Tag: Regenerative medicine

  • TnpB tool promises big results

    TnpB tool promises big results

    [ad_1]

    Recent advancements in genome editing have introduced new possibilities for treating genetic disorders, with tools like CRISPR-Cas taking center stage.

    Now, scientists have developed a more efficient and compact genome editing system using TnpB, a protein that offers significant improvements in precision and delivery.

    This breakthrough opens doors for therapeutic applications that could transform how genetic diseases are treated, particularly familial hypercholesterolemia.

    Origins of CRISPR and genome editing

    The CRISPR-Cas system, which revolutionised genome editing over the past decade, originally evolved as a defence mechanism in bacteria to fend off viruses.

    It works like molecular ‘scissors’ by identifying and cutting specific locations in DNA, making it possible to correct genetic mutations.

    However, the size of Cas proteins often poses challenges when delivering them to human cells. This has driven scientists to explore smaller alternatives that can still provide precise genome editing capabilities.

    TnpB: A smaller, more efficient tool

    A new study led by Gerald Schwank from the University of Zurich and ETH Zurich focused on a smaller and more efficient genome editing protein called TnpB, which is a precursor to Cas12.

    TnpB is found in various bacteria and archaea, including Deinococcus radiodurans, one of the most radiation-resistant organisms.

    The research team successfully engineered TnpB to increase its efficiency by 4.4 times, solving the challenge of low functionality seen in earlier versions.

    Enhanced DNA targeting and precision

    One of the key achievements of the research team was improving TnpB’s ability to bind to DNA. The initial version of TnpB had limited targeting abilities, but by modifying the protein, researchers enhanced its range and accuracy.

    ” The trick was to modify the tool in two ways: first, so that it more efficiently goes to the nucleus where the genomic DNA is located, and second, so that it also targets alternative genome sequences,” explained Kim Marquart, the study’s first author.

    To better understand how TnpB interacts with DNA, the team tested the protein across 10,211 different DNA sites.

    Collaborating with artificial intelligence experts, they developed a predictive model that can forecast TnpB’s editing success based on target site characteristics. This model achieved genome editing efficiency rates of up to 75.3% in mouse livers and 65.9% in mouse brains.

    Targeting genetic diseases

    A significant focus of the study was the potential application of TnpB in treating familial hypercholesterolemia, a genetic condition affecting over 31 million people worldwide.

    This disease leads to dangerously high cholesterol levels and an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases. Using their optimised TnpB system, researchers were able to edit the genes responsible for regulating cholesterol, reducing levels by nearly 80% in treated mice.

    The future of genome editing

    The development of TnpB represents a critical advancement in genome editing, offering a smaller and more efficient alternative to CRISPR-Cas systems.

    By overcoming the size limitations of traditional Cas proteins and improving editing precision, TnpB has the potential to make gene therapy more accessible and effective for a wider range of genetic diseases.

    As this tool continues to evolve, it may reshape the future of medicine by providing safer, more reliable ways to treat complex genetic disorders through precise genome editing.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Cutting-edge tubular scaffolds enhance bone regeneration

    Cutting-edge tubular scaffolds enhance bone regeneration

    [ad_1]

    Scientists from Sun Yat-sen University’s School of Biomedical Engineering have made a significant breakthrough in the field of bone regeneration.

    By developing advanced tubular scaffolds using electrospun membranes, they have created a cutting-edge solution to promote the healing of critical skull defects.

    These scaffolds, designed to mimic the structure of natural bone, provide an ideal environment for stem cells to flourish and accelerate the healing process, marking a major step forward in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

    Addressing critical bone defects

    Critical-sized bone defects have long been a major challenge in the medical world. Traditional treatments, such as autografts and allografts, often face limitations, including the scarcity of donors, size mismatches, and potential immune rejection.

    These issues have hindered the widespread use of these methods for bone repair. However, the growing field of bone tissue engineering offers a promising solution.

    Adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs), which are easily accessible and possess strong osteogenic (bone-forming) capabilities, have attracted significant attention for their potential in bone regeneration.

    While injecting ADSCs directly into defect sites often results in a short survival time, combining them with scaffold materials has proven to enhance retention and improve bone regeneration.

    Researchers are now exploring new ways to develop scaffolds that mimic the natural structure of bone, utilising methods like electrospinning and 3D printing.

    Innovative tubular scaffolds for bone regeneration

    The team at Sun Yat-sen University tackled these challenges head-on by developing multilayer composite nanofibrous membranes made from polycaprolactone (PCL), poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA), and nano-hydroxyapatite (HAp).

    These materials, created using electrospinning technology, are engineered to replicate the structure of bone. When shaped into tubular scaffolds, they create an optimal environment for adipose-derived stem cells (rADSCs) to promote bone regeneration.

    The scaffolds not only simulate bone structure but also enhance the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of rADSCs, meaning they help these stem cells transform into bone-forming cells more effectively.

    In laboratory and animal studies, the scaffolds demonstrated remarkable results in promoting bone growth and healing.

    With a bilayer thickness ratio of 1:2 and an initial total thickness of 2.5 μm, these materials can spontaneously transform into 3D scaffolds when exposed to certain conditions, adding to their practicality in medical applications.

    The future of bone regeneration

    The success of these scaffolds points to a bright future for bone regeneration treatments. The research has shed light on the mechanisms behind how these scaffolds, combined with growth factors like VEGF and BMP-2, promote bone formation.

    By integrating both chemical signals and physical properties, these advanced scaffolds have the potential to revolutionise bone defect repair.

    Further research is needed to optimise the design of these fibrous scaffolds and explore the mechanisms by which mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) promote bone regeneration.

    However, the results thus far are highly promising, offering a new approach to treating bone defects that could soon be applied in clinical settings.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trinity College Dublin secures €800,000 for tissue engineering

    Trinity College Dublin secures €800,000 for tissue engineering

    [ad_1]

    A Trinity College Dublin researcher has been awarded major funding to pioneer an innovative tissue engineering approach.

    Dr Josephine Wu, a distinguished researcher from Trinity College Dublin’s School of Engineering and the Trinity Centre for Biomedical Engineering, has been awarded a prestigious Wellcome Early Career Award.

    This €800,000 grant will support her pioneering work in tissue engineering over the next five years.

    Dr Wu’s project, known as OPTO-BIOPRINTING, aims to revolutionise regenerative medicine by developing a novel approach to creating living organ replacements.

    How tissue engineering will revolutionise healthcare

    Tissue engineering is an interdisciplinary field that combines principles of biology, engineering, and materials science to create functional tissues that can replace or repair damaged organs.

    By using a combination of cells, scaffolds, and growth factors, researchers aim to develop tissues that can perform as well as, or even better than, natural tissues.

    The importance of tissue engineering lies in its potential to address the growing shortage of donor organs for transplantation, offering new hope for patients with chronic diseases, injuries, or congenital disabilities.

    Moreover, tissue engineering holds promise for advancing personalised medicine, where treatments can be tailored to the individual patient using engineered tissues derived from their own cells.

    This reduces the risk of immune rejection and enhances the efficacy of treatments. As the field continues to evolve, innovations like the OPTO-BIOPRINTING project could bring us closer to a future where engineered tissues and organs are widely available, improving the quality of life for countless individuals.

    Advancing the field of tissue engineering

    Despite the immense potential of tissue engineering, current strategies often fall short as they struggle to replicate the complex processes involved in natural tissue development.

    During physiological development, finely coordinated gradients of signalling molecules guide cellular and tissue growth.

    Current artificial tissues lack this intricate guidance, resulting in constructs that do not perform as well as fully native tissues.

    Dr Wu’s OPTO-BIOPRINTING project seeks to address this challenge by establishing a new platform for tissue engineering.

    This platform will leverage the natural ability of cells to self-assemble into complex structures while introducing spatiotemporal control over the process.

    One of the groundbreaking aspects of this project is the use of light to trigger cells to produce specific proteins on demand, allowing for precise control over tissue formation.

    A proof-of-concept for future applications

    As part of her research, Dr Wu will focus initially on developing a cartilage-bone unit, serving as a proof-of-concept for the OPTO-BIOPRINTING platform.

    The success of this project could extend beyond cartilage-bone engineering, opening up new possibilities for creating a wide variety of tissue types.

    This breakthrough could have significant implications for regenerative medicine and disease modelling, providing new avenues for treatment and research in various medical fields.

    Dr Wu expressed her gratitude for the Wellcome Trust’s support: “I’m immensely grateful for the support of a Wellcome Trust Early Career Award. It represents an important stepping stone in my pathway to independence, and I’m excited to bring together two powerful technologies for patterning tissue complexity and see where it can take the field of tissue engineering.

    “Previous funding support from a Marie Skłodowska-Curie fellowship (ADMIRE COFUND) made this award possible, and I’d also like to acknowledge the continued support from friends, colleagues, mentors, and Trinity’s Research Development Office.”

    Dr Wu’s work represents a significant step forward in the field of tissue engineering. With the support of the Wellcome Early Career Award, her innovative approach has the potential to narrow the gap between artificial and natural tissues, paving the way for more effective regenerative therapies.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • DTU advances tissue healing through hydrogel innovation

    DTU advances tissue healing through hydrogel innovation

    [ad_1]

    A breakthrough study conducted by the Technical University of Denmark (DTU) has opened new horizons in the realm of tissue healing.

    This innovative research team has tapped into the bioproduction abilities of bacteria, resulting in a novel biopolymer that shows exceptional promise for muscle tissue regeneration.

    Bacterial biopolymer: Pantoan Methacrylate (PAMA)

    The team successfully developed a new biopolymer known as Pantoan Methacrylate (PAMA), which is integral to the creation of a unique hydrogel or ‘bactogel.’

    This hydrogel is characterised by its durability, resilience, and elasticity—making it exceptionally suited for muscle tissue healing.

    Promising results from in vivo studies

    In vivo experiments conducted on rats have provided compelling evidence of the effectiveness of the PAMA bactogel.

    Results revealed a substantial increase in muscle tissue formation, alongside a marked reduction in fibrous tissue, crucial indicators of successful tissue healing.

    The mechanical recovery observed was nearly 100%, demonstrating excellent biocompatibility and an impressive capacity for healing.

    Associate Professor Dolatshahi-Pirouz highlighted the rarity of such favourable mechanical properties in existing bioactive hydrogels, emphasising their inadequacy in addressing the complex needs of musculoskeletal tissues like muscle.

    Potential uses

    The implications of this research are far-reaching, suggesting that PAMA could lead to enhanced therapeutic options for diverse groups, including athletes, the elderly, and individuals with traumatic muscle injuries, such as soldiers or accident victims.

    Notably, the team has shown that significant tissue healing can occur without the addition of cells, sparking interest in the potential for combining PAMA with muscle progenitor or stem cells for even greater efficacy.

    A vision for the future of regenerative medicine

    Looking ahead, Dolatshahi-Pirouz envisions a transformative future in the field of regenerative medicine.

    He detailed a scenario where polymers derived from bacteria—termed ‘bactomers’—could redefine tissue healing.

    “I imagine a future where bacteria in so-called regenerative bacto-baths secrete regenerative bactomers on demand to heal injured tissues in patients,” he explained.

    This groundbreaking research heralds exciting prospects for the future of tissue healing and muscle regeneration.

    As the scientific community continues to explore the possibilities presented by PAMA and its applications, there is a growing anticipation of innovative therapies that could significantly improve the quality of life for countless individuals suffering from muscle injuries.

    With its combination of biocompatibility, mechanical robustness, and healing potential, the PAMA hydrogel represents a significant step forward in regenerative medicine.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • This Bag of Cells Could Grow New Livers Inside of People

    This Bag of Cells Could Grow New Livers Inside of People

    [ad_1]

    In early experiments, Lagasse found that if he injected healthy liver cells into the lymph nodes of mice, the cells would flourish and form a second, smaller liver to take over the functions of the animal’s failing one. The new livers grew up to 70 percent of the size of a native liver. “What happened is that the liver grew to a certain size and then stopped growing when it reached the level necessary for normal function,” Lagasse says.

    At the University of Pittsburgh, Lagasse and his colleagues also tested the approach in pigs. In a study published in 2020, they found that pigs regained liver function after getting an injection of liver cells into an abdominal lymph node. When the scientists examined the lymph nodes with miniature livers, they found that a network of blood vessels and bile ducts had spontaneously formed. The more severe the damage in the pigs’ native liver, the bigger the second livers grew, suggesting the animals’ bodies may be able to recognize the healthy liver tissue and transfer responsibilities to it.

    “It is remarkable to identify lymph nodes as a reproducible and fertile bed for the regeneration of a variety of tissues and organs in two different animal species,” Abla Creasey, vice president of therapeutics development at the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine, says of the company’s approach. “These findings suggest that such an approach could present an alternative tissue source for patients with failing organs,”

    Elliot Tapper, a liver specialist at the University of Michigan, is also excited by the prospect of turning a lymph node into a new liver. “Even though it’s not where the liver was intended to sit, it can still do some liver functions,” he says.

    The most likely benefit of the LyGenesis treatment, he says, would be removing ammonia from the blood. In end-stage liver disease, ammonia can build up and travel to the brain, where it causes confusion, mood swings, falls, and sometimes comas. He doesn’t think the new mini organs could do all the jobs of a natural liver though, because they contain cell types other than hepatocytes.

    One of the big questions is how many cells it will require for humans to grow a liver big enough to take over certain vital functions, such as filtering blood and producing bile. In the LyGenesis trial, three additional patients will get an injection of 50 million cells into a single lymph node—the lowest “dose.” If that seems safe, a second group of four will get 150 million cells into three different lymph nodes. A third group would get 250 million cells in five lymph nodes—meaning they could have five mini livers growing inside them.

    The effects of the therapy won’t be immediate. Hufford says it will likely take two to three months for the new organ to grow big enough to take over some of the functions of the native liver. And like organ donor recipients, trial participants will need to go on immunosuppressant drugs for the rest of their lives to prevent their body from rejecting the donor cells.

    If the approach works, it could provide a life-saving alternative to liver transplantation for some patients. “If they prove it’s effective and safe,” Tapper says, “there will definitely be candidates that are interested in this kind of intervention.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • CGRP sensory neurons promote tissue healing via neutrophils and macrophages

    [ad_1]

    Ethical statement for animal experiments

    Animal experiments were approved by the Monash Animal Research Platform ethics committee and the Animal Research Committee of the Research Institute for Microbial Diseases of Osaka University (approval numbers 13294, 13335, 17075, 14013 and 23006).

    Animals

    Wild-type C57BL/6 J mice were from the Monash Animal Research Platform. Sperm from Nav1.8cre+/+ mice (B6.129-Scn10atm2(cre)Jnw/H B6, stock ID EM:04582, European Mouse Mutant Archive) were used for in vitro fertilization to generate Nav1.8cre+/− mice on a C57BL/6 J background. Rosa26DTA+/+ mice (B6.129-Gt(ROSA)26Sortm1(DTA)Mrc/J), strain 010527, Jackson Laboratory) were maintained on a C57BL/6 J background. To delete sensory neurons expressing NaV1.8, Nav1.8cre+/− mice were bred with Rosa26DTA+/+ mice to generate Nav1.8cre+/−/Rosa26DTA+/− mice. Nav1.8cre−/−/Rosa26DTA+/− littermates were used as controls. For visualizing NaV1.8+ neurons, Rosa26tdT reporter mice (B6.Cg-Gt(ROSA)26Sortm14(CAG-tdTomato)Hze/J, strain 007914, Jackson Laboratory) were bred with Nav1.8cre+/+ mice to generate Nav1.8cre+/−/Rosa26tdT+/−. Leprdb/db mice (BKS.Cg-Dock7m + /+Leprdb/J, strain 000642) were obtained from Jackson Laboratory. Mice were bred as heterozygotes to generate Leprdb/db and Leprdb/+ littermates. B6.129S2-Ramp1<tm1.2Tsuj> mouse sperm was kindly provided K. Tsujikawa and used for in vitro fertilization to generate Ramp1fl/+ mice. Ramp1−/− mice were generated by crossing Ramp1fl/fl mice with CAGcre mice (C57BL/6-Tg(CAG-cre)13Miya, RIKEN BioResource Research Center, strain 09807). Specific deletion of Ramp1 in myeloid cells (LysMcre+/−/Ramp1fl/fl mouse) was done by crossing Ramp1fl/fl mice with LysMcre+/+ mice (B6.129P2-Lyzs<tm1(cre)Ifo>, RIKEN BioResource Research Center, strain 02302). LysMcre+/− littermates were used as controls. To obtain mice constitutively expressing tdTomato, Rosa26tdT mice were crossed with B6.C-Tg(CMV-cre)1Cgn/J mice from Jackson Laboratory (strain 006054).

    Full-thickness skin wound model

    Male 10- to 12-week-old mice were used for most experiments, except for experiment with CGRP variant delivery in which female (10- to 12-week-old non-diabetic or 12- to 14-week-old diabetic) mice were used. Full-thickness punch-biopsy wounds (5 mm in diameter) were created while mice were under isoflurane anaesthesia as described25,26. For analgesia, mice received subcutaneous administration of 0.1 mg kg−1 buprenorphine. In non-diabetic mice, wounds were covered with a round seal spot plaster (22.5 mm, Livingstone International, Australia) secured with 3M surgical tape. In experiments involving CGRP delivery, a nylon ring (Zenith 5/16 inch and M8 Nylon Washer) was attached with superglue (UHU) to prevent wound contraction. Wounds received topical treatment with either 10 μl of saline (PBS) or a CGRP variant in PBS. Solutions were applied in two different dosages: 250 ng of CGRP or equimolar eCGRP on day 1 post-injury for the low dose, and 500 ng of CGRP or equimolar eCGRP on day 1 and day 4 post-injury for the high dose. For diabetic mice, 4 wounds were created and treated with PBS or CGRP variant in PBS (500 ng CGRP or equimolar eCGRP) on day 1 and day 3.

    Volumetric muscle loss model

    Non-diabetic (10- to 12-week-old) and diabetic (12- to 14-week-old) male mice underwent isoflurane anaesthesia. For analgesia, mice received subcutaneous administration of 0.1 mg kg−1 buprenorphine. A 1-cm unilateral incision was made, exposing the fascia. Muscle injuries were created either with a 3-mm biopsy punch or by excising a 3 mm × 5 mm segment of the quadriceps, including the rectus femoris muscle. In experiments involving CGRP delivery, muscle defects were covered with a fibrin matrix (40 μl total, 8 mg ml−1 fibrinogen (Enzyme Research Laboratories), 12 U ml−1 bovine thrombin (Sigma), 5 mM CaCl2, and 17 μg ml−1 aprotinin (Roche, Sigma)) containing CGRP (250 ng or 1 μg for non-diabetic mice and 1 μg for diabetic mice) or equimolar eCGRP. The incision site was sutured with non-absorbable sutures.

    Adoptive transfer of bone marrow cells

    Bone marrow cells (1 × 107) from 6-week-old Ramp1−/− or wild-type C57BL/6 J mice were intravenously injected into lethally irradiated 6-week-old recipient wild-type or Ramp1−/− mice that received 100 mg l−1 neomycin sulfate for 2 weeks post-irradiation. Skin or muscle defect surgeries were performed 6 weeks after transplantation.

    Histological analysis

    Skin wounds were collected using an 8-mm biopsy punch, fixed in 10% formalin at room temperature for 24 h, cut at the edge of the wounds, embedded in paraffin and sectioned at 4 μm until the centre of the wound was passed. Re-epithelialization was measured by histomorphometric analysis. Slides were stained with haematoxylin and eosin, and the centre of the wound was determined by measuring the distance between the panniculus carnosus muscle gap using Aperio ImageScope Viewer (Leica Biosystems). Closure was calculated as the ratio of epidermis closure to the length of the panniculus carnosus gap. Muscle injury sites, including the proximal and distal quadriceps segments, were collected, fixed in 10% formalin solution for 24 h, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned at 4 μm thickness for 5 depths, starting from the edge of the patella, passing the centre of the wound, up to the proximal end of the defect site. Cross-sections were stained with Masson’s Trichrome. Muscle regeneration was determined by averaging the percentage of blue-stained fibrotic area (normalized to the total area) and the remaining non-fibrotic muscle area across five tissue section depths, using Aperio ImageScope.

    Immunohistochemistry for neuropeptides, TSP-1 and myeloid cells

    Tissues and DRGs (L1–L6 vertebrae) were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, cryoprotected in 30% sucrose, and embedded in OCT compound for 10 μm cryosections. Sections were stored at −20 °C, thawed, permeabilized and blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA), 10% normal goat serum (NGS) or normal donkey serum in PBS for 1 h. Sudan Black B solution (0.1% in 70% ethanol) was applied for 10 min. For neuropeptide detection, primary antibodies were added in staining buffer (0.5% BSA, 5% NGS or 0.5% BSA, 5% normal donkey serum in PBS) overnight at 4 °C. The primary antibodies included rabbit anti-CGRP (66.7 μg ml−1, Sigma, C8198), rabbit anti-substance P (1:500, Thermo Fisher Scientific, 20064), rabbit anti-VIP (1:500, Thermo Fisher Scientific, 20077), and goat anti-galanin (1 μg ml−1, Abcam, 99452). For TSP-1 detection, sections were incubated with AffiniPure Fab Fragment goat anti-mouse IgG (H + L) at 100 μg ml−1 (Jackson ImmunoResearch Labs, 115-007-003) in PBS for 2 h at room temperature, followed by mouse anti-thrombospondin-1 (5 μg ml−1, Thermo Fisher Scientific, 14-9756-82). For myeloid cell detection, slides were incubated with rat anti-mouse CD11b (5 μg ml−1, Thermo Fisher Scientific, 14-0112-82). Sections were washed and incubated with respective secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. The secondary antibodies included F(ab′)2-Goat anti-Rabbit IgG Alexa Fluor 488 (2.6 μg ml−1, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-11070), donkey anti-goat IgG Alexa Fluor 488 (2.6 μg ml−1, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-11055), goat anti-mouse IgG Alexa Fluor Plus 488 (2.6 μg ml−1, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A48286TR), and goat anti-rat IgG Alexa Fluor Plus 594 (2.6 μg ml−1, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A48264). Counterstaining with DAPI for 10 min and mounting with Fluoroshield followed. Imaging was done using Leica DMi8 fluorescent microscope and Leica SP8 inverted confocal microscope.

    Evaluation of neuropeptide expression

    Skin and muscle samples from male Nav1.8cre+/−/Rosa26tdT+/− mice (10- to 12-week-old) were immunostained as detailed above, imaged on a Leica DMi8 fluorescent microscope and processed using Fiji59. Binary images were created with an optimal threshold, and overlapping areas were determined by combining region of interest binary images. Area fraction values, indicating neuropeptide expression in NaV1.8+ nerves, were calculated based on pixel ratios and converted using a built-in scale bar60,61.

    Immunofluorescence for Ki-67 and KRT14

    Paraffin sections underwent 20-minute antigen retrieval in 10 mM sodium citrate buffer (pH 6.0), followed by PBS washes and 5-minute permeabilization (0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS). Blocking with 10% NGS in 1% BSA/PBS occurred for 2 h, and endogenous IgG was blocked with unconjugated affinity-purified F(ab) fragment anti-mouse IgG (H + L) (10 μg ml−1, Jackson ImmunoResearch, AB_2338476) for 1 h at room temperature. Staining overnight at 4 °C utilized rat anti-mouse Ki-67 (5 μg ml−1, Thermo Fisher Scientific, 5698-82) and mouse anti-mouse cytokeratin 14 (4 μg ml−1, Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA5-11599) in 1% NGS in PBS with 0.1% BSA. After PBS-T washes, incubation with secondary antibodies occurred: goat anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 647 (2 μg ml−1, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-21235) and goat anti-rat Alexa Fluor 488 (2.67 μg ml−1, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A48262TR) for 1 h at room temperature, followed by PBS-T wash. Counterstaining with DAPI (1 μg ml−1) for 10 min at room temperature preceded mounting with Fluoroshield.

    TUNEL assay

    The In Situ Cell Death Detection Kit, TMR red (Roche, 12156792910) was used, following the manufacturer’s instructions on muscle and skin tissue cryosections. To detect CD11b+ cells, sections were incubated overnight at 4 °C with rat anti-mouse CD11b (5 μg ml−1, M1/70, Thermo Fisher Scientific, 14-0112-82) in staining buffer. After PBS-T washes, sections were incubated with Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-rat antibody (2.67 µg ml−1, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A48262TR), washed with PBS-T, and counterstained with DAPI (1 μg ml−1) before mounting with Fluoroshield. Two tissue section levels were evaluated per sample to determine the percentage of TUNEL+ apoptotic cells over total CD11b+ cells, examining three fields per section within the injury site.

    Fibroblast, keratinocytes, myoblasts and endothelial cell maintenance

    Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs; Sigma, 200P-05N) cultured in EGM-2 medium (Lonza, CC-4176) up to 3 passages, and primary mouse fibroblasts from C57BL/6 J mouse tails26 (passages 2–3) were used. MCDB-131 medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with 100 mg ml−1 penicillin/streptomycin and 2 mM glutamine was employed for proliferation assays. C2C12 mouse myoblasts (CellBank Australia) were cultured in a 1:1 ratio of DMEM to F10 medium (2 mM glutamine, 10% FBS, 100 units ml−1 penicillin/streptomycin). HaCaT keratinocytes (a gift from R. Boyd) were cultured in DMEM without Ca2+ and Mg2+ (2 nM glutamine, 10% Chelex-treated FBS, 0.03 nM calcium chloride, 100 units ml−1 penicillin/streptomycin) for at least 3 passages. Cells obtained from vendors were authenticated and certified negative for Mycoplasma contamination. For proliferation assays, FBS was reduced to 2% or kept at 10% for 24 h. Detached with TrypLE, cells were seeded (2,000 cells per well for HUVECs, fibroblasts, HaCaTs; 1,000 cells per well for C2C12) and treated with CGRP (1 or 20 nM) or 10–20% FBS. Incubation for 48 h (fibroblasts, C2C12) or 72 h (HUVECs, HaCaTs) at 37 °C with 5% CO2 followed. Proliferation was determined using the CyQUANT Cell Proliferation Assay (Invitrogen), presented as fold change over basal proliferation (medium only). PerkinElmer EnVision multi-mode plate reader with EnSpire Manager software was used.

    Flow cytometry with tissue samples

    Skin wounds were collected using an 8-mm biopsy punch, and muscle defects were dissected to isolate the quadriceps. Samples were minced with scissors and subjected to two serial digestions with collagenase XI (1 mg ml−1) at 37 °C (two times 20 min for skin, two times 15 min for muscle). After the first digestion, the supernatant was collected and mixed with neutralization buffer (DMEM/F12 with 10% FBS and 5 mM EDTA). The first collection was kept on ice and fresh collagenase XI was added to the undigested tissue for the second digestion. Digestion mixtures were passed through a 70-μm cell strainer and stained with LIVE/DEAD Fixable Aqua dye (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 1:400 dilution in PBS) for 20 min on ice. Cells were incubated with TruStain FcX anti-CD16/32 (10 μg ml−1; clone 93, BioLegend) diluted in staining buffer (5% FBS and 2 mM EDTA in PBS) for 20 min and subsequently incubated with primary antibodies in staining buffer for a further 30 min on ice. The following anti-mouse antibodies from BioLegend were used: FITC anti-CD11b (clone M1/70, 6.6 μg ml−1) or BV711 anti-CD11b (clone M1/70, 2 μg ml−1); PE anti-F4/80 (clone BM8, 4 μg ml−1); BV421 anti-Ly6G (clone 1A8, 2 μg ml−1); BV711 anti-Ly6C (clone HK1.4, 1 μg ml−1) or FITC anti-Ly6C (clone HK1.4, 5 μg ml−1); PE-Cyanine7 anti-CD206 (clone C068C2, 2.6 μg ml−1); APC anti-CD206 (clone C068C2, 2 μg ml1); PE-Cyanine7 anti-CD3 (clone 17A2, 4 μg ml−1); BV711 anti-CD3 (clone 17A2, 4 μg ml−1);APC anti-CD4 (clone GK1.5, 2 μg ml−1); BV421 anti-CD8 (clone 53-6.7, 2 μg ml−1); PE anti-TCR β (clone H57-597, 2 μg ml−1); APC/Fire 750 anti-TCR γ/δ (clone GL3, 2 μg ml−1); PE-Cyanine anti-CD11c (clone N418, 2 μg ml−1); APC/Fire 750 anti-MHC Class II (clone M5/114.15.2, 2 μg ml−1). Cells were washed once with a large volume of staining buffer before analysis with BD LSR Fortessa X-20 and FlowJo software (BD Biosciences).

    Mouse bone marrow neutrophil and monocyte isolation

    Bone marrow cells were flushed from femora and tibiae of C57BL/6 J mice (8- to 12-week-old) with HBSS without Ca2+ and Mg2+ containing 2% FBS and 1 mM EDTA. Cell suspension was passed through a 70-μm strainer. Next, EasySep Mouse Neutrophil Enrichment Kit or EasySep Mouse Monocyte Isolation Kit (STEMCELL Technologies) was used to isolate neutrophils or monocytes according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Neutrophils were resuspended in RPMI containing 100 units ml−1 penicillin/streptomycin and 10% FBS for cell migration assay and cell death assay or 2% FBS for efferocytosis. Monocytes were cultured in DMEM/F12 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) containing 10% FBS, 2–10 ng ml−1 M-CSF (PeproTech) and 100 units ml−1 penicillin/streptomycin for subsequent experiments. RAMP1 and CALCRL were detected on neutrophils and monocytes using rabbit anti-RAMP1 (8.5 μg ml−1, Alomone Lab, ARR-021) and rabbit anti-calcitonin receptor-like receptor (5 μg ml−1, Biorbyt, orb526584).

    Neutrophil cell death

    Bone marrow-isolated neutrophils were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (10% FBS). Cells were incubated with CGRP (1-20 nM, Tocris Bioscience, 83651-90-5) for 10 min, followed by treatment with IL-1 (5 ng ml−1) and TNF (50 ng ml−1) for 12 h at 37 °C with 5% CO2 to induce cell death. After 12 h, cells were washed with PBS and incubated with LIVE/DEAD Fixable Aqua dye (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 1:400 dilution) in PBS on ice for 20 min. Cell death was assessed using BD LSR Fortessa X-20 and FlowJo software (BD Biosciences).

    Macrophage cell death and polarization marker expression

    Bone marrow cells from 8- to 12-week-old C57BL/6 J mice were flushed, filtered and cultured in conditioned medium (DMEM/F12 with 10% heat-inactivated FBS, 100 units ml−1 penicillin/streptomycin, and 20% L929 fibroblasts-conditioned medium) at 37 °C with 5% CO2. After 7–9 days, differentiated macrophages were collected and seeded in 12-well or 6-well plates. The next day, cells were treated with CGRP (1 or 20 nM, Tocris Bioscience, 83651-90-5) for 20 min before exposure to mouse IL-1 (5 ng ml−1) and TNF (50 ng ml−1), IL-4 (2 ng ml−1) and IL-13 (2 ng ml−1), or IL-10 (2 ng ml−1) (PeproTech Inc) for 24 or 72 h. Macrophages were detached with TrypLE (Gibco) containing 3 mM EDTA, stained with LIVE/DEAD Aqua dye for 20 min on ice, and incubated with blocking solution (10 μg ml−1 TruStain FcX anti-CD16/32 (clone 93, BioLegend)) for 20 min before staining with antibodies for 30 min on ice. Antibodies from BioLegend included PE anti-CD11b (clone M1/70, 1 μg ml−1), BV711 anti-F4/80 (clone BM8, 2 μg ml−1), APC anti-CD80 (clone 16-10A1, 0.5 μg ml−1) and PE-Cyanine7 anti-CD206 (clone C068C2, 1 μg ml−1). For intracellular staining, cells were fixed and permeabilized using FluoroFix Buffer and Intracellular Staining Permeabilization Wash Buffer (Perm buffer, BioLegend). APC anti-mouse arginase-1 (Thermo Fisher, Clone AlexF5, 1 μg ml−1) was added to the Perm buffer and incubated with the cells for 30 min on ice. After washing with Perm buffer and staining buffer, cells were analysed using BD LSR Fortessa X-20 and FlowJo software (BD Biosciences).

    Neutrophil and macrophage migration

    Assays were conducted using 6.5-mm-diameter culture plate inserts (Corning) with 5-μm and 3-μm pore sizes for macrophages and neutrophils, respectively. Macrophages (1 × 105) or neutrophils (3 × 105) in migration media (DMEM/F12 with 0.25% BSA) were added to the inserts. The lower chambers contained migration buffer alone or chemoattractant (mouse CCL2 10 ng ml−1 for macrophages or mouse CXCL1/KC 150 ng ml−1 for neutrophils, PeproTech) with or without CGRP. Cells were allowed to migrate through the insert membrane for 3-4 h at 37 °C with 5% CO2. For macrophages, the inserts were then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, and cells on the upper side were removed. DAPI (1 μg ml−1) was used to stain cells on the bottom side, and they were counted using a fluorescent microscope. For neutrophils, cells that migrated into the lower chamber were collected and counted using a haemocytometer. The data are presented as the fold change, calculated by dividing the number of cells that migrated in response to treatments by the number of cells that migrated spontaneously (migration media only).

    Efferocytosis

    An efferocytosis assay kit (Cayman, 601770) was used following the manufacturer’s instructions. Neutrophils were labelled with CFSE and cultured in RPMI with 2% serum for 12 h to induce cell death. Bone marrow-derived macrophages cultured for 7 days were seeded at a density of 4 × 105 cells per well in a 6-well plate with DMEM/F12 containing 10% FBS and 100 units ml−1 penicillin/streptomycin. Prior to the assay, macrophages were pre-treated with CGRP (1 or 20 nM) for 24 h. Macrophages were collected, labelled with CytoTell Blue, and then incubated with CFSE-labelled dead/dying neutrophils at different ratios (1:1, 1:2, and 1:4) at 37 °C for 15 min. The reaction was stopped by washing cells with ice-cold PBS containing 5% FBS and 1 mM EDTA. Cells were analysed with BD LSR Fortessa X-20 and FlowJo software (BD Biosciences). Macrophages were identified by CytoTell Blue-positive staining, and the efferocytosis index was calculated as the percentage of CFSE-positive cells in CytoTell Blue-labelled macrophages.

    Adoptive transfer of tdTomato+ cells for in vivo migration and efferocytosis

    tdTomato+ bone marrow cells from CMV-cre/Rosa26tdTomato male mice (8- to 12-week-old) were adoptively transferred into Nav1.8cre/Rosa26DTA and Rosa26DTA mice either directly after red blood cell lysis (migration assay) or following neutrophil isolation (efferocytosis assay). In the migration assay, 1 × 107 cells were intravenously delivered on day 2 after skin or muscle injury. On day 3, collected tissues were analysed via flow cytometry to detect tdTomato+ cells. For the efferocytosis assay, neutrophils were cultured in low serum (2%) for 24 h to induce cell death, and 2 × 106 dead or dying neutrophils were intradermally injected at the skin wound border on day 3 post-injury. After 30 min, collected tissues were assessed via flow cytometry to quantify efferocytosis as the number of monocytes or macrophages that had taken up tdTomato+ apoptotic neutrophils. Results were presented as fold change relative to Rosa26DTA control mice.

    RT–PCR, qPCR and RNA-seq

    Isolated neutrophils were treated with CGRP (1 nM) in RPMI with 10% FBS and 100 units ml−1 penicillin/streptomycin for 4 h at 37 °C with 5% CO2. Isolated monocytes cultured in DMEM/F12 with 10% FBS, 100 units ml−1 penicillin/streptomycin, and M-CSF (10 ng ml−1) for 3 days, had their medium replaced with CGRP (1 nM) for 4 h at 37 °C with 5% CO2. After collection, RNA extraction used the RNeasy Plus Micro Kit (Qiagen). For PCR with reverse transcription (RT–PCR) and quantitative PCR (qPCR), reverse transcription used ReverTra Ace (Toyobo). RT–PCR primers were: Human_Calcrl 5′-CATGCACATCCTTATGCAC-3′ and 5′-CCATCACTGATTGTTGACAC-3′; Human_Ramp1 5′-GCCAGGAGGCTAACTACG-3′ and 5′-GAAGAACCTGTCCACCTCTG-3′; Mouse_Calcrl 5′-GGTACCACTACTTGGCATTG-3′ and 5′-GTCACTGATTGTTGACACTG-3′; Mouse_Ramp1 5′-GACGCTATGGTGTGACT-3′ and 5′-GAGTGCAGTCATGAGCAG-3′. Human or mouse GAPDH primers were from Integrated DNA Technologies (51-01-07-12 and 51-01-07-13, respectively). PCR products were analysed by gel electrophoresis. qPCR was performed using LightCycle96 with software LightCycle96 (Roche Diagnostics) and TaqMan Assay primers from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Thbs1, Mm00449032_g1; Gapdh, Mm99999915_g1). For RNA-seq, RNA quantity and quality assessment, library preparation and sequencing were performed at the Medical Genomics Facility, Monash Health Translation Precinct (MHTP). RNA quantity was assessed using Qubit. RNA samples (20 ng) with RNA integrity number (RIN) value ≥ 7 were used for library preparation. First strand synthesis was performed using a dT primer which adds the Illumina P7 (5′-CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGAGAT-3′), 8-bp i7 index for each sample and a 10-bp unique molecular identifier. The modified reverse transcriptase reaction also adds a template switching sequence at the 5′ end of the RNA during the generation of indexed cDNA. These first stand indexed cDNA were pooled and amplified using primers to P7 and the template switch sequence. Illumina P5 was added by tagmentation by Nextera transposase during amplification. Standard Illumina R1 primer was used (main cDNA read), followed by standard i7 primer for index or unique molecular identifier. R2 primer was present but not used as it will read into poly-A tail. Sequencing was performed on the NextSeq2000 (Illumina), using NextSeq 1000/2000 P2 Reagents (100 cycles) v3 (Illumina) in accordance with the Illumina Protocol 1000000109376 v3 Nov2020.

    Demultiplexing and mapping

    Fastq files were processed using the nfCore/RNAseq (v3.2) pipeline using the umi function62. Reads were aligned to the Mus musculus GRCm38 reference using STAR aligner63. Reads were quantified using featureCounts producing the raw genes count matrix and various quality control metrics which were summarized in a multiQC report64,65. Raw counts were analysed with Degust66, a web tool which performs normalization using trimmed mean of M values (TMM)67. Differential gene expression analysis was performed using limma/voom68 in Degust and genes with a FDR-adjusted P value < 0.05 were considered significantly upregulated or downregulated. Volcano plots were made using the web tool, VolcaNoseR69. Gene ontology enrichment analysis for biological processes was performed with the web tool, ShinyGO 0.77, by providing all upregulated or downregulated DEGs separately as the input for each experimental group70.

    siRNA-mediated knockdown

    Macrophages (4 × 105 cells per well in a 6-well plate) were transfected with 10 nM scrambled siRNA (Silencer Select Negative Control No. 1 siRNA, Thermo Fisher, 4390843) or Silencer Select Pre-Designed siRNA against mouse TSP-1 (Thermo Fisher, s124596) using Reduced-Serum Medium (Opti-MEM, Gibco) and Lipofectamine RNAiMAX (Invitrogen, 51985034) for 6 h. The medium was then replaced with fresh culture medium (DMEM/F12 with 10% FBS). After 24 h, cells were collected for the migration assay. For the efferocytosis assay, cells were cultured with 1 nM CGRP immediately after transfection. After 24 h, cells were collected and co-cultured with dead or dying neutrophils. The evaluation of cell death and polarization used the same methods as those for assessing macrophage death and polarization marker expression.

    CGRP variants

    CGRP and eCGRP were synthesized by ProteoGenix. eCGRP was designed to contain PlGF residues 123–141 at the N terminus followed by a plasmin-sensitive sequence from vitronectin (KGYR)71. For both variants, a disulfide bond was formed between the two cysteine residues and the C-terminal phenylalanine was amidated. Peptide purity, determined by high performance liquid chromatography, was 89.63% for CGRP and 87.33% for eCGRP.

    Cleavage of eCGRP by plasmin

    CGRP (4 μg) and equimolar eCGRP in 20 μl of PBS (pH 7.2) were incubated with plasmin (0.0005 U μg−1, Sigma) at 37 °C for 60 min. Aprotinin (25 μg ml−1, Sigma) was added for 5 min at 37 °C to stop plasmin activity. Samples were analysed by SDS–PAGE.

    Retention of CGRP and eCGRP into skin and muscle

    CGRP (1 μg) or an equal molar amount of eCGRP was intradermally administered to the shaved dorsal skin of male 10- to 12-week-old Nav1.8cre+/−/Rosa26tdT+/− mice, with injection sites marked using a marker. For muscle, CGRP variants were injected into the quadriceps. After 24 h, collected injection sites underwent cryosectioning and immunostaining. Fiji59 was used for analysis, excluding the co-localization area of CGRP with tdTomato fluorescence, indicating endogenous CGRP expression.

    cAMP quantification

    Freshly isolated neutrophils or bone marrow-derived macrophages (1 million cells) were treated with CGRP (1 nM) in RPMI with 10% FBS for 30 min at 37 °C with 5% CO2. cAMP levels were quantified using a cAMP ELISA kit from Cayman Chemical (581001) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

    Spontaneous pain behaviour assessment

    Eight mice per group (4 males, 4 females, C57BL/6 J, 10- to 12-week-old) were acclimatized for 1 h in empty cages. The right hind paw received an intraplantar injection 1 μg of wild-type CGRP, equimolar amount of eCGRP, 0.05% capsaicin (Sigma, M2028), or 20 μl saline. Mice were immediately placed in the cage, and their behaviour was recorded. The number of episodes and the time spent licking, shaking, flinching and lifting the paw were recorded for first 5 min and for 5 min after 1, 6, 24 and 48 h.

    Hot plate test

    Eight mice per group (4 males, 4 females, C57BL/6 J, 10- to 12-week-old) received an intraplantar injection of 1 μg of wild-type CGRP, equimolar amount of eCGRP, or 20 μl saline in the right hind paw. After 30 min, mice were individually placed on a metal hot plate set to 52 °C. The latency, from mouse placement on the surface to the first behavioural sign of nociception (for example, lifting, shaking, licking the hind paw or jumping), was measured. Mice were immediately removed from the hot plate after responding or after a 30 s cut-off. The test was repeated after 1, 6, 24 and 48 h.

    ELISAs for cytokines and MMPs

    Homogenized skin wound and muscle tissues were incubated for 30 min on ice in T-PER Tissue Protein Extraction Reagent (10 ml per g of tissue, Thermo Fisher Scientific) containing 1 tablet of protease inhibitor for 7 ml (Roche). Samples were then centrifuged at 10,000g for 5 min and supernatants were stored at −80 °C. Total protein concentration was measured with a Bradford assay (Millipore). Cytokines and MMPs were detected by ELISA from R&D Systems; Mouse IL-1 beta/IL-1F2 DuoSet ELISA; Mouse CCL2/JE/MCP-1 DuoSet ELISA, Mouse CXCL2/MIP-2 DuoSet ELISA; Total MMP-2 Quantikine ELISA Kit; Mouse Total MMP-9 DuoSet ELISA.

    Statistical analysis

    Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 10 (GraphPad). Significant differences were calculated with Student’s t-test, one-sample t-test, and by ANOVA when performing multiple comparisons between groups. P < 0.05 was considered as a statistically significant difference.

    Reporting summary

    Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.

    [ad_2]

    Source link