Tag: instagram

  • The Shade Room Founder Is Ready to Dial Down the Shade

    The Shade Room Founder Is Ready to Dial Down the Shade

    [ad_1]

    Angie Nwandu launched The Shade Room in 2014 as a side hustle. Today, that side hustle—which grew from an Instagram-only celebrity tabloid into a media company with a 40-person staff—reaches 29 million social media obsessives by tapping into their wolfish appetite for drama.

    The Shade Room pioneered a unique, if somewhat innovative, brand of digital media, merging elements of fan culture around the machine of celebrity news (Shade Room regulars are called Roomies). More than your run-of-the-mill gossip rag or news aggregator, TSR evolved into an information hub for “the culture,” Nwandu says, “but also a reflection of it and voice for it. We’re known as a megaphone.”

    The primary focus of the platform is the fragile world of Black celebrity. Want to know who NFL quarterback Jalen Hurts got engaged to or why Naomi Campbell has beef with Rihanna? Maybe you are wondering why a Louisville woman claims Kanye West “telegraphically” told her to allegedly steal a vehicle with a child inside? TSR has you covered.

    I recently phoned Nwandu to chat about the controversial influence of The Shade Room and the legacy she wants to leave behind. The platform has slowly branched into different coverage areas—politics, investigative reporting, spirituality—and she says that’s all part of a larger plan to eventually move beyond celebrity gossip, which she describes as “tiring.”

    Nwandu hasn’t gotten there yet. The week we spoke, music mogul Diddy was arrested after a grand jury indicted him on charges including sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy (he pleaded not guilty), so we also talked about that—and Nwandu was an open book.

    JASON PARHAM: The Shade Room was a pioneer of social media-centric celebrity news on Instagram. Today there are hundreds of accounts that do what you do. How does that feel?

    ANGIE NWANDU: Nobody ever gives this nod to The Shade Room but we served up a blueprint that was able to be replicated. I’m friends with Shawn McKenzie [founder of The Spiritual Word] and Jason Lee [founder of Hollywood Unlocked], and we’ve had conversations. I had talks with both of them where I shared tips and advice. I’m happy to see that our blueprint was able to inspire other Black media companies who are thriving in their own right. To see the success of all these platforms is amazing to me. I’m actually really proud of that because who doesn’t want to start something that creates a ripple effect?

    The Shade Room has never shied away from controversy but I imagine there are editorial guidelines that you follow. What won’t you post?

    If I say which stories, it would defeat the purpose now. I will say, what we don’t do is out people. A lot of people send us very salacious stories where they are outing people. That’s something that we stay away from. In the beginning we were kinda wild, but generally that is something we have avoided. I’ve seen the damage in what it does to people who are not ready to step out in that way. We have tried to move away from invasion of privacy in certain areas.

    But is it not called The Shade Room for a reason?

    We’re trying to change what we post and move towards positivity. We used to post clapbacks all day long and we have eased off of that. It’s been hard because our name is The Shade Room—like, if Diddy goes to jail, we have to get that up. But there’s a lot we won’t post. It’s been a dance, for sure.



    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Meta Connect 2024: How to Watch and What to Expect

    Meta Connect 2024: How to Watch and What to Expect

    [ad_1]

    Meta Connect, the big developer event and hardware showcase from the company that runs Facebook and Instagram, is kicking off next week. Meta is likely to show off its new VR and mixed-reality technology, put a shiny polish on its meandering metaverse ambitions, and delve into all the fresh ways it plans to squeeze artificial intelligence into every crevice of its devices and services.

    The event takes place on Wednesday September 25, starting at 10 am Pacific time. The keynote address, where most of the new stuff will be announced, will be livestreamed. The host for the event will be Meta CEO and newly minted cool guy Mark Zuckerberg. Zuck’s hour-long presentation will be followed by a developer-focused address at 11 am led by Meta CTO and Reality Labs chief Andrew Bosworth. You can watch the events on the Meta Connect website or on Meta’s YouTube channel. And yes, you can also watch it in VR in Meta Horizon.

    The focus of the event will likely be a fusion of Meta’s mixed-reality efforts and its AI ambitions across its product line. Like any tech event, there are bound to be surprises. Here are the big things to look out for.

    Blurry MetaVision

    The one thing Meta won’t likely be announcing is a very expensive VR headset. It’s a move informed by where the mixed-reality-device market is right now—and whether people actually want to spend big to buy in. Instead, rumors abound about a so-called Meta Quest 3S, a headset which could be a cheaper version of the Meta Quest 3 with lighter features.

    Meta was briefly the bigwig in the AR/VR space 10 years ago when Meta (then Facebook) bought the VR company Oculus. Shortly thereafter, Facebook changed its name to Meta and sank $45 billion into its vision of a digital universe that most people just don’t seem to give much of a damn about. Workplaces aren’t using Meta’s Horizon Workrooms that much—we’re all still on Zoom—and despite the initial bouts of expensive corporate land grabs for digital real estate, users aren’t exactly eager to move into the metaverse.

    Other companies have struggled to find their virtual footing. Apple released its first-mixed reality headset, the $3,500 Apple Vision Pro, in February. Since then, the product has been regarded as a rare misstep for the company, or at least very clearly a first-generation product not intended for the masses. The device didn’t sell very well and was widely criticized as being an expensive, heavy, and ultimately lonely experience. (Apple mentioned the Vision Pro only once, in passing, at its optimistic iPhone announcement event on September 9.)

    Had the Vision Pro’s, well, vision panned out, Meta may have been more inclined to pursue the pricy premium category of VR headset. In August, The Information reported that Meta seems to have abandoned—or at least delayed—plans to reveal an update to its Oculus Quest Pro that would have gone into the ring against Apple’s Vision Pro. Bosworth, Meta’s CTO, responded to that news on Meta’s Threads platform and insisted the move is not that big of a deal, but rather a natural part of the company’s device iterations. Still, it is a move that makes sense in the aftermath of the Apple Vision Pro fizzling out.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Moo Deng Is More Than a Meme

    Moo Deng Is More Than a Meme

    [ad_1]

    Everyone, it seems, wants a piece of Moo Deng. The baby pygmy hippo is barely two months old and already famous. So beloved on TikTok, Instagram, and X is Moo Deng that workers at Khao Kheow Open Zoo, the place in Thailand where she was born, are doing all they can to keep up with her fans’ appetite for more. They post videos, photos, updates. They also welcome thousands of visitors a day and find themselves having to defend Moo Deng when tourists throw shells at her while she’s just trying to chill.

    Moo Deng, a name that means “bouncy pig,” has probably been all over your timeline lately—on Sephora makeup tutorials, on X’s main feed. She was born in July and in the past few weeks has become the Internet’s New Favorite Animal. A tradition almost as old as the internet itself, Favorite Animals—Maru, any of the dogs on the shiba inu puppy cam, those two llamas who just happened to run free the same day everyone was trying to decide what color The Dress was—come into the public consciousness seemingly out of nowhere. Some, like Doge, stick around; others disappear, or simply outgrow their cuteness, within a matter of weeks.

    All of which makes capitalizing on their fame a matter of some urgency. It seems heartless to think of animals this way, but if their owners don’t, someone else will. Perhaps that’s why zoo director Narongwit Chodchoi told the Associated Press this week that the zoo has begun the process of trying to trademark and patent the hippo to avoid her likeness getting used by anyone else—a smart move considering Moo Deng mugs, T-shirts, and other merch are already popping up online. Income from these efforts, Chodcho told the wire service, could “support activities that will make the animals’ lives better.”

    Moo Deng might need it. Fandom is getting a bit out of control these days. As pop stars like Chappell Roan have amassed online and offline fame, they’ve also had to use their platforms to ask for space from boundary-less fans and stalkers. Social media celebs like Drew Afualo, on whose podcast Roan appeared to talk about the subject, also tell stories of being approached in public by people who simply know them from the internet.

    It may seem odd to compare them to Favorite Animals, but the ways in which people feel entitled to their time aren’t that far apart. Everyone wants something for the ’gram, even if that something is a living being with its own sense of agency. One of Moo Deng’s most popular TikToks has 34 million views, and zoo staff have had to limit her visiting time to five minutes on Saturdays and Sundays to keep too many people from trying to get content of their own.

    Trademark protections may be the best way for Moo Deng’s caretakers to ensure others don’t cash in on her viral fame. When Jools Lebron made efforts to trademark her “very demure, very mindful” meme, one of the hurdles that emerged was that it’s hard to claim ownership of a phrase. As Kate Miltner, a lecturer in data, AI, and society at the University of Sheffield’s Information School, told me at the time, memes with audiovisual elements, like Nyan Cat or Grumpy Cat, are easier to register. “People will invariably try to make money off of viral or memetic content, as we’ve seen time and again,” Miltner says when asked about trademarking the baby hippo, adding that the Cincinnati Zoo has already done this with Fiona the Hippo. “It’s smart of the Khao Kheow Open Zoo to (at least try to) ensure that they’re the ones that do so.”



    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The More This Rolex Costs, the More You Want It. Here’s Why

    The More This Rolex Costs, the More You Want It. Here’s Why

    [ad_1]

    To start with, it’s all about understanding the trade-off between work and free time, explains University College London professor of economics Wendy Carlin. “You work to get income that you can spend on goods and services. As you become better off, we would expect people to both want more free time and more goods; the question is what the balance is between one or the other.”

    Different societies make different choices; Carlin touches on the classic contrast between European and American work-life balance. “People say ‘Oh, the Europeans are just very lazy, and they take all these holidays.’ But they’re making a different choice in terms of the way they take advantage of their higher living standards, because the thing that’s really scarce is time.” Veblen’s theories come in when you look at why people work more in different countries, she explains.

    “Some of those people are working two jobs just to survive,” Carlin says, “but some of them are working two jobs because they want to have the latest thing, the new phone, or the new car, or whatever.”

    It might sound obvious to us, but it defies traditional economic theory, which, in a nutshell, says we should be happy once our basic needs are met—and it would have seemed like madness to the academics of a hundred years ago.

    “It was thought that by now we would be working just two days a week,” says Carlin, in reference to John Maynard Keynes’ 1930 paper Economic Possibilities for Our Grandchildren, in which the economist predicted that improvements in technology and manufacturing efficiency would leave people needing only to work 15 hours a week. “Instead, people work two, three jobs, take two weeks’ holiday and have more goods. And why do they do that? Well, as Veblen said, because they’re comparing themselves with other people.”

    Image may contain Accessories Bag Handbag and Purse

    The cost of a Chanel Classic Flap bag has tripled since 2010.

    Image may contain Clothing Long Sleeve Sleeve Adult Person Knitwear and Sweater

    Brunello Cucinelli cashmere is also a powerful social status symbol.

    As the Rich Get Richer …

    We might not recognize the analysis of our working habits, believing that we all have more noble motivations at heart, but who among us can deny that we also aspire to a new Porsche, a Chanel bag, or a week in the Hamptons? Veblen’s work stated that people at every level of society would work to attain the symbols they perceiv as belonging to a superior class; it turns out that the more extreme that disparity—the more unevenly wealth is distributed in a society—the harder people will strive. “More inequality intensifies the Veblen effect,” Carlin says.

    Research that compared the income share of the top 1 percent of earners with the average number of hours worked bore out this idea. “The Nordic countries were very unequal a century ago,” says Carlin. “Then inequality fell dramatically, and at the same time, hours of work fell. People were less interested in comparing themselves with ultrarich people, and so they decided to take more leisure time.”

    If it’s not immediately clear how that impacts our lives—and our spending—today, consider that income inequality in the US has worsened dramatically in the past four decades, according to a 2020 report from the Pew Research Center, which remarked that “the wealth gap between America’s richest and poorer families more than doubled from 1989 to 2016” and noted that America’s Gini index (a measure of income inequality) was higher than any other G7 nation. No surprise then that projections for luxury goods sales in the US are rosy.

    Insta Effect

    There is another element that’s essential to understanding the increasing hold Veblen goods have over us: their visibility. Because Veblen’s theories rely on the perception of others, for anything to be considered a traditional Veblen good, its price—or exclusivity—must be easily understood by others.

    This simple fact underpins big-logo luxury products such as a Louis Vuitton monogrammed holdall, the oversize grille of a Rolls-Royce, or the instant recognition of iconic watch designs like the Audemars Piguet Royal Oak.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • How Camo Hats Became an Instant Meme

    How Camo Hats Became an Instant Meme

    [ad_1]

    On Tuesday, when Vice President Kamala Harris picked Tim Walz to be her running mate in her bid for US president, she commemorated it by sharing a video of her calling the Minnesota governor and asking him if he’d like to join her campaign. In the clip, he appears in a T-shirt, khakis, white sneakers, and a camouflage baseball cap.

    In politics, this is known as “appealing to the base”—looking like an average (yet electable) American. For pop culture followers, it was known as “appealing to Chappell Roan stans.” Over the last year, during the singer’s meteoric rise, Roan has been selling camo caps emblazoned with “Midwest Princess” in orange block letters. Once Walz officially joined the ticket, the campaign began selling a similar hat with “Harris Walz” on it.

    Soon, everyone wanted to know: Has Chappell seen this?

    Eventually, she did. Later on Tuesday she reposted an image on X showing a side-by-side comparison of her hat and the Harris campaign’s with the caption “Is this real[?]”

    Indeed it was, and according to reporting from my colleagues at Teen Vogue, the 3,000 hats that were initially made sold out in 30 minutes. Close to $1 million worth of hats have now been sold, officially making it a liberal status symbol. As the hat, and its similarities to Roan’s merch, began to spread, the jokes sprang to life.

    “This is the Bushwick x Los Feliz unity our nation needs,” wrote podcast and TV personality Desus Nice, referring to the hip enclaves in New York and Los Angeles, respectively. Wall Street Journal tech columnist Christopher Mims shared Roan’s tweet on Threads saying, “Chappell Roan posting the Harris-Walz camo hat is some kind of Gen Z inception.”

    You say “inception,” others say “reclaiming the narrative.” Yes, the hat could be a subtle (or not subtle) attempt by the Harris-Walz campaign to get a Roan endorsement. When President Biden was still running for reelection, she’d turned down an opportunity to play a Pride event at the White House, and so maybe the hat was a move to make her reconsider. (A rep for Roan didn’t respond to a request for comment.) It could also be an attempt to make camo do for Harris-Walz what red has done for Donald Trump.

    In the years since Trump started wearing them, the red Make America Great Again hat has become a symbol of not only Trump’s campaigns for the US presidency, but also for the values he and the GOP stand for. Red hats became symbols, memes of their own. Kanye West wore one to the White House; supporters wear them at rallies.

    The language of the MAGA cap also became something translatable. The Strand bookstore in New York made a line of hats that said “Make America Read Again” (albeit in white); in 2020, LeBron James and the Los Angeles Lakers wore red caps that read “Make America Great Again Arrest the Cops Who Killed Breonna Taylor.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Kamala Harris’ Campaign Is a Windfall for Influencers

    Kamala Harris’ Campaign Is a Windfall for Influencers

    [ad_1]

    After President Joe Biden stepped down and Harris announced her candidacy, excitement quickly swelled around the new campaign. The KamalaHQ account on TikTok quintupled in followers within the first week, the campaign tells WIRED, and the new Harris-focused content received 232 million views and more than 33 million likes. This far surpassed Trump’s total like count: As of publication, Trump’s account has nearly 30 million total likes, compared to Harris’ 60 million.

    Beyond the engagement data, the campaign also noticed TikTok users and content creators creating pro-Harris content at a rate once inconceivable with Biden at the top of the ticket.

    “We’re able to tap into the For You page in a different way now because the amount of people creating content about KamalaHQ has grown so much,” Lauren Kapp, who runs the Harris campaign’s TikTok account, tells WIRED. “We’ve seen that in our engagement with influencers and celebrities as well too. There’s a huge rise of them in our comments and resharing our content on KamalaHQ in a way that wasn’t really happening on BidenHQ.”

    This has created a feedback loop where supporters are creating content that the campaign remixes on its own. “Our audience is always encouraging us to use different sounds and trends, and we’re being responsive—tapping into these viral moments and engaging directly with our audience in a way that they are excited about,” says Kapp. “Our comment section is flooded with people saying, ‘oh my gosh I’ve been waiting for them to do this!’ It creates a community with our followers, which allows our content to be shared widely and organically.”

    It’s not just Harris who has benefited from a digital groundswell of support for her campaign. Political influencers and content creators are raking in followers, likes, and engagement. Several creators who spoke with WIRED said their posts on platforms like TikTok and Instagram were receiving more likes and positive comments than when Biden led the ticket.

    “The response to anything with Kamala’s name being in the post is incredibly high, like I have never, never seen that for Biden,” Saadia Mirza, a political creator with around 100,000 followers on TikTok, tells WIRED. Mirza characterizes herself as a “Never-Trumper” who aggregates news and states from across the web. “I don’t know what their numbers are, but I can tell you, just from my posts alone, I’ve noticed the engagement, the sharing, the comments, people replying to them, sending you private DMs is extremely high.”

    “I’ve definitely seen a shift of excitement, people getting more involved in politics, people engaging in the conversation, more sharing things that they wouldn’t before,” says singer, actor, and political influencer Malynda Hale. Hale posts news commentary to her 50,000 Instagram followers. “And a lot of people that I’ve talked to, who are like, ‘Oh, I don’t really do politics.’ They’re definitely doing politics now, because this is such a crucial election.”

    For Kelton Allen, a TikTok creator from Florida, the excitement he’s witnessed online has crept into his daily life as well.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Kamala Harris and the Paradox of Progress

    Kamala Harris and the Paradox of Progress

    [ad_1]

    “Kamala finally has an online presence,” says Marlon Twyman, a professor of quantitative social science at USC Annenberg who specializes in social network analysis. “For years, her political activity and contributions have not been broadly shared through online platforms. Now we are paying attention, but how much time are people spending researching her impact?”

    It is the legitimacy of Harris’ impact that is at stake—especially among Black Dems, a bloc she cannot win without. “Are we critically examining what we’re seeing online,” Twyman continued, “or do we just passively accept these narratives about her candidacy?”

    In the united States, binaries are a convenient framing in political warfare. Good versus bad. The elite versus the underclass. Black versus white. Operating the old way as opposed to demanding new frameworks.

    In reality, it’s never that simple. In the case of Harris, despite a wave of early momentum, there are noticeable fissures among Black progressives playing out online. In one camp, there are those who believe they don’t have the benefit of “virtue voting,” as actor Nicholas Ashe said in one Zoom fundraiser meeting, and that Black voters must support Harris no matter what. In the other, voters have been more critical of Harris and slower to pledge support, calling for a more imaginative political future.

    “I hate hearing the lesser of two evils because we are threatened with fascism on the other side,” Ashe said on that video call, hosted by Black Gay and Queer Men for Harris. He was careful not to fully excuse the vice president’s record or overlook the difficulty in untangling major issues like reproductive justice, Palestine, immigration, and the economy that are on the ballot. “It is a tall order, but it is one Kamala will have to accept if she wants our nomination,” he said.

    Others have been less enthusiastic about Harris. In the warped panorama of American politics, many believe a two-party system is antithetical to actual progress and tangible change. “If you lack political imagination, then just say that. If you can’t envision a different way of living, if you can’t imagine another way of organizing society, then just say that,” visual artist Ja’Tovia Gary said in an Instagram post, noting how she was exhausted by the “cyclical nature of the browbeating and vote shaming” that takes place every presidential cycle.

    When Harris released a statement following a DC protest, on July 24, over objections to Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s visit to Congress and what protestors believe is a genocidal war being enacted on Palestinians, she drew ire from every side. “[Y’all] didn’t do enough on them Zooms,” @ashtoncrawley posted on X, alluding to the performative allyship that has been called out by critics of the presumptive nominee. Others have said understanding the matter requires more nuance.

    The online reactions surrounding the vice president are not surprising, says James Pratt Jr., a professor of criminal justice at Fisk University. Coalition-building among identity and affinity groups is to be expected, he says, all the more so given past failures to show up for Hillary Clinton or, more generally, speak up in support of Black women. Particularly in US politics, there is often a desire to contribute to the weaving of our shared history. It is natural to want to be part of something bigger than yourself. It is also “profitable, at least on the left, to be the ‘first’ and to be seen as supportive of ‘the first,’ as history uses those cases as the basis for our collective memory,” Pratt says. “Folks want to be remembered. Being critical can cause distance from that history.”



    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • How to opt out of Meta’s AI training

    How to opt out of Meta’s AI training

    [ad_1]

    Internet data scraping is one of the biggest fights in AI right now. Tech companies argue that anything on the public internet is fair game, but they are facing a barrage of lawsuits over their data practices and copyright. It will likely take years until clear rules are in place. 

    In the meantime, they are running out of training data to build even bigger, more powerful models, and to Meta, your posts are a gold mine. 

    If you’re uncomfortable with having Meta use your personal information and intellectual property to train its AI models in perpetuity, consider opting out. Although Meta does not guarantee it will allow this, it does say it will “review objection requests in accordance with relevant data protection laws.” 

    What that means for US users

    Users in the US or other countries without national data privacy laws don’t have any foolproof ways to prevent Meta from using their data to train AI, which has likely already been used for such purposes. Meta does not have an opt-out feature for people living in these places. 

    A spokesperson for Meta says it does not use the content of people’s private messages to each other to train AI. However, public social media posts are seen as fair game and can be hoovered up into AI training data sets by anyone. Users who don’t want that can set their account settings to private to minimize the risk. 

    The company has built in-platform tools that allow people to delete their personal information from chats with Meta AI, the spokesperson says.

    How users in Europe and the UK can opt out 

    Users in the European Union and the UK, which are protected by strict data protection regimes, have the right to object to their data being scraped, so they can opt out more easily. 

    If you have a Facebook account:

    1. Log in to your account. You can access the new privacy policy by following this link. At the very top of the page, you should see a box that says “Learn more about your right to object.” Click on that link, or here

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Worried About AI Killing Art? This App Offers a Refuge—If Its Founder Can Keep the Lights On

    Worried About AI Killing Art? This App Offers a Refuge—If Its Founder Can Keep the Lights On

    [ad_1]

    At the moment we’re having this conversation, how many people have Cara accounts?

    Now we’re at nearly 900,000 users. But it’s been stressful. Yesterday or the day before—I’m losing track of time now—I saw a bill from a service provider and it was almost $100,000 for six days. So we’re trying to figure out our financial situation. It’s an ongoing process.

    Are they working with you to reduce the bill?

    I certainly hope so. We’re talking, and there have been other service providers talking to us too. We’re considering our options.

    This wasn’t meant to be your full-time gig. Is there a point where this gets too big and you have to look for partners? And are you considering a subscription model or outside investors?

    Before this all happened, the next thing on our to-do list was to start a subscription service for our users, to see what the response would be and whether it would be self-sustaining. Now we don’t have time—we have to pay the bills now. So I’m looking at all options.

    Do you worry about people from outside your circle getting involved and having a say?

    The important thing is that I maintain control of how I’m building Cara. I love to be independent and want to do it on my own as long as possible, but in the worst-case scenario, we raise money. I did consider a friends and family [funding] round for later this year, with people I can absolutely trust.

    Where would you like to see Cara in five years?

    I want to see what the community needs and build according to that. I have some idea of how generative AI will impact jobs, and how it might reduce pay even for people who still have jobs, but who is to say what will be the most helpful in five years? I’m sorry if that sounds like a non-answer, but I just think you have to adapt as best you can and build what makes the most sense in the moment.

    How many people are working on Cara right now?

    Four or five of us for the last year or so. We temporarily have a bunch of help. I don’t know if they’ll stick around, but right now we have closer to 10 on the engineering team working with us through this crisis. Originally we had three staff helping me day-to-day, and right now we have 10 to 20 people trying to do things like manage our Discord, which last time I checked had between 8,000 and 10,000 people. They’re trying to manage content moderation. On Instagram we have tens of thousands of messages. Everyone just wants to help, and people are being really kind.

    Backing up a bit, could you walk me through joining the class action lawsuits against generative AI companies?

    I don’t really like to be involved in things, but if nobody has addressed something that I’d like to see, I’ll do it. It doesn’t matter if it makes me unpopular. It was a little difficult for me to watch when people were still in the denial stage about generative AI being usable for work. This will never replace artists, look how bad the hands are.

    I will say that the hands are, indeed, bad.

    My exposure to tech and art production is different since I work as a photographer and I’m in the pipeline of production. I’d have companies sending me demos talking about natural language processing being used to generate stuff five, six years ago. I stayed out of the AI discourse for a while because I was underway with my own copyright lawsuit at the time, and there was a lot of harassment.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Germany’s Far-Right Party Is Running Hateful Ads on Facebook and Instagram

    Germany’s Far-Right Party Is Running Hateful Ads on Facebook and Instagram

    [ad_1]

    Earlier this month, a German court ruled that the country’s nationalist far-right party, Alternative for Germany (AfD), was potentially “extremist” and could warrant surveillance by the country’s intelligence apparatus.

    Campaign ads placed by AfD have been allowed to appear on Facebook and Instagram anyway, according to a new report from the nonprofit advocacy organization Ekō shared exclusively with WIRED. Researchers found 23 ads that accrued 472,000 views from the party on Facebook and Instagram that appear to violate Meta’s own policies around hate speech.

    The ads push the narrative that immigrants are dangerous and a burden on the German state ahead of the European Union’s elections in June.

    One ad placed by AfD politician Gereon Bollman asserts that Germany has seen “an explosion of sexual violence” since 2015, specifically blaming immigrants from Turkey, Syria, Afghanistan, and Iraq. The ad was seen by between 10,000 and 15,000 people in just four days, between March 16 and 20, 2024. Another ad, which had over 60,000 views, features a man of color lying in a hammock. Overlaid text reads, “AfD reveals: 686,000 illegal foreigners live at our expense!”

    Ekō was also able to identify at least three ads that appear to have used generative AI to manipulate images, though only one was run after Meta put its manipulated media policy into place. One shows a white woman with visible injuries, with accompanying text saying “the connection between migration and crime has been denied for years.”

    “Meta, and indeed other companies, have very limited ability to detect third party tools that generate AI imagery,” says Vicky Wyatt, senior campaign director at Ekō. “When extremist parties use those tools with their ads, they can create incredibly emotive imagery that can really move people. So it’s incredibly worrying.”

    In its submission to the European Commission’s consultation on election guidelines, obtained by a freedom of information request made by Ekō, Meta says “it is not yet possible for providers to identify all AI-generated content, particularly when actors take steps to seek to avoid detection, including by removing invisible markers.”

    Meta’s own policies prohibit ads that “claim people are threats to the safety, health, or survival of others based on their personal characteristics” and ads that “include generalizations that state inferiority, other statements of inferiority, expressions of contempt, expressions of dismissal, expressions of disgust, or cursing based on immigration status.”

    “We do not allow hate speech on our platforms and have Community Standards that apply to all content – including ads,” says Meta spokesperson Daniel Roberts. “Our ads review process has several layers of analysis and detection, both before and after an ad goes live, and this system is one of many we have in place to protect European elections.” Roberts told WIRED the company plans to review the ads flagged by Ekō but didn’t respond to questions about whether the German court’s designation of the AfD as potentially extremist would invite further scrutiny from Meta.

    Targeted ads, says Wyatt, can be powerful because extremist groups can more effectively target people that might sympathize with their views and “use Meta’s ads library to reach them.” Wyatt also says this allows the group to test which messages are more likely to resonate with voters.

    [ad_2]

    Source link