[ad_1]
People with body dysmorphic disorder seem to have altered activity in a brain pathway involved in attention and recognition, which may explain why they overly focus on aspects of their appearance
[ad_2]
Source link
Tag: mental health
-

We may have found why people experience body dysmorphic disorder
-

Post-Pandemic Recovery Isn’t Guaranteed | WIRED
[ad_1]
Lucy Easthope, one of the UK’s top experts in disaster planning, has advised the UK government on major international incidents such as 9/11, the Grenfell Tower fire, the war in Ukraine and, of course, the Covid pandemic. “If you were a pandemic planner in 2020, then there have been few surprises over the past few years,” Easthope says. “In those pandemic plans we wrote a reasonable worst-case scenario—and now we get to live it.”
Emergency planners such as Easthope know that the aftermath of a disaster can usually be divided roughly into three stages: the honeymoon (“Or, as we call it now, lockdown one”), the slump, and the uptick. “We’re still in the slump,” she says, of the UK. “We’ve reached a stage where all signs of institutional collapse are here. Basic reliance on the health care system for the most privileged is now gone. Failure gets talked about loudly.”
However, Easthope warns that the uptick, the stage when societies rebuild, isn’t always guaranteed. “It’s really important to have no issue be off the table and [to keep things] nonpolitical,” she says. “To be very aware that the Titanic can sink, and to leave the hubris at the door.”
Disaster planning research, for instance, shows that the post-pandemic mental health crisis will continue for the next 30 to 40 years, with an increased prevalence of alcohol and drug abuse in affected communities. “Recovery after these sorts of events is not a spring, but the worst kind of endurance,” Easthope says. “The only good thing that comes out of a disaster like a pandemic is that it creates one single opportunity to reexamine structures and institutions.”
This article appears in the July/August 2024 issue of WIRED UK magazine.
[ad_2]
Source link -

Dear David: How do I help my daughters deal with their social anxiety?
[ad_1]

Melanie Acevedo/Getty Images
Thank you to everyone who proposed questions for my new evidence-based advice column. This time, I am responding to a reader who is concerned about his daughters’ social anxiety. “For one of them, this is so high that she feels unable to ever start a conversation with someone outside of the immediate family,” he tells me. How can he help?
It is a major dilemma for many parents. Social anxiety affects adults and children alike, but it seems to be especially problematic in the second decade of life, with the US National Institute of Mental Health estimating that around…
[ad_2]
Source link -

The surprising mental health and brain benefits of weight-loss drugs
[ad_1]

ADDICTIVE STOCK CREATIVES/Alamy; AdoBe stock
Kathy Schwartz was 10 years free from alcohol, cigarettes and opiates but every day it was painful to control her cravings. “They were always in the background,” she says. In June last year, however, this noise fell silent.
Prescribed the weight-loss drug semaglutide, she not only lost nearly 30 kilograms over 10 months, but also her desire to reach for a drink or take some pills. “I do not crave, which I didn’t think would be a side effect,” says Schwartz. Remarkably, the depression and anxiety that would previously come over her in waves also calmed down.
Schwartz isn’t alone in this experience. New research is revealing the surprising brain and mental health benefits of semaglutide drugs such as Ozempic and Wegovy, and other related diabetes and weight-loss drugs that mimic a gut hormone released after eating.
It is early days, but there are hints that these drugs could be repurposed to treat depression, anxiety, addiction and even certain eating disorders – as well as neurological conditions such as Parkinson’s disease and Alzheimer’s. What’s more, it seems that these effects aren’t just mediated via weight loss, but through direct action on the brain.
The story of drugs like Ozempic starts back in the 1970s and 1980s when researchers discovered that a gut hormone called glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) could stimulate insulin production when injected into rodents in the lab. More surprisingly, these animals started eating less and losing weight. We now know that the hormone leads to an increased feeling of fullness.
Semaglutide and more
Today, drugs that mimic…
[ad_2]
Source link -

The Case for MDMA’s Approval Is Riddled With Problems
[ad_1]
The results sounds promising, but Michael Ostacher, professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at Stanford University who’s not involved with Lykos and wasn’t on the FDA panel, says there’s a big problem: “It’s unclear whether or not the participation in the study and anticipation of the effect is what makes people better, rather than the impact of the drug itself.”
In medical research, a double-blinded placebo controlled trial—in which neither the participants nor the researchers know who gets a placebo or the experimental treatment—is considered the gold standard. But the effects of psychedelics are so well known that it’s easy for volunteers and therapists alike to guess whether they received it. Ostacher says the growing hype over psychedelics has created certain expectations for people enrolled in these studies.
“My main concern is that people in the trial who did not receive the MDMA would experience a lot of disappointment about not getting the drug, and that would have a large influence on how they reported their symptoms,” he says. “In the same fashion, the people who did get the MDMA, which has been advertised by advocates as a life-changing treatment, would be inclined to feel positive about their experience.”
This “unblinding” effect is a well-known conundrum not just for Lykos but for the entire field of psychedelics research, and scientists are currently considering alternative ways of designing trials to account for this potential bias.
Another issue surrounds the psychotherapy, or talk therapy, administered during the trial sessions. When participants took MDMA or placebo, two therapists were in the room to help them express and process their memories and emotions during eight-hour sessions. Lykos describes this therapy as a “personalized experience,” but FDA committee members had concerns with the variability in therapy approaches and how much of patient outcomes could be attributed to the drug itself versus the therapy.
Natalie Gukasyan, an assistant professor of psychiatry at Columbia University who studies psychedelics, says “there’s a lot of wiggle room” in the Lykos manual on how the therapy session can be conducted. “If the treatment is medication-assisted psychotherapy, maybe a little bit more of a prescribed therapy is appropriate,” she says.
The FDA does not regulate therapy, nor is it involved with credentialing of psychotherapists, which raises the question of how therapy would be standardized. Gukasyan wonders whether it’s appropriate for Lykos to be involved with training therapists because it could present a conflict of interest.
While some of the participants who testified on Tuesday or submitted written comments to the committee described positive stories of their sessions and lasting benefits, others had negative experiences. In one particularly troubling report, former trial participant Meaghan Buisson testified that her therapists, a married couple, pinned her down on a bed while stroking and cuddling her. (New York Magazine reported on Buisson’s experiences two years ago, publishing a video of this incident.)
Another volunteer, Sarah McNamee, wrote that during her MDMA session, her therapists told her she was “helping make history” and that she was “part of a movement.” According to McNamee, they encouraged her to give a positive report of the experience, saying her responses during and after the trial could jeopardize the drug’s legalization. When her mental health symptoms worsened, she was told she would feel better in six months.
[ad_2]
Source link -

Does coming off antidepressants really cause withdrawal symptoms?
[ad_1]

The extent to which antidepressants cause withdrawal symptoms, if at all, has long been a contentious issue
Aleksandr Davydov/Alamy
Antidepressants are one of the most commonly taken medications in high-income countries – and are among the most controversial. Just 10 years ago, some doctors may have doubted that antidepressant withdrawal symptoms happen very much at all. Now, a study has found that these reactions occur in as many as 1 in 3 people who stop taking the medicines, although they may not always be what they seem.
Most antidepressants used today belong to a…
[ad_2]
Source link -

Race is a social construct, but racism can cause real biological harm
[ad_1]

It has been more than four years since Darnella Frazier, then a teenager, captured on camera the murder of George Floyd, an unarmed Black man, by white police officer Derek Chauvin in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Yet the impact on Frazier’s brain of what she witnessed could linger for much longer.
“I still hold the weight and trauma of what I witnessed,” Frazier wrote in a social media post on the one-year anniversary of Floyd’s murder. “I’m not who I used to be. A part of my childhood was taken from me.”
Burgeoning evidence suggests racism causes stress and trauma that can …
[ad_2]
Source link -

Smartphone use can actually help teenagers boost their mood
[ad_1]

How do smartphones make teens feel?
Shutterstock/DavideAngelini
A small study of children aged 12 to 17 suggests that using a smartphone slightly improves their mood, adding to the debate on whether teenagers should have access to the devices.
Experts are split on the matter: some researchers, including Jonathan Haidt at New York University, claim that smartphones may be contributing to a mental health crisis, while others like Pete Etchells at Bath Spa University, UK, argue that there is a lack of evidence to prove such a link.
Now, Matt Minich and Megan Moreno at the University of Wisconsin-Madison have gone further, showing a positive association with smartphones. They enlisted 253 children in the US to take part in a six-day study, sending them 30 short surveys via text at random times between 9am and 9pm.
The surveys asked people if they were on their phone at the time they received the text message, as well as to rate their mood on a 7-point scale at that present moment and before they picked up their phone.
On average, people said their mood had lifted from just below 5 on the 7-point scale to just below 5.5 when using their phone, suggesting they were using the device as a mood management tool. “Adolescents reported higher moods when they were using their phones,” says Minich. “And they reported that their moods had improved during the time that they were using their phones.”
So does this mean smartphones are good for teenagers? “Phones are neither good nor bad,” says Minich. “If a teen is also developing other healthy mood management techniques, it’s likely harmless for them to use their phones in this way. But if phone use becomes a crutch that prevents them from learning other ways to regulate moods, it might become an addictive or compulsive behaviour. Importantly, nothing in our results suggests that smartphone use is harmful for teens.”
Etchells praises the way that Minich and Moreno asked people for responses in the moment rather than only to recall past emotions, which can be misleading. But he disagrees with attempts to suggest that using phones to manage mood can be addictive. “It feels as though there’s this need to acknowledge that phones could still be bad, because we’re so stuck in that way of thinking,” he says.
Topics:
[ad_2]
Source link



