Tag: Natural gas

  • A Breakthrough in Efficiency and Cost

    A Breakthrough in Efficiency and Cost

    [ad_1]

    Energy Fuel Gas Production Concept Art

    Gas separation is crucial across many industries but often involves energy-intensive processes, such as cooling gases to liquefy and then separate them based on their evaporation temperatures. However, Professor Wei Zhang and his team at the University of Colorado Boulder have developed a new type of porous material that is flexible, sustainable, and energy-efficient. This material can adjust its pore sizes at different temperatures to selectively allow certain gases to pass through, potentially revolutionizing the way gases are separated and reducing the overall energy required for these processes.

    A new porous material allows for efficient, low-energy gas separation and is scalable for industrial use, offering a sustainable alternative to traditional methods.

    Separating gases plays a crucial role in various industries, from medical applications, where nitrogen and oxygen are separated from air, to environmental processes like carbon capture, where carbon dioxide is isolated from other gases, and the purification of natural gas by removing impurities.

    Separating gases, however, can be both energy-intensive and expensive. “For example, when separating oxygen and nitrogen, you need to cool the air to very low temperatures until they liquefy. Then, by slowly increasing the temperature, the gases will evaporate at different points, allowing one to become a gas again and separate out,” explains Wei Zhang, a University of Colorado Boulder professor of chemistry and chair of the Department of Chemistry. “It’s very energy intensive and costly.”

    Much gas separation relies on porous materials through which gases pass and are separated. This, too, has long presented a problem, because these porous materials generally are specific to the types of gases being separated. Try sending any other types of gas through them and they don’t work.

    However, in research published on June 27 in the journal Science, Zhang and his co-researchers detail a new type of porous material that can accommodate and separate many different gases and is made from common, readily available materials. Further, it combines rigidity and flexibility in a way that allows size-based gas separation to happen at a greatly decreased energy cost.
    “We are trying to make technology better,” Zhang says, “and improve it in a way that’s scalable and sustainable.”

    Adding Flexibility

    For a long time, the porous materials used in gas separation have been rigid and affinity-based—specific to the types of gases being separated. The rigidity allows the pores to be well-defined and helps direct the gases in separating, but also limits the number of gases that can pass through because of varying molecule sizes.

    For several years, Zhang and his research group worked to develop a porous material that introduces an element of flexibility to a linking node in an otherwise rigid porous material. That flexibility allows the molecular linkers to oscillate, or move back and forth at a regular speed, changing the accessible pore size in the material and allowing it to be adapted to multiple gases.

    “We found that at room temperature, the pore is relatively the largest and the flexible linker barely moves, so most gases can get in,” Zhang says. “When we increase the temperature from room temperature to about 50 degrees (Celsius), oscillation of the linker becomes larger, causing effective pore size to shrink, so larger gases can’t get in. If we keep increasing the temperature, more gases are turned away due to increased oscillation and further reduced pore size. Finally, at 100 degrees, only the smallest gas, hydrogen, can pass through.”

    The material that Zhang and his colleagues developed is made of small organic molecules and is most analogous to zeolite, a family of porous, crystalline materials mostly comprised of silicon, aluminum, and oxygen. “It’s a porous material that has a lot of highly ordered pores,” he says. “You can picture it like a honeycomb. The bulk of it is solid organic material with these regular-sized pores that line up and form channels.”

    The researchers used a fairly new type of dynamic covalent chemistry that focuses on the boron-oxygen bond. Using a boron atom with four oxygen atoms around it, they took advantage of the reversibility of the bond between the boron and oxygen, which can break and reform again and again, thus enabling self-correcting, error-proof behavior and leading to the formation of structurally ordered frameworks.

    “We wanted to build something with tunability, with responsiveness, with adaptability, and we thought the boron-oxygen bond could be a good component to integrate into the framework we were developing, because of its reversibility and flexibility,” Zhang says.

    Sustainable Solutions

    Developing this new porous material did take time, Zhang says: “Making the material is easy and simple. The difficulty was at the very beginning, when we first obtained the material and needed to understand or elucidate its structure—how the bonds form, how angles form within this material, is it two-dimensional or three-dimensional. We had some challenges because the data looked promising, we just didn’t know how to explain it. It showed certain peaks (x-ray diffraction), but we could not immediately figure out what kind of structure those peaks corresponded to.”

    So, he and his research colleagues took a step back, which can be an important but little-discussed part of the scientific process. They focused on the small-molecule model system containing the same reactive sites as those in their material to understand how molecular building blocks packed in a solid state, and that helped explain the data.

    Zhang adds that he and his co-researchers considered scalability in developing this material, since its potential industrial uses would require large amounts, “and we believe this method is highly scalable. The building blocks are commercially available and not expensive, so it could be adopted by industry when the time is right.”

    They have applied for a patent on the material and are continuing the research with other building block materials to learn the substrate scope of this approach. Zhang also says he sees potential to partner with engineering researchers to integrate the material into membrane-based applications.

    “Membrane separations generally require much less energy, so in the long term they could be more sustainable solutions,” Zhang says. “Our goal is to improve technology to meet industry needs in sustainable ways.”

    Reference: “Molecular recognition with resolution below 0.2 angstroms through thermoregulatory oscillations in covalent organic frameworks” by Yiming Hu, Bratin Sengupta, Hai Long, Lacey J. Wayment, Richard Ciora, Yinghua Jin, Jingyi Wu, Zepeng Lei, Kaleb Friedman, Hongxuan Chen, Miao Yu and Wei Zhang, 27 June 2024, Science.
    DOI: 10.1126/science.adj8791



    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Duren, R. M. et al. California’s methane super-emitters. Nature 575, 180–184 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cusworth, D. H. et al. Intermittency of large methane emitters in the Permian Basin. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 8, 567–573 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cusworth, D. H. et al. Strong methane point sources contribute a disproportionate fraction of total emissions across multiple basins in the United States. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2202338119 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Frankenberg, C. et al. Airborne methane remote measurements reveal heavy-tail flux distribution in Four Corners region. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 9734–9739 (2016).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • US Environmental Protection Agency. Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990–2020; www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/inventory-us-greenhouse-gas-emissions-and-sinks-1990-2020 (2022).

  • Yarmuth, J. A. Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, H.R.5376, Public Law No. 117–169, https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/5376/text (2022).

  • Brandt, A. R. et al. Methane leaks from North American natural gas systems. Science 343, 733–735 (2014).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Conrad, B. M., Tyner, D. R., Li, H. Z., Xie, D. & Johnson, M. R. A measurement-based upstream oil and gas methane inventory for Alberta, Canada reveals higher emissions and different sources than official estimates. Commun. Earth Environ. 4, 416 (2023).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • US Environmental Protection Agency. Methodology Report: Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks by State: 1990–2020; https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/methodology-report-inventory-us-greenhouse-gas-emissions-and-sinks-state-1990-2020 (2023).

  • Johnson, M. R., Conrad, B. M. & Tyner, D. R. Creating measurement-based oil and gas sector methane inventories using source-resolved aerial surveys. Commun. Earth Environ. 4, 139 (2023).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Alvarez, R. A. et al. Assessment of methane emissions from the U.S. oil and gas supply chain. Science 361, 186–188 (2018).

  • Carras, J. N. et al. in 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Ch. 4 (2006).

  • Irakulis-Loitxate, I. et al. Satellite-based survey of extreme methane emissions in the Permian basin. Sci. Adv. 7, eabf4507 (2021).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chen, Y. et al. Quantifying regional methane emissions in the New Mexico Permian Basin with a comprehensive aerial survey. Environ. Sci. Technol. 56, 4317–4323 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Varon, D. J. et al. Satellite discovery of anomalously large methane point sources from oil/gas production. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 13507–13516 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Varon, D. J. et al. High-frequency monitoring of anomalous methane point sources with multispectral Sentinel-2 satellite observations. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 14, 2771–2785 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lauvaux, T. et al. Global assessment of oil and gas methane ultra-emitters. Science 375, 557–561 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rutherford, J. S. et al. Closing the methane gap in US oil and natural gas production emissions inventories. Nat. Commun. 12, 4715 (2021).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kunkel, W. M. et al. Extension of methane emission rate distribution for Permian Basin oil and gas production infrastructure by aerial LiDAR. Environ. Sci. Technol. 57, 12234–12241 (2023).

  • Sherwin, E. D., Chen, Y., Ravikumar, A. P. & Brandt, A. R. Single-blind test of airplane-based hyperspectral methane detection via controlled releases. Elementa (Wash. D. C.) 9, 00063 (2021).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Jacob, D. J. et al. Quantifying methane emissions from the global scale down to point sources using satellite observations of atmospheric methane. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 22, 9617–9646 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bell, C. et al. Single-blind determination of methane detection limits and quantification accuracy using aircraft-based LiDAR. Elementa (Wash. D. C.) 10, 00080 (2022).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Sherwin, E. D. et al. Single-blind validation of space-based point-source detection and quantification of onshore methane emissions. Sci. Rep. 13, 3836 (2023).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sherwin, E. D. et al. Single-blind test of nine methane-sensing satellite systems from three continents. Atmospheric Meas. Tech. 70, 765–782 (2024).

  • US Environmental Protection Agency. State GHG Emissions and Removals; www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/state-ghg-emissions-and-removals (2022).

  • Omara, M. et al. Methane emissions from US low production oil and natural gas well sites. Nat. Commun. 13, 2085 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Brandt, A. R., Heath, G. A. & Cooley, D. Methane leaks from natural gas systems follow extreme distributions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 12512–12520 (2016).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Crippa, M. et al. Fossil CO2 and GHG emissions of all world countries: 2019 report (Publications Office of the European Union, 2019).

  • Masson-Delmotte, V. et al. (eds.) Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021).

  • Omara, M. et al. Methane emissions from natural gas production sites in the United States: data synthesis and national estimate. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52, 12915–12925 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Peischl, J. et al. Quantifying atmospheric methane emissions from the Haynesville, Fayetteville, and northeastern Marcellus shale gas production regions. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 120, 2119–2139 (2015).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pétron, G. et al. A new look at methane and nonmethane hydrocarbon emissions from oil and natural gas operations in the Colorado Denver-Julesburg Basin: hydrocarbon emissions in oil & gas basin. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 119, 6836–6852 (2014).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Barkley, Z. R. et al. Quantifying methane emissions from natural gas production in north-eastern Pennsylvania. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 17, 13941–13966 (2017).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Peischl, J. et al. Quantifying methane and ethane emissions to the atmosphere from central and western U.S. oil and natural gas production regions. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 123, 7725–7740 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fried, A. & Dickerson, R. Interim Report on Proposal Activities and No-Cost Extension Request: Continuous Airborne Measurements and Analysis of Oil & Natural Gas Emissions During the 2021 Denver-Julesburg Basin Studies. Prepared for the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission and the Colorado Air Pollution Control; https://apcd.state.co.us/aqidev/tech_doc_repository.aspx?action=open%26file=CU_UMD_2021_Final_Report.pdf (2022).

  • Lin, J. C. et al. Declining methane emissions and steady, high leakage rates observed over multiple years in a western US oil/gas production basin. Sci. Rep. 11, 22291 (2021).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, Y. et al. Quantifying methane emissions from the largest oil-producing basin in the United States from space. Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz5120 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schneising, O. et al. Remote sensing of methane leakage from natural gas and petroleum systems revisited. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 20, 9169–9182 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fox, T. A., Gao, M., Barchyn, T. E., Jamin, Y. L. & Hugenholtz, C. H. An agent-based model for estimating emissions reduction equivalence among leak detection and repair programs. J. Clean. Prod. 282, 125237 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kemp, C. E. & Ravikumar, A. P. New technologies can cost effectively reduce oil and gas methane emissions, but policies will require careful design to establish mitigation equivalence. Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 9140–9149 (2021).

  • US Environmental Protection Agency. Standards of Performance for New, Reconstructed, and Modified Sources and Emissions Guidelines for Existing Sources: Oil and Natural Gas Sector Climate Review; https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/11/15/2021-24202/standards-of-performance-for-new-reconstructed-and-modified-sources-and-emissions-guidelines-for (2022).

  • Cusworth, D. H. Methane plumes for NASA/JPL/UArizona/ASU Sep–Nov 2019 Permian campaign. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5610307 (2021).

  • Cusworth, D. et al. Methane plumes from airborne surveys 2020–2021 (1.0). Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5606120 (2021).

  • Berman, E. S. F., Wetherley, E. B. & Jones, B. B. Kairos Aerospace Technical White Paper: Methane Detection (Version 1F); https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/HZG52 (2023).

  • Thorpe, A. K. et al. Mapping methane concentrations from a controlled release experiment using the next generation airborne visible/infrared imaging spectrometer (AVIRIS-NG). Remote Sens. Environ. 179, 104–115 (2016).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • El Abbadi, S. et al. Comprehensive evaluation of aircraft-based methane sensing for greenhouse gas mitigation. Preprint at eartharxiv.org/repository/view/5569/ (2023).

  • Branson, K., Jones, B. B. & Berman, E. S. F. Kairos Aerospace Methane Emissions Quantification; https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/2UNWQ (2021).

  • Thorpe, A. K., Frankenberg, C. & Roberts, D. A. Retrieval techniques for airborne imaging of methane concentrations using high spatial and moderate spectral resolution: application to AVIRIS. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 7, 491–506 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Robertson, A. M. et al. New Mexico Permian Basin measured well pad methane emissions are a factor of 5–9 times higher than U.S. EPA estimates. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 13926–13934 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wasserman, L. All of Statistics: A Concise Course in Statistical Inference (Springer Science+Business Media, 2004).

  • KairosAerospace/stanford_fort_worth_data_2021: v1.0. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8302419 (2023).

  • KairosAerospace/stanford_nm_data_2019: v1.0. Zenodo https://zenodo.org/records/10067753 (2023).

  • Sherwin, E. D. & Zhang, Z. Data and code for “US oil and gas system emissions from nearly one million aerial site measurements”. Zenodo https://zenodo.org/records/10064774 (2023).

  • JSRuthe/BU_methane_model: Release for distributions paper. Zenodo https://zenodo.org/records/10073882 (2023).

[ad_2]

Source link