McCabe, E. R. B. Translational genomics in medical genetics. Genet. Med. 4, 468–471 (2002).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Zeggini, E., Gloyn, A. L., Barton, A. C. & Wain, L. V. Translational genomics and precision medicine: moving from the lab to the clinic. Science 365, 1409–1413 (2019).
Article
ADS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Salentijn, E. M. J. et al. Plant translational genomics: from model species to crops. Mol. Breed. 20, 1–13 (2007).
Article
Google Scholar
Cannon, S. B., May, G. D. & Jackson, S. A. Three sequenced legume genomes and many crop species: rich opportunities for translational genomics. Plant Physiol. 151, 970–977 (2009).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Ronald, P. C. Lab to farm: applying research on plant genetics and genomics to crop improvement. PLoS Biol. 12, e1001878 (2014).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Sun, Y., Shang, L., Zhu, Q.-H., Fan, L. & Guo, L. Twenty years of plant genome sequencing: achievements and challenges. Trends Plant Sci. 27, 391–401 (2022).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bennetzen, J. L. & Ma, J. The genetic colinearity of rice and other cereals on the basis of genomic sequence analysis. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 6, 128–133 (2003).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Carlson, E. A. H. J. Muller’s contributions to mutation research. Mutat. Res. 752, 1–5 (2013).
Article
ADS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Simmonds, N. W. Bandwagons I Have Known. Tropical Agriculture Association Newsletter December 1991, 7–10 (Tropical Agriculture Association International, 1991).
Davey, J. W. et al. Genome-wide genetic marker discovery and genotyping using next-generation sequencing. Nat. Rev. Genet. 12, 499–510 (2011).
Article
ADS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Schneeberger, K. et al. SHOREmap: simultaneous mapping and mutation identification by deep sequencing. Nat. Methods 6, 550–551 (2009).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Yu, J. et al. A unified mixed-model method for association mapping that accounts for multiple levels of relatedness. Nat. Genet. 38, 203–208 (2006).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Rhie, A. et al. Towards complete and error-free genome assemblies of all vertebrate species. Nature 592, 737–746 (2021).
Article
ADS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Alkan, C., Coe, B. P. & Eichler, E. E. Genome structural variation discovery and genotyping. Nat. Rev. Genet. 12, 363–376 (2011).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Ho, S. S., Urban, A. E. & Mills, R. E. Structural variation in the sequencing era. Nat. Rev. Genet. 21, 171–189 (2020).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Lei, L. et al. Plant pan-genomics comes of age. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 72, 411–435 (2021).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Orlando, L. et al. Ancient DNA analysis. Nat. Rev. Methods Primers 1, 14 (2021).
Article
Google Scholar
Tanksley, S. D., Young, N. D., Paterson, A. H. & Bonierbale, M. W. RFLP mapping in plant breeding: new tools for an old science. Bio/Technology 7, 257–264 (1989).
Google Scholar
Rafalski, J. A. Association genetics in crop improvement. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 13, 174–180 (2010).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bernardo, R. Bandwagons I, too, have known. Theor. Appl. Genet. 129, 2323–2332 (2016).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Holland, J. B. Genetic architecture of complex traits in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 10, 156–161 (2007).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Korte, A. & Farlow, A. The advantages and limitations of trait analysis with GWAS: a review. Plant Methods 9, 29 (2013).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Distelfeld, A., Li, C. & Dubcovsky, J. Regulation of flowering in temperate cereals. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 12, 178–184 (2009).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Comadran, J. et al. Natural variation in a homolog of Antirrhinum CENTRORADIALIS contributed to spring growth habit and environmental adaptation in cultivated barley. Nat. Genet. 44, 1388–1392 (2012).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Cheng, S. et al. Harnessing landrace diversity empowers wheat breeding. Nature 632, 823–831 (2024).
Wulff, B. B. & Krattinger, S. G. The long road to engineering durable disease resistance in wheat. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 73, 270–275 (2022).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Athiyannan, N. et al. Long-read genome sequencing of bread wheat facilitates disease resistance gene cloning. Nat. Genet. 54, 227–231 (2022). A good example of how the recent progress in genome sequencing has made gene isolation easier.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Meuwissen, T. H., Hayes, B. J. & Goddard, M. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157, 1819–1829 (2001).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Lin, Z., Hayes, B. J. & Daetwyler, H. D. Genomic selection in crops, trees and forages: a review. Crop Pasture Sci. 65, 1177–1191 (2014).
Article
Google Scholar
Rembe, M., Zhao, Y., Jiang, Y. & Reif, J. C. Reciprocal recurrent genomic selection: an attractive tool to leverage hybrid wheat breeding. Theor. Appl. Genet. 132, 687–698 (2019).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Poland, J. & Rutkoski, J. Advances and challenges in genomic selection for disease resistance. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 54, 79–98 (2016).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Zhou, Y. et al. Graph pangenome captures missing heritability and empowers tomato breeding. Nature 606, 527–534 (2022). Structural variants derived from pangenomes improve the accuracy of quantitative genetic analyses.
Article
ADS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Jensen, S. E. et al. A sorghum practical haplotype graph facilitates genome-wide imputation and cost-effective genomic prediction. Plant Genome 13, e20009 (2020).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Seyum, E. G. et al. Genomic selection in tropical perennial crops and plantation trees: a review. Mol. Breed. 42, 58 (2022).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Wolfe, M. D. et al. Prospects for genomic selection in cassava breeding. Plant Genome 10, https://doi.org/10.3835/plantgenome2017.03.0015 (2017).
Flor, H. H. Current status of the gene-for-gene concept. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 9, 275–296 (1971).
Article
Google Scholar
Tamborski, J. & Krasileva, K. V. Evolution of plant NLRs: from natural history to precise modifications. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 71, 355–378 (2020).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Barragan, A. C. & Weigel, D. Plant NLR diversity: the known unknowns of pan-NLRomes. Plant Cell 33, 814–831 (2021).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Moore, J. W. et al. A recently evolved hexose transporter variant confers resistance to multiple pathogens in wheat. Nat. Genet. 47, 1494–1498 (2015).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Krattinger, S. G. et al. A putative ABC transporter confers durable resistance to multiple fungal pathogens in wheat. Science 323, 1360–1363 (2009).
Article
ADS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Ercoli, M. F. et al. Plant immunity: rice XA21-mediated resistance to bacterial infection. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2121568119 (2022).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Jupe, F. et al. Resistance gene enrichment sequencing (RenSeq) enables reannotation of the NB-LRR gene family from sequenced plant genomes and rapid mapping of resistance loci in segregating populations. Plant J. 76, 530–544 (2013).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Hafeez, A. N. et al. Creation and judicious application of a wheat resistance gene atlas. Mol. Plant 14, 1053–1070 (2021).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Guo, Y. et al. Population genomics of Puccinia graminis f.sp. tritici highlights the role of admixture in the origin of virulent wheat rust races. Nat. Commun. 13, 6287 (2022).
Article
ADS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Seong, K. & Krasileva, K. V. Prediction of effector protein structures from fungal phytopathogens enables evolutionary analyses. Nat. Microbiol. 8, 174–187 (2023).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Förderer, A. et al. A wheat resistosome defines common principles of immune receptor channels. Nature 610, 532–539 (2022).
Article
ADS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Zhao, Y.-B. et al. Pathogen effector AvrSr35 triggers Sr35 resistosome assembly via a direct recognition mechanism. Sci. Adv. 8, eabq5108 (2022).
Article
ADS
MathSciNet
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Ma, S. et al. Direct pathogen-induced assembly of an NLR immune receptor complex to form a holoenzyme. Science 370, eabe3069 (2020).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).
Article
ADS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Frankel, O. H. Genetic conservation: our evolutionary responsibility. Genetics 78, 53–65 (1974).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Altieri, M. A. & Merrick, L. In situ conservation of crop genetic resources through maintenance of traditional farming systems. Econ. Bot. 41, 86–96 (1987).
Article
Google Scholar
Meilleur, B. A. & Hodgkin, T. In situ conservation of crop wild relatives: status and trends. Biodivers. Conserv. 13, 663–684 (2004).
Article
Google Scholar
Marden, E., Sackville Hamilton, R., Halewood, M. & McCouch, S. International agreements and the plant genetics research community: a guide to practice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2205773119 (2023).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Mascher, M. et al. Genebank genomics bridges the gap between the conservation of crop diversity and plant breeding. Nat. Genet. 51, 1076–1081 (2019).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Sansaloni, C. et al. Diversity analysis of 80,000 wheat accessions reveals consequences and opportunities of selection footprints. Nat. Commun. 11, 4572 (2020).
Article
ADS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Schulthess, A. W. et al. Genomics-informed prebreeding unlocks the diversity in genebanks for wheat improvement. Nat. Genet. 54, 1544–1552 (2022). Genomics helps to bridge the gap between the conservation of plant genetic resources and practical breeding.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Milner, S. G. et al. Genebank genomics highlights the diversity of a global barley collection. Nat. Genet. 51, 319–326 (2019).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Romay, M. C. et al. Comprehensive genotyping of the USA national maize inbred seed bank. Genome Biol. 14, R55 (2013).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Wang, W. et al. Genomic variation in 3,010 diverse accessions of Asian cultivated rice. Nature 557, 43–49 (2018).
Article
ADS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
McCouch, S. R., McNally, K. L., Wang, W. & Sackville Hamilton, R. Genomics of gene banks: a case study in rice. Am. J. Bot. 99, 407–423 (2012).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
De Beukelaer, H., Davenport, G. F. & Fack, V. Core Hunter 3: flexible core subset selection. BMC Bioinformatics 19, 203 (2018).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Yu, X. et al. Genomic prediction contributing to a promising global strategy to turbocharge gene banks. Nat. Plants 2, 16150 (2016).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bhullar, N. K., Street, K., Mackay, M., Yahiaoui, N. & Keller, B. Unlocking wheat genetic resources for the molecular identification of previously undescribed functional alleles at the Pm3 resistance locus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 9519–9524 (2009).
Article
ADS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Milne, R. J. et al. The wheat Lr67 gene from the Sugar Transport Protein 13 family confers multipathogen resistance in barley. Plant Physiol. 179, 1285–1297 (2019).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Risk, J. M. et al. The wheat Lr34 gene provides resistance against multiple fungal pathogens in barley. Plant Biotechnol. J. 11, 847–854 (2013).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Luo, M. et al. A five-transgene cassette confers broad-spectrum resistance to a fungal rust pathogen in wheat. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 561–566 (2021).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Wulff, B. B. & Moscou, M. J. Strategies for transferring resistance into wheat: from wide crosses to GM cassettes. Frontiers Plant Sci. 5, 692 (2014).
Article
Google Scholar
Athiyannan, N. et al. Long-read genome sequencing of bread wheat facilitates disease resistance gene cloning. Nat. Genet. 54, 227–231 (2022).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Wang, Y. et al. An unusual tandem kinase fusion protein confers leaf rust resistance in wheat. Nat. Genet. 55, 914–920 (2023).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Cavalet-Giorsa, E. et al. Origin and evolution of the bread wheat D genome. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07808-z (2024).
Cardi, T. et al. CRISPR/Cas-mediated plant genome editing: outstanding challenges a decade after implementation. Trends Plant Sci. 28, 1144–1165 (2023).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Watson, A. et al. Speed breeding is a powerful tool to accelerate crop research and breeding. Nat. Plants 4, 23–29 (2018).
Article
ADS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Cha, J.-K. et al. Speed vernalization to accelerate generation advance in winter cereal crops. Mol. Plant 15, 1300–1309 (2022).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Mascher, M. et al. A chromosome conformation capture ordered sequence of the barley genome. Nature 544, 427–433 (2017).
Article
ADS
PubMed
Google Scholar
The International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium. Shifting the limits in wheat research and breeding using a fully annotated reference genome. Science 361, eaar7191 (2018). In the past, large international consortia were needed to assemble reference sequences of large crop genomes.
Article
Google Scholar
Jayakodi, M. et al. The barley pan-genome reveals the hidden legacy of mutation breeding. Nature 588, 284–289 (2020).
Article
ADS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Zhou, Y. et al. Pan-genome inversion index reveals evolutionary insights into the subpopulation structure of Asian rice. Nat. Commun. 14, 1567 (2023).
Article
ADS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Przewieslik-Allen, A. M. et al. The role of gene flow and chromosomal instability in shaping the bread wheat genome. Nat. Plants 7, 172–183 (2021).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
van Rengs, W. M. J. et al. A chromosome scale tomato genome built from complementary PacBio and Nanopore sequences alone reveals extensive linkage drag during breeding. Plant J. 110, 572–588 (2022).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Wendler, N. et al. Bulbosum to go: a toolbox to utilize Hordeum vulgare/bulbosum introgressions for breeding and beyond. Mol. Plant 8, 1507–1519 (2015).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Mieulet, D. et al. Unleashing meiotic crossovers in crops. Nat. Plants 4, 1010–1016 (2018). Single genes can have large effects on the recombination landscape.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Rönspies, M., Dorn, A., Schindele, P. & Puchta, H. CRISPR–Cas-mediated chromosome engineering for crop improvement and synthetic biology. Nat. Plants 7, 566–573 (2021).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Schmidt, C. et al. Changing local recombination patterns in Arabidopsis by CRISPR/Cas mediated chromosome engineering. Nat. Commun. 11, 4418 (2020).
Article
ADS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Schwartz, C. et al. CRISPR–Cas9-mediated 75.5-Mb inversion in maize. Nat. Plants 6, 1427–1431 (2020).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bartlett, M. E., Moyers, B. T., Man, J., Subramaniam, B. & Makunga, N. P. The power and perils of de novo domestication using genome editing. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 74, 727–750 (2023).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Yu, H. & Li, J. Breeding future crops to feed the world through de novo domestication. Nat. Commun. 13, 1171 (2022).
Article
ADS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Hanak, T., Madsen, C. K. & Brinch-Pedersen, H. Genome editing-accelerated re-domestication (GEaReD)—a new major direction in plant breeding. Biotechnol. J. 17, 2100545 (2022).
Article
Google Scholar
Zhang, S. et al. Sustained productivity and agronomic potential of perennial rice. Nat. Sust. 6, 28–38 (2023).
Article
Google Scholar
Singh, D., Buhmann, A. K., Flowers, T. J., Seal, C. E. & Papenbrock, J. Salicornia as a crop plant in temperate regions: selection of genetically characterized ecotypes and optimization of their cultivation conditions. AoB Plants 6, plu071 (2014).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Lenser, T. & Theißen, G. Molecular mechanisms involved in convergent crop domestication. Trends Plant Sci. 18, 704–714 (2013).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Larson, S. et al. Genome mapping of quantitative trait loci (QTL) controlling domestication traits of intermediate wheatgrass (Thinopyrum intermedium). Theor. Appl. Genet. 132, 2325–2351 (2019).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Stetter, M. G., Gates, D. J., Mei, W. & Ross-Ibarra, J. How to make a domesticate. Curr. Biol. 27, R896–R900 (2017).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Abbo, S. et al. Plant domestication versus crop evolution: a conceptual framework for cereals and grain legumes. Trends Plant Sci. 19, 351–360 (2014).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Fuller, D. Q. Contrasting patterns in crop domestication and domestication rates: recent archaeobotanical insights from the Old World. Ann. Bot. 100, 903–924 (2007).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Lemmon, Z. H. et al. Rapid improvement of domestication traits in an orphan crop by genome editing. Nat. Plants 4, 766–770 (2018). Agronomically relevant traits in a minor crop were improved by targeted mutagenesis.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Li, T. et al. Domestication of wild tomato is accelerated by genome editing. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 1160–1163 (2018).
Article
Google Scholar
Fernie, A. R. & Yan, J. De novo domestication: an alternative route toward new crops for the future. Mol. Plant 12, 615–631 (2019).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bevan, M. W. et al. Genomic innovation for crop improvement. Nature 543, 346–354 (2017).
Article
ADS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Khoury, C. K. et al. Crop genetic erosion: understanding and responding to loss of crop diversity. New Phytol. 233, 84–118 (2022).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Brown, W. L. Genetic diversity and genetic vulnerability—an appraisal. Econ. Bot. 37, 4–12 (1983).
Article
Google Scholar
Mayer, M. et al. Discovery of beneficial haplotypes for complex traits in maize landraces. Nat. Commun. 11, 4954 (2020).
Article
ADS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Stephan, W. Genetic hitchhiking versus background selection: the controversy and its implications. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 365, 1245–1253 (2010).
Article
Google Scholar
Yang, J. et al. Incomplete dominance of deleterious alleles contributes substantially to trait variation and heterosis in maize. PLoS Genet. 13, e1007019 (2017).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Wang, L. et al. The interplay of demography and selection during maize domestication and expansion. Genome Biol. 18, 215 (2017).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Lozano, R. et al. Comparative evolutionary genetics of deleterious load in sorghum and maize. Nat. Plants 7, 17–24 (2021).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Liu, Q., Zhou, Y., Morrell, P. L. & Gaut, B. S. Deleterious variants in Asian rice and the potential cost of domestication. Mol. Biol. Evol. 34, 908–924 (2017).
PubMed
Google Scholar
Cingolani, P. et al. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly 6, 80–92 (2012).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Ng, P. C. & Henikoff, S. SIFT: predicting amino acid changes that affect protein function. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 3812–3814 (2003).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Khan, A. W. et al. Super-pangenome by Integrating the wild side of a species for accelerated crop improvement. Trends Plant Sci. 25, 148–158 (2019).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Gao, H. et al. The landscape of tolerated genetic variation in humans and primates. Science 380, eabn8153 (2023).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Ramstein, G. P. & Buckler, E. S. Prediction of evolutionary constraint by genomic annotations improves functional prioritization of genomic variants in maize. Genome Biol. 23, 183 (2022).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Wallace, J. G., Rodgers-Melnick, E. & Buckler, E. S. On the road to breeding 4.0: unraveling the good, the bad, and the boring of crop quantitative genomics. Annu. Rev. Genet. 52, 421–444 (2018).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Roze, D. A simple expression for the strength of selection on recombination generated by interference among mutations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2022805118 (2021).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Gabriel, W., Lynch, M. & Bürger, R. Muller’s ratchet and mutational meltdowns. Evolution 47, 1744–1757 (1993).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Naeem, M., Demirel, U., Yousaf, M. F., Caliskan, S. & Caliskan, M. E. Overview on domestication, breeding, genetic gain and improvement of tuber quality traits of potato using fast forwarding technique (GWAS): a review. Plant Breed. 140, 519–542 (2021).
Article
Google Scholar
Jansky, S. H. et al. Reinventing potato as a diploid inbred line–based crop. Crop Sci. 56, 1412–1422 (2016).
Article
Google Scholar
ter Steeg, E. M. S., Struik, P. C., Visser, R. G. F. & Lindhout, P. Crucial factors for the feasibility of commercial hybrid breeding in food crops. Nat. Plants 8, 463–473 (2022).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Zhou, Q. et al. Haplotype-resolved genome analyses of a heterozygous diploid potato. Nat. Genet. 52, 1018–1023 (2020).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Sun, H. et al. Chromosome-scale and haplotype-resolved genome assembly of a tetraploid potato cultivar. Nat. Genet. 54, 342–348 (2022).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Tang, D. et al. Genome evolution and diversity of wild and cultivated potatoes. Nature 606, 535–541 (2022). Initial analysis of a genus-wide pangenome of potato and its wild relatives.
Article
ADS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Zhang, C. et al. The genetic basis of inbreeding depression in potato. Nat. Genet. 51, 374–378 (2019).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Wu, Y. et al. Phylogenomic discovery of deleterious mutations facilitates hybrid potato breeding. Cell 186, 2313–2328.e2315 (2023).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Ye, M. et al. Generation of self-compatible diploid potato by knockout of S-RNase. Nat. Plants 4, 651–654 (2018).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Mascher, M., Jayakodi, M. & Stein, N. The reinvention of potato. Cell Res. 31, 1144–1145 (2021).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Servin, B., Martin, O. C., Mézard, M. & Hospital, F. Toward a theory of marker-assisted gene pyramiding. Genetics 168, 513–523 (2004).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Hurni, S. et al. The powdery mildew resistance gene Pm8 derived from rye is suppressed by its wheat ortholog Pm3. Plant J. 79, 904–913 (2014).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Cordell, H. J. Epistasis: what it means, what it doesn’t mean, and statistical methods to detect it in humans. Hum. Mol. Genet. 11, 2463–2468 (2002).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Soyk, S. et al. Bypassing negative epistasis on yield in tomato imposed by a domestication gene. Cell 169, 1142–1155.e1112 (2017).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Soyk, S., Benoit, M. & Lippman, Z. B. New horizons for dissecting epistasis in crop quantitative trait variation. Annu. Rev. Genet. 54, 287–307 (2020).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Jiang, Y., Schmidt, R. H., Zhao, Y. & Reif, J. C. A quantitative genetic framework highlights the role of epistatic effects for grain-yield heterosis in bread wheat. Nat. Genet. 49, 1741–1746 (2017).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bouché, F., Lobet, G., Tocquin, P. & Périlleux, C. FLOR-ID: an interactive database of flowering-time gene networks in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D1167–D1171 (2016).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Chen, D., Yan, W., Fu, L.-Y. & Kaufmann, K. Architecture of gene regulatory networks controlling flower development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat. Commun. 9, 4534 (2018).
Article
ADS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Ahsan, A. et al. Identification of epistasis loci underlying rice flowering time by controlling population stratification and polygenic effect. DNA Res. 26, 119–130 (2018).
Article
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Mathew, B., Léon, J., Sannemann, W. & Sillanpää, M. J. Detection of epistasis for flowering time using Bayesian multilocus estimation in a barley MAGIC population. Genetics 208, 525–536 (2018).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Durand, E. et al. Flowering time in maize: linkage and epistasis at a major effect locus. Genetics 190, 1547–1562 (2012).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Padmarasu, S., Himmelbach, A., Mascher, M. & Stein, N. In situ Hi-C for plants: an improved method to detect long-range chromatin interactions. Methods Mol. Biol. 1933, 441–472 (2019).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Liu, L. et al. Enhancing grain-yield-related traits by CRISPR–Cas9 promoter editing of maize CLE genes. Nat. Plants 7, 287–294 (2021).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Aguirre, L., Hendelman, A., Hutton, S. F., McCandlish, D. M. & Lippman, Z. B. Idiosyncratic and dose-dependent epistasis drives variation in tomato fruit size. Science 382, 315–320 (2023). On the molecular genetics of regulatory variation in tomato.
Article
ADS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Boyle, E. A., Li, Y. I. & Pritchard, J. K. An expanded view of complex traits: from polygenic to omnigenic. Cell 169, 1177–1186 (2017).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Zhao, L. et al. Integrative analysis of reference epigenomes in 20 rice varieties. Nat. Commun. 11, 2658 (2020).
Article
ADS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Han, T. et al. An epigenetic basis of inbreeding depression in maize. Sci. Adv. 7, eabg5442 (2021).
Article
ADS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Thiel, J. et al. Transcriptional landscapes of floral meristems in barley. Sci. Adv. 7, eabf0832 (2021).
Article
ADS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Zhang, T.-Q., Chen, Y., Liu, Y., Lin, W.-H. & Wang, J.-W. Single-cell transcriptome atlas and chromatin accessibility landscape reveal differentiation trajectories in the rice root. Nat. Commun. 12, 2053 (2021).
Article
ADS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Watt, M. et al. Phenotyping: new windows into the plant for breeders. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 71, 689–712 (2020).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Araus, J. L. et al. Crop phenotyping in a context of global change: what to measure and how to do it. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 64, 592–618 (2022).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Sweet, D. D., Tirado, S. B., Springer, N. M., Hirsch, C. N. & Hirsch, C. D. Opportunities and challenges in phenotyping row crops using drone-based RGB imaging. Plant Phenome J. 5, e20044 (2022).
Article
Google Scholar
Barker, J. et al. Development of a field-based high-throughput mobile phenotyping platform. Comput. Electron. Agric. 122, 74–85 (2016).
Article
Google Scholar
Araus, J. L. & Cairns, J. E. Field high-throughput phenotyping: the new crop breeding frontier. Trends Plant Sci. 19, 52–61 (2014).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Heuermann, M. C., Knoch, D., Junker, A. & Altmann, T. Natural plant growth and development achieved in the IPK PhenoSphere by dynamic environment simulation. Nat. Commun. 14, 5783 (2023).
Article
ADS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Perez de Souza, L., Alseekh, S., Scossa, F. & Fernie, A. R. Ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography high-resolution mass spectrometry variants for metabolomics research. Nat. Methods 18, 733–746 (2021).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Dubin, M. J. et al. DNA methylation in Arabidopsis has a genetic basis and shows evidence of local adaptation. eLife 4, e05255 (2015).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Nica, A. C. & Dermitzakis, E. T. Expression quantitative trait loci: present and future. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 368, 20120362 (2013).
Article
Google Scholar
Monroe, J. G. et al. Mutation bias reflects natural selection in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 602, 101–105 (2022).
Article
ADS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Araus, J. L., Kefauver, S. C., Zaman-Allah, M., Olsen, M. S. & Cairns, J. E. Translating high-throughput phenotyping into genetic gain. Trends Plant Sci. 23, 451–466 (2018).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Hu, Y. & Schmidhalter, U. Opportunity and challenges of phenotyping plant salt tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 28, 552–566 (2023).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Reynolds, M. et al. Breeder friendly phenotyping. Plant Sci. 295, 110396 (2020).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Awada, L., Phillips, P. W. B. & Smyth, S. J. The adoption of automated phenotyping by plant breeders. Euphytica 214, 148 (2018).
Article
Google Scholar
Papoutsoglou, E. A., Athanasiadis, I. N., Visser, R. G. F. & Finkers, R. The benefits and struggles of FAIR data: the case of reusing plant phenotyping data. Sci. Data 10, 457 (2023).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Papoutsoglou, E. A. et al. Enabling reusability of plant phenomic datasets with MIAPPE 1.1. New Phytol. 227, 260–273 (2020).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Selby, P. et al. BrAPI—an application programming interface for plant breeding applications. Bioinformatics 35, 4147–4155 (2019).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Bell, G., Hey, T. & Szalay, A. Beyond the data deluge. Science 323, 1297–1298 (2009).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Jones, J. W. et al. Brief history of agricultural systems modeling. Agric. Syst. 155, 240–254 (2017).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Chenu, K. et al. Contribution of crop models to adaptation in wheat. Trends Plant Sci. 22, 472–490 (2017).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
De Souza, A. P. et al. Soybean photosynthesis and crop yield are improved by accelerating recovery from photoprotection. Science 377, 851–854 (2022).
Article
ADS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Habier, D., Fernando, R. L. & Garrick, D. J. Genomic BLUP decoded: a look into the black box of genomic prediction. Genetics 194, 597–607 (2013).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Hammer, G., Messina, C., Wu, A. & Cooper, M. Biological reality and parsimony in crop models—why we need both in crop improvement! in silico Plants 1, diz010 (2019).
Article
Google Scholar
Roeder, A. H. K. et al. Fifteen compelling open questions in plant cell biology. Plant Cell 34, 72–102 (2021). A collection of thought-provoking perspectives on future directions in basic plant science.
Article
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Alexandratos, N. & Bruinsma, J. World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision. ESA Working Paper 12-03 (FAO, 2012).
Roser, M. Breaking out of the Malthusian trap: How pandemics allow us to understand why our ancestors were stuck in poverty. Our World in Data https://ourworldindata.org/breaking-the-malthusian-trap (2020).
Ritchie, H., Rosado P. & Roser, M. Hunger and Undernourishment. Our World in Data https://ourworldindata.org/hunger-and-undernourishment (2023).
Ghazal, H. et al. Plant genomics in Africa: present and prospects. Plant J. 107, 21–36 (2021).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Jamnadass, R. et al. Enhancing African orphan crops with genomics. Nat. Genet. 52, 356–360 (2020).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
VanBuren, R. et al. Exceptional subgenome stability and functional divergence in the allotetraploid Ethiopian cereal teff. Nat. Commun. 11, 884 (2020).
Article
ADS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Wang, M. et al. Improved assembly and annotation of the sesame genome. DNA Res. 29, dsac041 (2022).
Article
ADS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Qi, W. et al. The haplotype-resolved chromosome pairs of a heterozygous diploid African cassava cultivar reveal novel pan-genome and allele-specific transcriptome features. GigaScience 11, giac028 (2022).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Kuon, J.-E. et al. Haplotype-resolved genomes of geminivirus-resistant and geminivirus-susceptible African cassava cultivars. BMC Biol. 17, 75 (2019).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Varshney, R. K. et al. Achievements and prospects of genomics-assisted breeding in three legume crops of the semi-arid tropics. Biotechnol. Adv. 31, 1120–1134 (2013).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Mboowa, G., Sserwadda, I. & Aruhomukama, D. Genomics and bioinformatics capacity in Africa: no continent is left behind. Genome 64, 503–513 (2021).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Santantonio, N. et al. Strategies for effective use of genomic information in crop breeding programs serving Africa and South Asia. Frontiers Plant Sci 11, 353 (2020).
Article
Google Scholar
Poore, J. & Nemecek, T. Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science 360, 987–992 (2018). This paper presents strong arguments for why environmental concerns matter to everyone, including plant breeders.
Article
ADS
PubMed
Google Scholar