Tag: Plant signalling

  • Probing plant signal processing optogenetically by two channelrhodopsins

    [ad_1]

    Ethics

    The laparotomy to obtain oocytes from X.laevis was carried out in accordance with the principles of the Basel Declaration and recommendations of Landratsamt Wuerzburg Veterinaeramt. The protocol under License number 70/14 from Landratsamt Wuerzburg, Veterinaeramt, was approved by the responsible veterinarian.

    Molecular cloning

    The pGEMHE vector51 was used for in vitro RNA synthesis and the following expression in X.aevis oocytes. The binary pCAMBIA3300 vector with the UBQ10 promoter or the pCAMBIA1300 vector with the CaMV 35S promoter was used for Agrobacterium infiltration and stable transformation of plants.

    Substitutions were introduced by QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis PCR. The pCambia1300 NES-2×R-GECO1 was cloned using the USER cloning technique52. For other constructs, all of the fragments with suitable restriction sites were introduced into the pGEMHE vector or the binary vectors pCAMBIA3300 with T4 DNA ligase (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

    Plasmid extractions from Escherichia coli cultures were carried out using the MiniPrep 250 Kit (QIAGEN) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All constructs were verified by sequencing (Eurofins Genomics). The sequences of XXM 1.1 and XXM 2.0 are available in the Supplementary Information.

    Molecular engineering and development of XXM 2.0

    ChR2-XXM (D156H) was selected as a template to start molecular engineering owing to the high expression level and already enhanced Ca2+ permeability19. As no specific ion-selective filter is identified in ChR2, we anticipated that the three (extracellular, centre and intracellular) molecular gates (ECG, CG and ICG) might contribute to modulating ion-selective properties of ChR2, in addition to its gating function. Considering known substitution sites of ChR2 variants with modified ion selectivity in relation to the crystal structure indeed suggests a possibility to modulate ion selectivity using the ChR2 structure generated by PyMOL53 (Extended Data Fig. 1b). Within the three-dimensional structure, the internal cavities were calculated using HOLLOW, which is a published python script54. Some gating residues (H134 and E83 in ICG, and Q117 and R120 in ECG) and residues located in close proximity to the gate (E101 near ECG) were therefore substituted (Extended Data Fig. 1b). S63 (when combined with D156H) and E90 substitutions in CG have been reported to decrease Ca2+ conductance55,56, and therefore were not tested here. The resulting variants were first tested by two-electrode voltage-clamp analysis with X.laevis oocytes for comparison of photocurrent amplitude (Extended Data Fig. 1c). Variants exhibiting high photocurrent amplitude were next studied to determine the ion selectivity (reversal potential shift comparison) by changing extracellular ion concentrations (Extended Data Fig. 1d, see details in the following section) for selecting the superior candidate with high Ca2+ conductance (Fig. 1). To further enhance its membrane trafficking, N-terminal truncation of ChR2 and addition of signal peptides as recently reported4 were explored and examined by fluorescence imaging along with a comparison of photocurrents in X.laevis oocytes.

    Two-electrode voltage-clamp analysis with X.
    laevis oocytes

    The AmpliCap-MaxT7 High Yield Message Maker Kit (Epicentre Biotechnologies) was used to synthesize XXM, XXM 1.1, XXM 1.2, XXM 1.3 and XXM 2.0 complementary RNA (cRNA). All of the cRNAs were stored in nuclease-free water at −20 °C. Oocytes were injected with 30 ng cRNA and incubated in ND96 solution (96 mM NaCl, 2 mM KCl, 1 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 10 mM 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES), pH 7.4) at 16 °C for 2 days. Two-electrode voltage-clamp recordings were carried out at room temperature with a two-electrode voltage-clamp amplifier (TURBO TEC-03X, NPI Electronic). Electrode capillaries (diameter 1.5 mm, wall thickness 0.178 mm; Hilgenberg) were pulled by a vertical puller (PC-10, Narishige) and filled with 3 M KCl, with tip resistance of 0.4–1 MΩ. A USB-6221 DAQ interface (National Instruments) and WinWCP V5.3.4 software (University of Strathclyde, UK) were used for data acquisition. Blue light illumination was supplied by a 473-nm laser (Changchun New Industries Optoelectronics Tech).

    Photocurrents of different XXM versions in response to blue light illumination (473 nm, 3 mW mm−2) were compared at a holding potential of −90 mV in a standard recording solution (96 mM NaCl, 2 mM KCl, 1 mM BaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.6). For the reversal potential shift (mV) comparison, photocurrents of XXM and XXM 1.1 were recorded in both buffer A (119 mM N-methyl-d-glucamine, 0.8 mM BaCl2, 5 mM HEPES, pH 7.6) and buffer B (80 mM BaCl2, 5 mM HEPES, pH 7.6). Blue light (473 nm, 3 mW mm−2) was applied to activate different XXM variants. In the experiment for the comparison of calcium currents between XXM and XXM 1.1, 10 mM 1,2-bis(o-aminophenoxy)ethane-N,N,NN′-tetraacetic acid (BAPTA) was injected to block the endogenous Ca2+-activated chloride channels of oocytes. The Ca2+ currents triggered by 3 mW mm−2 blue light were measured in the bath solution containing 80 mM CaCl2 and 10 mM 3-(cyclohexylamino)-2-hydroxy-1-propanesulfonic acid (CAPSO) at pH 9 and a holding potential of −90 mV.

    The action spectrum for XXM 2.0 was detected with light of different wavelengths. Light of different wavelengths (399.3 nm, 422 nm, 440.7 nm, 456 nm, 479.5 nm, 496 nm, 516 nm, 541 nm, 562 nm and 595 nm) was obtained by narrow bandwidth interference filters (Edmund Optics) together with a PhotoFluor II light source (89 North). Equal photon flux was set for each wavelength. Photocurrents were detected when treated with light of distinct wavelength and normalized to the maximal stationary currents triggered by blue light (456 nm). The light intensities were measured with a Plus 2 Power & Energy Meter (Laserpoint).

    Agrobacterium transformation

    The Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 was collected by centrifugation after 1 day of culture and washed twice with sterile distilled water. All of the plasmids described for plant expression were transformed into A.tumefaciens by an electroporation protocol57. Monoclonal colonies were selected from lysogeny broth (LB)–agar plates with 100 μg ml−1 kanamycin, 25 μg ml−1 gentamycin and 10 μg ml−1 rifampicin at 28 °C and cultured in LB medium with 100 μg ml−1 kanamycin, 25 μg ml−1 gentamycin and 10 μg ml−1 rifampicin at 28 °C. The colonies were confirmed by PCR.

    Agrobacterium infiltration of N.
    benthamiana leaves

    For Agrobacterium infiltration, 30–37-day-old N.benthamiana plants grown in the greenhouse (40–60 kilolux light irradiation from 08:00–20:00, 24–26 °C) were used. Transient transformation of N.benthamiana plants was carried out according to the protocol of ref. 58. Briefly, agrobacteria were cultured in LB medium with 150 µM acetosyringone at 28 °C for about 16–18 h, collected by centrifugation and washed twice with infiltration buffer (10 mM MgCl2, 10 mM 2-morpholinoethanesulfonic acid (MES) (pH was adjusted to 5.6 by KOH), 150 μM acetosyringone). The final concentration was adjusted to 0.4 at an optical density of 600 nm (OD600nm) in infiltration buffer. A 1-ml syringe was used to infiltrate the resuspended agrobacteria into the leaves through the abaxial epidermis. The infiltrated plants were grown in 650 nm red light (light intensity of about 30 µW mm−2; cycles of 14 h light at 26 °C/10 h dark at 16 °C).

    Stable transformation of N.
    tabacum plants

    N.tabacum (N.tabacum cultivar Petit Havana SR1) seeds sterilized by 6% NaOCl were germinated and grown in 500-ml sterile plastic boxes on agar plates (Murashige and Skoog medium including vitamins and MES (Duchefa Biochemie), 3% sucrose, 0.8% Gelzan (Sigma-Aldrich), pH 5.8 with KOH) in stable culture conditions of cycles of 14 h light at 26 °C/10 h dark at 16 °C. The A.tumefaciens strain GV3101 harbouring the pCAMBIA3300 vector with BASTA resistance or the pCAMBIA1300 vector with hygromycin resistance was used for N.tabacum transformation as described previously59 with some minor modifications. Agrobacteria were collected and washed twice with sterilized MS solution (Murashige and Skoog medium including vitamins and MES (Duchefa Biochemie), 3% sucrose, pH 5.8 with KOH). The final concentration was adjusted to OD600nm = 0.1. Sterilized leaves were cut into pieces of about 2 cm2 and soaked in the resuspended agrobacteria solution for 20 min. The wet leaf pieces were dried, placed on plant growth medium and transferred after 3 days to a callus-inducing medium (Murashige and Skoog medium including vitamins and MES (Duchefa Biochemie), 3% sucrose, 0.8% Gelzan (Sigma-Aldrich), pH 5.8 with KOH, 20 µg ml−1 dl-phosphinothricin (Duchefa Biochemie) or 30 mg l−1 hygromycin B (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 500 µg ml−1 ticarcillin disodium (Duchefa Biochemie), 100 mg l−1 myo-inositol, 1 mg l−1 thiamine hydrochloride, 1 mg l−1 6-benzylaminopurine and 100 µg l−1 1-naphthaleneacetic acid (Sigma-Aldrich)) and cultured under 650-nm light-emitting diode (LED) red light with light intensity of about 30 µW mm−2. The pieces of leaves, explants and calli were transferred to new callus-inducing medium every 2 weeks. Generated shoots were decapitated and moved onto rooting medium (Murashige and Skoog medium including vitamins and MES (Duchefa Biochemie), 3% sucrose, 0.8% Gelzan (Sigma-Aldrich), pH 5.8 with KOH, 20 µg ml−1 dl-phosphinothricin (Duchefa Biochemie) or 30 mg l−1 hygromycin B (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 500 µg ml−1 ticarcillin disodium (Duchefa Biochemie), 100 mg l−1 myo-inositol, 1 mg l−1 thiamine hydrochloride)) and, after root formation, were grown on soil in 650 nm red light (about 30 µW mm−2, cycles of 14 h light at 26 °C/10 h dark at 16 °C).

    The transgenic plants were verified by eYFP fluorescence or R-GECO1 fluorescence in leaves. Seeds of individual plants were collected and selected for BASTA or hygromycin resistance using selection medium (Murashige and Skoog medium including vitamins and MES (Duchefa Biochemie), 3% sucrose, 0.8% Gelzan, pH 5.8 with KOH, 20 µg ml−1 dl-phosphinothricin (Duchefa Biochemie) or 30 mg l−1 hygromycin B (Thermo Fisher Scientific)). Homozygous lines were used for experimental studies.

    Confocal microscopy and image processing

    A confocal laser scanning microscope (Leica SP5, Leica Microsystems CMS) controlled by Leica LAS AF (Version 2.7.3.9723, Leica Microsystems) was used to subcellularly localize the rhodopsin–eYFP fusions in plant cells or X.laevis oocytes. The yellow fluorescence was observed with a dipping 25× HCX IRAPO 925/0.95 objective in N.benthamiana leaves 3 days post Agrobacterium infiltration, in N.tabacum leaves after 45 days grown in red light (light intensity of about 30 µW mm−2; cycles of 14 h light at 26 °C/10 h dark at 16 °C) and in X.laevis oocytes 2 days post injection. eYFP was excited at 496 nm and fluorescence was captured between 520 and 580 nm. N.benthamiana and N.tabacum leaf discs were placed upside down for yellow fluorescence detection. FIJI IMAGEJ-win64 software60 was used for image processing.

    Aequorin-based cytoplasmic free Ca2+ measurements

    Co-infiltration of agrobacteria with 10 μM of coelenterazine (PJK Biotech) was carried out as described in the ‘Agrobacterium infiltration of N.benthamiana leaves’ section under red light conditions. After 2 days in the red light growth room, aequorin luminescence from the infiltrated leaves was measured by a homemade luminometer. Luminescence was detected by a photomultiplier (Photo Counting Module MP 1983 RS CPM, Perkin Elmer) controlled by IGI-MPRS232 (IGIsystems). Labview 14.0.0 (National Instruments) was used to control the shutter and LEDs. A 520-nm green light LED (from WINGER, WEPGN3-S1) with a light intensity of 50 μW mm−2 was used to activate rhodopsins. To prevent the LED light from being detected by the photomultiplier, an additional shutter (Uniblitz, VCM-D1) was installed.

    Live-cell imaging and all-optical physiology measurements

    Live-cell imaging experiments were carried out using transiently transformed N.benthamiana leaves, transgenic N.tabacum leaves (Ret-XXM 2.0 with R-GECO1, Ret-ACR1 2.0 with R-GECO1, R-GECO1, Ret-XXM 2.0 with pHuji and pHuji) or transiently transformed N.benthamiana mesophyll protoplasts (R-GECO1 and Ret-XXM 2.0 with R-GECO1). The A.tumefaciens strain GV3101 harbouring the corresponding pCAMBIA vectors and A.tumefaciens strain K19 were cultured at 28 °C overnight. The infiltration solution for co-expression of Ret-XXM 2.0 with R-GECO1 contained A.tumefaciens strain K19 (OD600nm = 0.3) and A.tumefaciens strain GV3101 harbouring the pCAMBIA plasmids (pCAMBIA3300 vector carrying Ret-XXM 2.0, pCAMBIA1300 vector carrying NES-2× R-GECO1; OD600nm = 0.4 for both). Control plants were infiltrated with infiltration solution containing A.tumefaciens strain K19 (OD600nm = 0.3) and A.tumefaciens strain GV3101 harbouring the pCAMBIA1300 vector carrying NES-2× R-GECO1 (OD600nm = 0.4). [Ca2+]cyt measurements were carried out 3 days post infiltration. Mesophyll protoplasts were prepared from the transiently transformed N.benthamiana leaves from which the abaxial epidermis was peeled off. The leaf pieces without the main vein were incubated in enzyme solution (1% BSA, 0.05% pectolyase Y23, 0.5% cellulase R-10, 0.5% macerozym R-10, 1 mM CaCl2, 10 mM MES, 500 mM d-sorbitol, pH 5.6 with Tris) for 2 h. Following enzymatic digestion, cells were filtered through a 100-µm mesh. Protoplasts were collected by low-speed centrifugation (80g) without acceleration at 4 °C. Protoplasts were washed twice using precooled wash solution (1 mM CaCl2, 500 mM d-sorbitol, pH 5.6 with Tris) and finally resuspended in precooled wash solution and stored on ice until use. Leaf disc samples with a diameter of 5 mm were prepared by peeling the abaxial epidermis off and gluing leaf discs upside down with medical adhesive (ULRICH Swiss) on custom-made recording chambers. The samples were allowed to recover in the dark in bath solution (1 mM KCl, 1 mM CaCl2, 10 mM MES, and 1,3-bis(tris(hydroxymethyl)methylamino)propane (BTP), pH  6.0) at room temperature (about 25 °C) overnight before R-GECO1 or pHuji fluorescence measurement and all-optical experiments were carried out.

    The microscope setup to carry out live-cell imaging is described in detail elsewhere61. R-GECO125 and pHuji26 were excited with 570 nm excitation light. VisiView software (Version 2.1.1) was used to simultaneously control R-GECO1 imaging and triggering of local green light (532 nm, 180 μW mm−2) illumination by a solid-state laser (Changchun New Industries Optoelectronics Tech) or global green light (520 nm, 9 μW mm−2) illumination by a homemade LED device (LED from WINGER, WEPGN3-S1). XXM 2.0 activation by green light was carried out in the 5 s interval time during R-GECO1 or pHuji imaging. Green light illumination was terminated more than 1 s before R-GECO1 was excited to avoid photoswitching effects of R-GECO1 during optogenetic stimulation as reported previously62. A dichroic mirror (HC593 (F38-593), AHF Analysetechnik) combined with a high-speed filter wheel equipped with bandpass filters for R-GECO1 or pHuji (ET 624/20 nm) was used to detect the red fluorescence. During the detection of [Ca2+]cyt signal triggered by XXM 2.0 stimulation when a different light condition was used, a 2 s interval time was set during R-GECO1 illuminations. It should be noted that the light pulse protocols used to set defined [Ca2+]cyt signatures must be customized for each particular cell system or plant line and cannot act as a blueprint as features such as the expression level and cell type used or the Ca2+ homeostasis will probably influence the signature.

    To avoid undesirable XXM 2.0 or ACR1 2.0 activations during bright-field imaging, the microscope white light source was covered by a primary red filter (Lee filter 106). Simultaneous plasma membrane potential and R-GECO1 fluorescence recordings were carried out in R-GECO1, Ret-XXM 2.0 with R-GECO1, Ret-ACR1 2.0 with R-GECO1 samples. Current-clamp-based voltage recordings were carried out by microelectrode impalement as described elsewhere61. Glass microelectrodes filled with 300 mM KCl were connected to the microelectrode amplifier (TEC-05X; NPI Electronic) equipped with head stages of more than 1013 Ω input impedance. The reference electrodes were filled with 300 mM KCl. A piezo-driven micromanipulator (Sensapex) was used to direct the glass electrode. The current-clamp protocols were applied by WinWCP V5.3.4 software (University of Strathclyde, UK). R-GECO1 fluorescence intensities were recorded using FIJI IMAGEJ-win64 software60.

    Ca2+ signals were detected in N.tabacum leaves utilizing the R-GECO1 reporter following Pst treatment using a perfusion system (780 μl min−1), which prevents motion and touch-induced imaging artefacts47,63,64,65. Pst inoculated from LB–agar plates containing 10 µg ml−1 rifampicin was cultured in LB medium with 10 µg ml−1 rifampicin for 1.5 days (28 °C, 200 r.p.m.) and subsequently subcultured in 500 ml LB medium containing 10 µg ml−1 rifampicin for 16 h. Pst cells were washed twice using sterile deionized water and suspended in bath solution (1 mM KCl, 1 mM CaCl2, 10 mM MES and BTP, pH 6.0), resulting in a final perfusion solution with an OD600nm of 0.5. Leaf disc samples from R-GECO1 transgenic N.tabacum plants without abaxial epidermis were glued with the adaxial side down to the coverslip in custom-made chambers using Medical Adhesive B (Ulrich Swiss) and allowed to recover in bath solution overnight before Ca2+ imaging.

    Membrane voltage recordings in mesophyll cells

    Microelectrodes for mesophyll cell impalement were pulled from borosilicate glass capillaries (inner diameter 0.58 mm, outer diameter 1.0 mm, Hilgenberg) using a horizontal laser puller (P2000, Sutter). Microelectrodes filled with 300 mM KCl having an electrode resistance of 60–110 MΩ were connected by Ag/AgCl wires to the microelectrode amplifier (Axon geneclamp 500 or VF-102; BioLogic). Reference electrodes were filled with 300 mM KCl, and plugged with 2% agar in 300 mM KCl. The NA USB-6221 interface (National Instruments) was used to digitalize data. Cells were impaled by an electronic micromanipulator (NC-30, Kleindiek Nanotechnik) and current-clamp protocols were applied with the WinWCP V5.3.4 software (University of Strathclyde, UK).

    Plant growth conditions and sample collection

    All of the WT and transgenic N.tabacum plants were grown under constant red light (650 nm, 30 μW mm−2, 26 °C) for 45 days. For ACR1 2.0 and XXM 2.0 stimulation, 0 h, 1 h, 4 h and 24 h additional global green light (520 nm, 9 μW mm−2) were applied for the experimental groups. For osmotic stress treatment, 35% PEG was used to water Ret-eYFP #1 transgenic N.tabacum plants. This PEG concentration was selected after initial experiments with different PEG concentrations that would cause wilting phenotypes in a similar time frame (after 4–5 h) to that for the green-light-treated Ret-ACR1 2.0 plants. For Pst treatment, the Pst was washed twice with sterile deionized water and suspended in 10 mM MgCl2 containing 0.04% Silwet L-77 with a final OD600nm of 0.5 and sprayed on the entire Ret-eYFP #1 transgenic N.tabacum plants. Pst treatment was applied by spray inoculation to prevent wounding effects taking place that would unequivocally occur during infiltration by a syringe. The same amount (about 25 ml for each plant) of 10 mM MgCl2 containing 0.04% Silwet L-77 was sprayed on Ret-eYFP #1 transgenic N.tabacum as the negative control. At t = 0 h before the additional green light illumination, PEG, Pst or 10 mM MgCl2 was applied. For plants treated with 0 h, 1 h and 4 h green light illumination, the fifth leaves of N.tabacum were collected at different time points (t = 0 h, 1 h, 4 h and 8 h) and frozen in liquid nitrogen quickly for metabolite measurement and transcriptomics analysis. For plants treated with 24 h global green light, PEG, Pst or 10 mM MgCl2, the fifth leaves from N.tabacum at different time points (t = 0 min, 3 min, 10 min, 0.5 h, 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 8h and 24 h) were used for detection and quantification of ROS, electrolyte leakage estimations, chlorophyll fluorescence detection, metabolite measurement and transcriptomics analysis.

    Detection of necrosis in leaf discs

    A tissue puncher (Stiefel Disposable biopsy punch, diameter of 6 mm) was used to prepare leaf discs from the fifth leaf of 45-day-old N.tabacum plants. Leaf discs were washed twice with deionized water and transferred into 24-well plates containing 0.4 ml ultrapure H2O that contained 1 mM CaCl2, 10 mM CaCl2, 5 mM EGTA (pH 7.0, KOH), 5 mM K4BAPTA or 5 mM K4BAPTA plus 10 mM NaCl as indicated in Extended Data Fig. 5c,d. Samples were placed in the dark for 1 h before exposing them to the light condition (growth chamber with constant red light (650 nm, 30 μW mm−2) plus constant green light (520 nm, 9 µW mm−2, 26 °C)). Images were captured after 24 h treatment.

    Chlorophyll fluorescence measurements

    N.tabacum plants treated as described in the ‘Plant growth conditions and sample collection’ section were used to quantify photosynthesis performance with a pulse-amplitude modulation fluorometer. The fifth leaf was fixed and monitored with a Maxi pulse-amplitude modulation fluorometer (AVT 033); chlorophyll fluorescence measurements were recorded with IMAGING WIN v.2.41a FW MULTI RGB (Walz). The dark-adapted N.tabacum leaf was exposed to actinic light with intensity 7 (photosynthetically active radiation as 146 μmol m−2 s−1). The maximal fluorescence yield of a dark-adapted sample (Fm) and dark-level fluorescence yield (Fo) were detected. The quantum yield of the dark-adapted leaf samples is a measure of the potential quantum yield of the samples, which was calculated according to the equation: Yield = (Fm − Fo)/Fm.

    Electrolyte leakage estimations

    The membrane integrity of N.tabacum leaf cells was estimated by electrolyte leakage of leaf samples. Ion conductivity was measured as described previously66. Seven leaf discs (5 mm diameter) were detached from the fifth leaves of 45-day-old plants and equilibrated together in 0.3 ml of ultrapure H2O after washing twice with ultrapure H2O. Ion conductivity was quantified 20 min after leaf disc equilibration in ultrapure H2O (EC1) using a LAQUAtwin EC-11 conductivity meter (Horiba). The samples were then heated at 99 °C for 1 h to measure the final electrical conductivity (EC2) when the samples reached room temperature again. The relative electrolyte leakage was calculated, as a percentage, by the formula: EL = EC1/EC2 × 100.

    Detection of ROS

    Chemical detection of ROS in green light (520 nm, 9 μW mm−2)-treated N.tabacum leaves was carried out by 3,3-diaminobenzidine (DAB, Sigma-Aldrich) staining as described previously67. The fifth leaves of N.tabacum plants were stained with fresh DAB staining solution (10 mM Na2HPO4, 1 mg ml−1 DAB, 0.05% Tween 20, pH 3.0) by application of negative pressure for 5 min in dark. After 5 h incubation (shaking speed of 80–100 r.p.m.), the stained leaves were moved into fresh chlorophyll destaining solution (ethanol/acetic acid/glycerol, 3:1:1) and bathed in hot water (about 90–95 °C) for 15 min. Finally, the stained leaves were put into cold fresh chlorophyll destaining solution for 30 min. Images were taken with a plain white background under uniform lighting.

    The chemiluminescent ‘superoxide probe’ luminol can be applied to indicate the ROS production68. Superoxide released from leaf tissues was detected by the luminescence of luminol with Skanlt software (Version 6.1) according to the method described previously69 with minor modifications. Leaf discs were prepared from the fifth leaves of 45-day-old N.tabacum plants using a tissue puncher (Stiefel Disposable biopsy punch, diameter of 6 mm). Leaf discs were washed with deionized water twice and transferred into the 96-well assay plate (black plate, clear bottom with lid, Corning) and incubated in the dark overnight to recover. Water was replaced with 200 µl of luminol–peroxidase working solution (30 mg l−1 luminol (Sigma) and 20 mg l−1 horseradish peroxidase (Sigma)) in each well containing leaf discs. Samples were kept in the dark for 1 h before measurement. Luminescence was measured in a microplate reader (Luminoskan Ascent, Thermo Labsystems) and 5 min global constant green light (9 µW mm2) illumination was applied during the rest periods.

    The method for in vivo measuring the production of H2O2 amperometrically from mesophyll cells in parallel with intracellular membrane potential recordings was described previously70. Measurements were carried out in standard bath solution (1 mM KCl, 1 mM CaCl2, 10 mM MES, and BTP, pH 6.0) with a platinum–iridium electrode (MicroProbes) cut back to an active (uninsulated) area of about 1 mm length. ROS detection was carried out by Patch-Master software V2x90 (HEKA). The platinum–iridium disc was gently placed in close proximity to mesophyll cells and held at a constant voltage of 600 mV with an amperometry amplifier (VA 10X, NPI Electronic). Oxidation of H2O2 at the active microelectrode surface resulted in a positive current signal, which was low-pass-filtered at 1 Hz and recorded with Patch-Master software V2x90 (HEKA). The electrode was calibrated in freshly prepared bath solutions with defined H2O2 concentrations. Green light (520 nm, about 9 µW mm−2) illumination on the N.tabacum leaves was carried out by green LEDs (WINGER, WEPGN3-S1).

    All-trans retinal and carotenoid measurements

    All-trans retinal and carotenoids were measured according to a protocol published elsewhere4. The fifth leaf of transgenic N.tabacum plants grown for 45 days in red light was triturated in liquid nitrogen and 200 mg leaf material was extracted with 500 µl of chloroform. The extract was centrifuged for 5 min at 18,400g and 50 µl of the organic phase was evaporated in a SpeedVac at 40 °C and dissolved in 50 µl of a 1:1 ethanol and chloroform mixture. A 5 µl volume of dissolved solution was analysed by ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) combined with ultraviolet and tandem mass spectrometry detection using a Waters Acquity UPLC system coupled to a Waters Quattro Premier triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer equipped with an electrospray interface. Ten plants were used for retinal and 12 plants were used for carotenoid quantification.

    Phytohormone measurement

    All of the samples were prepared as described in the ‘Plant growth conditions and sample collection’ section. Ground samples (150 mg) were lyophilized in a laboratory freeze dryer (CHRIST, Laboratory freeze dryer Alpha 1-2) and subsequently used for phytohormone extraction. The extraction and chromatographic separation was carried out as described previously71, using 5 ng of dihydro-JA, JA–norvaline, [18O2]OPDA, [D4]SA and [D6]ABA as phytohormone internal standard. The extraction solution contained ethylacetate (p.a.) and formic acid (p.a.) (99:1 in volume) to which 5 ng phytohormone internal standard was added. All samples were fixed on a TissueLyser with shaking for 3 min at a speed of 23 Hz. After that, samples were centrifuged and the supernatant was dried in a SpeedVac at 45 °C and finally dissolved in 40 μl liquid (acetonitrile (for high-performance liquid chromatography)/water (MilliQ), 1:1 (v/v)). Phytohormones were analysed by UPLC–electrospray interface–tandem mass spectrometry using a Waters Acquity I-Class UPLC system coupled to an AB Sciex 6500+ QTRAP tandem mass spectrometer (AB Sciex), operated in negative ionization mode as described elsewhere72,73. Analyst (Version 1.6.3) software and MultiQuant (Version 3.0.2) software from Sciex were used for mass spectrometry detection of hormones and metabolites.

    Proline quantification

    The proline content of N.tabacum leaves was measured according to the spectroscopic method of ref. 74. Samples were prepared as described in the section ‘Plant growth conditions and sample collection’. Ground samples (150 mg) were lyophilized in a laboratory freeze dryer (CHRIST, Laboratory freeze dryer Alpha 1-2). The dry samples were mixed in 40% ethanol and incubated at 4 °C overnight. The supernatant was collected after centrifugation at 13,500g for 5 min. A 500 µl volume of the ethanol extraction or 100 µl standard solution was mixed with 1,000 µl reaction mix (1% ninhydrin (w/v) in 60% acetic acid (v/v) and 20% ethanol (v/v)). After incubation at 95 °C for 20 min and subsequent centrifugation for 1 min at 9,000g, the samples (supernatant) were subjected to absorption measurement at 520 nm with a spectrophotometer (Hitachi U-1500). Proline concentration was determined according to the standard curve, and concentrations were calculated on the basis of dry weight.

    Transcriptomics analysis

    Three replicates of leaf samples from two batches of N.tabacum plants were collected for RNA sequencing. The experimental design for transcriptomics is shown in Extended Data Fig. 8a. Samples at 0 h, 1 h, 4 h and 8 h from plants growing in red light conditions were used as the biological controls to compare the expression levels of Ret-XXM 2.0 and Ret-ACR1 2.0 transgenic plants during or after the global green light illumination. In these experiments PEG-treated plants and Pst inoculation served as possible physiological controls to ACR1 2.0 and XXM 2.0 activation, and spraying leaves with buffer (MgCl2) served as an additional control to Pst-sprayed plants (Extended Data Fig. 8a). RNA extraction was carried out using ground samples (150 mg) with the Macherey-Nagel NucleoSpin RNA Plant Kit (https://www.takarabio.com/documents/User%20Manual/UM/UM_TotalRNAPlant_Rev_07.pdf). DNase1 (Thermo Fisher) was used to digest DNA. RNA sequencing was carried out by Novogene (UK) with an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 Sequencing System. Paired-end 150 bp was the read length. Data processing (fastp) and mapping to the N.tabacum genome (kallisto)75 was carried out using Amalgkit (https://github.com/kfuku52/amalgkit). Functional annotations of N.tabacum genes for subsequent bioinformatic analyses were retrieved from the Dicots PLAZA 5.0 repository76,77.

    Normalization and DEG analysis were carried out employing the DIANE package using DESeq2 and default parameters77. DESeq2 uses a Wald test, in which the shrunken estimate of log fold change is divided by the standard error to produce a z-statistic. This z-statistic is then compared against a standard normal distribution78. A prefiltering step eliminated genes exhibiting rowMeans over all conditions ≤ 5 counts, reducing the number of input genes from 69,500 to 42,196. Unless stated otherwise, |log2[fold change]| ≥ 2 with a false discovery rate of 0.01 was taken as the cutoff for DEG identification. Only a small number of DEGs were identified when comparing Ret-ACR1 2.0 or Ret-XXM 2.0 transgenes with Ret-eYFP control plants grown under non-stimulating red light conditions (Supplementary Table 2, tab 1), demonstrating that ACR1 and XXM expression have virtually no impact on the transcript profiles of plants and plants growing in red light conditions are proper biological controls. Likewise, GO enrichment analysis on DEGs was carried out using the DIANE suite and corresponding enrichment plots were created using the srplot web interface (https://www.bioinformatics.com.cn/en). Venn diagrams were generated with the GOVenn script of the GOPlot package79 and subsequent GO analysis on Venn subsets was carried out using gprofiler280. g:Profiler functional enrichment analysis is conducted using the g:GOSt tool that carries out over-representation analysis via the hypergeometric test80. Finally, heat maps were generated with the pheatmap R package (version 1.0.12; https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=pheatmap). N.tabacum genes were further annotated manually according to their A. thaliana orthologues81 and corresponding gene symbols from the Aramemnon database82.

    Quantitative real-time PCR

    Quantification of gene transcripts was carried out by real-time PCR as described elsewhere83. The samples were prepared as described in the section ‘Plant growth conditions and sample collection’. Ground samples (100 mg) were used for RNA extraction by the NucleoSpin RNA Plant Kit (Macherey-Nagel). cDNA was synthesized from 2.5 g of total RNA using oligo(dT) primer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and M-MLV Reverse Transcriptase (Promega). All quantitative real-time PCR reactions were carried out with the Eppendorf Mastercycler ep realplex 2 system and Eppendorf Mastercycler ep realplex (Version 2.2) software, in a 20 µl reaction volume containing 2 µl diluted cDNA, 0.8 µM primer pairs and 10 µl ABsolute qPCR SYBR Green Capillary Mix (Thermo Scientific). Information on the genes and primers used is provided in Supplementary Table 7. Transcripts were normalized to that of 10,000 molecules of actin.

    Surface potential recording on N.
    tabacum leaves

    The design for long-range electrical signal measurements in N.tabacum leaves is shown in a diagram in Extended Data Fig. 10a. The surface potential recordings were carried out on 6–7-week-old N.tabacum leaves according to a previously described protocol84 with minor modifications. A USB-6221 interface (National Instruments) was used to digitalize the electrical signals, which were recorded with WinWCP V5.3.4 software (University of Strathclyde, UK). The electrode silver wires (Ag/AgCl) connected to a microelectrode amplifier (Axon geneclamp 500) were wrapped around the petiole of the fifth leaves gently. Electrode gel (Auxynhairol) was used to cover the surface of the wrapped wires to aid connectivity between the electrodes and the petiole. The reference electrode consisting of an Ag/AgCl electrode was placed in a 200-ml pipette tip filled with electrode gel (Auxynhairol), which was inserted in the soil of the pots the N.tabacum plants grew in. Nine hours after mounting the electrodes, the surface potential was recorded when applying a 600-ms green light (532 nm, 5.3 mW mm−2) pulse at the main vein. A popular Technology Enhanced Clad Silica multimode optical fibre (diameter of 1,500 µm, 0.39 NA, Thorlabs) was placed directly on the top of main vein for light application. To prevent scattering of light and to guarantee local green light application, the optical fibre was covered by a non-transparent black plastic pipe up to the tip. The electrical signals were monitored at exactly 5 cm away from the illumination spot.

    Significance analysis

    Student’s t-test or ANOVA was used to analyse significant differences between groups. Significance analysis among more than three groups was carried out with one-way ANOVA using IBM SPSS statistics (version 26.0). For the post hoc multiple comparisons, the homogeneity of variances was tested first. If the variances were homogeneous (P > 0.05), the Tukey test was used for significance analysis. If the variances were not homogeneous (P < 0.05), either the Dunnett T3 or Games-Howell test was chosen, depending on whether the sample sizes were equal or not. Different letters indicate significant differences among the samples (lowercase letters indicate P values at the 0.05 level and capital letters indicate P values at the 0.01 level). Significance analysis among two groups was carried out with a two-sided Student’s t-test. *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01 and ***P ≤ 0.001. The significance analysis is performed with a 95% confidence of interval. All of the P values are listed in Supplementary Table 8.

    Reporting summary

    Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Zinc mediates control of nitrogen fixation via transcription factor filamentation

    [ad_1]

    Plant lines and growth conditions

    The Lotus japonicus Gifu ecotype was used as the wild type. All plants were grown at 21 °C under 16 h light/8 h dark conditions. For germination, Lotus seeds were scarified with sandpaper and surface sterilized with 1% sodium hypochlorite for 10 min. Seedlings were washed with sterile water for 5 times and germinated on wet filter paper (AGF 651; Frisenette ApS) in sterile square Petri dishes at 21 °C for 2 days. Then, seedlings were transferred into the substrate mixture (leca:vermiculite=3:1). Three weeks post-inoculation, plants were treated with 10 mM KNO3 or KCl for 14 days (or as indicated). Subsequently, nodule number, nitrogenase activity (ARA), or leghaemoglobin content were recorded. For Zn treatment, 3 weeks post-inoculation, plants were watered with 500 µM MgCl2 (mock) or 500 µM ZnCl2 for 3 days followed by 10 days 10 mM KNO3 treatments. ARA and leghaemoglobin content were recorded. LORE1 insertion mutants were ordered through LotusBase (https://lotus.au.dk) and homozygotes were isolated for phenotyping and generation of higher order mutants as described43. Line numbers and genotyping primers are provided in Extended Data Fig. 2a. Mesorhizobium loti NZP2235 was used for nodulation assays.

    Mutant screening and sequence analysis

    A LORE1-mutant pool, in which there are random LORE1 insertions in the genome of each individual, were germinated in substrate mixture (leca:vermiculite 3:1) and inoculated with M.loti NZP2235. Four weeks post-inoculation, plants were watered with 10 mM KNO3 for three weeks. Most nodules became green or black, and we isolated plants with pink nodules for rescreening in subsequent generations. DNA from mutant plants was isolated and LORE1-flanking sequences sequenced to identify LORE1 insertion positions as previously described19. FUN protein sequences were identified by BLAST and SHOOT44 and aligned with MAFFT 7.490 and a tree constructed using FastTree 2.1.11. The tree was visualized using iTOL 6.7.345.

    Hairy root transformation

    For complementation assays, the Lotus ubiquitin promoter, FUN coding sequence, and 35S terminator were cloned into the pIV10 expression vector46. To study the expression pattern of FUN, native FUN promoter, glucuronidase (GUS) and the native FUN terminator sequence (tFUN) were cloned into the pIV10 expression vector. Constructs mentioned above were transformed into Agrobacterium rhizogenes AR1193. These agrobacteria were used to transform the hypocotyl of 6-day old seedlings. After three weeks, non-transformed roots were removed, and seedlings were transferred into the substrate mixture mentioned above or onto 0.25× Broughton and Dilworth 1971 medium plates. Subsequently, plants were inoculated with rhizobia and watered with nitrate as described above.

    Acetylene reduction assay

    ARAs were conducted essentially as described47. The nodulated root from single plants was placed in a 5 ml glass gas chromatography vial. A syringe was used to replace 500 µl air in the vial with 2% acetylene. Samples were incubated at room temperature for 30 min before ethylene quantification using a SensorSense (Nijmegen, NL) ETD-300 ethylene detector operating in sample mode with 2.5 l h−1 flow rate and 6 min detection time. The curve was integrated using the SensorSense valve controller software to calculate the total ethylene production per sample.

    Leghaemoglobin content measurement

    Leghaemoglobin content measurements were conducted using a spectrophotometric method as described previously41. Fresh nodules from each individual plant were first ground and homogenized in 16-fold volumes of 0.1 M precooled PBS (Na2HPO4:NaH2PO4 buffer at 5 °C, pH 6.8). The resulting slurry was then centrifuged at 12,000g for 15 min prior to assaying the supernatant by spectrophotometry at a wavelength of 540, 520 and 560 nm. The Leghaemoglobin content was calculated from a standard curve using bovine haemoglobin as a protein standard.

    GUS staining

    Three weeks post-inoculation, hairy roots were put into GUS staining buffer, which contains 0.5 mg ml−1 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-d-glucuronic acid, 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), 10 mM EDTA (pH 8.0), 1 mM potassium ferricyanide, 1 mM potassium ferrocyanide and 0.1% Triton X-100. The roots were incubated at 37 °C overnight. Roots were washed with 70% ethanol twice before image acquisition. Quantitative GUS assays are described below for the trans-activation assays.

    Gene expression

    For RNA-seq, 3 weeks post-inoculation, plants were acclimatized prior to treatment by submerging in 0.25× Long Ashton liquid medium overnight, then treated with 0 or 10 mM KNO3 for 24 h. Mature nodules were collected. mRNA was isolated using the NucleoSpin RNA Plant kit (Macherey-Nagel) and RNA-seq (PE-150 bp Illumina sequencing) was conducted by Novogene. RNA-seq analysis was performed by mapping reads to the reference transcriptome using Salmon48 and quantification performed using DEseq249. A publicly available timeseries of nitrate-treated nodules17 was obtained from GEO using accession number GSE197362. GO enrichment was performed using GO_MWU with GO terms obtained from https://lotus.au.dk.

    For the expression of target genes, RevertAid Reverse Transcriptase (Thermo) was used for the synthesis of first strand cDNA. LightCycler480 instrument and LightCycler480 SYBR Green I master (Roche Diagnostics) were used for quantitative PCR with reverse transcription. Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme was used as a reference. The cDNA concentration of target genes was calculated using amplicon PCR efficiency calculations using LinRegPCR50. Target genes were compared to the reference for each of 5 biological repetitions (each consisting of 8 to 10 nodules). At least two technical repetitions were performed in each analysis. Primers used are listed in Extended Data Fig. 4b.

    Electrophoretic mobility shift assay

    The DNA probes with 6-FAM-label at the 5′ end were synthesized by Eurofins and are listed in Extended Data Fig. 5h. We incubated the purified FUN DNA-binding domain (residues 178–237) with the probes at 37 °C for 60 min in EMSA buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 80 mM NaCl, 35 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2). After incubation, the reaction mixture was electrophoresed in 6% native polyacrylamide gel and then labelled DNA was detected with the Typhoon scanner (Fujifilm). Probes without 6-FAM-label served as competitors, while probes with mutation in the core binding sites (TGACG) served as mutants.

    Transient activation assay

    Promoters of FUN candidate target genes (NRT2.1, HO1, NRT3.1 and AS1), the glucuronidase (GUS) coding sequence and 35S terminator were cloned into compatible Golden Gate vectors as reporters; while the 35S promoter, FUN coding sequence, eGFP and 35S terminator were cloned as the effector. The reporters and effector were cloned into the p50507 Golden Gate binary vector. These constructs were then transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain AGL1. These A. tumefaciens were diluted to OD600 = 0.2 and were infiltrated into N.benthamiana leaves. Three days after infiltration, samples of about 20 mg were collected for protein extraction. GUS activities were measured with 4-methylumbelliferyl-β-d-glucuronide as substrate (Sigma-Aldrich) using a Thermo Scientific Varioskan flash. For Zn treatment, 2 days after A. tumefaciens infiltration, N.benthamiana leaves were infiltrated with 500 µM MgCl2 (mock), 500 µM ZnCl2, or 2.5 mM EDTA. GUS activities were measured 1 day after treatments.

    Protein production and purification

    The FUN sensor domain (residues 244–480) with a 3C-cleavable N-terminal tag consisting of 10 histidines, 7 arginines and a SUMO tag was obtained from GenScript together with a construct of the FUN sensor with the zipper domain (residues 178–480) N-terminally tagged with 7 histidines and a GB1 tag. The plasmids were transformed into Escherichia coli LOBSTR cells51. The expression culture was grown to OD600 = 0.6 in LB medium with 0.1 mg ml−1 ampicillin and 0.034 mg ml−1 chloramphenicol at 37oC and 110 rpm. Cells were cold shocked on ice for 30 min before expression was induced with 0.4 mM IPTG at 18oC overnight. The cells were pelleted (4,400g, 4 °C, 10 min), resuspended in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 500 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 10 mM imidazole, 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol and 1 mM benzamidine) and lysed by sonication. The lysate was cleared by centrifugation (30,600g, 4 °C, 30 min), and the proteins were purified from the cleared lysate using a Protino Ni-NTA 5 ml column (Machery-Nagel). The protein was eluted with a high-imidazole buffer (50 mM Tris-Hcl pH 8.0, 250 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol, 500 mM imidazole, 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol). The FUN sensor with zipper was not purified further, while the FUN sensor was dialysed overnight against 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 250 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol, 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol with 3C protease in a 1:50 molar ratio. The cleaved tag and the protease were subsequently removed by a second Ni-IMAC step. The FUN sensor was further purified by size-exclusion chromatography on a Superdex 200 Increase 10/300 GL (GE Healthcare) in minimal buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol). For SAXS analysis, the FUN sensor was further purified on a ResourceQ 1 ml (GE Healthcare) and eluted with a linear gradient of 10–500 mM NaCl and 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0 and 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol. Eluted fractions were pooled and dialysed against minimal buffer.

    DLS and nanoDSF

    The FUN protein was analysed on a Prometheus Panta instrument (NanoTemper Technologies) for alterations in thermal unfolding (nanoDSF) and size (DLS) upon addition of ligands. 0.8 mg ml−1 of the purified protein was incubated with 4 mM of different potential ligands or a 0–4 mM ZnCl2 series for 20 min whereupon 5 mM EDTA was added to samples analysed for reversible filamentation. Before addition, ZnCl2 was filtered using VivaSpin MWCO 5 kDa and immediately added to the protein samples. 10 consecutive DLS measurements were performed for each sample at 25 °C with 100% laser power and followed by a nanoDSF experiment measured at a temperature slope of 1 °C/min from 25–90 °C with 100% excitation power. All measurements were performed in triplicates.

    SAXS

    SAXS measurements were performed at the in-house NanoSTAR instrument at Aarhus University52,53 (Bruker AXS). The instrument uses a Cu rotating anode, has a scatterless pinhole in front of the sample47 and employs a two-dimensional position-sensitive gas detector (Vantec 500, Bruker AXS). The samples and buffer were measured in a homebuilt flow-through capillary. The intensity I(q) is displayed as a function of the modulus of the scattering vector. The buffer scattering was subtracted from the scattering from the samples and the intensities were converted to an absolute scale and corrected for variations in detector efficiency by normalizing to the scattering of pure water46. The data were plotted in Guinier of ln(I(q)) versus q2 to determine the radius of gyration Rg, and an indirect Fourier transformation54,55 was performed to obtain the pair distance-distribution function p(r), which is a histogram of distances between pair of points within the particles weighted by the excess scattering length density at the points. Note that the resolution of the SAXS data is about 400 Å and therefore the overall length of the fibrils induced by zinc is not resolved. The p(r) function is in this case related to the cross-section structure of the filaments.

    Negative-stain electron microscopy

    For electron microscopy, 0.1 mg ml−1 of the purified FUN sensor domain was incubated 20 min at room temperature with or without 100 µM ZnCl2 and with or without 5 mM EDTA. Samples for negative staining were prepared on 400 copper mesh grids that were manually covered with a collodion support film coated with carbon using a Leica EM SCD 500 High Vacuum Sputter Coater. Before staining, the grids were glow discharged with negative polarity, 25 mA for 45 s, using a PELCO easiGlow glow discharge system. 3 µl of the FUN sensor was deposited on the grid, incubated 30 s, and excess sample was removed from the grid using Whatman paper. After the blotting, the grid was floated 3 times on 2% uranyl formate solution for 15 s and then dried. Negative-staining micrographs were recorded using a Tecnai G2 Spirit microscope operating at 120 kV, equipped with a TemCam-F416 (4kx4k) TVIPS CMOS camera and a Veleta (2kx2k) CCD camera, at EMBION the Danish national cryo-EM facility in Aarhus, Denmark. Micrographs were recorded at a magnification of 42,000× and 52,000×.

    Microscopy and confocal imaging

    For the FUN expression pattern, the roots after GUS staining were observed by Leica M165FC Fluorescence stereomicroscope. Nodules were embedded in 3% agarose and sectioned in 100-µm slices using a vibratome. Nodule slices were observed by Zeiss Axioplan 2 light microscope. For FUN subcellular locations, Lotus hairy roots and N.benthamiana leaves expressing FUN–GFP were treated with 500 µM ZnCl2 (Zn) or MgCl2 (mock) for 3 days, and fluorescence were observed using a 491–535 nm filter on a Zeiss LSM 710 confocal microscope.

    Zinpyr-1 imaging and quantification

    Plants with pink nodules (3 weeks post-inoculation) were acclimatized prior to treatment by submerging in 0.25× Long Ashton liquid medium overnight, then treated with 0 or 10 mM KNO3 for 24 h. Mature nodules were embedded in 3% agarose and sectioned in 80-µm slices using a vibratome. Slides were stained with 5 µM Zinpyr-1 for 3 h and rinsed 3 times with water. Fluorescence was observed by Zeiss LSM 710 confocal microscope, using excitation at 488 nm and emission from 505 to 550 nm. Fluorescence densities were quantified by ImageJ.

    Micro-XRF

    XRF images were acquired at the ID21 beamline of the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility56. The scanning X-ray microscope at ID21 is equipped with a liquid nitrogen passively cooled cryogenic stage. Samples were prepared as described57. In brief, nodules were embedded in OCT medium and cryo-fixed by plunging them into liquid nitrogen-chilled isopentane. 20 mm sections of frozen samples were obtained using a Leica LN22 cryo-microtome and mounted in a liquid nitrogen-cooled sample holder between two Ultralene (Spex SamplePrep) foils. The beam was focused to 0.9 × 0.6 mm2 using Kirkpatrick–Baez mirror optics. The emitted fluorescence signal was detected with an energy-dispersive, large area (80 mm2) SDD detector equipped with a beryllium window (XFlash SGX, RaySpec). Images were acquired at a fixed energy of 9.8 keV by raster-scanning the sample with a step of 2 × 2 mm2 and a 220 ms dwell time. Elemental distribution was calculated with the PyMca software package58.

    Reporting summary

    Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Hetherington, A. M. & Brownlee, C. The generation of Ca2+ signals in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 55, 401–427 (2004).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tazawa, M., Shimmen, T. & Mimura, T. Membrane control in the Characeae. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 38, 95–117 (1987).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kung, C. A possible unifying principle for mechanosensation. Nature 436, 647–654 (2005).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Arnadottir, J. & Chalfie, M. Eukaryotic mechanosensitive channels. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 39, 111–137 (2010).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kefauver, J. M., Ward, A. B. & Patapoutian, A. Discoveries in structure and physiology of mechanically activated ion channels. Nature 587, 567–576 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yuan, F. et al. OSCA1 mediates osmotic-stress-evoked Ca2+ increases vital for osmosensing in Arabidopsis. Nature 514, 367–371 (2014).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hsiao, T. C. Plant responses to water stress. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 24, 519–570 (1973).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Oliver, M. J. et al. Desiccation tolerance: avoiding cellular damage during drying and rehydration. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 71, 435–460 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Johnson, M. A., Harper, J. F. & Palanivelu, R. A fruitful journey: pollen tube navigation from germination to fertilization. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 70, 809–837 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kim, Y. J., Zhang, D. B. & Jung, K. H. Molecular basis of pollen germination in cereals. Trends Plant Sci. 24, 1126–1136 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bremer, E. & Kramer, R. Responses of microorganisms to osmotic stress. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 73, 313–334 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bourque, C. W. Central mechanisms of osmosensation and systemic osmoregulation. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 9, 519–531 (2008).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Waadt, R. et al. Plant hormone regulation of abiotic stress responses. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 23, 680–694 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, H., Zhu, J., Gong, Z. & Zhu, J.-K. Abiotic stress responses in plants. Nat. Rev. Genet. 23, 104–119 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Okazaki, Y., Yoshimoto, Y., Hiramoto, Y. & Tazawa, M. Turgor regulation and cytoplasmic free Ca2+ in the alga Lamprothamnium. Protoplasma 140, 67–71 (1987).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Taylor, A. R., Manison, N. F. H., Fernandez, C., Wood, J. & Brownlee, C. Spatial organization of calcium signaling involved in cell volume control in the fucus rhizoid. Plant Cell 8, 2015–2031 (1996).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bickerton, P., Sello, S., Brownlee, C., Pittman, J. K. & Wheeler, G. L. Spatial and temporal specificity of Ca2+ signalling in Chlarnydomonas reinhardtii in response to osmotic stress. New Phytol. 212, 920–933 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Takahashi, K., Isobe, M., Knight, M. R., Trewavas, A. J. & Muto, S. hypo-osmotic shock induces increases in cytosolic Ca2+ in tobacco suspension-culture cells. Plant Physiol. 113, 587–594 (1997).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kudla, J. et al. Advances and current challenges in calcium signaling. New Phytol. 218, 414–431 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hedrich, R. Ion channels in plants. Physiol. Rev. 92, 1777–1811 (2012).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zipfel, C. & Oldroyd, G. E. D. Plant signalling in symbiosis and immunity. Nature 543, 328–336 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liedtke, W. et al. Vanilloid receptor-related osmotically activated channel (VR-OAC), a candidate vertebrate osmoreceptor. Cell 103, 525–535 (2000).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Julius, D. TRP channels and pain. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 29, 355–384 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jiang, Z. et al. Plant cell-surface GIPC sphingolipids sense salt to trigger Ca2+ influx. Nature 572, 341–346 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wu, F. H. et al. Hydrogen peroxide sensor HPCA1 is an LRR receptor kinase in Arabidopsis. Nature 578, 577–581 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Choi, J. et al. Identification of a plant receptor for extracellular ATP. Science 343, 290–294 (2014).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Laohavisit, A. et al. Quinone perception in plants via leucine-rich-repeat receptor-like kinases. Nature 587, 92–97 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kutschera, A. et al. Bacterial media-chain 3-hydroxy fatty acid metabolites trigger immunity in Arabidopsis plants. Science 364, 178–181 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, M. F. et al. Structure of the mechanosensitive OSCA channels. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 25, 850–858 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Thor, K. et al. The calcium-permeable channel OSCA1.3 regulates plant stomatal immunity. Nature 585, 569–573 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liu, X., Wang, J. W. & Sun, L. F. Structure of the hyperosmolality-gated calcium-permeable channel OSCA1.2. Nat. Commun. 9, 9 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jojoa-Cruz, S. et al. Cryo-EM structure of the mechanically activated ion channel OSCA1.2. eLife 7, e41845 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hamilton, E. S., Schlegel, A. M. & Haswell, E. S. United in diversity: mechanosensitive ion channels in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 66, 113–137 (2015).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Venkatachalam, K. & Montell, C. TRP channels. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 76, 387–417 (2007).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wu, X. M., Yuan, F., Wang, X. W., Zhu, S. & Pei, Z.-M. Evolution of osmosensing OSCA1 Ca2+ channel family coincident with plant transition from water to land. Plant Genome 15, e20198 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Radin, I. et al. Plant PIEZO homologs modulate vacuole morphology during tip growth. Science 373, 586–590 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mousavi, S. A. R. et al. PIEZO ion channel is required for root mechanotransduction in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2102188118 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yoshimura, K., Iida, K. & Iida, H. MCAs in Arabidopsis are Ca2+-permeable mechanosensitive channels inherently sensitive to membrane tension. Nat. Commun. 12, 6074 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Levina, N. et al. Protection of Escherichia coli cells against extreme turgor by activation of MscS and MscL mechanosensitive channels: identification of genes required for MscS activity. EMBO J. 18, 1730–1737 (1999).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rosano, G. L. & Ceccarelli, E. A. Recombinant protein expression in Escherichia coli: advances and challenges. Front. Microbiol. 5, 172 (2014).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hepler, P. K., Kunkel, J. G., Rounds, C. M. & Winship, L. J. Calcium entry into pollen tubes. Trends Plant Sci. 17, 32–38 (2012).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Brewbake, J. L. & Kwack, B. H. Essential role of calcium ion in pollen germination and pollen tube growth. Am. J. Bot. 50, 859–865 (1963).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cheung, A. Y. & Wu, H. M. Structural and signaling networks for the polar cell growth machinery in pollen tubes. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 59, 547–572 (2008).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chen, T.-W. et al. Ultrasensitive fluorescent proteins for imaging neuronal activity. Nature 499, 295–300 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hamilton, E. S. et al. Mechanosensitive channel MSL8 regulates osmotic forces during pollen hydration and germination. Science 350, 438–441 (2015).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Clapham, D. E. TRP channels as cellular sensors. Nature 426, 517–524 (2003).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Iwano, M. et al. Ca2+ dynamics in a pollen grain and papilla cell during pollination of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 136, 3562–3571 (2004).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Diao, M., Qu, X. L. & Huang, S. J. Calcium imaging in Arabidopsis pollen cells using G-CaMP5. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 60, 897–906 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wudick, M. M. et al. CORNICHON sorting and regulation of GLR channels underlie pollen tube Ca2+ homeostasis. Science 360, 533–536 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Frietsch, S. et al. A cyclic nucleotide-gated channel is essential for polarized tip growth of pollen. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 14531–14536 (2007).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nichols, R. J. et al. Phenotypic landscape of a bacterial cell. Cell 144, 143–156 (2011).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ali, R., Zielinski, R. E. & Berkowitz, G. A. Expression of plant cyclic nucleotide-gated cation channels in yeast. J. Exp. Bot. 57, 125–138 (2006).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kung, C., Martinac, B. & Sukharev, S. Mechanosensitive channels in microbes. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 64, 313–329 (2010).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S. & Eliceiri, K. W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 671–675 (2012).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zonia, L. & Munnik, T. Osmotically induced cell swelling versus cell shrinking elicits specific changes in phospholipid signals in tobacco pollen tubes. Plant Physiol. 134, 813–823 (2004).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Michard, E. et al. Glutamate receptor–like genes form Ca2+ channels in pollen tubes and are regulated by pistil d-serine. Science 332, 434–437 (2011).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, J. et al. Sperm cells are passive cargo of the pollen tube in plant fertilization. Nat. Plants 3, 17079 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Steinhorst, L. et al. Vacuolar CBL-CIPK12 Ca2+-sensor-kinase complexes are required for polarized pollen tube growth. Curr. Biol. 25, 1475–1482 (2015).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zonia, L., Müller, M. & Munnik, T. Hydrodynamics and cell volume oscillations in the pollen tube apical region are integral components of the biomechanics of Nicotiana tabacum pollen tube growth. Cell Biochem. Biophys. 46, 209–232 (2006).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, H. J., Meng, J. G. & Yang, W. C. Multilayered signaling pathways for pollen tube growth and guidance. Plant Reprod. 31, 31–41 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, H., Lin, Y., Heath, R. M., Zhu, M. X. & Yang, Z. Control of pollen tube tip growth by a Rop GTPase–dependent pathway that leads to tip-localized calcium influx. Plant Cell 11, 1731–1742 (1999).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jacob, P. et al. Plant “helper” immune receptors are Ca2+-permeable nonselective cation channels. Science 373, 420–425 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cheung, A. Y., Boavida, L. C., Aggarwal, M., Wu, H. M. & Feijo, J. A. The pollen tube journey in the pistil and imaging the in vivo process by two-photon microscopy. J. Exp. Bot. 61, 1907–1915 (2010).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Huang, J. B. et al. Stigma receptors control intraspecies and interspecies barriers in Brassicaceae. Nature 614, 303–308 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, L. L. et al. FERONIA receptor kinase-regulated reactive oxygen species mediate self-incompatibility in Brassica rapa. Curr. Biol. 31, 3004–U3072 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Caterina, M. J. et al. The capsaicin receptor: a heat-activated ion channel in the pain pathway. Nature 389, 816–824 (1997).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Han, S. C., Tang, R. H., Anderson, L. K., Woerner, T. E. & Pei, Z.-M. A cell surface receptor mediates extracellular Ca2+ sensing in guard cells. Nature 425, 196–200 (2003).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Coste, B. et al. Piezo1 and Piezo2 are essential components of distinct mechanically activated cation channels. Science 330, 55–60 (2010).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Clough, S. J. & Bent, A. F. Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 16, 735–743 (1998).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cheung, A. Y. & Wu, H.-M. Overexpression of an Arabidopsis formin stimulates supernumerary actin cable formation from pollen tube cell membrane. Plant Cell 16, 257–269 (2004).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • de Graaf, B. H. J. et al. Rab11 GTPase-regulated membrane trafficking is crucial for tip-focused pollen tube growth in tobacco. Plant Cell 17, 2564–2579 (2005).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Meng, J. G. et al. Integration of ovular signals and exocytosis of a Ca2+ channel by MLOs in pollen tube guidance. Nat. Plants 6, 143–154 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bolte, S. et al. FM-dyes as experimental probes for dissecting vesicle trafficking in living plant cells. J. Microsc. 214, 159–173 (2004).

    Article 
    MathSciNet 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hooper, C. M., Castleden, I. R., Tanz, S. K., Aryamanesh, N. & Millar, A. H. SUBA4: the interactive data analysis centre for Arabidopsis subcellular protein locations. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, D1064–D1074 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jefferson, R. A., Kavanagh, T. A. & Bevan, M. W. GUS fusions: beta-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. EMBO J. 6, 3901–3907 (1987).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhong, S. et al. Cysteine-rich peptides promote interspecific genetic isolation in Arabidopsis. Science 364, 851 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mecchia, M. A. et al. RALF4/19 peptides interact with LRX proteins to control pollen tube growth in Arabidopsis. Science 358, 1600–1603 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Monshausen, G. B., Bibikova, T. N., Weisenseel, M. H. & Gilroy, S. Ca2+ regulates reactive oxygen species production and pH during mechanosensing in Arabidopsis roots. Plant Cell 21, 2341–2356 (2009).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Denninger, P. et al. Male–female communication triggers calcium signatures during fertilization in Arabidopsis. Nat. Commun. 5, 4645 (2014).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Toyota, M. et al. Glutamate triggers long-distance, calcium-based plant defense signaling. Science 361, 1112–1115 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Damineli, D. S. C., Portes, M. T. & Feijo, J. A. Oscillatory signatures underlie growth regimes in Arabidopsis pollen tubes: computational methods to estimate tip location, periodicity, and synchronization in growing cells. J. Exp. Bot. 68, 3267–3281 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Guo, J., He, J., Dehesh, K., Cui, X. & Yang, Z. CamelliA-based simultaneous imaging of Ca2+ dynamics in subcellular compartments. Plant Physiol. 188, 2253–2271 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ruiz, M. C. M. et al. Circadian oscillations of cytosolic free calcium regulate the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Nat. Plants 4, 690–698 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Basu, D. & Haswell, E. S. The mechanosensitive ion channel MSL10 potentiates responses to cell swelling in Arabidopsis seedlings. Curr. Biol. 30, 2716–2728 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Morgan, J. M. Osmoregulation and water-stress in higher-plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 35, 299–319 (1984).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Munns, R. & Tester, M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant. Biol. 59, 651–681 (2008).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Maggio, A., Zhu, J.-K., Hasegawa, P. M. & Bressan, R. A. Osmogenetics: aristotle to Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 18, 1542–1557 (2006).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, Z.-Y. & Tobin, E. M. Constitutive expression of the CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED 1 (CCA1) gene disrupts circadian rhythms and suppresses its own expression. Cell 93, 1207–1217 (1998).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Newton, A. C., Bootman, M. D. & Scott, J. D. Second messengers. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Biol. 8, a005926 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Berridge, M. J., Bootman, M. D. & Roderick, H. L. Calcium signalling: dynamics, homeostasis and remodelling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 4, 517–529 (2003).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bailey-Serres, J., Parker, J. E., Ainsworth, E. A., Oldroyd, G. E. D. & Schroeder, J. I. Genetic strategies for improving crop yields. Nature 575, 109–118 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yu, X., Feng, B., He, P. & Shan, L. From chaos to harmony: responses and signaling upon microbial pattern recognition. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 55, 109–137 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Edel, K. H., Marchadier, E., Brownlee, C., Kudla, J. & Hetherington, A. M. The evolution of calcium-based signalling in plants. Curr. Biol. 27, R667–R679 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Oldroyd, G. E. D. Speak, friend, and enter: signalling systems that promote beneficial symbiotic associations in plants. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 11, 252–263 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Helliwell, K. E. et al. Spatiotemporal patterns of intracellular Ca2+ signalling govern hypo-osmotic stress resilience in marine diatoms. New Phytol. 230, 155–170 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

[ad_2]

Source link

  • Substrate-induced condensation activates plant TIR domain proteins

    [ad_1]

  • Jones, J. D. & Dangl, J. L. The plant immune system. Nature 444, 323–329 (2006).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ma, S. et al. Direct pathogen-induced assembly of an NLR immune receptor complex to form a holoenzyme. Science 370, eabe3069 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Martin, R. et al. Structure of the activated ROQ1 resistosome directly recognizing the pathogen effector XopQ. Science 370, eabd9993 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wan, L. et al. TIR domains of plant immune receptors are NAD+-cleaving enzymes that promote cell death. Science 365, 799–803 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Horsefield, S. et al. NAD+ cleavage activity by animal and plant TIR domains in cell death pathways. Science 365, 793–799 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Couto, D. & Zipfel, C. Regulation of pattern recognition receptor signalling in plants. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 16, 537–552 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jones, J. D., Vance, R. E. & Dangl, J. L. Intracellular innate immune surveillance devices in plants and animals. Science 354, aaf6395 (2016).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yuan, M. et al. Pattern-recognition receptors are required for NLR-mediated plant immunity. Nature 592, 105–109 (2021).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ngou, B. P. M., Ahn, H. K., Ding, P. & Jones, J. D. G. Mutual potentiation of plant immunity by cell-surface and intracellular receptors. Nature 592, 110–115 (2021).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tian, H. et al. Activation of TIR signalling boosts pattern-triggered immunity. Nature 598, 500–503 (2021).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pruitt, R. N. et al. The EDS1–PAD4–ADR1 node mediates Arabidopsis pattern-triggered immunity. Nature 598, 495–499 (2021).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, J., Song, W. & Chai, J. Structure, biochemical function, and signaling mechanism of plant NLRs. Mol. Plant 16, 75–95 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, J. et al. Reconstitution and structure of a plant NLR resistosome conferring immunity. Science 364, eaav5870 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bi, G. et al. The ZAR1 resistosome is a calcium-permeable channel triggering plant immune signaling. Cell 184, 3528–3541 e3512 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jia, A. et al. TIR-catalyzed ADP-ribosylation reactions produce signaling molecules for plant immunity. Science 377, eabq8180 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Huang, S. et al. Identification and receptor mechanism of TIR-catalyzed small molecules in plant immunity. Science 377, eabq3297 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jacob, P. et al. Plant “helper” immune receptors are Ca2+-permeable nonselective cation channels. Science 373, 420–425 (2021).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chai, J., Song, W. & Parker, J. E. New biochemical principles for NLR immunity in plants. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 36, 468–475 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Meyers, B. C., Morgante, M. & Michelmore, R. W. TIR-X and TIR–NBS proteins: two new families related to disease resistance TIR–NBS–LRR proteins encoded in Arabidopsis and other plant genomes. Plant J. 32, 77–92 (2002).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nandety, R. S. et al. The role of TIR–NBS and TIR-X proteins in plant basal defense responses. Plant Physiol. 162, 1459–1472 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lapin, D., Johanndrees, O., Wu, Z., Li, X. & Parker, J. E. Molecular innovations in plant TIR-based immunity signaling. Plant Cell 34, 1479–1496 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Krasileva, K. V., Dahlbeck, D. & Staskawicz, B. J. Activation of an Arabidopsis resistance protein is specified by the in planta association of its leucine-rich repeat domain with the cognate oomycete effector. Plant Cell 22, 2444–2458 (2010).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nishimura, M. T. et al. TIR-only protein RBA1 recognizes a pathogen effector to regulate cell death in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E2053–E2062 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, X. et al. Multiple functional self-association interfaces in plant TIR domains. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E2046–E2052 (2017).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zbierzak, A. M. et al. A TIR–NBS protein encoded by Arabidopsis Chilling Sensitive 1 (CHS1) limits chloroplast damage and cell death at low temperature. Plant J. 75, 539–552 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Peeples, W. & Rosen, M. K. Mechanistic dissection of increased enzymatic rate in a phase-separated compartment. Nat. Chem. Biol. 17, 693–702 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sang, D. et al. Condensed-phase signaling can expand kinase specificity and respond to macromolecular crowding. Mol. Cell 82, 3693–3711.e3610 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Alberti, S., Gladfelter, A. & Mittag, T. Considerations and challenges in studying liquid–liquid phase separation and biomolecular condensates. Cell 176, 419–434 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Du, M. & Chen, Z. J. DNA-induced liquid phase condensation of cGAS activates innate immune signaling. Science 361, 704–709 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ruff, K. M., Dar, F. & Pappu, R. V. Ligand effects on phase separation of multivalent macromolecules. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2017184118 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Canto, C., Menzies, K. J. & Auwerx, J. NAD+ metabolism and the control of energy homeostasis: a balancing act between mitochondria and the nucleus. Cell Metab. 22, 31–53 (2015).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Greiner, J. V. & Glonek, T. Intracellular ATP concentration and implication for cellular evolution. Biology 10, 1166 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kato, H., Saito, T., Ito, H., Komeda, Y. & Kato, A. Overexpression of the TIR-X gene results in a dwarf phenotype and activation of defense-related gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Plant Physiol. 171, 382–388 (2014).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bose, M., Lampe, M., Mahamid, J. & Ephrussi, A. Liquid-to-solid phase transition of oskar ribonucleoprotein granules is essential for their function in Drosophila embryonic development. Cell 185, 1308–1324.e1323 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bernoux, M. et al. Structural and functional analysis of a plant resistance protein TIR domain reveals interfaces for self-association, signaling, and autoregulation. Cell Host Microbe 9, 200–211 (2011).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chan, S. L., Mukasa, T., Santelli, E., Low, L. Y. & Pascual, J. The crystal structure of a TIR domain from Arabidopsis thaliana reveals a conserved helical region unique to plants. Protein Sci. 19, 155–161 (2010).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Williams, S. J. et al. Structure and function of the TIR domain from the grape NLR protein RPV1. Front. Plant Sci. 7, 1850 (2016).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Banani, S. F., Lee, H. O., Hyman, A. A. & Rosen, M. K. Biomolecular condensates: organizers of cellular biochemistry. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 285–298 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bayless, A. M. et al. Plant and prokaryotic TIR domains generate distinct cyclic ADPR NADase products. Sci. Adv. 9, eade8487 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lapin, D. et al. A coevolved EDS1–SAG101–NRG1 module mediates cell death signaling by TIR-domain immune receptors. Plant Cell 31, 2430–2455 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Burke, K. A., Janke, A. M., Rhine, C. L. & Fawzi, N. L. Residue-by-residue view of in vitro FUS granules that bind the C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II. Mol. Cell 60, 231–241 (2015).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shi, M., Zhang, P., Vora, S. M. & Wu, H. Higher-order assemblies in innate immune and inflammatory signaling: a general principle in cell biology. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 63, 194–203 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zavaliev, R., Mohan, R., Chen, T. & Dong, X. Formation of NPR1 condensates promotes cell survival during the plant immune response. Cell 182, 1093–1108.e1018 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Huang, S., Zhu, S., Kumar, P. & MacMicking, J. D. A phase-separated nuclear GBPL circuit controls immunity in plants. Nature 594, 424–429 (2021).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kim, J. H. et al. Increasing the resilience of plant immunity to a warming climate. Nature 607, 339–344 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Xiao, Q., McAtee, C. K. & Su, X. Phase separation in immune signalling. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 22, 188–199 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • O’Flynn, B. G. & Mittag, T. The role of liquid–liquid phase separation in regulating enzyme activity. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 69, 70–79 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yu, D. et al. TIR domains of plant immune receptors are 2′,3′-cAMP/cGMP synthetases mediating cell death. Cell 185, 2370–2386.e2318 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Loring, H. S. et al. A phase transition enhances the catalytic activity of SARM1, an NAD+ glycohydrolase involved in neurodegeneration. eLife 10, e66694 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Morehouse, B. R. et al. STING cyclic dinucleotide sensing originated in bacteria. Nature 586, 429–433 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hogrel, G. et al. Cyclic nucleotide-induced helical structure activates a TIR immune effector. Nature 608, 808–812 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Manik, M. K. et al. Cyclic ADP ribose isomers: production, chemical structures, and immune signaling. Science 377, eadc8969 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shin, Y. & Brangwynne, C. P. Liquid phase condensation in cell physiology and disease. Science 357, eaaf4382 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, Y., Dorey, S., Swiderski, M. & Jones, J. D. Expression of RPS4 in tobacco induces an AvrRps4-independent HR that requires EDS1, SGT1 and HSP90. Plant J. 40, 213–224 (2004).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Song, S. K. Misexpression of AtTX12 encoding a Toll/interleukin-1 receptor domain induces growth defects and expression of defense-related genes partially independently of EDS1 in Arabidopsis. BMB Rep. 49, 693–698 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Saile, S. C. et al. Two unequally redundant “helper” immune receptor families mediate Arabidopsis thaliana intracellular “sensor” immune receptor functions. PLoS Biol. 18, e3000783 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sun, X. et al. Pathogen effector recognition-dependent association of NRG1 with EDS1 and SAG101 in TNL receptor immunity. Nat. Commun. 12, 3335 (2021).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fang, X. et al. Arabidopsis FLL2 promotes liquid–liquid phase separation of polyadenylation complexes. Nature 569, 265–269 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dongus, J. A. et al. The Arabidopsis PAD4 lipase-like domain is sufficient for resistance to green peach aphid. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 33, 328–335 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Mechanisms of calcium homeostasis orchestrate plant growth and immunity

    [ad_1]

  • White, P. J. & Broadley, M. R. Calcium in plants. Ann. Bot. 92, 487–511 (2003).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Clapham, D. E. Calcium signaling. Cell 131, 1047–1058 (2007).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Luan, S. & Wang, C. Calcium signaling mechanisms across kingdoms. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 37, 311–340 (2021).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, C. & Luan, S. Calcium homeostasis and signaling in plant immunity. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 77, 102485 (2023).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jones, J. D. G. & Dangl, J. L. The plant immune system. Nature 444, 323–329 (2006).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tian, W. et al. A calmodulin-gated calcium channel links pathogen patterns to plant immunity. Nature 572, 131–135 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Thor, K. et al. The calcium-permeable channel OSCA1.3 regulates plant stomatal immunity. Nature 585, 569–573 (2020).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bi, G. et al. The ZAR1 resistosome is a calcium-permeable channel triggering plant immune signaling. Cell 184, 3528–3541 (2021).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jacob, P. et al. Plant “helper” immune receptors are Ca2+-permeable nonselective cation channels. Science 373, 420–425 (2021).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bjornson, M., Pimprikar, P., Nürnberger, T. & Zipfel, C. The transcriptional landscape of Arabidopsis thaliana pattern-triggered immunity. Nat. Plants 7, 579–586 (2021).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ast, C. et al. Ratiometric Matryoshka biosensors from a nested cassette of green- and orange-emitting fluorescent proteins. Nat. Commun. 8, 431 (2017).

    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bose, J., Pottosin, I. I., Shabala, S. S., Palmgren, M. G. & Shabala, S. Calcium efflux systems in stress signaling and adaptation in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2, 85 (2011).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cheng, N.-H. et al. Functional association of Arabidopsis CAX1 and CAX3 is required for normal growth and ion homeostasis. Plant Physiol. 138, 2048–2060 (2005).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Boursiac, Y. et al. Disruption of the vacuolar calcium-ATPases in Arabidopsis results in the activation of a salicylic acid-dependent programmed cell death pathway. Plant Physiol. 154, 1158–1171 (2010).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hilleary, R. et al. Tonoplast-localized Ca2+ pumps regulate Ca2+ signals during pattern-triggered immunity in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 18849–18857 (2020).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rahmati Ishka, M. et al. Arabidopsis Ca2+-ATPases 1, 2, and 7 in the endoplasmic reticulum contribute to growth and pollen fitness. Plant Physiol. 185, 1966–1985 (2021).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, Z., Harper, J. F., Weigand, C. & Hua, J. Resting cytosol Ca2+ level maintained by Ca2+ pumps affects environmental responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 191, 2534–2550 (2023).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Conn, S. J. et al. Cell-specific vacuolar calcium storage mediated by CAX1 regulates apoplastic calcium concentration, gas exchange, and plant productivity in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 23, 240–257 (2011).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pittman, J. K. & Hirschi, K. D. Regulation of CAX1, an Arabidopsis Ca2+/H+ antiporter. Identification of an N-terminal autoinhibitory domain. Plant Physiol. 127, 1020–1029 (2001).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Waight, A. B. et al. Structural basis for alternating access of a eukaryotic calcium/proton exchanger. Nature 499, 107–110 (2013).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Xu, S.-L. et al. Proteomic analysis reveals O-GlcNAc modification on proteins with key regulatory functions in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E1536–E1543 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Obayashi, T., Hibara, H., Kagaya, Y., Aoki, Y. & Kinoshita, K. ATTED-II v11: a plant gene coexpression database using a sample balancing technique by subagging of principal components. Plant Cell Physiol. 63, 869–881 (2022).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tang, R. J. et al. Tonoplast CBL–CIPK calcium signaling network regulates magnesium homeostasis in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 3134–3139 (2015).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tang, R.-J., Wang, C., Li, K. & Luan, S. The CBL–CIPK calcium signaling network: unified paradigm from 20 years of discoveries. Trends Plant Sci. 25, 604–617 (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liu, J., Ishitani, M., Halfter, U., Kim, C. S. & Zhu, J. K. The Arabidopsis thaliana SOS2 gene encodes a protein kinase that is required for salt tolerance. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 3730–3734 (2000).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Koster, P., DeFalco, T. A. & Zipfel, C. Ca2+ signals in plant immunity. EMBO J. 41, e110741 (2022).

  • Yu, X. et al. A phospho-switch constrains BTL2-mediated phytocytokine signaling in plant immunity. Cell 186, 2329–2344 (2023).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhao, C. et al. A mis-regulated cyclic nucleotide-gated channel mediates cytosolic calcium elevation and activates immunity in Arabidopsis. New Phytol. 230, 1078–1094 (2021).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Grant, M. et al. The RPM1 plant disease resistance gene facilitates a rapid and sustained increase in cytosolic calcium that is necessary for the oxidative burst and hypersensitive cell death. Plant J. 23, 441–450 (2000).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ranf, S., Eschen-Lippold, L., Pecher, P., Lee, J. & Scheel, D. Interplay between calcium signalling and early signalling elements during defence responses to microbe- or damage-associated molecular patterns. Plant J. 68, 100–113 (2011).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ranf, S. et al. Microbe-associated molecular pattern-induced calcium signaling requires the receptor-like cytoplasmic kinases, PBL1 and BIK1. BMC Plant Biol. 14, 374 (2014).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liu, F. et al. The activated plant NRC4 immune receptor forms a hexameric resistosome. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.18.571367 (2023).

  • Ngou, B. P. M., Ahn, H.-K., Ding, P. & Jones, J. D. G. Mutual potentiation of plant immunity by cell-surface and intracellular receptors. Nature 592, 110–115 (2021).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yuan, M. et al. Pattern-recognition receptors are required for NLR-mediated plant immunity. Nature 592, 105–109 (2021).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, L. et al. The FLS2-associated kinase BIK1 directly phosphorylates the NADPH oxidase RbohD to control plant immunity. Cell Host Microbe 15, 329–338 (2014).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lu, D. et al. A receptor-like cytoplasmic kinase, BIK1, associates with a flagellin receptor complex to initiate plant innate immunity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 496–501 (2010).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ma, X. et al. Ligand-induced monoubiquitination of BIK1 regulates plant immunity. Nature 581, 199–203 (2020).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mirdita, M. et al. ColabFold: making protein folding accessible to all. Nat. Methods 19, 679–682 (2022).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, Y. et al. CNGC2 is a Ca2+ influx channel that prevents accumulation of apoplastic Ca2+ in the leaf. Plant Physiol. 173, 1342–1354 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, Y. & Li, X. Salicylic acid: biosynthesis, perception, and contributions to plant immunity. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 50, 29–36 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ngou, B. P. M., Jones, J. D. G. & Ding, P. Plant immune networks. Trends Plant Sci. 27, 255–273 (2022).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fu, Z. Q. & Dong, X. Systemic acquired resistance: turning local infection into global defense. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 64, 839–863 (2013).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wildermuth, M. C., Dewdney, J., Wu, G. & Ausubel, F. M. Isochorismate synthase is required to synthesize salicylic acid for plant defence. Nature 414, 562–565 (2001).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fu, Z. Q. et al. NPR3 and NPR4 are receptors for the immune signal salicylic acid in plants. Nature 486, 228–232 (2012).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ding, Y. et al. Opposite roles of salicylic acid receptors NPR1 and NPR3/NPR4 in transcriptional regulation of plant immunity. Cell 173, 1454–1467 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cui, H. et al. A core function of EDS1 with PAD4 is to protect the salicylic acid defense sector in Arabidopsis immunity. New Phytol. 213, 1802–1817 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • He, Z., Webster, S. & He, S. Y. Growth–defense trade-offs in plants. Curr. Biol. 32, R634–R639 (2022).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Catalá, R. et al. Mutations in the Ca2+/H+ transporter CAX1 increase CBF/DREB1 expression and the cold-acclimation response in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 15, 2940–2951 (2003).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhao, J., Barkla, B. J., Marshall, J., Pittman, J. K. & Hirschi, K. D. The Arabidopsis cax3 mutants display altered salt tolerance, pH sensitivity and reduced plasma membrane H+-ATPase activity. Planta 227, 659–669 (2008).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yang, J. et al. The vacuolar H+/Ca transporter CAX1 participates in submergence and anoxia stress responses. Plant Physiol. 190, 2617–2636 (2022).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hwang, I., Harper, J. F., Liang, F. & Sze, H. Calmodulin activation of an endoplasmic reticulum-located calcium pump involves an interaction with the N-terminal autoinhibitory domain. Plant Physiol. 122, 157–168 (2000).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yang, D.-L. et al. Calcium pumps and interacting BON1 protein modulate calcium signature, stomatal closure, and plant immunity. Plant Physiol. 175, 424–437 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Xiang, T. et al. Pseudomonas syringae effector AvrPto blocks innate immunity by targeting receptor kinases. Curr. Biol. 18, 74–80 (2008).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yu, H., Yan, J., Du, X. & Hua, J. Overlapping and differential roles of plasma membrane calcium ATPases in Arabidopsis growth and environmental responses. J. Exp. Bot. 69, 2693–2703 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Capieaux, E., Vignais, M. L., Sentenac, A. & Goffeau, A. The yeast H+-ATPase gene is controlled by the promoter binding factor TUF. J. Biol. Chem. 264, 7437–7446 (1989).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mumberg, D., Müller, R. & Funk, M. Yeast vectors for the controlled expression of heterologous proteins in different genetic backgrounds. Gene 156, 119–122 (1995).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cunningham, K. W. & Fink, G. R. Calcineurin inhibits VCX1-dependent H+/Ca2+ exchange and induces Ca2+ ATPases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 2226–2237 (1996).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yoo, S. D., Cho, Y. H. & Sheen, J. Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts: a versatile cell system for transient gene expression analysis. Nat. Protoc. 2, 1565–1572 (2007).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • [ad_2]

    Source link