Tag: gear

  • Best Galaxy S24 Cases (2024): Screen Protectors, Chargers, and More

    Best Galaxy S24 Cases (2024): Screen Protectors, Chargers, and More

    [ad_1]

    You’ll inevitably drop your smartphone. Once at a theater, my Galaxy Note slipped out of my pocket and fell onto the seat’s metal frame, crushing the side button so that the phone kept trying to activate Bixby, Samsung’s voice assistant. The phone was very hot by the end of the movie. A case might have prevented any damage … or not.

    A case isn’t a guaranteed form of protection from drops, but it could help, especially if you pair it with a good screen protector. I’ve tested more than 50 cases and screen protectors for Samsung’s Galaxy S24, S24+, and S24 Ultra smartphones to find the best that offers comprehensive defense at reasonable prices. You’ll also find a few handy-dandy accessories to round out your new phone. Going with last year’s model instead? We’ve got a roundup of cases for the Galaxy S23 series too.

    Special offer for Gear readers: Get WIRED for just $5 ($25 off). This includes unlimited access to WIRED.com, full Gear coverage, and subscriber-only newsletters. Subscriptions help fund the work we do every day.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Tesla Wins EV Charging: All Car Companies Using NACS

    Tesla Wins EV Charging: All Car Companies Using NACS

    [ad_1]

    A big pain point for electric vehicle owners could soon sting less, thanks to an announcement from the Jeep-, Ram-, and Chrysler-maker Stellantis—one of Detroit’s Big Three automakers.

    This week, the company said that it would add the Tesla-designed charging connection system, called the North American Charging Standard, or NACS, to its electric vehicles by 2025.

    In most cases, the new connector will supplement an older one called the Combined Charging System, or CCS, and an even older one, called CHAdeMO. Those were designed by a group of professional engineers, but they tended to be slower, clunkier, and in many cases harder to get into the ground than the Tesla competitor.

    Stellantis was the final domino to fall before Tesla’s connector could declare victory in North America. Ford said it would add the newer connector to its electric vehicles in May. Since then, General Motors, ​​Mercedes-Benz, Nissan, Honda, the Hyundai Group, Toyota, BMW, Volkswagen, and others have followed. In fact, only a handful of electric startups are still holding out.

    The upshot: By 2025, many more vehicles will be able to use many of the same stations to charge.

    Surveys suggest that today’s American electric vehicle owners, a relatively tolerant first adopter lot, are often frustrated with the public charging experience. Chargers with broken plugs, wonky payment systems, and software incompatible with the cars they’re trying to charge—all are common on public roads.

    Tesla chargers

    Tesla’s North American Charging Standard has now been adopted by GM, ​​Mercedes, Nissan, Honda, Hyundai, Toyota, BMW, Volkswagen and more.

    Courtesy of Tesla

    Tracking down the right public charging station is “a weird mental hurdle for people,” says Joseph Yoon, a consumer insights analyst at the auto research firm Edmunds. “Did you have to Google where the nearest gas station was?”

    For those reasons, the mess of acronyms and standards feels like EV esoterica, but could be a make-or-break factor in the electric transition. Now, finally, the US has reached some charging standardization, in the same way that Europe and China have. (Not surprisingly, those places are further ahead in electric vehicle adoption.) The change could help convince more potential EV drivers that electric is both better and not that different from what they’re used to in a gas-powered car.

    For Tesla, the dominance of its charging standard (which it cleverly renamed in 2022) is a big win. It is, symbolically, an acknowledgement from other automakers that its Supercharger network is both the widest ranging and most reliable in the US. It is also a tacit acknowledgement that the more compact design of NACS is superior.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • BMW CE 02 E-Motorbike 2024 Review: Price, Specs, Availability

    BMW CE 02 E-Motorbike 2024 Review: Price, Specs, Availability

    [ad_1]

    With this Tron Light Cycle and skateboard mashup, BMW is back with the CE 02—its next future-facing electric super scooter.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Apple Beats an Apple Watch Lawsuit

    Apple Beats an Apple Watch Lawsuit

    [ad_1]

    In recent months, Apple has grappled with a series of lawsuits concerning the fate of its popular Apple Watch line. But this week, the company had a victory. As reported by Reuters, a federal judge ruled in Apple’s favor and dismissed an antitrust lawsuit that claimed that Apple had illegally monopolized the United States market on heart rate apps for the Apple Watch.

    AliveCor, a medical device and AI company, filed the lawsuit in 2021. It claimed that Apple had abused its market power by injuring competition and engaging in “predatory” and “exclusionary” conduct related to the Apple Watch’s electrocardiogram (ECG) technology. The judge’s reasoning is currently not available due to confidentiality concerns, but the decision should be released at some point.

    This is a separate lawsuit from the one filed by the medical tech company Masimo. As we previously reported, the US International Trade Commission (ITC) barred Apple from selling the Series 9 and Watch Ultra 2 due to a patent infringement claim concerning the technology in the watch’s blood oxygen sensor. Apple appealed and was granted a temporary stay, but in January 2024, the US Court of Appeals declined to extend the stay further.

    For the past few months, the company has been grappling with last-minute workarounds to avoid breaking the law. Since the ban only applies to Apple directly, you can still buy the watches with the blood oxygen sensor intact from other retailers for as long as supplies are available; otherwise, Apple has disabled the sensor and started shipping modified watches earlier this year.

    In a statement to 9to5Mac, AliveCor noted that it plans to appeal the ruling. The company also notes that it still has another, entirely separate, ongoing suit regarding the ECG sensor that will be reviewed in upcoming months. In 2015, the company showed Apple its ECG sensor with the intention of future collaboration; then in 2018, Apple launched its own ECG sensor. The ITC ruled that Apple infringed on AliveCor’s technology. That case never resulted in a ban.

    This week’s decision was a setback for smaller companies hoping to take on the tech giant. The good news for Apple Watch owners, though, is that their devices won’t lose any functionality, as they did as a result of the Masimo dispute.(And even then, if the blood oxygen sensor doesn’t matter to you, then the more affordable Watch SE never had that capability in the first place.) We will continue to update our Best Apple Watches guide with the best guidance we have at the time.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Epsilon W35 Xi speaker: specs, price, availability

    Epsilon W35 Xi speaker: specs, price, availability

    [ad_1]

    Hail the orb! High-end French audio hardware manufacturer Elipson has a brand-new Death Star-esque orboid speaker worthy of worrying any self-respecting Alderaanian. It is called the W35 Xi.

    At £699 ($876) it’s a pricey boombox but not far off from similar speakers made by other premium audio companies. (It’s even slightly cheaper than Sonos’ standout soundbar.)

    This thing does look like the Death Star, or perhaps Starkiller Base even more so—though discerning viewers will also recognize hints of an orb-of-Saruman-Palantír chic. This dark dome can sit directly on a shelf or table or be mounted on a wall. Tor an additional £149 ($187), the speaker can be propped up on a matching black tripod for a more War-of-the-Worlds-invader vibe. (And here you thought we couldn’t fit in any more movie references.)

    Inside the W35 Xi is a beefy 300-watt amplifier that’s sure to rattle your rafters. The speaker boasts aptX HD Bluetooth and works with Chromecast and AirPlay 2. It has digital (S/PDIF optical) and analog wired inputs, with an RJ45 socket or 3.5-mm aux port if need be.

    It’s capable of high-quality audio playback from your phone, tablet, or laptop, as lossless files can be accommodated up to 24 bits/192 kHz. But like a Sonos system, you’ll need the associated Elipson Connect App to control your playback properly and to alternate between music services like Spotify and Tidal.

    We haven’t heard it yet, but Epsilon is claiming the W35 Xi, an evolution of the company’s W35 multiroom stereo speaker from 2020, has super-deep bass and remarkably precise mid-high frequencies, with stereo sound thanks to the arrangement of speakers and tweeters on each side. If you splurge on two W35 Xis, however, you can create a more impressive stereo image by dedicating one audio channel to each speaker. Perfect for listening to Figrin D’an and the Modal Nodes’ Dune Sea Special, perhaps reliving the last time you saw them live on Tatooine in Chalmun’s Spaceport Cantina.

    Interestingly, continuing the space connection, Epsilon actually has a Planet range of speakers, but it was in 1958 that the brand released the classic spherical BS 50. You can buy an updated version of it today for the not inconsiderable sum of €5,580 (that’s just shy of $6,000).

    The W35 Xi is available for purchase now, though it is only in the UK at the moment.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Tesla Has Lost Its Range Crown to a Chinese EV You’ve Never Heard Of

    Tesla Has Lost Its Range Crown to a Chinese EV You’ve Never Heard Of

    [ad_1]

    There were a good few other poor results for car brands independently tested at the winter El Prix 2024. Let’s look at the losses in terms of percentage. This way, we can see more clearly how a car has fallen short of its WLTP range, and not be distracted by the EVs with the biggest batteries going furthest.

    It’s also worth remembering that every car in the Norwegian Automobile Association test had its cabin set to 21°C (69.8°F). What’s more, to ensure fairness, the temperature was set using a thermometer, not the vehicle’s own climate control system, since two cars may have differing ideas of what 21°C actually is.

    The HiPhi Z fell short of its WLTP range by just 5.9 percent, making it the winner by this metric, too. The Tesla Model 3, meanwhile, missed its advertised range by just shy of 30 percent, putting it in 19th place.

    Polestar, VW and Volvo Were Surprise Losers

    Interestingly, the four cars that performed even worse than Tesla were the Polestar 2 Long Range (30 percent, a 115-mile deficit on the WLTP figure), Volvo C40 (30.9 percent, 110 miles), Toyota bZ4X (31.8 percent, 91 miles) and the Volkswagen ID.7 (31.9 percent, 121 miles). Put simply, the range of these cars fell by almost a third compared to their WLTP-backed manufacturer claim.

    The WLTP stands for Worldwide Harmonized Light Vehicle Test Procedure. Brought in as a global standard in 2017, it is intended to mimic how cars are driven in the real world. The test cycle includes four parts, each with a different average speed, and all featuring a variety of acceleration and braking phases, plus stops and starts.

    The El Prix winter range test also scrutinizes energy efficiency, in this case using the European metric of kWh per 100 km (62 miles). The highest efficiency was achieved by the MG4 Trophy Long Range (17.9 kWH per 100 km), but because this test focuses on how cars perform compared to their manufacturer claims, the winner is the Nio EL6, which hit 20 kWh per 100 km—a 9.5 percent improvement on the manufacturer claim. Although undeniably efficient, the MG fell 8.5 percent short of its maker’s range claim.

    The Model 3 returned 18 kWh per 100km, but since Tesla doesn’t publish a claimed efficiency this is tricky to contextualize. The HiPhi Z recorded energy consumption of 23.5 kWh per 100km, 15.2 percent higher than claimed.

    Drawing conclusions from this test is, to say the least, a nuanced process. How much range an EV loses in cold weather is of little value to drivers in consistently warmer climes, and a car with a bigger battery (like the HiPhi Z and its massive 120 kWh pack) is almost always at an advantage. Similarly, a car that doesn’t go as far but charges more quickly is also beneficial, providing the local charge network is up to the job.

    But the positive and negative outliers are still worthy of your attention. The Polestar 2, Tesla Model 3, Volkswagen ID.7 and Volvo C40 all missed their WLTP range claims by more than 100 miles, and the Hyundai Ioniq 6—a car praised for its impressive 800-volt system architecture and a a drag coefficient of just 0.21—also struggled, with a 91-mile deficit. Whichever way you slice it, a car falling 100 miles short of its claimed range is far from ideal, and, as this test shows, not a universal phenomenon.

    Estimated Range Winners: HiPhi, BMW, Kia and Lotus

    At the other end of the scale, praise should be given not only to the HiPhi Z (its real-world range just 21 miles short of WLTP), but also the BMW i5 (38 miles short, or a 12.2 percent deviation), Kia EV9 (39 miles or 12.5 percent), Lotus Eletre (40 miles or 12.3 percent) and fellow Chinese newcomer, the XPeng G9 (42 miles or 13.1 percent).

    The next step is to surely question whether tests like the WLTP—plus the generally stricter EPA in North America and rather more generous CLTC in China—are up to the job. Nils Sødal from the Norwegian Automobile Association told WIRED: “The test results show us that we need a winter WLTP for EVs. We have suggested an official WLTP in -7°C [19.4°F]. Unfortunately, the EU is not following this up in the negotiations on Euro 7.” Euro 7 is a collection of regulations that set a new emissions standard for new cars and vehicles sold in Europe.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The Apple Vision Pro’s Killer App Is … Kitchen Timers

    The Apple Vision Pro’s Killer App Is … Kitchen Timers

    [ad_1]

    It’s why you may see breathless takes about how a Vision Pro lets you pull up a “4K screen” without any reference to how big it is (the actual resolution of this virtual screen would depend on how large you make that display). But that doesn’t matter too much in person, because 60 ppd is not far off the visual acuity of the average person’s vision.

    Based on Apple’s 23 million pixel stat, our best bet is that the Vision Pro has a resolution of around 3280 x 3508 pixels per eye, or total resolution of an epic 6560 x 3508 pixels. That’s mega.

    You know what’s even more impressive? The Apple Vision Pro’s passthrough, the view of your actual surroundings, is not straight trash. GoPros are bad in low light. Mobile phone video is still 95 percent bad in low light. The Meta Quest 3’s passthrough is bad in any light, despite being the best Meta has made. The Vision Pro’s really is not, and the amount of smarts that go into this is likely staggering.

    The Vision Pro outer cameras have to provide 90 fps of image data. The more frames per second required, the harder time a camera will have in lower light. Sure, the passthrough isn’t going to look as good in your moodily lit living room as it does in Marques Brownlee’s clinical studio, but even Joanna Stern’s more relatable kitchen footage isn’t too bad.

    Apple’s engineers deserve all the praise they can get—achieving this stuff even with DSLRs strapped to the front of Vision Pro would be tough enough.

    Fun Is for the Competition, Says Tim

    In classic Apple fashion, however, the company has not embraced the fun with Vision Pro. It is so desperate to convince us that this headset bears almost no relation to “VR headsets” like the Meta Quest 3 and Quest Pro, we’re robbed of big parts of the experience of what is, and should be, the best VR headset ever made.

    There are no announcements of the amazing VR gaming titles made for Quest 3 or PSVR 2 yet, and there’s not even a Netflix app. “Our members will be able to enjoy Netflix on the web browser on the Vision Pro, similar to how they watch Netflix on Macs,” a Netflix spokesperson told us.

    Then there’s Apple’s obsession with prestige hardware. Aluminum, magnesium alloy, and glass are the core materials here, leading to up to 26 percent more weight than a Meta Quest 3. And that doesn’t count the cabled 300-plus-gram battery you’re meant to stash in your back pocket that Apple really doesn’t want you to think about before you hit the checkout.

    It’s as if Apple wants us to believe this hardware is timeless, not something that will seem worthy of a tech heritage museum in five years or so.

    People do actually perform fitness activities with Meta Quest strapped in. But John Gruber of Daring Fireball says it’s a no-go for Vision Pro. “There is no fitness-related marketing angle for Vision Pro,” he wrote. “It’s simply too heavy. No one wants to exert themselves with a 650g device strapped to their face. Someday Apple will make a fitness-suitable Vision headset; this Vision Pro is not it.”

    What are we left with? Apple’s vision for Vision Pro is a narrow, prescriptive one, because it wants us to take its specific leaps forward as a sign of a break from, rather than a continuation of, current VR hardware. That makes sense when Meta is losing billions from its VR division. But it’s still not clear whether there’s enough here to break through the crust of enthused, well-heeled Apple-fan glassholes and into the homes of normal folks.

    But, hey, it’s only a gen-one. And do we still want one? Absolutely, like nothing else in tech right now. How else are we going to keep tabs on our rehydrating pasta?

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Why Is There Lead in Stanley Cups or Other Reusable Water Bottles?

    Why Is There Lead in Stanley Cups or Other Reusable Water Bottles?

    [ad_1]

    You can see the pellet that Stanley refers to at the bottom of your drink container. It seals those layers together where they all meet at the bottom of the bottle, in a process called lead soldering. Technically, the vessel does contain lead, but it’s enclosed with stainless steel and should never come in contact with your drink or skin. However, should you drop the water bottle, or if it otherwise gets damaged, and this piece of steel comes loose, there’s a chance the lead can be exposed to your skin.

    Lead is a naturally occurring toxic metal. The World Health Organization (WHO) cites that there is no safe level of lead exposure. “Once lead enters the body, it is distributed to organs such as the brain, kidneys, liver, and bones.” High levels of lead exposure can be fatal. With lower levels of exposure—which can happen with a microscopic amount—lead poisoning in adults can cause nerve disorders, decreased kidney function, and fertility issues. In children, it can cause developmental delays and seizures. The WHO says children are “particularly vulnerable to lead poisoning because they absorb four to five times as much ingested lead as adults.”

    “Lead is ubiquitous in the environment, so low levels of daily exposure are a fact of life,” says Jane Houlihan, national director of science and health at Healthy Babies Bright Futures. “Exposures and risks add up day to day from lead in food, water, house dust, and soil. This makes it all the more important for companies to keep lead out of consumer products. Children don’t need another potential source of lead in their lives.”

    What Do Other Brands Use?

    Lead soldering is low-cost and easy to use. However, alternative methods are available. Several of the reusable water bottle companies we reached out to do not use lead in their manufacturing process. Here’s the list:

    • Owala, which makes popular bottles like the FreeSip and a Stanley-dupe tumbler, says it has never used lead in its manufacturing process. “The production of vacuum-sealed containers using lead-free solder is more costly and complicated. However, we made a commitment from day one with Owala to use lead-free solder on our bottles,” an Owala spokesperson says.
    • Hydro Flask, another internet-famous water bottle company, stopped using lead solder more than 10 years ago. “By mid-2013, the lead was out of the Hydro Flask production process because the brand designed a proprietary sealant, TempShield,” a Hydro Flask spokesperson says.
    • Klean Kanteen also forgoes lead, instead using a noncrystalline silica bead to create its vacuum-insulated bottles. “The process, using silica instead of lead, is the same except higher heat is required to melt the silica,” says Rich Haver, the company’s director of global operations. While some forms of silica can be dangerous if very fine particles are inhaled—sand is made from crystalline silica, so even finer than that—this doesn’t apply to noncrystalline silica glass. “Silica in its noncrystalline form does not have the same respiratory health properties as crystalline silica,” says Marty Cohen, a teaching professor in the Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences at the University of Washington.
    • MiiR is the only company, of the ones we contacted, to use lead in its manufacturing process. According to its website, “This pellet does contain lead for manufacturing efficiency, waste reduction, and to ensure a complete seal. For these reasons and because there is zero lead exposure, MiiR utilizes this process with confidence.”

    The following companies did not respond to our requests for comment: Yeti, S’well, HydroJug, Greens Steel, and LifeStraw. (Sigg responded but has not given us an answer yet; we’ll update this story when they do.)

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Ford Is Giving Away Free Tesla Charger Converters That Will Unlock a New World of EV Power

    Ford Is Giving Away Free Tesla Charger Converters That Will Unlock a New World of EV Power

    [ad_1]

    Ford CEO Jim Farley hopped on Elon Musk’s X today to make an announcement relevant to Elon Musk’s Tesla: Ford will be giving away adapters so that its electric vehicles can easily charge on Tesla’s charging network. “We want to make charging more convenient for our Ford EV owners,” Farley wrote.

    The announcement underscored the importance of charging to the Detroit automaker’s electric vehicle strategy—and the degree to which Tesla has dominated public charging in the United States.

    Ford’s public North American charging network is made up of some 106,000 chargers. Drivers of Ford’s Mustang Mach-E and F-150 Lightning pickup will now have access to double the number of fast charge points, Ford says. US and Canadian owners of Mustangs and Lightnings from model year 2021 through 2024 will be able to reserve their adapters this spring. (The automaker said it had no news to share about adapters for customers outside of the US and Canada.)

    Ford announced last year that its electric vehicles would come with Tesla-compatible charging ports by 2025. With almost 6,000 charging stations globally, Tesla’s network is one of the most developed and reliable in the world. A survey from the analytics and research firm JD Power found that 21 percent of US electric vehicle owners who attempted to charge at a public station in the beginning of last year were unable to complete their charging session. However, the same statistic for Tesla owners was just 4 percent.

    The announcement means greater convenience for electric vehicle owners. Car buyers often cite “range anxiety” as the number one reason they haven’t gone electric. More public chargers could help ease the transition for drivers accustomed to seeing gas stations every few blocks.

    It’s also vindication for Tesla’s charging strategy. For years, most global automakers defaulted to the Combined Charging Standard, a connector-and-port design created by a committee of professionals. Tesla and its charging network was the outlier. But in 2022, the electric carmaker opened up the design and specifications for its charging ports, and in a fortuitous bit of marketing renamed it the North American Charging Standard. By the next year, Ford became the first automaker to announce it would switch to Tesla’s charger design. Almost every other car manufacturer—including BMW, General Motors, Honda, Kia, Rivian, and Toyota—has followed.

    Tesla said last year it would install CCS ports on at least 7,500 of its chargers by the end of 2024, opening its network up to even those electric drivers without Tesla-compatible cars or adapters.

    Last week, on a call with investors, Tesla executives warned that the electric carmaker’s explosive growth would slow in 2024 as it gears up for the launch of a cheaper “next generation” car in 2025. (The Chinese automaker BYD overtook Tesla as the top seller of battery electric vehicles late last year.) But charging was a possible bright spot. Pay-per-use charging, especially for fleets, could become a “meaningful driver of profit generation” in the years to come, the company wrote in financial filing.



    [ad_2]

    Source link