Tag: Melanoma

  • An Arm and a Leg: The Medicare episode

    An Arm and a Leg: The Medicare episode

    [ad_1]

    Medicare may sound like an escape from the expensive world of U.S. health insurance, but it’s more complicated, and expensive, than many realize. And decisions seniors make when they sign up for the federal health insurance program can have huge consequences down the road. 

    Host Dan Weissmann speaks with Sarah Jane Tribble, KFF Health News’ chief rural health correspondent, about one of the biggest choices seniors must make: whether to enroll in traditional Medicare or the privatized version, Medicare Advantage. 

    Then, Weissmann shares practical tips about how soon-to-be seniors can avoid penalties and pick the plan that’s right for them.

    Dan Weissmann @danweissmann Host and producer of “An Arm and a Leg.”

    Previously, Dan was a staff reporter for Marketplace and Chicago’s WBEZ. His work also appears on All Things Considered, Marketplace, the BBC, 99 Percent Invisible, and Reveal, from the Center for Investigative Reporting.

    Credits

    • Emily Pisacreta Producer
    • Adam Raymonda Audio wizard
    • Ellen Weiss Editor




    Kaiser Health NewsThis article was reprinted from khn.org, a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF – the independent source for health policy research, polling, and journalism.



    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Study reveals key mechanism of PD-1 function

    Study reveals key mechanism of PD-1 function

    [ad_1]

    Insights into the workings of an immune cell surface receptor, called PD-1, reveal how treatments that restrict its action can potentially be strengthened to improve their anticancer effect, a new study shows. The same findings also support experimental treatment strategies for autoimmune diseases, in which the immune system attacks the body, because stimulating the action of PD-1, as opposed to restricting it, can potentially block an overactive immune response.

    Led by researchers at NYU Langone Health’s Perlmutter Cancer Center and the University of Oxford, the study is publishing in the journal Science Immunology online March 8.

    The study results revolve around the body’s immune system, which is primed to attack virally infected and cancerous cells while leaving normal cells alone. To spare normal cells from immune attack, the system uses “checkpoints,” sensors on the surface of immune cells, including T cells, which turn them off or dampen activation when they receive the right signal. The immune system recognizes tumors as abnormal, but cancer cells can hijack checkpoints to turn off immune responses.

    Among the most important checkpoints is a protein called programmed cell death receptor 1 (PD-1), which is shut down by a relatively new drug class called checkpoint inhibitors to make tumors “visible” again to immune attack. Such drugs are at least somewhat effective in a third of patients with a variety of cancers, say the study authors, but the field is urgently seeking ways to improve their performance and scope. 

    At the same time, PD-1 signaling is slowed in autoimmune diseases like rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, and type 1 diabetes, such that the action of unchecked immune cells creates inflammation that can damage tissues. Agonists, drugs that stimulate PD-1, are now showing promise in clinical trials.

    Many immune checkpoints are receptors on the surface of T cells that act to translate docking information from the outside of the cell to the signaling portion of the receptor inside the cell. Connecting the outside-of-the-cell portion of PD-1 with the inside portion is the transmembrane segment. Many immune receptors function in pairs called dimers, but to date, PD-1 has been thought to function alone, not in the dimer form.

    Study results showed that PD-1 forms a dimer through interactions of its transmembrane segment. Researchers say this finding is in sharp contrast to other immune receptors, which typically form dimers through the segment of the receptor that is outside the cell.

    Further immune cell testing in mice showed that encouraging PD-1 to form dimers, specifically in the transmembrane domain but not in its outer or inner regions, increased its ability to suppress T cell activity, while decreasing transmembrane dimerization lowered PD-1’s ability to inhibit immune cell activity.

    Our study reveals that the PD-1 receptor functions optimally as dimers driven by interactions within the transmembrane domain on the surface of T cells, contrary to the dogma that PD-1 is a monomer.”


    Elliot Philips, MD, PhD, Study Lead Investigator and Physician-Scientist, NYU Grossman School of Medicine

    Elliot Philips is an internal medicine resident at NYU Grossman School of Medicine and Perlmutter Cancer Center. Philips is also an alumnus of the Vilcek Institute of Biomedical Sciences at NYU.

    “Our findings offer new insights into the molecular workings of the PD-1 immune cell protein that have proven pivotal to the development of the current generation of anticancer immunotherapies, and which are proving essential in the design and developing of the next generation of immunotherapies for autoimmune diseases,” said study co-senior investigator and cancer immunologist Jun Wang, PhD. Wang is an assistant professor in the Department of Pathology at NYU Grossman and Perlmutter.

    “Our goal is to use our new knowledge of the functioning of PD-1 to determine if weakening its dimerization, or pairing, helps make anticancer immunotherapies more effective, and just as importantly, to see if strengthening its dimerization helps in the design of agonist drugs that quiet overactive T cells, tamping down the inflammation seen in autoimmune diseases,” said study co-senior investigator and structural biologist Xiang-Peng Kong, PhD. “Presently, research efforts have focused on strengthening PD-1 interactions with its ligands, or signaling molecules, involved with inhibiting T cell action.

    “Our new study suggests that efforts to design better drugs should focus on increasing or decreasing PD-1’s dimerization to manipulate T cell function,” said Kong, a professor in the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology at NYU Grossman and Perlmutter.

    Among the study’s other findings was that a single change in the amino acid structure of the transmembrane segment can act to either enhance or diminish the inhibitory function of PD-1 in immune responses. The team plans further investigations of PD-1 inhibitors and agonists to see if they can tailor what they say are more effective, “rationally designed” therapies for both cancer and autoimmune disorders.

    Funding support for the new study was provided by National Institutes of Health grants R01AI125640, R37CA273333 T32AR069515, and T32GM007308. Additional funding support was provided by NYU Grossman School of Medicine, Kennedy Trust for Rheumatology Research grant 100262Z/12/Z; Research Council of Norway grant 275466, in conjunction with Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions; Wellcome Trust grant 108869/Z/15/Z; the Melanoma Research Alliance; and a pilot award from the NYU Colton Center for autoimmunity. Wang has been a paid consultant to RootPath Genomics, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Hanmi Pharmaceutical and is a founder, equity holder, and consultant to Remunix. These interests and relationships are being managed in accordance with the policies of NYU Langone Health.

    Besides Philips, Wang, and Kong, other NYU Langone researchers involved in this study are colead investigator Jia Liu, and coinvestigators Charles Ng, Ian Ahearn, Ruimin Pan, Christina Luo, Alexander Leithner, Zhihua Qin, and Dan Littman, who is also a Howard Hughes Medical Institute investigator. Other study coinvestigators include Audun Kvalvaag, at Oslo University, Norway; Alexander Morch and co-senior investigator Michael Dustin, at the University of Oxford, United Kingdom; Anna Tocheva, at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York; Hong Liang and Yong Zhou, at the University of Texas in Houston; Antonio Garcia-Espana, at the University of Rovira i Virgili in Tarragona, Spain; and Adam Mor, at Columbia University in New York.

    Source:

    Journal reference:

    Philips, E. A., et al. (2024) Transmembrane domain–driven PD-1 dimers mediate T cell inhibition. Science Immunologydoi.org/10.1126/sciimmunol.ade6256.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Microbial signatures linked to immunotherapy response across cancers

    Microbial signatures linked to immunotherapy response across cancers

    [ad_1]

    The microbiome can identify those who benefit from combination immunotherapy across multiple different cancers, including rare gynecological cancers, biliary tract cancers and melanoma.

    Researchers from the Wellcome Sanger Institute, the Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute in Australia, and collaborators, have identified specific strains of bacteria that are linked with a positive response to combination immunotherapy in the largest study of its kind.

    The study, published today (1 March) in Nature Medicine, details a signature collection of microorganisms in an individual’s gut bacteria that may help identify those who would benefit from combination immunotherapy and help explain why the efficacy of this treatment is otherwise hard to predict.

    In the future, understanding more about these bacteria strains can help drive the development of next-generation probiotics, known as ‘live biotherapeutic products’, that focus on modulating the microbiome to support combination immunotherapy from the inside.

    Immunotherapy is a type of treatment that harnesses the body’s immune system to target the cancer. While it can be very effective, it only works in a proportion of recipients across a wide range of cancers. As with all cancer treatments, immunotherapy can have multiple side effects. Therefore, being able to predict who is most likely to respond to treatment helps ensure that patients do not endure these unnecessary side effects for no medical benefits.

    This study used samples collected in a large, multi-center Australian clinical trial where combination immunotherapy was effective in 25 per cent of people with a broad range of advanced rare cancers, including rare gynecological cancers, neuro-endocrine neoplasms, and upper gastrointestinal and biliary cancers.

    The clinical trial focused on a type of combination immunotherapy known as immune checkpoint inhibitors. These anti-cancer agents block the body’s immune checkpoint proteins, allowing the immune cells to destroy cancer cells. In this case, the immunotherapy blocked the PD-1 and CTLA-4 checkpoints.

    Researchers used stool samples from clinical trial patients and performed deep shotgun metagenomic sequencing1 to map all the organisms within the participants’ microbiomes, down to the strain-level.

    They discovered multiple strains of bacteria in those who responded well to treatment, many of which had not been cultivated before. This allowed them to identify a microbiome signature that was found in patients who responded well to treatment.

    In addition to this, the team used this signature to train a machine learning model that could predict who would benefit from combination immunotherapy.

    They conducted a meta-analysis of previous studies and found that their signature can be applied to different cancers, such as melanoma, and across countries, to predict individuals whose cancer will likely respond to combination immunotherapy.

    However, when applied to patients who received just one of the immunotherapy drugs, targeting the immune checkpoint receptor PD-1 only, the machine-learning model could not identify those who would respond to treatment.

    This suggests that the relationship between gut microbiota and treatment response is specific for particular therapeutic combinations. The researchers therefore suggest that future development of diagnostics tests or therapeutics that rely on the gut microbiome should be tailored to the immunotherapy regimen, regardless of cancer type.

    This step towards personalized medicine may help extend cancer treatments to more people and can match individuals to therapies that would benefit them the most.

    Dr Ashray Gunjur, first author from the Wellcome Sanger Institute and the Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Australia, said: “Our study shows that understanding the microbiome at strain-level, not just species-level, can open up a new level of personalised medicine. Having that extra resolution is crucial if we are to understand what is happening in the human body and the interplay between cancer treatment and the microbiome. Being able to test the specific mechanisms of this relationship between specific strains and response is the next horizon in this research, and one that could benefit human health in a multitude of ways.”

    Rare cancers can be hard to study and treat and while immunotherapy treatment can be incredibly effective in some of these cases, it can also be unpredictable. Our research shows that the microbiome impacts how well someone responds to combination immunotherapy, but that monotherapy gives a different result. This suggests that the microbiome should be taken into account when developing therapeutics going forward. In addition to this, there is a possibility of developing live biotherapeutic products that could provide the bacteria shown to support immunotherapy, helping the microbiome work with the patient to give them the best odds of response possible.”


    Dr David Adams, co-senior author from the Wellcome Sanger Institute

    Dr Trevor Lawley, co-senior author from the Wellcome Sanger Institute, said: “Our microbiomes vary from person to person, all of us containing a different ecosystem of bacteria and other organisms that shape our responses to the world around us. Our research highlights how an individual’s microbiome can predict how they will respond to cancer treatment, which can have a direct clinical impact by identifying those that would benefit the most, and aid in the design of future clinical trials.”

    Source:

    Journal reference:

    Gunjur, A., et al. (2024). A gut microbial signature for combination immune checkpoint blockade across cancer types. Nature Medicine. doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-02823-z.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Pioneering cell-based treatment for melanoma offered at Siteman Cancer Center

    Pioneering cell-based treatment for melanoma offered at Siteman Cancer Center

    [ad_1]

    Siteman Cancer Center, based at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, is one of the first centers nationwide to offer a newly approved cell-based immunotherapy that targets melanoma.

    With the green light from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Washington University physicians at Siteman Cancer Center will administer tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) therapy to treat certain adult patients with metastatic melanoma, an aggressive skin cancer that has spread to other parts of the body. The therapy is for patients with metastatic melanoma that can’t be treated with surgery and that has continued to grow and spread despite already having been heavily treated with other approved strategies, including chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors.

    Washington University doctors and researchers were involved in clinical trials that led to the FDA approval.

    The immunotherapy was approved under Accelerated Approval regulations, which allow the FDA to approve drugs for serious illnesses or conditions that have an unmet medical need. For approval, such drugs are shown to have an effect that indicates a likely clinical benefit to patients — for example, improving how they feel or function, or extending survival. The Accelerated Approval pathway generally gives patients the opportunity to access a promising therapy while further trials are conducted to confirm the drug’s clinical benefits.

    Doctors, researchers and patients at Siteman also continue to participate in ongoing clinical trials investigating TIL therapy for patients with advanced lung and cervical cancers.

    These types of cell-based immunotherapies have been very impactful in blood cancers. More recently, in the solid tumor area, particularly melanoma, we have seen progress in developing effective cell-based immunotherapies, and this is the first to be FDA-approved. While metastatic melanoma treatment was revolutionized with immune checkpoint therapy — the first immunotherapy for cancer — and many of our patients do very well, at some point most patients have some kind of recurrence. Now, we have another option to offer.”


    George Ansstas, MD, associate professor of medicine at Washington University and leader of the solid tumor TIL program at Siteman

    Developed by Iovance Therapeutics, the new TIL therapy is called lifileucel (trade name Amtagvi).

    TIL therapy uses a patient’s own T cells that have already found and infiltrated the tumor in an attempt to kill the cancer. These natural cancer-killing immune cells can’t go it alone, though, because they are few in number and are quickly overwhelmed by the tumors.

    “This is truly personalized cancer therapy, because the T cells are taken from the individual patient’s tumor,” said surgical oncologist Ryan C. Fields, MD, the Kim and Tim Eberlein Distinguished Professor, chief of the Section of Surgical Oncology and co-leader of the Solid Tumor Therapeutics Program, which is led by Fields and other Washington University physicians and researchers at Siteman. “These T cells are already targeted in multiple ways to the specific cancer cells. And because the T cells belong to the patient, there is no risk of the immune cells attacking the patients’ healthy tissues — a dangerous condition called graft-versus-host disease — as can sometimes happen with stem cell transplantation for blood cancers.”

    The Cutaneous Oncology Program — within Washington University’s Division of Oncology and co-led by Ansstas, Fields and Lynn A. Cornelius, MD, the Winfred A. and Emma R. Showman Professor and director of the Division of Dermatology — will administer TIL therapy for eligible patients with melanoma.

    For the therapy, doctors at an authorized treatment center take a sample of the tumor and send the tissue to an Iovance manufacturing facility, where tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes are isolated from the tumor and then expanded outside the body. This TIL therapy cell product is then cryopreserved and shipped back to the patient. When returned to the patient’s body via intravenous infusion, the tumor-specific T cells — now numbering in the billions — are much more effective at killing tumor cells throughout the body. Patients receive a course of chemotherapy to prepare the body to receive the T cells. Patients also are treated with interleukin-2, which boosts T cell activity.

    According to the results of a clinical trial reported in The Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer, in about 30% of patients, the tumors shrank at least 30%. And about half of the patients whose tumors responded to the therapy experienced a remission of at least 12 months following a single TIL treatment.

    Treatment includes chemotherapy to eliminate existing T cells and create space for the new T cells to take hold and trigger a heightened immune response. This can result in a range of side effects, including increased risk of infection, internal hemorrhage, heart arrhythmias, respiratory failure, kidney failure and allergic reactions. Many of the side effects can be managed well, but some are potentially severe and life-threatening. With that in mind, the first centers to administer TIL therapy are those with extensive expertise treating patients with cell-based immunotherapies, such as CAR-T cell therapy for blood cancers.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Advanced melanoma survival rates improve significantly from 2013 to 2019, Dutch study finds

    Advanced melanoma survival rates improve significantly from 2013 to 2019, Dutch study finds

    [ad_1]

    In a recent study published in EClinicalMedicine, a group of researchers assessed the change in overall survival (OS) among advanced melanoma patients diagnosed between 2013 and 2021.

    Study: Improving survival in advanced melanoma patients: a trend analysis from 2013 to 2021. Image Credit: Africa Studio/Shutterstock.comStudy: Improving survival in advanced melanoma patients: a trend analysis from 2013 to 2021. Image Credit: Africa Studio/Shutterstock.com

    Background 

    The outlook for advanced melanoma, encompassing unresolvable stage III and IV cases, has markedly improved due to the advent of novel treatments.

    Starting with the Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Antigen 4 (CTLA-4) blocking antibody ipilimumab in 2012, the treatment landscape expanded to include B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase (BRAF) inhibitors for patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma in 2012, anti-Programmed Cell Death (PD)-1 antibodies in 2015, and combinations of BRAF inhibitors with Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MEK) inhibitors and ipilimumab with nivolumab in 2016.

    Recent advancements also introduced therapies such as Lymphocyte-Activation Gene 3 (LAG-3) antibodies and Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocyte (TIL) therapy. In the Netherlands, survival rates have risen following these innovations, even outside clinical trials.

    Further research is needed to understand the factors driving the recent decline in survival rates and to develop strategies to improve outcomes for advanced melanoma patients, particularly in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and evolving treatment modalities.

    About the study 

    The data for the present study was sourced from the Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry (DMTR). They involved patients aged 18 and over diagnosed with advanced melanoma from 2013 to 2021, specifically focusing on those who received systemic treatment.

    These patients were categorized based on the year their melanoma was diagnosed as unresectable.

    Those who progressed to unresectable disease following neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatments were included from the point they commenced treatment for their unresectable condition. Exclusions were made for patients with uveal or mucosal melanoma.

    Patient demographics and tumor characteristics at the point of advanced disease diagnosis – including age, gender, performance status, lactate dehydrogenase levels (LDH) levels, melanoma location and type, thickness, ulceration presence, liver and brain metastases, number of metastatic organ sites, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition staging, and mutation status were carefully recorded. The study also differentiated between synchronous and metachronous presentations of melanoma.

    Statistical analysis was conducted using various methods to compare baseline characteristics and to estimate median survival times and the impact of the year of diagnosis on overall survival.

    This involved descriptive statistics, Pearson’s chi-squared, and t-tests for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Survival analysis was performed with the Kaplan-Meier method, and the Cox proportional hazards model was applied for multivariable analysis, considering several factors identified from previous research.

    Statistical computations were performed using R software and several packages for data manipulation and analysis, ensuring a comprehensive and rigorous statistical examination of the collected data.

    Study results 

    Between 2013 and 2021, the DMTR recorded 7,928 patients with advanced melanoma. After excluding cases of uveal and mucosal melanoma, 7,317 patients were included in the analysis.

    Many of these patients received systemic treatment, increasing from 74% in 2013 to 86% in 2020 and slightly decreasing to 83% in 2021.

    Out of those treated, 6,260 patients were included after further exclusions for uveal and mucosal melanoma. Among these, 428 had received neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment before their systemic treatment for advanced melanoma.

    The study observed a median follow-up of 50.9 months, with the longest follow-up for the 2013 cohort at 106.0 months and the shortest for the 2021 cohort at 14.1 months.

    The median age of patients diagnosed with advanced melanoma increased over the years, and there was a noticeable rise in the number of patients with poor performance status and brain metastases. Interestingly, the prevalence of synchronous metastatic disease also increased, particularly in 2020 and 2021.

    Treatment modalities evolved from BRAF inhibitors and ipilimumab monotherapy to BRAF/MEK inhibitors, anti-PD-1 antibodies, and combination therapies. The study also noted changes in the duration of these treatments over time.

    The median OS for systemically treated advanced melanoma patients improved from 11.2 months in 2013 to 32.0 months in 2019.

    However, a decline was observed in patients diagnosed in 2020 and 2021, with median OS dropping to 26.6 and 24.0 months, respectively, although these decreases were not statistically significant.

    This trend was mirrored in the melanoma-specific survival (MSS) data, with improvements seen until 2019, followed by a decrease for the cohorts of 2020 and 2021.

    Furthermore, the study found that neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatments did not significantly affect survival outcomes for advanced melanoma. Patients with synchronous metastases had shorter survival than those with metachronous metastases.

    Despite treatments improving survival post-2013, a concerning trend of increased mortality risk was noted for diagnoses in 2020 and 2021, underscoring the urgency for ongoing research and treatment adaptation.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Androgen receptor signaling found to upregulate gene driving melanoma severity in men

    Androgen receptor signaling found to upregulate gene driving melanoma severity in men

    [ad_1]

    In a recent study published by Nature Communications, researchers uncovered a previously unknown method by which androgen-activated androgen receptors (ARs) increase fucosyltransferase 4 (FUT4) expression, which promotes melanoma invasiveness by interfering with adherens junctions (AJs).

    Study: Androgen drives melanoma invasiveness and metastatic spread by inducing tumorigenic fucosylation. Image Credit: Image Point Fr/Shutterstock.comStudy: Androgen drives melanoma invasiveness and metastatic spread by inducing tumorigenic fucosylation. Image Credit: Image Point Fr/Shutterstock.com

    Background

    Melanoma incidence and death rates are higher in males than in females, and sex hormones play a crucial role in the disease’s biology and progression. Studies have demonstrated that androgen and its receptor have tumorigenic functions in melanoma, although the underlying processes are poorly understood.

    Men with advanced melanoma typically have lower clinical outcomes. Sex hormones, such as G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) signaling, inhibit tumor development and boost anti-programmed death cell death 1 (anti-PD-1) immune checkpoint blockade effectiveness in a female mouse model.

    Global fucosylation disrupts as melanoma progresses, affecting cell motility and ribonucleic acid (RNA) processing.

    About the study

    In the present study, researchers investigated ways in which sex-hormone-regulated fucosylation leads to disparately poor outcomes in male melanoma patients.

    The researchers investigated the effects of androgen-induced and transcriptionally active androgen receptors on melanoma biology and tumorigenicity. They concentrated on the AR-FUT4 signaling pathway and its role in male sex-related biological consequences in melanoma.

    They confirmed the presence of a putative androgen response element (ARE) in the FUT4 5′-promoter region and created mutant promoter constructs.

    The researchers further confirmed the androgen receptor-fucosyltransferase-4 axis modulation of cell signaling pathways in melanoma by creating empty vector (EV) controls or fucosyltransferase 4-overexpressing (FUT4-OE) melanoma cells.

    They conducted phosphoproteomic profiling of empty vectors and Ari-treated or untreated FUT4-overexpressing cells, followed by multiple-stage comparative analysis. The study sought to understand how ARs regulate fucosylation machinery genes and their significance in melanoma biology.

    The team discovered 368 distinct proteins (denoted by 484 phosphopeptide proteins) that were decreased by ≥2.0-fold in ARi-treated empty vector-WM793 cells (ARi-reduced phosphopeptide proteins).

    They then classified the phosphopeptides as those that FUT4 overexpression could restore (AR-FUT4-based effector molecules, n=95) and those unrestored by fucosyltransferase-4  overexpression (“AR-based, FUT4-independent effector molecules, n=241).

    The researchers performed further ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA) on 141 androgen receptor-fucosyltransferase-4 axis down- or upregulated signatures in WM1366 and WM793 cells.

    They measured the contacts between β-catenin, N-cadherin, and δ1-catenin, primary cytoplasmic adherens junction interactors. They performed proliferation and motility experiments to confirm the phosphoproteomic results and determine the effect of AR-FUT4-AJ signaling on melanoma biology.

    The team also investigated whether FUT8 contributes to the motility effects caused by FUT4. They also assessed AR expression and its relationships with downstream effectors in human melanoma samples.

    Results

    Researchers uncovered a method by which androgen-activated androgen receptors increase FUT4 expression, which promotes melanoma invasiveness by interacting with AJs. FUT4 is a critical transcriptional target of AR, disrupting cell-cell adhesion complexes in melanoma.

    AR-FUT4-mediated melanoma metastasis requires L1CAM, a downstream effector fucosylated by FUT4.  Tumor microarray and gene expression analysis revealed that AR-FUT4-L1CAM-AJs signaling is associated with clinical staging in melanoma patients.

    The researchers found that sex hormone-regulated fucosylation leads to the poor outcomes seen in male melanoma patients.

    The mechanism shows that androgen or its receptor signaling influences melanoma malignancy by increasing invasive and metastatic potential through tumorigenic fucosylation.

    Androgen/AR regulates cellular fucosylation in melanoma, with AR binding sites found in four genes (FUT4, FUT1, SLC35C2, and FUK). Androgen stimulation causes FUK to downregulate while FUT4 upregulates, indicating that AR modulates FUK and FUT4 expression in melanoma cells.

    The researchers discovered that 2FF and FUT4-OE reduce and promote melanoma cell motility, but ectopic FUT4 expression restores ARi-suppressed invasive potential. FUT4 levels are higher in metastatic lesions than in original melanoma tissues.

    They identified L1CAM as an essential target for the AR-FUT4 axis-induced melanoma invasiveness. FUT4-overexpressing cell lines produced more fucosylated proteins than FUT4-knockdown cell lines.

    DHT stimulation significantly elevated the fucosylation of L1CAM, and knockdown or overexpression of FUT4 resulted in lower or higher cellular levels of fucosylated L1CAM. L1CAM deletion inhibited DHT- or FUT4-induced melanoma motility.

    AR levels were higher in metastatic tumors from male patients, as was activated AR. Single-cell segmentation analysis revealed that metastatic lesions included fewer activated AR-high cells than initial tumors, demonstrating AR’s tumor-promoting involvement, particularly in male melanoma patients.

    Conclusion

    The study findings showed that androgen-triggered signaling is critical in melanoma, specifically targeting AR/FUT4 and its effectors.

    It supports the use of AR antagonists to treat melanomas and advises employing androgen- and fucosylation-based indicators to stratify therapy.

    AR activation enhances tumorigenic FUT4, resulting in worse clinical outcomes in male patients. The work also relates the AR transcriptional repertoire to oncogenic protein fucosylation, which promotes melanoma invasiveness in androgen-responsive melanomas.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Immune cell networks key to success of personalized cancer treatment

    Immune cell networks key to success of personalized cancer treatment

    [ad_1]

    Through an analysis of tumor samples collected over time from patients with advanced melanoma, a Ludwig Cancer Research study has identified a set of preexisting conditions in tumors that predict whether such patients are likely to respond to a personalized immunotherapy known as adoptive T cell therapy (ACT) using tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL).

    Led by Ludwig Lausanne’s David Barras, Eleonora Ghisoni, Johanna Chiffelle, Denarda Dangaj Laniti and Branch Director George Coukos and reported in Science Immunology, the study also describes biomarkers that, with further vetting, could help clinicians select patients for TIL-ACT. In this therapy, TIL-;which kill cancerous cells-;are isolated from a patient, expanded in culture and then reinfused into the patient as a treatment.

    Given the aggressiveness of advanced melanoma, the potential value of TIL-ACT for patients who respond to it after failing immune checkpoint blockade immunotherapy and other available lines of therapy can’t be overstated. The question, of course, is who those people are and since only a fraction of patients currently benefit from the experimental therapy, it is vitally important to be able to quickly identify those who are unlikely to respond so that they can be quickly offered alternative treatments. Our study has taken a big step toward making that possible.”


    George Coukos

    The Lausanne Branch of the Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research is developing a number of strategies for personalized immunotherapies, ranging from cancer vaccines to personalized adoptive cell therapies (ACT) for a variety of cancers, including TIL-ACT.

    To explore how the tumors differed between patients who responded to treatment and others, the researchers collected tumor samples from patients before therapy started and then at various timepoints after they had undergone TIL-ACT treatment. They then examined differences between the global gene expression patterns of individual cancerous and noncancerous cells and conducted additional molecular analyses of cellular features and, most notably, interactions between cells in the context of their location within the tumors.

    “Through these analyses,” Barras explained, “we discovered the underlying tumor cell biology and characteristics of the tumor microenvironment that mediate responses to ACT.”

    The researchers show that tumors that responded best to TIL-ACT were those that were most riddled with mutations-;and therefore coruscated with neoantigens likely to be recognized by CD8+ (or killer) T cells. Further, as might be expected, the killer T cells in these tumors were in states with a potential for intense anti-tumor activation.

    “Our most significant finding in this context was that tumors with preexisting networks of immune cells were the ones most primed to respond to TIL-ACT, and patients whose tumors featured such networks were the ones who responded best to therapy,” said Dangaj. “That included a pair of patients enrolled in the trial whose tumors were completely cleared by the treatment.”

    Those networks consisted of killer T cells in close association with myeloid cells-;dendritic cells and macrophages-;that “present” antigens to killer T cells to guide them to their targets. These cells also hyperactivate them by binding a protein known as CD28 on the TILs to boost and sustain their functionality and secreting other T cell-stimulating factors. Moreover, these myeloid cells, like the killer T cells, were themselves in an activated state in responsive patients.

    The researchers found in examining tumor samples collected after treatment that successful TIL-ACT therapy further expanded and activated these immune cell networks. Macrophages additionally expressed a molecule name CXCL9 that likely bolsters stimulatory interactions with T cells.

    Notably, the findings reflect discoveries Coukos, Dangaj and colleagues have made in studying the responsiveness of ovarian tumors to an approved immunotherapy known as PD-1 checkpoint blockade.

    “Aside from the value of improved patient stratification, our discoveries on the cell and molecular biology of tumors that respond to TIL-ACT could help us devise treatment strategies to ‘precondition’ patients to respond to this therapy,” said Coukos. “That is a very exciting possibility, and one we are eager to pursue.”

    Source:

    Journal reference:

    Barras, D., et al. (2024). Response to tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte adoptive therapy is associated with preexisting CD8 + T-myeloid cell networks in melanoma. Science Immunology. doi.org/10.1126/sciimmunol.adg7995.

    [ad_2]

    Source link