety to manage their symptoms in the face of these intense stressors, according to the study’s authors. The study, led by psychologists at McLean Hospital, a member of Mass General Brigham, and Touro University, published March 13th in PLOS One.

    Our research suggests that CBT and DBT can offer major benefits to protect individuals’ mental health amidst a major world catastrophe and period of upheaval. People who have been treated for anxiety know that fighting it is not helpful, and that there are tools to help accept the current realities of their situations,” he added. “In some ways, having a previous anxiety disorder before a crisis occurs can be a blessing.” 


    David H. Rosmarin, PhD, ABPP, lead study author, clinical psychologist at McLean Hospital, and associate professor of psychology at Harvard Medical School

    For the study, researchers compared the treatment trajectories of 764 individuals who participated in outpatient therapy and divided them into four groups based on when they initiated treatment: pre-pandemic (start date on or prior to 12/31/2019), pandemic-onset (from 01/01/2020 to 03/31/2020), during-pandemic (from 04/01/2020 through 12/31/2020), and post-pandemic once vaccines became available (on or after 01/01/2021).

    Anxiety was measured at intake and at each subsequent session using the GAD-7 questionnaire, which assesses for anxiety symptoms. Then, the researchers analyzed the trajectories of anxiety and compared the four groups. Therapy consisted of CBT and DBT.

    Their findings revealed that overall, patients presented with moderate anxiety when they began treatment, which rapidly decreased within 25 days of starting therapy, and gradually declined to mild anxiety over the remainder of their sessions. When comparing the four groups of patients, the researchers found no substantive differences between groups, suggesting that treatment effects were robust to environmental stressors related to the pandemic. Moreover, among patients who were in treatment at the start of the pandemic, the researchers did not detect an increase in anxiety during the initial acute phase of COVID-19 (March 20, 2020 through July 1, 2020).

    We were surprised. We thought that during the height of the pandemic and before vaccines were available, patients would show increased anxiety and that therapy would be less effective but that was not the case.”


    Steven Pirutinsky, PhD, study co-author, assistant professor at Graduate School of Social Work at Touro University

    Studies have shown that the COVID-19 pandemic adversely impacted mental health, with measurable increases in anxiety from the pandemic’s onset in early 2020 through the fist availability of vaccinations in early 2021. One report from the World Health Organization found global prevalence of anxiety and depression increased by 25 percent in the first year of the pandemic.

    “There is a widespread misperception that anxiety is a risk factor for people crumbling and not being able to function,” says Rosmarin. “However, when people receive evidence-based psychotherapy and learn skills to cope, they can become more resilient than those who have never had anxiety at all.”

    Limitations of the study include that the participant pool, while demographically and clinically diverse, consisted primarily of highly educated individuals geographically specific to the northeastern United States. The pandemic-onset group was also smaller than the others, which may be attributed to limited availability of in-person therapy around that time. The study also did not look at other mental health measures, including depression and substance use. More research is needed to gain insights into how these findings may be impacted in other regions of the country, and conditions aside from anxiety disorders.

    Source:

    Journal reference:

    Rosmarin, D. H., et al. (2024) Response to anxiety treatment before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic. PLOS ONE. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0296949.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Cognitive behavioral therapy helps prevent postpartum mental health challenges in low-resource settings

    Cognitive behavioral therapy helps prevent postpartum mental health challenges in low-resource settings

    [ad_1]

    Results from a large clinical trial funded by the National Institutes of Health show that an intervention for anxiety provided to pregnant women living in Pakistan significantly reduced the likelihood of the women developing moderate-to-severe anxiety, depression, or both six weeks after birth. The unique intervention was administered by non-specialized providers who had the equivalent of a bachelor’s degree in psychology-;but no clinical experience. The results suggest this intervention could be an effective way to prevent the development of postpartum mental health challenges in women living in low-resource settings.

    In low resource settings, it can be challenging for women to access mental health care due to a global shortage of trained mental health specialists. This study shows that non-specialists could help to fill this gap, providing care to more women during this critical period.”


    Joshua A. Gordon, M.D., Ph.D., Director of the National Institute of Mental Health, part of NIH

    Led by Pamela J. Surkan, Ph.D., Sc.D., of Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, the study was conducted in the Punjab Province of Pakistan between April 2019 and January 2022. Pregnant women with symptoms of at least mild anxiety were randomly assigned to receive either routine pregnancy care or a cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)-based intervention called Happy Mother-Healthy Baby. The researchers assessed the participants (380 women in the CBT group and 375 women in the routine care group) for anxiety and depression six weeks after the birth of their child.

    The researchers found that 9% of women in the intervention group developed moderate-to-severe anxiety compared with 27% of women in the routine care group. Additionally, 12% percent of women in the intervention group developed depression compared with 41% of women in the routine care group.

    “Postpartum depression not only harms mothers, it is also associated with poorer physical growth and delayed cognitive development in their children,” said Dr. Surkan. “The link between maternal and child health highlights the critical importance of developing effective ways to address postpartum anxiety and depression.”

    The Happy Mother-Healthy Baby intervention was created using input from pregnant women in a hospital in Rawalpindi, Pakistan. Pregnant women took part in six intervention sessions where they learned to identify anxious thoughts and behaviors, such as thoughts about possible miscarriage, and to practice replacing them with helpful thoughts and behaviors. The first five sessions were conducted in early to mid-pregnancy, and the sixth session occurred in the third trimester.

    Prior research suggests that up to 30% of women in the Global South, which includes South America, Africa, and most of southern Asia, report experiencing anxiety during pregnancy. Anxiety during pregnancy predicts the development of anxiety and depression after birth, making the prenatal period a prime target for intervention. However, it can be challenging for women living in low-resource settings to access trained clinical care. The findings from this study demonstrate that an intervention such as Happy Mother-Healthy Baby could be an effective way to help prevent the development of postpartum depression and anxiety in settings where specialist clinical care may be hard to access.

    “In the future, we can build on these findings through implementation research. Having identified an intervention that works, the next step is to figure out the best ways to deliver effective treatment to the people who need it, bridging the gap between science and practice,” said Dr. Surkan.

    Source:

    Journal reference:

    Surkan, P. J., et al. (2024). Anxiety-focused cognitive behavioral therapy delivered by non-specialists to prevent postnatal depression: a randomized, phase 3 trial. Nature Medicine. doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-02809-x.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Study finds digital CBT for children with anxiety delivers on par with traditional methods, lowers costs

    Study finds digital CBT for children with anxiety delivers on par with traditional methods, lowers costs

    [ad_1]

    In a recent study published in The Lancet Psychiatry, a group of researchers evaluated if digitally augmented, therapist-supported, parent-led cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is a cost-effective and clinically effective alternative to standard care for treating childhood anxiety.

    Study: Digitally augmented, parent-led CBT versus treatment as usual for child anxiety problems in child mental health services in England and Northern Ireland: a pragmatic, non-inferiority, clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness randomised controlled trial. Image Credit: Ground Picture/Shutterstock.comStudy: Digitally augmented, parent-led CBT versus treatment as usual for child anxiety problems in child mental health services in England and Northern Ireland: a pragmatic, non-inferiority, clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness randomised controlled trial. Image Credit: Ground Picture/Shutterstock.com

    Background

    Child mental health services worldwide struggle to meet demand, highlighting the need for more accessible care. Digital treatments could significantly expand service capacity, but their full integration into routine care is pending.

    Recognizing the urgency, entities like England’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) emphasize the importance of digital solutions for youth mental health. Anxiety, affecting a significant portion of the population from an early age, leads to major personal and economic impacts.

    CBT, especially in brief, parent-led formats supported by therapists, offers a viable solution by overcoming barriers to access and engaging families directly.

    Digital platforms like the Online Support and Intervention (OSI) for child anxiety, co-developed with families and therapists, show promise in making effective treatments more accessible. However, further research is crucial to evaluate their cost-effectiveness and potential for widespread use in varied clinical contexts.

    About the study 

    The present study was registered and followed a published protocol, sought to involve sites that were part of the National Health Service (NHS) or local authorities, totaling 34 participating sites. These included a diverse mix of NHS Trusts and local authority or voluntary or community sector providers, encompassing 73 Child Mental Health Teams.

    Eligibility criteria for children included being aged 5–12 years with a primary anxiety problem, alongside their parents having sufficient English language proficiency, internet access, and willingness to consent.

    Exclusions applied to children with certain comorbid conditions or those involved in child protection concerns, as well as parents with significant intellectual impairments or severe mental health issues.

    The study acknowledged the unique context of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, which necessitated a rapid shift to remote service delivery, influencing the trial’s approach to what constituted “treatment as usual.”

    Randomization was carefully managed using a web-based system, ensuring balanced allocation across intervention and control groups, albeit blinding to intervention was not feasible for participants.

    The trial’s procedures were thorough, with families being identified, consented, and assessed online, followed by a structured engagement with the treatment process across both arms.

    Qualitative interviews were conducted to gauge the acceptability of OSI plus therapist support, providing rich insights into participants’ experiences.

    The primary outcome focused on the impact of child anxiety on family life, using the Child Anxiety Impact Scale–Parent Report (CAIS-P), with a comprehensive suite of secondary outcomes to capture a broad spectrum of effects. 

    Study results 

    Between December 5, 2020, and August 3, 2022, 706 families were referred, and out of these referrals, 444 families met the inclusion criteria, provided consent, and were randomized equally between the two study arms.

    Despite initial plans, only 79% of these participants started their allocated treatment within the stipulated 12-week period post-randomization.

    By the end of the trial, completion rates for the 14-week and 26-week assessments were 79% and 74%, respectively, in the OSI plus therapist support and treatment as usual groups.

    The participant demographic was predominantly White-British, with a slight majority of girls over boys and an average child age of 9.20 years. Treatment as usual, primarily consisted of CBT, often delivered through parents.

    Before treatment, parents across both groups had similar expectations regarding the logical nature and potential success of the interventions. However, parents initially felt more confident in the success of the OSI, plus therapist support.

    Post-treatment, therapists felt more comfortable delivering traditional treatment than OSI, expressing hesitancy about future use of OSI, largely due to its novelty and their temporary access during the trial.

    The study found OSI plus therapist support to be non-inferior to traditional treatments across all primary and secondary outcomes, demonstrating minimal differences in effectiveness. This was consistent across various sensitivity analyses.

    Furthermore, there was little difference in utility scores and Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) between the groups.

    However, the OSI plus therapist support arm showed lower associated costs, primarily due to reduced delivery time. Despite some uncertainty, cost-utility analyses suggested that OSI plus therapist support could be cost-effective under certain scenarios.

    Health economic results revealed minor differences in treatment and resource use outcomes, suggesting the potential cost-effectiveness of OSI plus therapist support, though with noted uncertainty.

    Despite this uncertainty and the absence of serious adverse events, the trial highlighted the feasibility of OSI plus therapist support as an effective and potentially more efficient alternative to traditional treatment methods for child anxiety problems.

    This finding underscores the value of further exploring digitally augmented treatments within child mental health services.

    [ad_2]

    Source link