Tag: elections

  • The Election Was Even Weirder in VR

    The Election Was Even Weirder in VR

    [ad_1]

    Technology has been at the forefront of this election cycle from the start. Generative AI has driven concerns about misinformation and eye-rolling propaganda. Even the campaigns themselves embraced new-ish spaces, like the Harris-Walz-themed map in Fortnite.

    The metaverse may not be quite ready for the campaign cycle, but perhaps the political system should be ready for it. For all the chaos and trolling in the room on election night, what soon becomes clear is that the vibe in VR reflects the outside world.

    Image may contain Donald Trump Person Adult Computer Hardware Electronics Hardware Monitor Screen and Urban

    An avatar watches election returns.

    Image may contain Donald Trump Electronics Screen Computer Hardware Hardware Monitor TV People Person and Adult

    Trump support was strong in VRChat.

    Image may contain Computer Hardware Electronics Hardware Monitor Screen and Person

    The venue for the watch party.

    First off, the VR election rooms are overwhelmingly male, which will be unsurprising for anyone accustomed to the political manosphere in the US. Most of the people I encounter in both virtual realms seem to favor Trump, and that power imbalance only grows throughout the night as the red wave deepens and the former president’s reelection seems more and more likely.

    My colleague Kelly talks with a person dressed in a black Iron Man-esque suit of armor who says they are from Michigan. Ersatz Iron Man calls the state for Trump much earlier than it was officially reported. They say they know lots of people who support Trump, and for whom Elon Musk’s endorsement and posts on X were an important factor to helping Trump win more broadly.

    Lots of moments like this happen over the night. At first, the real-world results clash with the absurdity in the Horizon World rooms. People hiding within their brightly colored avatars, shouting over the top of each other, saying the most offensive things possibly to provoke a reaction. But then the room starts to split, a larger group on the Trump side—loud and excited. Then a smaller group on the Harris side, more somber and reflective. Some people congregate outside, talking in low voices and crunching the numbers about how many electoral votes are left.

    “We’ll never have a girl president,” I hear a child shout during my visit to MetDonalds, Horizon Worlds’ mockup of the fast-food chain with golden arches. “We’ve got to keep our American traditions!”

    “Let’s kill all the old white people in America that are around,” says somebody wearing an avatar that looks like a slinky dog from Toy Story. Then, to somebody else, “I guess if Trump wins you don’t have to worry about your school getting shot up as much I guess.”

    Later I watch somebody voraciously defend Trump’s policies while a different person in a knight avatar comes around behind him and starts miming rubbing his nipples while moaning loudly over the top of him. By the end of the night, it starts to feel like the virtual world is just as weird as the real one.

    Additional reporting by WIRED contributor Kelly Bourdet.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Perplexity Dove Into Real-Time Election Tracking While Other AI Companies Held Back

    Perplexity Dove Into Real-Time Election Tracking While Other AI Companies Held Back

    [ad_1]

    Perplexity’s Election Information Hub might also blur the line between verified and free-wheeling AI-generated information. While some results come directly from trusted sources, searching for more information triggered open-ended AI-generated results from the wider web.

    Other AI companies appear to be taking a more cautious approach to the election. In WIRED’s testing, ChatGPT Search, a newly launched service from OpenAI, often declined to provide information about voting. “We’ve instructed ChatGPT to not express preferences, offer opinions, or make specific recommendations about political candidates or issues even when explicitly asked,” Mattie Zazueta, an OpenAI spokesperson, told WIRED.

    The results were often inconsistent, however. For instance, the tool sometimes refused to provide talking points to help persuade someone to vote for one candidate or the other, and sometimes willingly offered some.

    Google’s search engine also avoided providing AI-generated results in relation to the election. The company said in August it would limit use of AI in relation to the election in search and other apps. “This new technology can make mistakes as it learns or as news breaks,” the company said in a blog post.

    Even regular search results sometimes prove problematic though. During voting on Tuesday, some Google users noticed that a search for “Where do I vote for Harris” provided the location of voting information while a search for “Where do I vote for Trump” did not. Google explained this was because the search interpreted the query as one related to Harris County in Texas.

    Some other AI search upstarts are, like Perplexity, taking a bolder approach. You.com, another startup that blends language models with conventional web search, on Tuesday announced its own election tool, built in collaboration with TollBit, a company that provides AI firms with managed access to content, as well as Decision Desk HQ, a company that provides access to poll results.

    Perplexity appears to have been particularly bold in its approach to upending web search. In June, a WIRED investigation found evidence that a bot associated with Perplexity was ignoring instructions not to scrape WIRED.com and other sites belonging to WIRED’s parent company, Condé Nast. The analysis confirmed an earlier report by developer Robb Knight concerning the behavior of bots operated by Perplexity.

    The AI search engine is also accused of cribbing liberally from news sites. For instance, also in June, a Forbes editor noted that Perplexity had summarized extensive details of an investigation published by the outlet with footnote citations. Forbes reportedly sent a letter threatening legal action against Perplexity for the practice.

    In October, News Corp sued Perplexity for ripping off content from The Wall Street Journal and the New York Post. The suit argues that Perplexity is breaching copyright law because it sometimes fabricated sections of news stories and falsely attributed words to its publications.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Donald Trump Defeats Kamala Harris in the 2024 Presidential Election

    Donald Trump Defeats Kamala Harris in the 2024 Presidential Election

    [ad_1]

    Trump, who was convicted of 34 felonies in May and welcomed climate change because it would create more oceanfront properties, ran a nativist campaign built around a promise to deport millions of unauthorized immigrants and impose tariffs on imports from foreign countries, which many economists have said would create a depression. The 78-year-old billionaire has also vowed to roll back environmental policies and protections, severely curtail the rights of transgender people, and seek revenge against his political enemies.

    In the final days of the campaign, Trump-aligned surrogates and influencers, like Musk, pushed for more men to cast their ballots for Trump. For months, Trump and his vice presidential pick JD Vance appeared on dozens of podcasts targeted at young men. Trump sat with the popular Kick streamer Adin Ross in a live video at Mar-a-Lago over the summer, joined wrestler and former vlogger Logan Paul’s Impaulsive podcast, and brought many influencers, like the Nelk Boys, along on the campaign trail.

    After the July assassination attempt against Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania, Musk formally endorsed Trump. “I fully endorse President Trump and hope for his rapid recovery,” Musk posted to X at the time.

    Musk subsequently donated well over $100 million dollars to support Trump’s reelection and turned his platform X into a megaphone for the former president. Musk’s America PAC, along with Turning Point Action, led Trump’s canvassing operations in states like Michigan, Arizona, and Wisconsin. Some of these canvassers were refused pay and forced into unsafe working conditions, like being transported in the back of a U-Haul without seat belts, WIRED reported.

    Other influencers lent Trump support as well. On Thursday, influencer and boxer Jake Paul formally endorsed Trump in a video posted to X. On Monday, Joe Rogan followed suit in a post sharing his most recent podcast episode with Musk. Paul has more than 20 million YouTube subscribers and Rogan hosts the most popular podcast in the US with over 14 million followers on Spotify.

    “They have degraded and disparaged our amazing men for far too long,” Ashley St. Clair said in an X post on Monday. “Men must VOTE!”

    In the leadup to the election, polls suggested a deep shift toward Harris among senior and independent women, seemingly driven by the Supreme Court overturning federal abortion rights and a subsequent wave of unpopular restrictions backed by Republicans at the state level. In the end, though, the Trump strategy of turning out voters in economically struggling, deindustrialized regions while chipping away at the margins among traditionally overwhelmingly Democratic minority constituencies carried the day.

    Republicans will take back the Senate, making it much easier for an incoming Trump administration to confirm judges and cabinet officials. The balance of power in the House of Representatives has yet to be decided.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Scenes From a Battleground Philadelphia Suburb on Election Day

    Scenes From a Battleground Philadelphia Suburb on Election Day

    [ad_1]

    Pennsylvania Is the essential battleground state for the 2024 election: Whoever wins here will likely be in the White House next year. We spent time today in Warrington Township, a suburb of Philadelphia in Bucks County, Pennsylvania. What we saw was a town divided. Signs reading “Communists” and “Fascists” plaster the streets, illustrating a tale of two Americas at odds with one another.

    As a contentious election season finally comes to a close, we saw a desperate plea from this small community, people of all political persuasions pushing their messages before time runs out. It’s still too early to say where this state will land. But we do know that whatever the result, the division that occurred along the way may be hard to repair.

    Signs supporting Trump are seen along the road outside Buck County Doylestown Pennsylvania.

    Signs supporting Trump are seen along the road outside Buck County Doylestown, Pennsylvania.Photograph: Alex Kent

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Groypers Gave Illegal Hot Dogs and Burgers to Trump Voters

    Groypers Gave Illegal Hot Dogs and Burgers to Trump Voters

    [ad_1]

    Mesa, AZ — A group of America First groypers, college Republicans, and a Christian nationalist pastor were handing out burgers and hot dogs to voters in Phoenix on Tuesday—but only if they voted for former president Donald Trump.

    The cookout took place about 100 yards from a polling station—and it was likely illegal.

    The effort was organized by the far-right College Republicans United group, in association with the Patriot Party of Arizona. It began just after polls opened at the Mesa Convention Center. Groypers, the name that followers of white nationalist Nick Fuentes give themselves, were helping hand out hot dogs, burgers, and cold drinks. Manning the grill was Pastor David MacLellan, a Christian nationalist pastor who is the chaplain for the Patriot Party of Arizona and subscribes to the extremist ideology of the Black Robe Regiment.

    “We’re giving away hot dogs and hamburgers to folks who are doing the right thing, voting for Trump,” MacLellan tells WIRED.

    Isaiah, a self-identified groyper who would not provide his last name, confirmed that the group was only giving out food to Trump voters, but added: “[The food is] specifically for Trump voters, but we do welcome others if they do want to come over and change their mind.”

    Providing food for a specific group of people at a polling location is in breach of federal law.

    “Not only is it illegal to give just to voters for one candidate, one cannot limit it only to voters. it must be made available to all people in the area, including children and others ineligible to vote, to avoid running afoul of federal law against vote buying,” Rick Hasen, a law professor at UCLA, tells WIRED, citing the same rules that Elon Musk was accused of breaching with his $1 million ballot.

    The Arizona Secretary of State’s office, which sets the rules for behavior at polling locations, did not respond to a request for comment.

    The College Republican United group was set up in 2018 by Rick Thomas, who is also a member of the Patriot Party of Arizona. Thomas told WIRED he founded the group out of frustration at the Republican student group that was in place at Arizona State University.

    “We eventually broke off and formed our own organization that was very pro-Trump,” Thomas said. “We are American first, we are MAGA.”

    While not all members of College Republican United are members of Fuentes’ group, there is a significant overlap, Isaiah told WIRED.

    Thomas portrayed the group as a relatively mainstream student group, but evidence online indicates otherwise: The College Republican United’s website’s book recommendations page features two deeply antisemitic works: the Protocols of the Elders of Zion and Henry Ford’s The International Jew: The World’s Foremost Problem.

    Another member of the CRU, Kevin Decuyper, was recently hired as an aide to former far-right sheriff Joe Arpaio,

    “There are reasons why College Republicans United have been denounced by so many GOP organizations,” says Nick Martin, an investigative journalist who closely tracks extremist groups in Arizona and who runs the online publication The Informant. “The organization recommends its members read discredited and debunked books filled with racist pseudoscience and conspiracy theories. Their guest speakers have included white nationalists, neo-Nazis, Pizzagate peddlers, fringe political candidates and, rarely, some actual Republicans.”

    You can follow all of WIRED’s 2024 presidential election coverage here.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Russia Is Going All Out on Election Day Interference

    Russia Is Going All Out on Election Day Interference

    [ad_1]

    As the 2024 US presidential election comes to a close, and with Donald Trump on the ballot once again, Russian actors are spreading disinformation with unprecedented and alarming intensity—and US officials say that the Kremlin’s efforts to undermine confidence in the election and foment unrest are likely to continue into January.

    Russian disinformation operations have had a prominent presence in United States elections since the Kremlin’s sea-changing influence campaign during the 2016 presidential race between Hillary Clinton and Trump. But with so much scrutiny and investigation into that operation’s mechanics and impact—including the use of hack-and-leak tactics against the Democratic National Committee, Clinton campaign, and other targets—Russia was less technically aggressive and more focused on influence operations in the midterms and 2020 presidential election. That momentary respite is now over.

    In calls with reporters on Monday night and Tuesday, as well as in public statements, US intelligence and law enforcement officials working on election security warned repeatedly that foreign influence actors including Iran, but “particularly Russia,” are ramping up their activity with an “increasing volume of inauthentic content online.” And while officials say they haven’t detected cyberattacks beyond floods of junk traffic, or DDoS attacks, attempting to knock election-related sites offline, Russian activity has become increasingly menacing.

    On Tuesday morning, for example, Georgia secretary of state Brad Raffensperger attributed multiple bomb threats against two Georgia polling places to Russia. The threats were deemed non-credible, but they briefly disrupted voting at the two poll sites. The FBI added later on Tuesday that poll sites in “several states” faced non-credible bomb threats that appeared to “originate from Russian email domains.”

    “It is a greater scope and scale of foreign influence operations we have seen in 2024 than in prior cycles, and yes, Russia presents, in terms of our adversaries, the greatest degree of capability and sophistication,” Cait Conley, senior adviser to the director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), told reporters in a call on Tuesday afternoon. “Overall, I think the range of tactics we are seeing being employed, and the level of sophistication, is greater than prior cycles.”

    In a joint statement on Monday evening, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, CISA, and the FBI emphasized that “Russia is the most active threat” to the US election. “Influence actors linked to Russia in particular are manufacturing videos and creating fake articles to undermine the legitimacy of the election, instill fear in voters regarding the election process, and suggest Americans are using violence against each other due to political preferences,” they wrote.

    The agencies cited some specific examples of content from Russian influence campaigns. One was a fake interview with someone purporting to be a former aide to Arizona secretary of state Adrian Fontes, claiming a vast election fraud campaign involving the manufacture of fake overseas ballots. Another involved alleged Russian influence actors amplifying an article that falsely claimed US officials in swing states were committing election fraud using a variety of tactics, including ballot stuffing and cyberattacks.

    A video claiming to show evidence of fraud in Georgia was also linked to “Russian influence actors” in late September. Last month, experts also credited Russia-aligned propaganda network Storm-1516 with amplifying baseless claims that Minnesota governor and vice presidential candidate Tim Walz previously assaulted one of his former students.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Elon Musk’s Twitter Takeover Set Off a Race to the Bottom

    Elon Musk’s Twitter Takeover Set Off a Race to the Bottom

    [ad_1]

    But for years, public pressure from government officials, civil society, and the media pushed tech companies to invest in teams and tools that could at least somewhat address issues of hate speech or misinformation on their platforms, so they could say they were making a good faith effort to deal with the issue.

    Musk’s purchase of Twitter signaled a change, according to six former trust and safety employees from Twitter and Meta.

    When Musk took over Twitter in October 2022, he quickly fired more than 50 percent of the company’s workers, including almost all of the company’s trust and safety and policy staff—the people tasked with creating and enforcing the platform’s policies around things like hate speech, violent content, conspiracy theories, and mis- and disinformation. Since then, Meta, Google, Amazon, and Discord have all made cuts to trust and safety staff.

    Shortly after Musk purged Twitter of its trust and safety teams, other companies began layoffs. In November 2022, Meta laid off 11,000 employees, including many trust and safety employees. In January 2023, Google followed suit, axing 12,000 people. Earlier this year, Twitch, which is owned by Amazon, disbanded its Safety Advisory Council.

    “I think that Elon really opened the floodgates,” says one former Meta employee. “So then other tech brands were like, ‘We can do that too, because we won’t be the black sheep for it.’”

    Meta spokesperson Corey Chambliss tells WIRED that the company has “40,000 people globally working on safety and security—more than during the 2020 cycle, when we had a global team of 35,000 people working in this area,” though he did not address how many of those people are staff versus outsourced workers.

    Musk’s sudden firings made it so that “anybody else could come along and nicely fire their teams and give them severance and it was nicer. Better,” says a former Twitter employee who was fired by Musk.

    After Musk fired the trust and safety staff, experts warned that this cut, coupled with Musk’s “free speech absolutism,” would allow toxic content to flood the platform and ultimately cause an exodus of users and advertisers, leading to Twitter’s eventual demise. Hate speech and misinformation did increase and advertisers did pull their dollars. Last year, X fired members of what remained of its elections team. Around the same time, Musk posted on X, saying, “Oh you mean the ‘Election Integrity’ Team that was undermining election integrity? Yeah, they’re gone.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • An Election Denial Group Has Spent Months Compiling ‘Suspicious Voter’ Lists in North Carolina

    An Election Denial Group Has Spent Months Compiling ‘Suspicious Voter’ Lists in North Carolina

    [ad_1]

    In response to a request for comment, Richards tells WIRED that EagleAI Network “has no relationships with entities” and, rather, “is used by individuals.”

    “We do not ask people whether they work with groups,” Richards says.

    The NCEIT is affiliated with the nationwide Election Integrity Network (EIN), whose members allege without evidence that the US is plagued with voter fraud. The EIN was created by Cleta Mitchell, Donald Trump’s former lawyer who was present on the 2020 phone call in which Trump asked the Georgia secretary of state to “find” him nearly 12,000 votes.

    When EagleAI Network was created in the wake of the 2020 election, it reportedly received legal assistance and strategy advice from Mitchell—though Richards has insisted that Mitchell has no “official relationship” with EagleAI Network. The company has courted contracts with public election boards in at least three states (Georgia, Texas, and West Virginia), and it has data about voters that have recently moved from at least nine states (Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Nevada, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, and Texas), but the total number of states EagleAI Network has been used in is unclear. Notably, North Carolina is absent from both publicly available lists.

    The NCEIT’s campaign to target “suspicious voters” could disproportionately impact Hispanic people. Jim Womack, NCEIT founder and president and Lee County Republican Party chair, said in a recent video obtained by CBS News that when generating suspicious voter lists, NCEIT members should target people with “Hispanic-sounding” last names.

    “If you’ve got folks that you, that were registered, and they’re missing information … and they were registered in the last 90 days before the election, and they’ve got Hispanic-sounding last names, that probably is, is a suspicious voter,” Womack says in the video. “It doesn’t mean they’re illegal. It just means they’re suspicious.”

    The emails don’t detail exactly how the “suspicious voter” tool from EagleAI Network works. However, the company’s tool for automating voter registration challenges, a similar process, is well documented. While voter registration challenges have to be filed no fewer than 90 days before an election, voter challenges can be filed up to five days after an election in North Carolina.

    EagleAI Network’s tool for filing voter registration challenges essentially centralizes the process. It allows users to search for people who they suspect have issues or mistakes in their voter registrations, using data from a combination of public and private sources. A search could surface voters who, say, live at a particular address, or share demographics like age.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • TikTok Employees Shrug Off the US Election

    TikTok Employees Shrug Off the US Election

    [ad_1]

    TikTok is one of the tech companies that could be most impacted by the outcome of the US elections. But as the election result looms, employees there found themselves surprisingly disengaged from the high-level political drama that could decide the app’s fate.

    A San Jose-based product manager, who requested anonymity because he is not authorized to speak to the media, says he was more worried about the TikTok ban before he joined the company earlier this year than now. He claims his colleagues rarely bring up the topic, and his team plans future product features in the app as if there’s no ban taking place soon.

    “I feel indifferent now,” he says. “There’s little you can do as an ordinary employee, and everyone thinks that way, so the result is business as usual.”

    WIRED talked to half a dozen employees at TikTok and its parent company ByteDance on the condition of anonymity, and all of them report very little, if any, discussion of US elections or politics among their ranks.

    While outsiders speculate about the app’s potential demise, US-based TikTok employees say discussions of the ban happen more with their international counterparts or with non-ByteDance friends. “There’s almost a consensus not to talk about this thing. Very occasionally, some of us might say that maybe it’s time to jump ship, but those discussions rarely come up,” the TikTok product manager says.

    In April, the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act (PAFACA) was signed into law, requiring that TikTok sell its US operation to a domestic buyer or be banned. But months later, the topic mostly slipped out of news headlines even as politicians kept talking about China leading to the elections.

    So far, Kamala Harris has not made any comment about what she would do to TikTok as US president, but experts expect her to more or less carry out the Biden administration’s tech policy, including following through on the PAFACA Act.

    Donald Trump, on the other hand, publicly backtracked his 2020 stance on banning the app after reportedly being lobbied by Jeff Yass, a billionaire ByteDance investor. Most recently, Trump said in a September campaign video that “for all of those who want to save TikTok in America, vote for Trump.” Yet he didn’t make saving TikTok a core talking point on his campaign stops, and people aren’t sure if he would uphold his latest opinion should he be elected.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Election Season in America: Scenes From Around the Country

    Election Season in America: Scenes From Around the Country

    [ad_1]

    Every presidential election feels like the most important yet. This one, though, may actually rise to the label. Kamala Harris and Donald Trump offer visions of the future for the US that couldn’t be more different. Their campaigns have diverged widely in tone, style, and substance. Maybe the only thing they have in common, in fact, is the extent to which they’ve been documented online.

    But while the memes and shares have in many ways defined the 2024 US presidential election, there’s a whole world of moments that have occurred outside of the viral limelight. At WIRED, we took a step back to look at the last months in moments, exploring places, scenes, and people that don’t always make the feeds. Below, we’re offering a different picture of an America that’s often at odds, and seldom offline.

    Image may contain Donald Trump People Person Electrical Device Microphone Head Clothing Hat Face Adult and Crowd

    Supporters of former US president Donald Trump are seen through a photo cutout as they arrive for a campaign rally at Macomb Community College in Warren, Michigan, on November 1, 2024.Photograph: ROBERTO SCHMIDT/Getty Images

    [ad_2]

    Source link