Tag: space exploration

  • White dwarf research reveals how the solar system might die

    White dwarf research reveals how the solar system might die

    [ad_1]

    Scientists from the University of Warwick have found that our solar system might be pulled into the gravity of a white dwarf star.

    The team have helped to answer what happens to planetary systems, like our solar system, when their host stars become white dwarfs.

    White dwarfs are the end state of stars when they have burned all their fuel. They can offer insight into different aspects of star formation and evolution.

    In the study, the team examined the fate of asteroids, moons, and planets that pass close to the white dwarfs by analysing transits – dips in the brightness of stars caused by objects passing in front of them.

    Unlike the predictable transits caused by orbiting planets around stars, transits caused by debris are oddly shaped and disorderly. This suggests the fate of these bodies to be extremely violent.

    Dr Amornrat Aungwerojwit of Naresuan University, who led the study, said: “Previous research had shown that when asteroids, moons and planets get close to white dwarfs, the huge gravity of these stars rips these small planetary bodies into smaller and smaller pieces.”

    Collisions between these pieces grind them into dust, which finally falls into the white dwarf. This allows the researchers to determine what type of material the original planetary bodies were made from.

    The study is published in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

    The team investigated the changes in the brightness of stars

    In the new research, scientists investigated changes in the brightness of stars for 17 years to gather insight into how these bodies are disrupted. They focused on three different white dwarfs which all behaved very differently.

    Professor Boris Gaensicke, Department of Physics, University of Warwick, commented: “The simple fact that we can detect the debris of asteroids, maybe moons or even planets whizzing around a white dwarf every couple of hours is quite mind-blowing, but our study shows that the behaviour of these systems can evolve rapidly, in a matter of a few years.

    “While we think we are on the right path in our studies, the fate of these systems is far more complex than we could have ever imagined.”

    White dwarf’s studied by the team

    The first white dwarf (ZTF J0328−1219) studied appeared steady over the last few years. However, the authors found evidence of a major catastrophic event around 2010.

    Another star (ZTF J0923+4236) was shown to dim irregularly every couple of months. During fainter states, this star shows chaotic variability on time scales of minutes before brightening again.

    The team examined the third white dwarf (WD 1145+017) in 2015 and showed that it behaved close to theoretical predictions. Surprisingly, this study showed that the transits are now totally gone.

    “The system is, overall, very gently getting brighter, as the dust produced by catastrophic collisions around 2015 disperses”, said Professor Gaensicke.

    “The unpredictable nature of these transits can drive astronomers crazy – one minute they are there, the next they are gone. And this points to the chaotic environment they are in.”

    What will happen to our solar system?

    Professor Gaensicke said: “The sad news is that the Earth will probably just be swallowed up by an expanding Sun, before it becomes a white dwarf.

    “For the rest of the solar system, some of the asteroids located between Mars and Jupiter, and maybe some of the moons of Jupiter may get dislodged and travel close enough to the eventual white dwarf to undergo the shredding process we have investigated.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Lovell telescope detects rare radio signals from a magnetar

    Lovell telescope detects rare radio signals from a magnetar

    [ad_1]

    An international team of astronomers has used the Lovell telescope at Jodrell Bank to illuminate radio signals coming from a magnetar.

    Researchers from the UK, Germany, and Australia have used the Lovell telescope to make a significant breakthrough in understanding the unprecedented behaviour of a previously dormant magnetar, known as XTE J1810-197.

    Magnetars are a type of neutron star and the strongest magnets in the Universe.

    At around 8,000 light years away, XTE J1810-197 is the closest magnetar known to Earth.

    The magnetar emits light, which is strongly polarised and rapidly changing.

    This implies that that interactions at the surface of the star are more complex than what is suggested in previous theoretical explanations.

    The results are published in two papers in Nature Astronomy.

    Close observation of the magnetar

    Detecting radio signals from magnetars is extremely rare. XTE J1810-197 is one of the only magnetars known to produce these emissions.

    The magnetar was first observed to emit radio signals in 2003 before going silent for over a decade.

    In 2018, the signals were detected by The University of Manchester’s 76m Lovell telescope at the Jodrell Bank Observatory.

    Subsequently, university scientists, working alongside institutions such as the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy in Germany, Australia’s CSIRO national science agency, and the University of Southampton, have been closely monitoring the magnetar.

    Significant changes in radio signals

    Close monitoring has revealed significant changes in the radio signals coming from the magnetar, particularly in the way the light was polarised. This has indicated the magnetar’s radio beam shifting its direction in relation to Earth.

    The team think that this was caused by an effect called free precession. This is where the magnetar wobbles slightly due to asymmetries in its structure, similar to a spinning top.

    The wobbling motion unexpectedly decreased rapidly over a few months until it eventually stopped altogether.

    This challenges the notion suggested by numerous astronomers that repeating fast radio bursts might originate from magnetars undergoing precession.

    Gregory Desvignes from the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy in Bonn, Germany, and lead author of one of the two papers, said: “We expected to see some variations in the polarisation of this magnetar’s emission, as we knew this from other magnetars but we did not expect that these variations are so systematic, following exactly the behaviour that would be caused by the wobbling of the star.”

    Results yet to be determined

    However, the cause behind the alteration of circular polarisation, where the light appears to spiral as it traverses through space, remains uncertain.

    Dr Marcus Lower, a postdoctoral fellow at CSIRO, who led the Australian research using Murriyang, CSIRO’s Parkes radio telescope, said: “Our results suggest there is a superheated plasma above the magnetar’s magnetic pole, which is acting like a polarising filter. How exactly the plasma is doing this is still to be determined.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Remarkable gravitational-wave signal detected by researchers

    Remarkable gravitational-wave signal detected by researchers

    [ad_1]

    Researchers from the Institute of Cosmology and Gravitation have helped to detect a gravitational-wave signal that could solve a key cosmic mystery.

    The discovery of the gravitational-wave signal is from a set of results announced recently by the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA collaboration, which comprises more than 1,600 scientists from around the world.

    The collaboration includes members of the ICG, which aims to detect gravitational waves and use them to explore the fundamentals of science.

    Observation of the gravitational-wave signal

    Shortly after the start of the fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA observing run in May 2023, the US LIGO Livingston detector observed a gravitational-wave signal from the collision of what is most likely a neutron star with a compact object 2.5 to 4.5 times the mass of the Sun.

    Neutron stars and black holes are compact objects. What makes this signal, GW230529, interesting is the mass of the heavier object.

    The object falls within a mass-gap between the heaviest known neutron stars and the lightest black holes.

    The gravitational-wave signal cannot reveal the nature of this object by itself.

    Therefore, future detections of similar events are required to solve this mystery.

    “This detection, the first of our exciting results from the fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA observing run, reveals that there may be a higher rate of similar collisions between neutron stars and low mass black holes than we previously thought,” said Dr Jess McIver, Assistant Professor at the University of British Columbia and Deputy Spokesperson of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.

    Assessing the reality of the event

    As the event was only seen by one gravitational-wave detector, assessing whether it is real becomes more difficult.

    Dr Gareth Cabourn Davies, a Research Software Engineer in the ICG, said: “Corroborating events by seeing them in multiple detectors is one of our most powerful tools in separating signals from noise.

    “By using appropriate models of the background noise, we can judge an event even when we don’t have another detector to back up what we have seen.”

    Previous way to detect masses of black holes and neutron stars

    Before gravitational waves were detected in 2015, the masses of stellar-mass black holes were found using X-ray observations. The masses of neutron stars were found using radio observations.

    The measurement fell into two distinct ranges, with a gap between them from about two to five times the mass of the Sun.

    Over the years, some measurements have encroached on the mass gap, which is highly debated amongst astrophysicists.

    Information provided by the newly detected signal

    Analysis of the gravitational-wave signal shows that it came from the merger of two compact objects. One object had a mass between 1.2 and 2.0 times that of our Sun, and the other was slightly more than twice as big.

    Although the gravitational-wave signal does not provide enough information to determine with certainty whether these objects are neutron stars or black holes, the lighter object is likely a neutron star, and the heavier one is a black hole.

    Scientists in the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Collaboration are confident that the heavier object is within the mass gap.

    Gravitation-wave signals have provided almost 200 measurements of compact-object masses. Of these, only one other merger may have involved a mass-gap compact object. The signal GW190814 came from the merger of a black hole with a compact object exceeding the mass of the heaviest known neutron stars and possibly within the mass gap.

    “While previous evidence for mass-gap objects has been reported both in gravitational and electromagnetic waves, this system is especially exciting because it’s the first gravitational-wave detection of a mass-gap object paired with a neutron star,” said Dr Sylvia Biscoveanu from Northwestern University.

    “The observation of this system has important implications for both theories of binary evolution and electromagnetic counterparts to compact-object mergers.”

    The fourth observing run

    The fourth observing run is planned to last for 20 months, including a break to make several improvements.

    By 16 January 2024, when the current break started, a total of 81 significant signal candidates had been identified.

    GW230529 is the first of these to be published after a detailed investigation.

    The fourth run will resume on 10 April 2024 and will continue until February 2025 with no further planned breaks in observing.

    While the run continues, the team will analyse the data from the first half of the run and check the remaining 80 significant signal candidates that have been identified.

    By the end of the fourth observing run, the total number of observed gravitational-wave signals should exceed 200.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Japan’s SLIM moon lander surprisingly survived a second lunar night

    Japan’s SLIM moon lander surprisingly survived a second lunar night

    [ad_1]

    New Scientist Default Image

    View of the moon’s surface taken from the SLIM lander’s tilted position

    JAXA

    Most landers we send to the moon operate for a single lunar day – about two Earth weeks – before being overtaken and killed by the extreme cold of lunar night. But Japan’s Smart Lander for Investigating Moon (SLIM) has now survived two nights on the moon and continues to send images back to Earth, an incredible feat.

    SLIM is Japan’s first lunar lander, making it the fifth country to land a spacecraft on the moon. When it touched down on 19 January, it was tilted, so the solar panels did not provide enough power to keep it running for more than a few hours. After nine days, the sun had moved through the sky enough to start it back up again.

    But after just three Earth days, lunar night began. Nighttime temperatures on the moon drop down as low as -133°C (-208°F), which can ruin spacecraft batteries and electronics. Generally, moon landers shut down for lunar night and never wake again, but when the sun rose over SLIM on 25 February, it turned back on.

    This in itself was a surprise – the lander was not specifically designed to survive lunar night, and its original mission was meant to end when night fell. So when another night approached, it seemed this would be the end for SLIM.

    But on 27 March, the official SLIM account posted the image above on X, with the caption: “We received a response from SLIM last night confirming that SLIM was successful in its second overnight. Last night, the sun was still high and the equipment was hot, so we hurriedly used the navigation camera to take pictures of the usual scenery for a short time.” It seems that in the next few Earth days, the lander should be able to restart its analysis of its surroundings.

    Some spacecraft use radioactive elements to stay warm, but SLIM does not, making its survival particularly astonishing. “It is a major achievement, given that they are not using a radioisotope heater,” says Haym Benaroya at Rutgers University in New Jersey. “The outcome is important and impressive given that this is a major design consideration for electronics (and people) surviving the lunar night.” Analyses of how SLIM survived where so many other spacecraft have failed could help us understand how to keep warm on the moon.

    Topics:

    • the moon/
    • space exploration



    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • NASA’s Artemis astronauts will try to grow plants on the moon

    NASA’s Artemis astronauts will try to grow plants on the moon

    [ad_1]

    Artist's concept of an Artemis astronaut deploying an instrument on the lunar surface

    An artist’s concept of an Artemis astronaut deploying an instrument on the lunar surface

    NASA

    NASA has selected the first science experiments that astronauts will bring to the moon as part of the Artemis III mission. This mission, currently planned for 2026, will mark the first time humans have walked on the lunar surface since the Apollo 17 mission in 1972.

    The first of the three scientific instruments is called Lunar Effects on Agricultural Flora (LEAF). In this experiment, astronauts will grow plants on the surface of the moon, observing their ability to photosynthesise and grow, and how they respond to the stress of lower gravity and space radiation.

    This won’t be the first time plants have been grown in space – astronauts have been growing vegetables aboard the International Space Station for a decade, and China’s Chang’e 4 mission sprouted seeds on the moon in 2019. Those seeds didn’t last long, though, so if all goes well, LEAF will give us our first glimpse of the full growth cycle of plants on the moon.

    The second experiment is the Lunar Environment Monitoring Station (LEMS), a small seismometer designed to measure moonquakes near the lunar south pole. Characterising how the ground moves during those quakes will help researchers understand the underground structure of the area.

    The final instrument, called the Lunar Dielectric Analyzer (LDA), will measure how electrically conductive the soil is. Ice bound to dust particles drastically increases the ability of the soil to conduct electricity, so the LDA will help the hunt for deposits of frost and measure changes in the soil as the sun rises and sets over the lunar surface.

    “These three deployed instruments were chosen to begin scientific investigations that will address key Moon to Mars science objectives,” said NASA’s Pam Melroy in a statement. The ultimate goal of the Artemis programme is to lay the groundwork for a long-term human presence on the moon, which will, in turn, teach us how to prepare for crewed missions to Mars.

    Topics:

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • See the messages NASA is sending to Jupiter’s icy moon, Europa

    See the messages NASA is sending to Jupiter’s icy moon, Europa

    [ad_1]

    New Scientist Default Image

    Illustration of NASA’s Europa Clipper spacecraft

    NASA/JPL-Caltech

    IN OCTOBER, NASA’s Europa Clipper spacecraft is due to start its journey to explore Jupiter’s ice-encrusted moon Europa (imagined above in illustration).

    NASA asked the scientific organisation that I lead, METI International, to draw on our expertise at attempting to contact extraterrestrial intelligence and help craft a symbolic missive engraved on a tantalum plate attached to the spacecraft – greetings from one water world to another.

    New Scientist Default Image

    We helped create two parts of the message. First, we collected a globally representative sample of audio recordings of the word for water in 103 languages, showing each as a waveform on the outward-facing side of the panel (shown above) that protects sensitive scientific instruments.

    On the other, inward-facing side (shown below), we designed the scientific part of the message. This describes water in terms of the “water hole”, the band of frequencies between the hydrogen and hydroxyl (which combine to form water) emission lines in the radio spectrum where many early searches for intelligence beyond Earth were conducted.

    New Scientist Default Image

    Other parts of the interior message include: the Drake equation, which estimates the number of extraterrestrial civilisations in our galaxy; a microchip with the names of 2.6 million endorsers, to be added closer to launch; and US poet laureate Ada LimÓn’s poem to Europa, which ends: “O second moon, we, too, are made / of water, of vast and beckoning seas… / of a need to call out through the dark.” The Europa Clipper is due to enter Jupiter’s orbit in April 2030.

    Douglas Vakoch, president of METI International

    Topics:

    • Jupiter/
    • space exploration

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • SpaceX’s Starship created a volcano-like explosion in first launch

    SpaceX’s Starship created a volcano-like explosion in first launch

    [ad_1]

    Debris around the Space X Starship launch pad

    Debris left by the explosion of the SpaceX Starship launch pad in Texas on 22 April 2023

    UPI/Alamy Live News

    When SpaceX’s Starship rocket launched for the first time in 2023, it destroyed its launch pad in an explosion similar to a volcanic eruption that sent huge chunks of concrete high into the sky. Understanding the blast in detail could help us design more robust launch and landing pads for future missions to the moon and Mars.

    “It was eye-opening to us that launch pads could explode so violently,” says Philip Metzger

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Starship launch 3: What time is the SpaceX flight today?

    Starship launch 3: What time is the SpaceX flight today?

    [ad_1]

    SpaceX's Starship prepped for flight

    SpaceX’s Starship prepped for flight

    SpaceX

    SpaceX is launching its massive Starship rocket for the third time on 14 March, following two failed missions. Here is everything you need to know about it.

    What is Starship?

    Starship is the most powerful rocket ever built. It is 121 metres long and its reusable booster can land safely after taking the second stage to an altitude of more than 70 kilometres. That second stage is also reusable, which is intended to make Starship an affordable, reliable vehicle capable of quickly turning around and relaunching. The ultimate aim of the project is to put humans on the moon and, later, Mars.

    What time is Starship blasting off?

    SpaceX has announced that livestream video of the launch will begin at 8.25am local time in Texas, which is 13.25 GMT. The actual launch is expected to happen about 30 minutes after the livestream begins.

    Where is Starship going?

    This launch is, as you would expect, the most ambitious so far. SpaceX is aiming to carry out a successful first and second stage launch, taking Starship into space, where it will open and close its payload door as a test, shuffle fuel from one tank to another as a first step towards the eventual refuelling of one Starship by another – which will be vital for long-range missions – and relight its engines for a controlled re-entry to Earth’s atmosphere.

    This launch will follow a new trajectory that will see the second stage splash down in the Indian Ocean. While it is designed to be a reusable craft, this mission aims to have it make a slow and controlled landing on the ocean rather than on land or a ship. This is easier and safer at this stage of development.

    What happened when Starship launched before?

    There have been two Starship launches, both ending in failure, although that is an expected part of SpaceX’s fail-fast, learn-fast strategy.

    The first launch on 20 April last year saw three engines on the first stage – from a total of 33 – fail to ignite. Several more subsequently failed during the flight. The rocket then span out of control, causing a self-destruct safeguard to kick in, something that SpaceX sardonically calls a rapid unscheduled disassembly (RUD). The whole flight lasted around 3 minutes and reached a maximum altitude of 39 kilometres.

    Starship’s second launch was on 18 November. This time, all 33 engines fired and the rocket flew long enough for the first and second stages to separate. But, as the first stage rotated to begin its slowdown and landing procedure, it exploded. The second stage successfully continued to an altitude of about 149 kilometres – passing the Kármán line that marks the beginning of space – but a safeguard feature destroyed it when it stopped sending back data, before it had a chance to complete an orbit or make its way back to Earth.

    What happens if this launch goes wrong?

    It probably will go wrong, in some respect. It is highly unlikely that Starship will complete its mission flawlessly. But any failure will supply data and experience that can be used to improve the design and processes for the fourth launch. SpaceX has so far shown that it can iterate rapidly and make big progress with every launch.

    Topics:



    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Starship launch 3: What time is the SpaceX flight and what to expect?

    Starship launch 3: What time is the SpaceX flight and what to expect?

    [ad_1]

    SpaceX's Starship prepped for flight

    SpaceX’s Starship prepped for flight

    SpaceX

    SpaceX is launching its massive Starship rocket for the third time on 14 March, following two failed missions. Here is everything you need to know about it.

    What is Starship?

    Starship is the most powerful rocket ever built. It is 121 metres long and its reusable booster can land safely after taking the second stage to an altitude of more than 70 kilometres. That second stage is also reusable, which is intended to make Starship an affordable, reliable vehicle capable of quickly turning around and relaunching. The ultimate aim of the project is to put humans on the moon and, later, Mars.

    What time is Starship blasting off?

    SpaceX has announced that livestream video of the launch will begin at 7.30am local time in Texas, which is 11.30am GMT. The actual launch is expected to happen about 30 minutes after the livestream begins.

    Where is Starship going?

    This launch is, as you would expect, the most ambitious so far. SpaceX is aiming to carry out a successful first and second stage launch, taking Starship into space, where it will open and close its payload door as a test, shuffle fuel from one tank to another as a first step towards the eventual refuelling of one Starship by another – which will be vital for long-range missions – and relight its engines for a controlled re-entry to Earth’s atmosphere.

    This launch will follow a new trajectory that will see the second stage splash down in the Indian Ocean. While it is designed to be a reusable craft, this mission aims to have it make a slow and controlled landing on the ocean rather than on land or a ship. This is easier and safer at this stage of development.

    What happened when Starship launched before?

    There have been two Starship launches, both ending in failure, although that is an expected part of SpaceX’s fail-fast, learn-fast strategy.

    The first launch on 20 April last year saw three engines on the first stage – from a total of 33 – fail to ignite. Several more subsequently failed during the flight. The rocket then span out of control, causing a self-destruct safeguard to kick in, something that SpaceX sardonically calls a rapid unscheduled disassembly (RUD). The whole flight lasted around 3 minutes and reached a maximum altitude of 39 kilometres.

    Starship’s second launch was on 18 November. This time, all 33 engines fired and the rocket flew long enough for the first and second stages to separate. But, as the first stage rotated to begin its slowdown and landing procedure, it exploded. The second stage successfully continued to an altitude of about 149 kilometres – passing the Kármán line that marks the beginning of space – but a safeguard feature destroyed it when it stopped sending back data, before it had a chance to complete an orbit or make its way back to Earth.

    What happens if this launch goes wrong?

    It probably will go wrong, in some respect. It is highly unlikely that Starship will complete its mission flawlessly. But any failure will supply data and experience that can be used to improve the design and processes for the fourth launch. SpaceX has so far shown that it can iterate rapidly and make big progress with every launch.

    Topics:



    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Expansion of the Universe solved by Hubble and Webb?

    Expansion of the Universe solved by Hubble and Webb?

    [ad_1]

    Researchers are combining observations from the Hubble and James Webb telescopes to better understand the expansion of the Universe.

    When tackling one of cosmology’s most complex riddles, meticulous attention to detail is paramount. Such is the case with the ‘Hubble Tension,’ a conundrum arising from the disparity between the observed rate of the Universe’s expansion and predictions derived from earlier missions like ESA’s Planck.

    This inconsistency prompts questions about the accuracy of measurements and the potential influence of unseen phenomena.

    For over three decades, NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope has served as a reliable tool for measuring the rate of the expansion of the Universe.

    However, lingering doubts about measurement accuracy prompted a collaborative effort with NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope. Together, they aimed to provide definitive answers and address uncertainties regarding the observed expansion rate.

    Initial findings from the Webb telescope in 2023 provided crucial validation for Hubble’s measurements.

    Nevertheless, concerns persisted about potential errors emerging with deeper observations. To address these concerns, the SH0ES (Supernova H0 for the Equation of State of Dark Energy) team, led by physicist Adam Riess, conducted additional observations using Webb, focusing on critical cosmic mileposts known as Cepheid variable stars.

    Developing the cosmic distance ladder

    By cross-referencing Cepheid variable star data with Hubble’s measurements, the team was able to confirm the accuracy of the cosmic distance ladder‘s foundational rungs.

    Astronomers employ a variety of methods to gauge distances across the Universe, adapting their techniques to suit the specific characteristics of the celestial objects under scrutiny.

    These diverse approaches collectively form what is known as the cosmic distance ladder, where each step builds upon the preceding one for precise calibration.

    However, concerns arise as astronomers contemplate ascending the ‘second rung’ of this ladder. They speculate that the reliability of Cepheid measurements may diminish with increasing distance, potentially introducing instability into the ladder’s accuracy.

    This potential discrepancy stems from the blending of light emitted by Cepheid variables with that of neighbouring stars, a phenomenon exacerbated by the crowding of stars as distances lengthen.

    The challenge intensifies when examining past Hubble images of distant Cepheid variables, where the stars appear increasingly clustered and intertwined with adjacent stellar bodies.

    Enhancing accuracy with the James Webb Space Telescope

    This phenomenon necessitates meticulous adjustments to account for such visual clutter, particularly as intervening dust clouds obscure clarity in visible light measurements.

    Fortunately, the James Webb Space Telescope circumvents these obstacles by operating in the infrared spectrum, providing sharper resolution and effectively isolating Cepheids from their neighbouring stars amidst dusty environments.

    Riess explained: “Combining Webb and Hubble gives us the best of both worlds. We find that the Hubble measurements remain reliable as we climb farther along the cosmic distance ladder.”

    The latest observations from the Webb telescope encompass five host galaxies housing eight Type Ia supernovae and a grand total of 1,000 Cepheids.

    These observations extend to NGC 5468, the farthest galaxy where Cepheids have been measured, situated at a staggering distance of 130 million light-years.

    Co-author Gagandeep Anand of the Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore added: “This spans the full range where we made measurements with Hubble. So, we’ve gone to the end of the second rung of the cosmic distance ladder.”

    Hubble and Webb’s confirmation of the Hubble Tension will enable other observatories, such as Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope and ESA’s Euclid observatory, to investigate the Universe’s expansion further, offering a clearer picture of cosmic evolution.

    [ad_2]

    Source link