Tag: Evolution

  • Heart-shaped mollusc has windows that work like fibre optics

    Heart-shaped mollusc has windows that work like fibre optics

    [ad_1]

    Heart cockle shells

    Heart cockles come in many colours and host photosynthetic algae inside their shells

    Dakota McCoy

    A heart-shaped mollusc has evolved tiny windows that work like fibre-optic cables, the first known example in nature.

    Heart cockles (Corculum cardissa) are bivalve molluscs a bit like clams that have a symbiotic relationship with photosynthetic algae that live inside them. The algae have a safe home, get light to photosynthesise and provide nutrients for their hosts.

    Unlike other bivalves, heart cockles don’t open their shells up wide, yet they somehow funnel light to their interior even while staying shut.

    Now, Dakota McCoy at the University of Chicago and her colleagues have found that there are transparent calcium carbonate crystal structures in the heart cockle shells that function like fibre-optic bundles, letting light inside to bathe the algae. “If you don’t have to open and can just have a transparent window, that’s a very safe way to irradiate your algae,” says McCoy.

    The researchers examined fragments of different heart cockle shells and the transparent structures within them, as well as the intensity and colour of light that gets through. They found that the windows were made from long, thin fibres of a mineral called aragonite – a form of calcium carbonate – which lets twice as much of the photosynthetically useful light through as it does harmful ultraviolet light. “We put on sunblock because UV causes mutations and cancer. The heart cockles are using these windows as a sunblock,” says McCoy.

    Heart cockle shells illuminated from within to show the transparent windows in their shells

    Heart cockle shells illuminated from within to show the transparent windows in their shells, which can be little triangles (left) or stripes (right)

    Dakota McCoy

    While the aragonite threads look similar to manufactured fibre optics, they lack a protective, insulating sheath, called cladding, yet transmit light just as effectively. This could serve as an inspiration for cladding-free fibre-optic cables, which would be cheaper to manufacture.

    The natural, UV-blocking properties of the shells could also be used to help protect corals, which, like the cockles, host photosynthetic algae inside them, but are more susceptible to environmental stresses like light and heat, says McCoy.

    Topics:

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • A 200-year-old mystery about newts has finally been solved

    A 200-year-old mystery about newts has finally been solved

    [ad_1]

    A genetic flaw dooms half of all crested newts to die before they hatch – now we know how this baffling evolutionary quirk came about

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • our cells learned to handle the stress that comes with size

    our cells learned to handle the stress that comes with size

    [ad_1]

    Sagittal slice through a human brain.

    Large brains place extra demands on nerve cells.Credit: Science Pictures Ltd/SPL

    Humans have evolved disproportionately large brains compared with our primate relatives — but this neurological upgrade came at a cost. Scientists exploring the trade-off have discovered unique genetic features that show how human brain cells handle the stress of keeping a big brain working. The work could inspire new lines of research to understand conditions such as Parkinson’s disease and schizophrenia.

    The study, which was posted to the bioRxiv preprint server on 15 November1, focuses on neurons that produce the neurotransmitter dopamine, which is crucial for movement, learning and emotional processing.

    By comparing thousands of laboratory-grown dopamine neurons from humans, chimpanzees, macaques and orangutans, researchers found that human dopamine neurons express more genes that boost the activity of damage-reducing antioxidants than do those of the other primates.

    The findings, which are yet to be peer-reviewed, are a step towards “understanding human brain evolution and all the potentially negative and positive things that come with it”, says Andre Sousa, a neuroscientist at the University of Wisconsin–Madison. “It’s interesting and important to really try to understand what’s specific about the human brain, with the potential of developing new therapies or even avoiding disease altogether in the future.”

    Stressed-out neurons

    Just as walking upright has led to knee and back problems, and changes in jaw structure and diet resulted in dental issues, the rapid expansion of the human brain over evolutionary time has created challenges for its cells, says study co-author Alex Pollen, a neuroscientist at the University of California, San Francisco. “We hypothesized that the same process may be occurring, and these dopamine neurons may represent vulnerable joints.”

    Using an imaging tool, Pollen and his colleagues showed that two dopamine-demanding regions of the brain are considerably bigger in humans than in macaques. The prefrontal cortex is 18 times larger, and the striatum nearly seven times bigger.

    Yet humans have only around twice as many dopamine neurons as their primate relatives, says Pollen. These neurons therefore have to stretch further and work harder — each forming more than two million synapses — in the larger, more complex human brain.

    “The dopamine neurons are real athletes,” says Nenad Sestan, a developmental neuroscientist at Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut. “They are constantly activated.”

    To understand how human dopamine neurons might have adapted to cope with the demands of a large brain, Pollen and his colleagues grew versions of these cells in the lab.

    They combined stem cells — which can develop into many cell types — from eight humans, seven chimpanzees, three macaques and one orangutan and grew them into miniature, brain-like structures called organoids. After 30 days, these structures started producing dopamine, mimicking a developing brain.

    The team then genetically sequenced the dopamine neurons to measure which genes were switched on and how they were controlled.

    In an analysis of human and chimpanzee neurons, the researchers found that the human neurons expressed higher levels of genes that manage oxidative stress — a type of cell damage that can be caused by the energy-intensive process of producing dopamine. These genes encode enzymes that break down and neutralize toxic molecules, called reactive oxygen species, that can harm cells.

    To investigate whether human dopamine neurons might have have evolved unique stress responses, the authors applied a pesticide that causes oxidative stress to the organoids. They found that neurons that had developed from human cells increased their production of a molecule known as BDNF, which is reduced in people with neurodegenerative disorders such as Parkinson’s disease. They did not see the same response in chimpanzee neurons.

    Boosting resilience

    Understanding these protective mechanisms could aid the development of therapies that boost cellular defences in people at risk of Parkinson’s disease. “Some of these protections might not be present in everyone due to mutations,” says Sousa. “That creates an extra vulnerability in those individuals.”

    “There are some candidate targets that might be very interesting to perturb and then transplant in [animal] models of Parkinson’s disease to see whether these endow the neurons with more resilience,” says Pollen.

    The organoids in the study represent developing neurons, equivalent to those that are present in an embryo, and do not fully capture the complexity of adult neurons. Future research will need to explore how such protective mechanisms hold up in mature and ageing neurons, says Sousa, because “degenerative diseases that affect these cells are usually at a late age”.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Exquisite bird fossil provides clues to the evolution of avian brains

    Exquisite bird fossil provides clues to the evolution of avian brains

    [ad_1]

    The skeleton of Navaornis hestiae, an 80-million-year-old bird fossil

    S. Abramowicz/Dinosaur Institute/Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County

    An 80-million-year-old fossil bird has been discovered with a skull so exquisitely preserved that scientists have been able to study the detailed structure of its brain.

    In both age and evolutionary development, the new species, named Navaornis hestiae, is almost midway between the earliest known bird-like dinosaur, Archaeopteryx, which lived 150 million years ago, and modern birds. It lived in the Cretaceous Period alongside dinosaurs such as Tyrannosaurus and Triceratops.

    The fossil, which bears a superficial resemblance to a pigeon, was found near Presidente Prudente, Brazil, in 2016 and was immediately recognised as significant because of the rarity of a full bird skeleton, particularly one of that age.

    But Daniel Field at the University of Cambridge says it wasn’t until 2022 that he and his colleagues realised the skull was so intact that they could possibly scan it and create a 3D model of its brain.

    High-resolution CT scanning allows palaeontologists to peer inside fossils. “This involves careful ‘digital dissection’: separating out each individual component of the skull and then reassembling them into a complete, undeformed three-dimensional reconstruction,” says Field.

    “The new fossil provides unprecedented insight into the pattern and timing by which the specialised features of the brain of living birds evolved.”

    Based on the team’s reconstruction of the brain, Field says the cognitive abilities and flying capacity of Navaornis were probably inferior to those of most living birds.

    Artist’s impression of Navaornis hestiae

    J. d’Oliveira

    The portions of the brain responsible for complex cognition and spatial orientation aren’t as enlarged as those of modern birds, he says.

    “Although the cerebrum of Navaornis is greatly expanded relative to the condition in a more archaic bird relative like Archaeopteryx, it is not as expanded as what we see in living birds.”

    The enlarged brains of modern birds support a huge range of complex behaviours, says Field, but understanding how their brains evolved has been challenging due to a lack of adequately complete and well-preserved fossil bird skulls from early bird relatives.

    Navaornis fills a roughly 70-million-year-long gap in our understanding of how the distinctive brains of modern birds evolved.”

    Topics:

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • What happens when a bacterium gets into a fungus and stays — for generations

    What happens when a bacterium gets into a fungus and stays — for generations

    [ad_1]

    • RESEARCH BRIEFINGS

    Bacteria living inside other cells can form stable, mutually beneficial partnerships with their hosts, but it is rare that two organisms are sufficiently compatible on their first encounter. Injecting bacteria into potential fungal hosts provides insights into the early evolutionary dynamics of the formation of such partnerships, and the associated costs and opportunities.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Growing up slowed down for an early <i>Homo</i> individual

    Growing up slowed down for an early <i>Homo</i> individual

    [ad_1]

    Nature, Published online: 13 November 2024; doi:10.1038/d41586-024-03547-3

    Human children pair fast growth of a large brain with slow body growth. Ancient Homo fossil teeth reveal that hominin dental growth rates began to slow before there was a major increase in brain size compared with apes.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Alonso, P. D., Milner, A. C., Ketcham, R. A., Cookson, M. J. & Rowe, T. B. Nature 430, 666–669 (2004).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Balanoff, A. M., Bever, G. S., Rowe, T. B. & Norell, M. A. Nature 501, 93–96 (2013).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Watanabe, A., Balanoff, A. M., Gignac, P. M., Gold, M. E. L. & Norell, M. A. eLife 10, e68809 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Northcutt, R. G. Science 332, 926–927 (2011).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chiappe, L. M. & Qingjin, M. Birds of Stone: Chinese Avian Fossils from the Age of Dinosaurs (Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 2016).


    Google Scholar
     

[ad_2]

Source link

  • Marmots could have the solution to a long-running debate in evolution

    Marmots could have the solution to a long-running debate in evolution

    [ad_1]

    Two yellow-bellied marmots on a rock in the Okanagan area of British Columbia, Canada

    Yellow-bellied marmots live in colonies with a single dominant male

    Maria Janicki/Alamy

    Friendly groups of marmots could help settle an enduring debate in evolution – whether the characteristics of a group can be more important to an individual’s chances of survival than the characteristics of that individual. An analysis of their behaviour is the first evidence in wild animals for this evolutionary idea, known as multilevel selection

    “What we found is that the group traits are under just as strong selection as the individual traits, if not slightly stronger,” says Conner Philson at the University of California, Los Angeles.…

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Clues to the origin of embryonic development in animals

    Clues to the origin of embryonic development in animals

    [ad_1]

    Nature, Published online: 06 November 2024; doi:10.1038/d41586-024-03468-1

    How did the characteristic pattern of embryonic cell divisions during animal development evolve? Analysis of the multicellular development of an organism related to animals now provides some answers.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Temporal recording of mammalian development and precancer

    Temporal recording of mammalian development and precancer

    [ad_1]

  • Tanay, A. & Regev, A. Scaling single-cell genomics from phenomenology to mechanism. Nature 541, 331–338 (2017).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Burrill, D. R. & Silver, P. A. Making cellular memories. Cell 140, 13–18 (2010).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Church, G. M., Gao, Y. & Kosuri, S. Next-generation digital information storage in DNA. Science 337, 1628 (2012).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sheth, R. U. & Wang, H. H. DNA-based memory devices for recording cellular events. Nat. Rev. Genet. 19, 718–732 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Park, J. et al. Recording of elapsed time and temporal information about biological events using Cas9. Cell 184, 1047–1063 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kaufman, M. H. Atlas of Mouse Development (Academic, 1992).

  • Sulston, J. E. & Horvitz, H. R. Post-embryonic cell lineages of the nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev. Biol. 56, 110–156 (1977).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kaiser, S. et al. Transcriptional recapitulation and subversion of embryonic colon development by mouse colon tumor models and human colon cancer. Genome Biol. 8, R131 (2007).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bellacosa, A. Developmental disease and cancer: biological and clinical overlaps. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 161a, 2788–2796 (2013).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Visvader, J. E. Cells of origin in cancer. Nature 469, 314–322 (2011).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sprouffske, K., Pepper, J. W. & Maley, C. C. Accurate reconstruction of the temporal order of mutations in neoplastic progression. Cancer Prev. Res. (Phila.) 4, 1135–1144 (2011).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gerstung, M. et al. The evolutionary history of 2,658 cancers. Nature 578, 122–128 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Heiser, C. N. et al. Molecular cartography uncovers evolutionary and microenvironmental dynamics in sporadic colorectal tumors. Cell 186, 5620–5637 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chan, M. M. et al. Molecular recording of mammalian embryogenesis. Nature 570, 77–82 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bowling, S. et al. An engineered CRISPR-Cas9 mouse line for simultaneous readout of lineage histories and gene expression profiles in single cells. Cell 181, 1410–1422 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wagner, D. E. & Klein, A. M. Lineage tracing meets single-cell omics: opportunities and challenges. Nat. Rev. Genet. 21, 410–427 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shin, H. Y. et al. CRISPR/Cas9 targeting events cause complex deletions and insertions at 17 sites in the mouse genome. Nat. Commun. 8, 15464 (2017).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Quinn, J. J. et al. Single-cell lineages reveal the rates, routes, and drivers of metastasis in cancer xenografts. Science 371, eabc1944 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yang, D. et al. Lineage tracing reveals the phylodynamics, plasticity, and paths of tumor evolution. Cell 185, 1905–1923 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Perli, S. D., Cui, C. H. & Lu, T. K. Continuous genetic recording with self-targeting CRISPR-Cas in human cells. Science 353, aag0511 (2016).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kalhor, R. et al. Developmental barcoding of whole mouse via homing CRISPR. Science 361, eaat9804 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Replogle, J. M. et al. Combinatorial single-cell CRISPR screens by direct guide RNA capture and targeted sequencing. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 954–961 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dixit, A. et al. Perturb-seq: dissecting molecular circuits with scalable single-cell RNA profiling of pooled genetic screens. Cell 167, 1853–1866 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Banerjee, A. et al. Succinate produced by intestinal microbes promotes specification of tuft cells to suppress ileal inflammation. Gastroenterology 159, 2101–2115 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pijuan-Sala, B. et al. A single-cell molecular map of mouse gastrulation and early organogenesis. Nature 566, 490–495 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Saitou, M. & Yamaji, M. Primordial germ cells in mice. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 4, a008375 (2012).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kobayashi, T. & Surani, M. A. On the origin of the human germline. Development 145, e202201706 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tzouanacou, E. et al. Redefining the progression of lineage segregations during mammalian embryogenesis by clonal analysis. Dev. Cell 17, 365–376 (2009).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nowotschin, S. et al. The emergent landscape of the mouse gut endoderm at single-cell resolution. Nature 569, 361–367 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kwon, G. S., Viotti, M. & Hadjantonakis, A. K. The endoderm of the mouse embryo arises by dynamic widespread intercalation of embryonic and extraembryonic lineages. Dev. Cell 15, 509–520 (2008).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zernicka-Goetz, M., Morris, S. A. & Bruce, A. W. Making a firm decision: multifaceted regulation of cell fate in the early mouse embryo. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10, 467–477 (2009).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ju, Y. S. et al. Somatic mutations reveal asymmetric cellular dynamics in the early human embryo. Nature 543, 714–718 (2017).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bryant, P. J. & Simpson, P. Intrinsic and extrinsic control of growth in developing organs. Q. Rev. Biol. 59, 387–415 (1984).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Stanger, B. Z. Organ size determination and the limits of regulation. Cell Cycle 7, 318–324 (2008).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • van Neerven, S. M. & Vermeulen, L. Cell competition in development, homeostasis and cancer. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 24, 221–236 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yzaguirre, A. D. & Speck, N. A. Insights into blood cell formation from hemogenic endothelium in lesser-known anatomic sites. Dev. Dyn. 245, 1011–1028 (2016).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Qiu, J. et al. Embryonic hematopoiesis in vertebrate somites gives rise to definitive hematopoietic stem cells. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 288–301 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nowakowski, R. S. et al. Population dynamics during cell proliferation and neuronogenesis in the developing murine neocortex. Results Probl. Cell Differ. 39, 1–25 (2002).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zafar, H., Lin, C. & Bar-Joseph, Z. Single-cell lineage tracing by integrating CRISPR-Cas9 mutations with transcriptomic data. Nat. Commun. 11, 3055 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tsai, Y. H. et al. LGR4 and LGR5 function redundantly during human endoderm differentiation. Cell. Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2, 648–662 (2016).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Franklin, V. et al. Regionalisation of the endoderm progenitors and morphogenesis of the gut portals of the mouse embryo. Mech. Dev. 125, 587–600 (2008).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Barker, N. et al. Crypt stem cells as the cells-of-origin of intestinal cancer. Nature 457, 608–611 (2009).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Guiu, J. et al. Tracing the origin of adult intestinal stem cells. Nature 570, 107–111 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Egeblad, M., Nakasone, E. S. & Werb, Z. Tumors as organs: complex tissues that interface with the entire organism. Dev. Cell 18, 884–901 (2010).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fearon, E. R., Hamilton, S. R. & Vogelstein, B. Clonal analysis of human colorectal tumors. Science 238, 193–197 (1987).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Williams, M. J. et al. Identification of neutral tumor evolution across cancer types. Nat. Genet. 48, 238–244 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Thorsen, A. S. et al. Heterogeneity in clone dynamics within and adjacent to intestinal tumours identified by Dre-mediated lineage tracing. Dis. Model. Mech. 14, dmm046706 (2021).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chen, B. et al. Differential pre-malignant programs and microenvironment chart distinct paths to malignancy in human colorectal polyps. Cell 184, 6262–6280 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schepers, A. G. et al. Lineage tracing reveals Lgr5+ stem cell activity in mouse intestinal adenomas. Science 337, 730–735 (2012).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fearon, E. R. & Vogelstein, B. A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis. Cell 61, 759–767 (1990).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Thirlwell, C. et al. Clonality assessment and clonal ordering of individual neoplastic crypts shows polyclonality of colorectal adenomas. Gastroenterology 138, 1441–1454 (2010).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Thliveris, A. T. et al. Clonal structure of carcinogen-induced intestinal tumors in mice. Cancer Prev. Res. (Phila.) 4, 916–923 (2011).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schenck, R. O. et al. The polyclonal path to malignant transformation in familial adenomatous polyposis. Cancer Res. 83, 3497–3497 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cross, W. et al. The evolutionary landscape of colorectal tumorigenesis. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 1661–1672 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Greaves, M. & Maley, C. C. Clonal evolution in cancer. Nature 481, 306–313 (2012).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Coorens, T. H. H. et al. Inherent mosaicism and extensive mutation of human placentas. Nature 592, 80–85 (2021).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nishimura, T. et al. Evolutionary histories of breast cancer and related clones. Nature 620, 607–614 (2023).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hsu, S. H. et al. Multiclonal origin of polyps in Gardner syndrome. Science 221, 951–953 (1983).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Becker, W. R. et al. Single-cell analyses define a continuum of cell state and composition changes in the malignant transformation of polyps to colorectal cancer. Nat. Genet. 54, 985–995 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Michor, F., Iwasa, Y. & Nowak, M. A. Dynamics of cancer progression. Nat. Rev. Cancer 4, 197–205 (2004).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Klein, A. M. et al. Droplet barcoding for single-cell transcriptomics applied to embryonic stem cells. Cell 161, 1187–1201 (2015).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kalhor, R., Mali, P. & Church, G. M. Rapidly evolving homing CRISPR barcodes. Nat. Methods 14, 195–200 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Westphalen, C. B. et al. Long-lived intestinal tuft cells serve as colon cancer-initiating cells. J. Clin. Invest. 124, 1283–1295 (2014).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ludwig, L. S. et al. Lineage tracing in humans enabled by mitochondrial mutations and single-cell genomics. Cell 176, 1325–1339 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nam, A. S. et al. Somatic mutations and cell identity linked by genotyping of transcriptomes. Nature 571, 355–360 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Vickovic, S. et al. High-definition spatial transcriptomics for in situ tissue profiling. Nat. Methods 16, 987–990 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wei, R. et al. Spatial charting of single-cell transcriptomes in tissues. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 1190–1199 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wolock, S. L., Lopez, R. & Klein, A. M. Scrublet: computational identification of cell doublets in single-cell transcriptomic data. Cell Syst. 8, 281–291 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Behjati, S. et al. Genome sequencing of normal cells reveals developmental lineages and mutational processes. Nature 513, 422–425 (2014).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jombart, T., Balloux, F. & Dray, S. adephylo: New tools for investigating the phylogenetic signal in biological traits. Bioinformatics 26, 1907–1909 (2010).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Deng, S. et al. A statistical method for quantifying progenitor cells reveals incipient cell fate commitments. Nat. Methods 21, 597–608 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, Z. & Jaenisch, R. At most three ES cells contribute to the somatic lineages of chimeric mice and of mice produced by ES-tetraploid complementation. Dev. Biol. 275, 192–201 (2004).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lawson, K. A., Meneses, J. J. & Pedersen, R. A. Clonal analysis of epiblast fate during germ layer formation in the mouse embryo. Development 113, 891–911 (1991).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Patel, S. H. et al. Lifelong multilineage contribution by embryonic-born blood progenitors. Nature 606, 747–753 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • van Dijk, D. et al. Recovering gene interactions from single-cell data using data diffusion. Cell 174, 716–729 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Setty, M. et al. Characterization of cell fate probabilities in single-cell data with Palantir. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 451–460 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gulati, G. S. et al. Single-cell transcriptional diversity is a hallmark of developmental potential. Science 367, 405–411 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Haber, A. L. et al. A single-cell survey of the small intestinal epithelium. Nature 551, 333–339 (2017).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fazilaty, H. et al. Tracing colonic embryonic transcriptional profiles and their reactivation upon intestinal damage. Cell Rep. 36, 109484 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cañellas-Socias, A. et al. Metastatic recurrence in colorectal cancer arises from residual EMP1(+) cells. Nature 611, 603–613 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liu, Y. et al. Comparative molecular analysis of gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas. Cancer Cell 33, 721–735 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Muyas, F. et al. De novo detection of somatic mutations in high-throughput single-cell profiling data sets. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 758–767 (2024).

  • Dou, J. et al. Single-nucleotide variant calling in single-cell sequencing data with Monopogen. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 803–812 (2023).

  • Tukiainen, T. et al. Landscape of X chromosome inactivation across human tissues. Nature 550, 244–248 (2017).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wu, T. et al. clusterProfiler 4.0: a universal enrichment tool for interpreting omics data. Innovation (Camb.) 2, 100141 (2021).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • [ad_2]

    Source link