[ad_1]
Millet, J. K., Jaimes, J. A. & Whittaker, G. R. Molecular diversity of coronavirus host cell entry receptors. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 45, fuaa057 (2021).
Li, F. Receptor recognition mechanisms of coronaviruses: a decade of structural studies. J. Virol. 89, 1954–1964 (2015).
Guo, H. et al. Isolation of ACE2-dependent and -independent sarbecoviruses from Chinese horseshoe bats. J. Virol. 97, e0039523 (2023).
Cui, J., Li, F. & Shi, Z.-L. Origin and evolution of pathogenic coronaviruses. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 17, 181–192 (2019).
Walls, A. C. et al. Cryo-electron microscopy structure of a coronavirus spike glycoprotein trimer. Nature 531, 114–117 (2016).
Walls, A. C. et al. Tectonic conformational changes of a coronavirus spike glycoprotein promote membrane fusion. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 11157–11162 (2017).
Walls, A. C. et al. Structure, function, and antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein. Cell 181, 281–292.e6 (2020).
Peng, G. et al. Crystal structure of mouse coronavirus receptor-binding domain complexed with its murine receptor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 10696–10701 (2011).
Yan, R. et al. Structural basis for the different states of the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 in complex with ACE2. Cell Res. 31, 717–719 (2021).
Hoffmann, M. et al. SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Cell 181, 271–280.e8 (2020).
Saunders, N. et al. TMPRSS2 is a functional receptor for human coronavirus HKU1. Nature 624, 207–214 (2023).
McCallum, M. et al. Human coronavirus HKU1 recognition of the TMPRSS2 host receptor. Cell 187, 4231–4245.e13 (2024).
Xiong, Q. et al. Close relatives of MERS-CoV in bats use ACE2 as their functional receptors. Nature 612, 748–757 (2022).
Hofmann, H. et al. Human coronavirus NL63 employs the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus receptor for cellular entry. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 7988–7993 (2005).
Starr, T. N. et al. ACE2 binding is an ancestral and evolvable trait of sarbecoviruses. Nature 603, 913–918 (2022).
Lee, J. et al. Broad receptor tropism and immunogenicity of a clade 3 sarbecovirus. Cell Host Microbe 31, 1961–1973.e11 (2023).
Lim, S., Zhang, M. & Chang, T. L. ACE2-independent alternative receptors for SARS-CoV-2. Viruses 14, 2535 (2022).
Baggen, J. et al. TMEM106B is a receptor mediating ACE2-independent SARS-CoV-2 cell entry. Cell 186, 3427–3442.e22 (2023).
Verheije, M. H. et al. Redirecting coronavirus to a nonnative receptor through a virus-encoded targeting adapter. J. Virol. 80, 1250–1260 (2006).
Wan, Y. et al. Molecular mechanism for antibody-dependent enhancement of coronavirus entry. J. Virol. 94, e02015–19 (2020).
Maemura, T. et al. Antibody-dependent enhancement of SARS-CoV-2 infection is mediated by the IgG receptors FcγRIIA and FcγRIIIA but does not contribute to aberrant cytokine production by macrophages. mBio 12, e0198721 (2021).
Kibria, M. G. et al. Antibody-mediated SARS-CoV-2 entry in cultured cells. EMBO Rep. 24, e57724 (2023).
Junqueira, C. et al. FcγR-mediated SARS-CoV-2 infection of monocytes activates inflammation. Nature 606, 576–584 (2022).
Cao, L. et al. De novo design of picomolar SARS-CoV-2 miniprotein inhibitors. Science 370, 426–431 (2020).
Hoffmann, M. A. G. et al. ESCRT recruitment to SARS-CoV-2 spike induces virus-like particles that improve mRNA vaccines. Cell 186, 2380–2391.e9 (2023).
Ying, T., Feng, Y., Wang, Y., Chen, W. & Dimitrov, D. S. Monomeric IgG1 Fc molecules displaying unique Fc receptor interactions that are exploitable to treat inflammation-mediated diseases. MAbs 6, 1201–1210 (2014).
Xiang, Y. et al. Versatile and multivalent nanobodies efficiently neutralize SARS-CoV-2. Science 370, 1479–1484 (2020).
Pinto, D. et al. Cross-neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 by a human monoclonal SARS-CoV antibody. Nature 583, 290–295 (2020).
Scheid, J. F. et al. B cell genomics behind cross-neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 variants and SARS-CoV. Cell 184, 3205–3221.e24 (2021).
Tortorici, M. A. et al. Ultrapotent human antibodies protect against SARS-CoV-2 challenge via multiple mechanisms. Science 370, 950–957 (2020).
Cui, Z. et al. Structural and functional characterizations of infectivity and immune evasion of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron. Cell 185, 860–871.e13 (2022).
McCallum, M. et al. N-terminal domain antigenic mapping reveals a site of vulnerability for SARS-CoV-2. Cell 184, 2332–2347.e16 (2021).
Sun, X. et al. Neutralization mechanism of a human antibody with pan-coronavirus reactivity including SARS-CoV-2. Nat Microbiol 7, 1063–1074 (2022).
Pinto, D. et al. Broad betacoronavirus neutralization by a stem helix-specific human antibody. Science 373, 1109–1116 (2021).
Sauer, M. M. et al. Structural basis for broad coronavirus neutralization. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 28, 478–486 (2021).
Low, J. S. et al. ACE2-binding exposes the SARS-CoV-2 fusion peptide to broadly neutralizing coronavirus antibodies. Science 377, 735–742 (2022).
Piccoli, L. et al. Mapping neutralizing and immunodominant sites on the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain by structure-guided high-resolution serology. Cell 183, 1024–1042.e21 (2020).
Walls, A. C. et al. Unexpected receptor functional mimicry elucidates activation of coronavirus fusion. Cell 176, 1026–1039.e15 (2019).
Zhang, S. et al. Loss of spike N370 glycosylation as an important evolutionary event for the enhanced infectivity of SARS-CoV-2. Cell Res. 32, 315–318 (2022).
Ou, X. et al. Host susceptibility and structural and immunological insight of S proteins of two SARS-CoV-2 closely related bat coronaviruses. Cell Discov. 9, 78 (2023).
Chi, X. et al. Comprehensive structural analysis reveals broad-spectrum neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants. Cell Discov. 9, 37 (2023).
Cao, Y. et al. BA.2.12.1, BA.4 and BA.5 escape antibodies elicited by Omicron infection. Nature 608, 593–602 (2022).
Chi, X. et al. A neutralizing human antibody binds to the N-terminal domain of the Spike protein of SARS-CoV-2. Science 369, 650–655 (2020).
Li, D. et al. In vitro and in vivo functions of SARS-CoV-2 infection-enhancing and neutralizing antibodies. Cell 184, 4203–4219.e32 (2021).
Beaudoin-Bussières, G. et al. A Fc-enhanced NTD-binding non-neutralizing antibody delays virus spread and synergizes with a nAb to protect mice from lethal SARS-CoV-2 infection. Cell Rep. 38, 110368 (2022).
Barnes, C. O. et al. Structures of human antibodies bound to SARS-CoV-2 spike reveal common epitopes and recurrent features of antibodies. Cell 182, 828–842.e16 (2020).
Benton, D. J. et al. Receptor binding and priming of the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 for membrane fusion. Nature 588, 327–330 (2020).
Starr, T. N. et al. SARS-CoV-2 RBD antibodies that maximize breadth and resistance to escape. Nature 597, 97–102 (2021).
Hunt, A. C. et al. Multivalent designed proteins neutralize SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern and confer protection against infection in mice. Sci. Transl. Med. 14, eabn1252 (2022).
Hsieh, C.-L. et al. Structure-based design of prefusion-stabilized SARS-CoV-2 spikes. Science 369, 1501–1505 (2020).
McCallum, M. et al. Molecular basis of immune evasion by the Delta and Kappa SARS-CoV-2 variants. Science 374, 1621–1626 (2021).
McCallum, M. et al. SARS-CoV-2 immune evasion by the B.1.427/B.1.429 variant of concern. Science 373, 648–654 (2021).
Shang, J. et al. Structure of mouse coronavirus spike protein complexed with receptor reveals mechanism for viral entry. PLoS Pathog. 16, e1008392 (2020).
Wang, H. et al. TMPRSS2 and glycan receptors synergistically facilitate coronavirus entry. Cell 187, 4261–4271.e17 (2024).
Pronker, M. F. et al. Sialoglycan binding triggers spike opening in a human coronavirus. Nature 624, 201–206 (2023).
Xu, J. et al. Nanobodies from camelid mice and llamas neutralize SARS-CoV-2 variants. Nature 595, 278–282 (2021).
Xia, S. et al. Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 (previously 2019-nCoV) infection by a highly potent pan-coronavirus fusion inhibitor targeting its spike protein that harbors a high capacity to mediate membrane fusion. Cell Res. 30, 343–355 (2020).
Xia, S. et al. Structural and functional basis for pan-CoV fusion inhibitors against SARS-CoV-2 and its variants with preclinical evaluation. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 6, 288 (2021).
Xia, S. et al. A pan-coronavirus fusion inhibitor targeting the HR1 domain of human coronavirus spike. Sci. Adv. 5, eaav4580 (2019).
Menachery, V. D. et al. Trypsin treatment unlocks barrier for zoonotic bat coronavirus infection. J. Virol. 94, e01774–19 (2020).
Catanzaro, NJ. et al. ACE2 from Pipistrellus abramus bats is a receptor for HKU5 coronaviruses. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.13.584892 (2024).
Qing, E. et al. Inter-domain communication in SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins controls protease-triggered cell entry. Cell Rep. 39, 110786 (2022).
Takano, T., Kawakami, C., Yamada, S., Satoh, R. & Hohdatsu, T. Antibody-dependent enhancement occurs upon re-infection with the identical serotype virus in feline infectious peritonitis virus infection. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 70, 1315–1321 (2008).
Loo, L. et al. Fibroblast-expressed LRRC15 is a receptor for SARS-CoV-2 spike and controls antiviral and antifibrotic transcriptional programs. PLoS Biol. 21, e3001967 (2023).
Schwegmann-Weßels, C. et al. Comparison of vesicular stomatitis virus pseudotyped with the S proteins from a porcine and a human coronavirus. J. Gen. Virol. 90, 1724–1729 (2009).
Du, Y. et al. A broadly neutralizing humanized ACE2-targeting antibody against SARS-CoV-2 variants. Nat. Commun. 12, 5000 (2021).
Whitt, M. A. Generation of VSV pseudotypes using recombinant ΔG-VSV for studies on virus entry, identification of entry inhibitors, and immune responses to vaccines. J. Virol. Methods 169, 365–374 (2010).
Nie, J. et al. Quantification of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody by a pseudotyped virus-based assay. Nat. Protoc. 15, 3699–3715 (2020).
Reed, L. J. & Muench, H. A simple method of estimating fifty per cent endpoints. Am. J. Epidemiol. 27, 493–497 (1938).
Lempp, F. A. et al. Lectins enhance SARS-CoV-2 infection and influence neutralizing antibodies. Nature 598, 342–347 (2021).
Bowen, J. E. et al. SARS-CoV-2 spike conformation determines plasma neutralizing activity elicited by a wide panel of human vaccines. Sci. Immunol. 7, eadf1421 (2022).
Russo, C. J. & Passmore, L. A. Electron microscopy: ultrastable gold substrates for electron cryomicroscopy. Science 346, 1377–1380 (2014).
Suloway, C. et al. Automated molecular microscopy: the new Leginon system. J. Struct. Biol. 151, 41–60 (2005).
Tegunov, D. & Cramer, P. Real-time cryo-electron microscopy data preprocessing with Warp. Nat. Methods 16, 1146–1152 (2019).
Punjani, A., Rubinstein, J. L., Fleet, D. J. & Brubaker, M. A. cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 14, 290–296 (2017).
Punjani, A., Zhang, H. & Fleet, D. J. Non-uniform refinement: adaptive regularization improves single-particle cryo-EM reconstruction. Nat. Methods 17, 1214–1221 (2020).
Zivanov, J., Nakane, T. & Scheres, S. H. W. A Bayesian approach to beam-induced motion correction in cryo-EM single-particle analysis. IUCrJ 6, 5–17 (2019).
Zivanov, J. et al. New tools for automated high-resolution cryo-EM structure determination in RELION-3. eLife 7, e42166 (2018).
Zivanov, J., Nakane, T. & Scheres, S. H. W. Estimation of high-order aberrations and anisotropic magnification from cryo-EM data sets in −3.1. IUCrJ 7, 253–267 (2020).
Rosenthal, P. B. & Henderson, R. Optimal determination of particle orientation, absolute hand, and contrast loss in single-particle electron cryomicroscopy. J. Mol. Biol. 333, 721–745 (2003).
Chen, S. et al. High-resolution noise substitution to measure overfitting and validate resolution in 3D structure determination by single particle electron cryomicroscopy. Ultramicroscopy 135, 24–35 (2013).
Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera–a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004).
Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 486–501 (2010).
Wang, R. Y.-R. et al. Automated structure refinement of macromolecular assemblies from cryo-EM maps using Rosetta. eLife 5, e17219 (2016).
Frenz, B. et al. Automatically fixing errors in glycoprotein structures with Rosetta. Structure 27, 134–139.e3 (2019).
Croll, T. I. ISOLDE: a physically realistic environment for model building into low-resolution electron-density maps. Acta Crystallogr. D 74, 519–530 (2018).
Chen, V. B. et al. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 12–21 (2010).
Barad, B. A. et al. EMRinger: side chain-directed model and map validation for 3D cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 12, 943–946 (2015).
Agirre, J. et al. Privateer: software for the conformational validation of carbohydrate structures. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 22, 833–834 (2015).
Liebschner, D. et al. Macromolecular structure determination using X-rays, neutrons and electrons: recent developments in Phenix. Acta Crystallogr. D 75, 861–877 (2019).
Goddard, T. D. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: meeting modern challenges in visualization and analysis. Protein Sci. 27, 14–25 (2018).
Li, W. et al. Bats are natural reservoirs of SARS-like coronaviruses. Science 310, 676–679 (2005).
Hu, B. et al. Discovery of a rich gene pool of bat SARS-related coronaviruses provides new insights into the origin of SARS coronavirus. PLoS Pathog. 13, e1006698 (2017).
Ge, X.-Y. et al. Isolation and characterization of a bat SARS-like coronavirus that uses the ACE2 receptor. Nature 503, 535–538 (2013).
Ju, X. et al. A novel cell culture system modeling the SARS-CoV-2 life cycle. PLoS Pathog. 17, e1009439 (2021).
Guo, H. et al. ACE2-independent bat sarbecovirus entry and replication in human and bat cells. mBio 13, e0256622 (2022).
[ad_2]
Source link