Tag: Manufacturing

  • Your Next Pair of Walmart Pants Could Be 3D Woven

    Your Next Pair of Walmart Pants Could Be 3D Woven

    [ad_1]

    The team has also developed a separate app that remotely scans a customer’s body to design a custom-fit pair of pants. You can use it today to order custom jeans, though they are cut and sewn in the traditional way—Unspun hasn’t yet bolted the software onto the machines. Right now, machine operators choose Vega’s settings to create the product. Unspun is working on software that would translate a design into direct commands to Vega, so retailers or fashion brands could feed their virtual creations into the machine and then get a wearable prototype in minutes.

    Unspun’s vision is to one day have hundreds of Vega machines across the US. A customer of one of Unspun’s retail clients would get a body scan, choose the type of garment they want, and as soon as they click purchase, send the design to the nearest Vega machine, which would output their order the same day. A custom fit means fewer returns, and because many returns are sent to the landfill or incinerated, that means waste and emissions are reduced even more.

    Walmart does have a successful program to curb its suppliers’ emissions that involves energy efficiency and renewable energy projects at factories. But when Walmart VP of sourcing Kyle Carlyle visited Unspun’s micro-factory last year, he was struck first by the giant American flag hanging above the machines. In 2021 Walmart announced that it was committing $350 billion (in addition to a 2013 $250 billion commitment) to support US suppliers. The move wasn’t just good marketing—in a 2019 survey, 85 percent of its customers said it was important that Walmart carry American-made products—but also one that would help future-proof Walmart’s business.

    “My team takes care of what Walmart calls surety of supply—essentially, building in resilience to how we source,” he says. He’s talking about a supply chain that can absorb shocks from natural disasters, pandemics, political unrest, and the like, and still deliver goods quickly enough to keep up with trends.

    3D Thinking

    Closeup of 3D printed denim fabric

    Photograph: Unspun

    The first step to making 3D woven chinos is completely rethinking how they’re designed. Typically, a designer will create a 2D tech pack with the cut shapes, and then select the fabric for look, feel, and performance based on swatches. But the machines require the selection of the individual threads going into the machine, plus envisioning the whole design as a series of 3D tubes. Knitwear designers are used to this mode of thinking. Designers of woven products—T-shirts, jeans, and pants—are not. “The designers are often getting to think about designing the fabric for the first time, rather than just the product made for that fabric,” Unspun’s Martin says.

    The possibilities afforded by 3D weaving are expansive. In September, Unspun worked with the designer label Ekhaus Latta to create several looks for New York Fashion Week, including shimmery plastic-tape-and-cotton pants. In the glass-walled showroom, Martin pulls another example off the rack: pants that looked like Chanel bouclé, but on acid, with a psychedelic pattern you could fall right into. Someday, a designer could upload an image and have it woven right into the fabric.

    But for now, the goal is more mundane: ensuring that when Average Joe walks into his local Walmart, he can find a pair of work pants in his favorite style and the right size. If it has a little American flag label, well, that’s just a bonus.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • World Vaccine Congress draws leaders from government, science and industry

    World Vaccine Congress draws leaders from government, science and industry

    [ad_1]

    The world’s top experts and policymakers, including government leaders, renowned researchers, and company executives driving vaccine development, will gather to discuss the latest progress in vaccines — from efforts to inoculate bees to a discussion of pathogens that could cause the next pandemic — at the World Vaccine Congress April 1-4. 

    The lineup of speakers includes top officials from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the National Institutes of Health, countries around the world, the World Health Organization, pharmaceutical companies, and many others.  

    “We have assembled the world’s foremost experts and policymakers in the field of vaccination for the 2024 World Vaccine Congress,” said Dr. Gregory A. Poland, Director of Mayo Vaccine Research Group, Mayo Clinic, and a member of the Science Advisory Board. “This event represents an unparalleled opportunity for collaboration and innovation and promises to drive meaningful progress in global health. It is a unique and massive forum for discovery and access to leaders across the field.” 

    Highlights include a keynote panel with women pioneers in developing and implementing lifesaving vaccines and a panel of directors from the Food and Drug Administration, the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease Vaccine Research Center, and other U.S. and international agencies. 

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Mandy Cohen will also give a keynote address. Other keynote panels will cover the sustainability of manufacturing, gaps in adult immunization, and efforts to develop universal and next-generation vaccines. 

    The four-day event at the Walter E. Washington Convention Center in Washington features hundreds of sessions, including panel discussions, dozens of interactive roundtable discussions, networking events, plenary sessions, keynotes, posters, and workshops on every topic related to vaccines — from manufacturing to biodefense and vaccines to prevent cancer. 

    In-depth sessions also cover vaccine supply and logistics, veterinary vaccines, emerging diseases, and vaccine delivery. The full agenda is available here. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Bormioli Pharma Expands Capacity and Infrastructure for North American Market

    Bormioli Pharma Expands Capacity and Infrastructure for North American Market

    [ad_1]

    Bormioli Pharma, a leading international manufacturer of pharmaceutical packaging and medical devices, today announced a significant increase of 47 % in its North American sales for 2023.

    Bormioli Pharma Expands Capacity and Infrastructure for North American Market

    Bormioli Pharma’s expanded capacity and infrastructure enable the company to provide dedicated product offerings compatible with North American regional standards. Image Credit: Bormioli Pharma

    This notable growth is a direct result of the company’s rapidly evolving infrastructure and expanded capacity tailored to meet the unique demands of the North American pharmaceutical market, including an increased need for pharmaceutical glass vials.

    Bormioli Pharma strengthened its strategic focus on the US market four years ago by establishing a new legal entity and a commercial branch in the US. From then on, the company’s on-site commercial team expanded, an FDA-approved warehouse was established, and dedicated product offerings compatible with regional standards were designed.

    For North American customers, this translates into the availability of a reliable and flexible packaging partner that can streamline their purchasing processes while reducing supply chain complexity, shortening their time-to-market, and supporting them in the development of high-value projects with local, qualified support.

    The pharmaceutical glass vials market is projected to grow from $12.1 billion in 2023 to $24.1 billion by 2033, expanding at a 7.10 % CAGR, driven by rising pharmaceutical product demands.1 The US market is one of the major growth contributors (with an expected CAGR of 8.0 % in North America for 2023-20282), and there is a high demand for suppliers capable of providing turn-key packaging solutions that meet regional standards, such as the use of glass Type I expansion 33.

    Bormioli Pharma recently signed a key contract with a US-based global leader in allergen immunotherapy for the supply of ready-to-use, vertically integrated packaging kits for two of its major manufacturing sites in the US.

    The full packaging kits include aluminum seals, rubber stoppers, Type I molded glass vials, and Type I tubular glass expansion 33 vials. 

    As we grow our presence in North America and expand our capabilities to meet regional standards, we are committed to the partnerships that enable us to broaden our reach. To best serve our North American customers, we’ve adapted our manufacturing processes to produce Type I Glass expansion 33 vials in our European facilities, ensuring robust production and backup. We have an on-site, dedicated US sales team and a local warehouse, and we look forward to expanding these resources further in 2024. Additionally, we are collaborating with a US-based sterilization company to prepare ready-to-use packaging kits – a partnership we believe is a significant step forward in ensuring that quality healthcare becomes a more accessible reality for people everywhere.

    Johann Depperschmidt, Bormioli Pharma’s Head of Sales, Americas

     

    Our momentous growth in the North American market embodies our dedication to meeting and exceeding the evolving needs of this dynamic market. We are not just expanding our footprint but also enhancing our efficiency and adaptability. This growth aligns perfectly with our mission to provide innovative and sustainable pharmaceutical packaging solutions, and we are proud to say that our growth is not only robust but also responsible.

    Andrea Lodetti, Bormioli Pharma’s Chief Executive Officer

    Bormioli Pharma has committed to several initiatives that place the company at the forefront of sustainable pharma packaging. The company has embarked on a strong ESG path and is working to publish its third ESG Report later this year.

    Bormioli Pharma made notable progress in its “50-in-5” program that aims to achieve 50 % sustainable raw materials in its pharmaceutical packaging products by 2025. In 2023, the company successfully increased its use of sustainable raw materials to 45 %, up from 39 % in the previous year. It also conducted comprehensive analyses on its sustainable pharma packaging, reaffirming the uncompromised safety and reliability of its products. 

    Bormioli Pharma recently partnered with leading Canadian clean technology company, Loop Industries, to use 100 % recycled virgin-quality Loop™ PET resin for developing a novel pharmaceutical packaging bottle. 

    References and further reading 

    1. Sutaria, I. Pharmaceutical Vials Market Outlook, Future Market Insights. [Accessed Jan 2024]

    2. IQVIA, IQVIA Forecast Link 2024. [Accessed Jan 2024]

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Chinese EVs have entered center stage in US-China tensions

    Chinese EVs have entered center stage in US-China tensions

    [ad_1]

    Last Thursday, the Biden administration announced it would investigate the security risks posed by Chinese-made smart cars, which could “collect sensitive data about our citizens and our infrastructure and send this data back to the People’s Republic of China,” the statement from White House claims.

    While many other technologies from China have been scrutinized because of security concerns, EVs have largely avoided that sort of attention until now. After all, they represent a technology that will greatly help the world transition to clean and renewable energy, and people have greeted its rapid growth in China with praise.

    But US-China relations have been at a low point since the Trump years and the pandemic, and it seems like only a matter of time before any trade or interaction between the two countries falls under security scrutiny. Now it’s EVs’ turn.

    The White House has made clear that there are two motivations behind the investigation: the economy and security.

    Even though the statement didn’t explicitly mention EVs, it’s undeniable that they are the only reason Chinese automakers have now become serious challengers to their American peers. Chinese companies like BYD make quality EVs at affordable prices, making them increasingly competitive in international markets. A recent report by the Alliance for American Manufacturing, an industry group, even describes EV competition as “China’s existential threat to America’s auto industry.”

    “The issue of Chinese EV imports really hits on so many major political factors all at the same time,” says Kyle Chan, a sociology researcher at Princeton University who studies industrial policies and China. “Not just the auto plants in swing states like Michigan and Ohio, but the broader auto manufacturing sector spread over many important states.”

    If the US auto industry fails to remain competitive, it will threaten the job security of millions of Americans, and countless other parts of the US economy will be affected. So it’s no surprise Chinese EVs are seen as a major economic threat that needs to be addressed. 

    In fact, it’s one of the few issues everyone seems to agree on in this election cycle. Before the Biden investigation, Trump drew people’s attention to Chinese EVs during campaign speeches, vowing to slap a 60% tariff on Chinese imported goods. Josh Hawley, a Republican senator and a longtime China hawk, proposed a bill last Tuesday for a whopping 125% tariff on Chinese cars, including Chinese-branded cars made in other countries like Mexico.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Supply chain assessment and management, optimizing pharmaceutical supply chains

    Supply chain assessment and management, optimizing pharmaceutical supply chains

    [ad_1]

    In this interview, News Med talks to Joseph P. Ivan about the Comprehensive Assessment and Management Approach to Optimizing Pharmaceutical Supply Chains.

    How do you optimize supply chain strategies while navigating the complexities of international regulation guidelines?

    Navigating international regulations involves various strategies. Consolidating supplies into a single global source is ideal, yet often impractical due to numerous factors, such as differing timelines necessitating strategic adjustments.

    A specific approach might involve prioritizing locations like Georgia for early implementation, with plans for subsequent inclusion in resupplies.

    Regulatory filings, such as IMPD, require attention to detail, varying by country within Europe and extending to regions like Latin America and Asia Pacific.

    Each country’s acceptance of stability data — for instance, Georgia’s 12-month and Bosnia’s 18-month periods — demands careful consideration. Managing this complexity across numerous countries involves meticulous organization, typically using tools like Excel to track country-specific regulations, product details, expiry dates, IMPD versions, and any other relevant supply chain specifics. This process is labor-intensive.

    Could you describe a strategy you have employed to harmonize supply chain processes internationally in addition to the Excel files?

    To carry out processes in countries like Georgia and Bosnia, one might initiate with individualized panels, even as plans include a broader range of European nations and those within its vicinity, considering the Quality Person (QP) aspect.

    The strategy involves beginning with simpler countries using these panels, progressing to a comprehensive guidebook encompassing all targeted nations, and ensuring alignment with various health regulatory filings. This approach requires careful regulatory considerations.

    Subsequently, joining supplies into a unified global inventory results in a single, possibly extensive guidebook, potentially spanning 100 pages, detailing each country’s specific requirements. However, this method may not be universally acceptable due to certain nations’ unique formulations or expiry date regulations. In such instances, a tailored approach is necessary.

    India, for example, necessitates specific manufacturer and manufacturing date details on labels, a requirement not universally shared across Europe. Therefore, maintaining India on an individual panel basis is sensible to avoid presenting unnecessary information to countries with differing regulations, aiming for a harmonized supply strategy.

    In pharmaceutical supply chains, what proactive steps have you found to be most successful in reducing risk?

    The proactive answer is you need a supply chain expert asking the right questions when building your strategy. Brazil has unique requirements at the port of entry for pharmaceuticals.

    For instance, after completing global supply preparations and assembling the booklet, including the expiration date, it is dispatched to a depot in Brazil amidst an ongoing trial. As the trial progresses smoothly, an update to the expiration date becomes necessary. This requires sending new labels to Brazil, which World Courier can deliver to apply over the old expiration date, offering a simple solution for updates.

    However, importing these labels into Brazil involves regulatory considerations, as the labels, due to their adhesive component—a chemical—must be listed on the import license, health authority filing, and pro forma invoice, attracting taxes. This requirement stems from Brazil’s customs and health authorities’ efforts to safeguard their population by ensuring the adhesive’s legality within the country, reflecting the unique regulatory landscapes across nations. The emergence of regulations like biodegradable plastic bag mandates illustrates the complexity of adapting supply chains to environmental and health standards globally.

    These details underscore the importance of early and frequent discussions, necessitating guidance from a professional or subject matter expert adept at navigating such intricacies. Without such expertise, even a highly competent Clinical Operations (ClinOps) professional with a directorial role might struggle, lacking the insight to ask appropriate questions for effective supply chain management.

    Image Credits: DS InPharmatics (DSI)

    Could you give an example of how risk-based management strategy improves the overall supply chain compliance?

    You have a couple of steps of manufacturing. You have API, drug substance, and the drug product. There are several lengthy steps of manufacturing whereby there is a risk associated with each one. For example, the specification may fail, impurities may increase, or the capsules may not press together correctly.

    From a risk-based standpoint, there are multiple tools out there. It can be something as simple as an Excel document that helps you to identify risk.

    You need to be able to ask the right question and understand if there is a risk or not. If it is, you can identify it and then categorize it.

    How does technological integration affect the regulatory compliance and product quality of pharmaceutical supply chains?

    Consider the situation in the United States, similar to that in other nations, where various government agencies scrutinize incoming shipments. These include Customs and Border Protection, which aims to collect taxes; the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), serving as the health authority; and the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), which ensures compliance with regulations on animal-derived products.

    Depending on the nature of the product, involvement from the Environmental Protection Agency or the Nuclear Regulatory Commission may also be necessary, among others. These agencies leverage a technological platform accessible by customs brokers at entry points, allowing for the efficient coding and processing of shipments.

    This platform, known as Automated Commercial Environment (ACE), enables seamless interaction between these agencies by facilitating the submission and review of tariff codes, FedEx details, FDA product codes, and USDA guideline exemptions for items containing animal parts but classified as pharmaceutical grade, thereby exempting them from certain permits.

    The system’s efficiency hinges on the accurate entry of these codes, which, if correctly done, allows shipments to bypass manual inspection, directly proceeding to logistics providers like FedEx or DHL for delivery. However, inaccuracies can trigger a halt in the system, necessitating inspection by a compliance officer and potentially causing delays. While random inspections are possible, accurate code submissions typically ensure expedited clearance, with officials essentially confirming the shipment’s compliance without further scrutiny.

    In what ways does DSI’s methodology improve clinical and commercial supply chain management and overrides?

    If you have a trained professional, somebody that has the right level of experience either supporting your commercial supply chain or your clinical supply chain, they are going to ask the right question of the right person.

    DSI is able to bring in a professional like me. In the world of consultancy, if you are a smaller company, you cannot afford a full-time employee, nor do you need one. You go the consultant route, and you have this wealth of information at your fingertips and only pay for what you use.

    From a business and cutting purchase orders standpoint, it is really easy for clients to add and subtract services as they need. Supply chain is one of those services.

    Similarly, in the commercial realm, it is common for organizations to attempt reassigning a Clinical Supplies Director to oversee a commercial product launch.

    While the underlying principles may appear similar, the practicalities of clinical and commercial operations differ significantly. A clinical expert without commercial experience might find themselves ill-equipped and unaware of the relevant inquiries required for a successful commercial debut.

    This is where DSI steps in, offering the expertise of professionals like me, who are experienced in navigating commercial launches.

    We formulate the necessary questions and facilitate connections with essential partners for acquiring state licenses or implementing supply chain security measures, which now often include the assignment of unique serial numbers to products.

    Ensuring the selection of an appropriate partner for these tasks is crucial, and we show clients how to engage with these companies effectively, emphasizing the importance of asking the right questions during the contracting process.

    What benefits have you seen from optimizing and assessing the end-to-end supply chain?

    The biggest benefit is cost. If you have done it right the first time, you are going to save millions of dollars on your supply chain.

    Optimizing your supply chain requires an initial investment of effort, time, and overhead expenses. However, this investment proves to be cost-effective in the long run, as the savings generated from optimization ultimately outweigh the initial costs.

    How can ERP software help to modernize pharmaceutical supply chain operations?

    Clinical Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) are third party services available for purchase. That acronym in clinical space is IRT, which stands for Interactive Response Technology. This is software used to help with randomization.

    In a blinded clinical trial, managing inventory and coordinating shipments are crucial, with specialized software handling these tasks from the outset, including dispatching supplies to depots or sites.

    This system allows site personnel to easily select medications for patients with a simple click. Such management tools are particularly vital in extensive, blinded trials, where without them, the added costs and complexity offer little benefit. In contrast, for a smaller trial, the additional expense and complexity of these tools may not yield significant advantages.

    For larger, double-blinded trials spanning numerous countries and involving thousands of patients, utilizing Interactive Response Technology (IRT) becomes indispensable. Without IRT, coordinating inventory across potentially hundreds of sites in multiple countries would require manual oversight, a task far more efficiently handled by software.

    The commercial sector parallels this with Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems, which serve a similar function by managing resources and information across the enterprise. However, for startups or small companies with a limited product range, investing in an ERP system may not be cost-effective, potentially leading to unnecessary expenditure and frustration.

    Initial reliance on simpler solutions, like spreadsheets or basic financial software, can suffice until the business scales up. As the product range, geographic footprint, and operational complexity grow, the investment in an ERP system becomes justifiable despite its high cost and maintenance requirements, because it streamlines operations across multiple sites and distribution centers. Yet, it is essential to remember that an ERP’s effectiveness is directly tied to the accuracy of the data entered into it, and it is not advisable for companies with only a few products.

    What are some of the difficulties in integrated cloud-based ERP solutions in the biomedical and pharmaceutical industries?

    Imagine a biotech company that decides to forego an Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system when launching its first commercial product, viewing it as an unnecessary expense. Later, the company acquires an additional asset from another entity or develops a second product in-house. Over a few years, this pattern continues, and the company finds itself with three commercial products. The challenge then becomes integrating the extensive data accumulated from these products over six or seven years into an ERP system, necessitating a significant data management project.

    Following the integration, the focus shifts to the resources required for system maintenance. With the ERP system being cloud-based, the company benefits from reduced risk; even in the event of physical disasters like fires or tornadoes, the data remains secure on remote servers with backup systems in place, ensuring data preservation.

    However, the utility of the ERP centers on the quality and accuracy of the data entered. Integrations with other systems, such as Interactive Response Technology (IRT) or external commercial vendors like McKesson or its subcontractors, introduce additional complexities. Ensuring seamless communication between different ERP systems presents a logistical challenge, emphasizing the importance of effective data flow management both into and out of the system.

    How can specialized ERP solutions for the pharmaceutical industries help with supply chain optimization and cost reduction?

    Some of the IRTs have optimizers built in. Some of them work really well. Again, you have to have an intimate working knowledge of how that software works.

    Some of the other IRTs are a little bit more simple, where you can put a buffer stock in there. You can define it, and that will help optimize your supplies so you are not getting orders for one unit triggered. You wait for orders of 50 units to be triggered, and you save on your shipping costs in that regard. Every time a shipment comes, somebody has to receive it, take it out of the box, look at what it is, go over to that online solution, say that they received it.

    If they are doing that every single day for one unit, or if they only do it once every 50 days, it is quicker and easier. You are saving money from a bandwidth perspective. Again, it is a value prop question. You have to balance that with how much you have spent on your IRT or your ERP, versus how much bandwidth and shipping costs that you may or may not incur. From an optimization standpoint, again, you go to Excel. Excel is a fantastic program. If you do not want to spend a lot of money, you have something in there called optimize.

    You really need to have a subject matter expert programming or building that. They might have tools that they have used in the past that they can tweak to make it work for that scenario.

    About Joseph P. Ivan 

    Mr. Ivan has over 20 years of experience in the pharmaceutical industry, 8 years in manufacturing and 12 years in supply chain. He has designed, implemented, and managed both clinical and commercial supply organizations for various sized companies.

    Joe’s experience includes protocol development and review, forecasting, label management, inventory management, IRT management, ancillary supply management and global logistics management for all clinical phases, protocol types (blinded, open) and world regions. His specialties include North America, Asia Pacific, the European Union, Eastern Europe, and Latin America. In particular, he is a subject matter expert for importing clinical drug into China. He has authored and managed site and subject facing materials such as Pharmacy Manuals and Dose Card instructions. He is International Trade Compliance Certified (ITCC) for Import/Export in the US.

    As a leader for bioanalytical laboratory testing, his experience includes assay development, validation and execution for clinical laboratory operations supporting clinical operations.

    Our Supply Chain Services team has experience that spreads across branded and generic pharmaceuticals with a focus on contract manufacturing organizations (CMOs) while it also includes scheduling, logistics, forecasting, API and excipient sourcing, comparator sourcing and contract packaging and labeling organizations.

    About DS InPharmatics LLC

    DS InPharmatics (DSI) provides regulatory, technical, and project management consulting services to healthcare product companies that manufacture and/or market pharmaceuticals, biopharmaceuticals, and cellular and gene therapy products.

    Since 2007 we have provided our clients with innovative strategies and exceptional quality work products intended to enhance product development, approval, and marketing presence. Whether advocating CMC strategy, directing CMC operations or developing CMC submission content that represent the best interests of emerging biotech, we focus on the critical CMC issues and build programs that enhance development.


    Sponsored Content Policy: News-Medical.net publishes articles and related content that may be derived from sources where we have existing commercial relationships, provided such content adds value to the core editorial ethos of News-Medical.Net which is to educate and inform site visitors interested in medical research, science, medical devices and treatments.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • BioCina and NovaCina forge strategic alliance to offer biologics developers integrated drug substance and drug product solutions

    BioCina and NovaCina forge strategic alliance to offer biologics developers integrated drug substance and drug product solutions

    [ad_1]

    BioCina Pty Ltd., a global end-to-end biologics Contract Development and Manufacturing Organisation (CDMO), and NovaCina Pty Ltd., a global fill-and-finish CDMO, announced a strategic partnership to provide integrated drug substance and drug product solutions for biologics developers.

    This alliance enables BioCina to offer the highest quality fill-and-finish solutions to their clients, to convert the drug substance produced at its state-of-the-art Adelaide, South Australia facility into ready-to-use drug product at NovaCina’s advanced facility in Perth, Australia. This collaboration marks a significant milestone in providing end-to-end biopharmaceutical manufacturing solutions to clients worldwide.

    BioCina delivers highest quality, cost-effective CDMO services, including cell line development, process development, and cGMP drug substance manufacturing for the microbial, pDNA and mRNA modalities. As a result of this partnership, BioCina’s clients can benefit from NovaCina’s decades of clinical and commercial fill-and-finish experience, backed by numerous regulatory approvals, including from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). NovaCina offers a comprehensive suite of services, including development, manufacturing, packaging, labeling, and stability studies.

    BioCina Chief Executive Officer & member of NovaCina Board of Directors, Mark W. Womack said, “BioCina is excited to partner with NovaCina, integrating our globally recognized expertise in clinical and commercial process development and drug substance manufacturing with their esteemed drug product services. This partnership promises to deliver unparalleled quality, adherence to the highest regulatory standards, and on-time delivery of client programs, setting a new benchmark in the market.”

    We are very excited to form this partnership with BioCina. Together, we provide a seamless end-to-end offering. At NovaCina, we are delighted to bring our world-class quality and safety to this value-adding collaboration.”

    Cyrus K. Mirsaidi, Chief Executive Officer, NovaCina

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • AI-based model enhances efficiency of Type II diabetes prevention efforts

    AI-based model enhances efficiency of Type II diabetes prevention efforts

    [ad_1]

    Better prevention of Type II diabetes could save both lives and money. The U.S. spends over $730 billion a year -; nearly a third of all health care spending -; on treating preventable diseases like diabetes.

    For the 98 million adults who are prediabetic and at risk of developing Type II diabetes, preventive treatments such as the drug metformin can help stave off the disease. But the medicines are expensive. With limited budgets, insurers and health care facilities need to allocate them to the patients they can help the most.

    Currently, a health provider calculates a patient’s risk of developing diabetes, using a simple charting tool. Patients whose risk scores exceed a predetermined threshold get enrolled in preventive care.

    Now, a new study from Texas McCombs has developed a novel tool for identifying those patients, based on artificial intelligence.

    Maytal Saar-Tsechansky, a professor of information, risk, and operations management, developed an AI- and machine learning-driven model to predict which patients are most likely to benefit from preventive treatment.

    Escalating health care costs necessitate more efficient and cost-effective approaches to disease prevention, particularly preventable diseases such as Type II diabetes.”


    Maytal Saar-Tsechansky, professor of information, risk, and operations management, Texas McCombs

    One hurdle for allocation models is that they’re often based on crude estimates of how a patient will benefit, she says. With Mathias Kraus of Friedrich-Alexander-Universität and Stefan Feuerriegel of the Munich School of Management, she leveraged a rich source of data to produce better assessments: electronic health records on 89,191 prediabetic patients from 2003 to 2012.

    The records came from a health insurer that wanted to improve care for patients at risk of developing Type II diabetes.

    When the researchers applied their decision model to the insurer’s data -; including body measurements, lab tests, disease codes, drug prescriptions, and sociodemographic information -; it improved both health and economic efficiency.

    • It prevented 25% more cases of Type II diabetes from developing than the use of traditional diabetes risk scores did.
    • It saved $2.9 million more per 10,000 patients than savings garnered through the traditional clinical baseline method.
    • If applied to the entire U.S. population, the model could save $1.1 billion annually in health care costs.

    “By enabling data-driven and cost-effective allocation of resources, this approach is instrumental in making preventive care more impactful,” Saar-Tsechansky says.

    The data-drive decision model could help prevent other conditions, she adds, such as respiratory diseases and cardiovascular disease, the leading cause of death in the U.S. It could improve patient outcomes for both, reducing long-term costs for the U.S. health care system.

    Using quality data, such as accurate electronic medical health records, could lead to another benefit: more customized approaches to health care.

    “For patients, especially those at risk for diseases such as Type 2 diabetes, our model means a more personalized and effective approach to preventive care,” Saar-Tsechansky says.

    “It suggests future preventive care could be more tailored to individual risk factors, increasing the effectiveness of interventions and potentially reducing the likelihood of disease onset.”

    Source:

    Journal reference:

    Kraus, M., et al. (2023) Data-Driven Allocation of Preventive Care with Application to Diabetes Mellitus Type II. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management. doi.org/10.1287/msom.2021.0251.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Global health boost as new vaccine SKYTyphoid gains WHO prequalification

    Global health boost as new vaccine SKYTyphoid gains WHO prequalification

    [ad_1]

    SK bioscience and the International Vaccine Institute (IVI) announced today that the typhoid conjugate vaccine developed by SK bioscience with technology transfer from IVI has achieved the World Health Organization prequalification (PQ), which paves the way for public procurement of the vaccine by UN organizations and gives a boost to the global TCV supply.

    WHO PQ certifies the safety, efficacy, and GMP of a vaccine by evaluating its manufacturing process, quality, and clinical trial results according to stringent standards. WHO PQ is essential for participating in international tenders organized by UN agencies including UNICEF and the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) and certifies the quality of the vaccine and the competitiveness of technology in the global market.

    The new vaccine SKYTyphoid™, which has received the WHO’s seal of approval this time, is a typhoid conjugate vaccine developed jointly by SK bioscience and IVI following IVI’s technology transfer with funding support from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. SK bioscience was the manufacturing partner and IVI led clinical trials conducted in the Philippines and Nepal.

    The vaccine utilizes the ‘purified Vi polysaccharide-diphtheria toxoid conjugate’ method, which conjugates diphtheria toxin protein (diphtheria toxoid), which acts as a carrier, to polysaccharide of typhoid bacteria, which acts as an antigen. Adopting conjugation technology, the vaccine is safe to administer in infants and young children aged 6 months to 2 years and is expected to provide sufficient immune response and long-term protection with a single dose compared to existing oral live or polysaccharide typhoid vaccines.

    Based on clinical results, SKYTyphoid™ obtained a licensure for export from the Korean Ministry of Food and Drug Safety in 2022. A Phase 3 clinical trial conducted by SK bioscience and IVI in Nepal on 2,160 healthy individuals aged 6 months to 45 years had confirmed the excellent immunogenicity and safety of the vaccine. In the comparative study with a conventional WHO-PQed polysaccharide-protein conjugate typhoid vaccine, SKYTyphoid™ demonstrated equivalent immunogenicity and safety, without any notable side effect after administration across all age groups. The findings were published in The Lancet Infectious Diseases, a sister publication to the journal The Lancet.

    Additionally, the results of the Phase II clinical trial of SKYTyphoid™ booster shot, published in the international ‘npj (Nature Partner Journal) Vaccine,’ showed that two doses of the TCV in infants aged 6 to 23 months induced a strong immune response, with a significant increase in antibody titers in the body compared to before vaccination.

    The WHO licensure of SK bioscience’s TCV represents the successful conclusion of a global public-private partnership to bring a novel vaccine crucial to global public health to market. SKYTyphoid™ will diversify and expand the supply of TVCs and help improve vaccine access in the endemic countries. With SK’s commitment to make the vaccine for global public health at a competitive price, SKYTyphoid™ will play an important role in typhoid prevention globally.”


    Dr. Sushant Sahastrabuddhe, Director of IVI’s Typhoid program

    With high demand for typhoid vaccines worldwide, especially in low-income countries, SK bioscience plans to start supplying the vaccine as soon as possible and expand global supply through public procurement markets including typhoid endemic countries. According to the WHO, an estimated 11 to 20 million typhoid fever cases occur worldwide every year, and 120,000 to 160,000 die from the disease.

    Dr. Jerome Kim, Director General of IVI said, “Typhoid fever is more prevalent in warmer temperatures, and climate change and the worrying rise of antimicrobial resistance are only adding to the threat of the disease. Vaccination is critical to effective prevention and control of the disease. In collaboration with SK bioscience and other partners, IVI will continue endeavors to make this vaccine accessible to people who need them the most.”

    Mr. Jae-Yong Ahn, President of SK bioscience said, “We are pleased that our global collaboration to address the global vaccine supply imbalance and improve public health has been recognized through the WHO PQ. In addition to the WHO PQ, we will obtain additional country-specific approvals to ensure that the vaccine can be supplied quickly.” With the addition of ‘SKYtyphoid™,’ SK bioscience has now achieved WHO PQ for four vaccines, including two influenza vaccines and a chickenpox vaccine.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Intel’s CEO Says AI Is the Key to the Company’s Comeback

    Intel’s CEO Says AI Is the Key to the Company’s Comeback

    [ad_1]

    When veteran engineer and executive Pat Gelsinger returned to Intel as CEO in 2021, the once-great chipmaker was in a slump. After failing to adapt to the mobile era and then missing several steps in cutting-edge microprocessor manufacturing, it was now also falling behind in supplying chips to feed the tech industry’s growing hunger for artificial intelligence.

    With optimism that at times seemed reckless, Gelsinger promised that Intel would make an epic comeback. He vowed to shake up its sleepy corporate culture, refocus on core engineering, and deliver a revitalized manufacturing plan that would put rivals TSMC and Samsung on notice.

    This week, Gelsinger declared Intel’s comeback plan well and truly on track. He announced a rebrand of the company’s “foundry” business, which manufactures chips designed by other companies, saying that Intel’s latest manufacturing process would later this year yield silicon chips as efficient and capable as ones from TSMC. Microsoft is the first big customer for this new chipmaking technology—a key coup for Intel as it tries to convince the industry that it can offer competitive products suited to the age of AI.

    Pat Gelsinger spoke to WIRED senior writer Will Knight about Intel’s AI reboot over Zoom from his home in Santa Clara, California. The conversation has been lightly edited for length and clarity.

    Will Knight: You announced this week that Intel will relaunch its business that manufactures chips on behalf of other companies as an “AI-era system foundry.” What does that mean?

    Pat Gelsinger: I began Intel’s strategy two plus years ago, and for the company, generative AI has been this unexpected surge. This has been the land of Nvidia, but we’re the one company that actually has the opportunity to participate in 100 percent of the AI market. We know how to connect up networks and memory and [provide] supply chains and all of these other elements that we’re finding customers are super excited to take advantage of.

    Speaking of the AI surge, what did you make of reports suggesting OpenAI’s CEO Sam Altman wants to raise $7 trillion to develop and manufacture chips needed to guarantee progress in AI?

    My first reaction was, that’s a mind-bogglingly big number. And then I had to do the math. Today, the biggest AI models were generated on about 10,000 GPUs. The belief is there that we probably need to be 10 million for the biggest AI models that get produced in the future.

    We’re already saying we may spend a couple billion dollars training the most advanced models today. Plus, the math in the $7 trillion also includes power and data centers.

    This week you said Intel is on track to deliver its new “18A” manufacturing process, which will compete with TSMC’s best offerings. What else are you doing to regain an edge?

    The whole industry is pursuing this next generation transistor, what we call ribbonFET. I think everybody’s [asking] who’s going to produce the next best transistor on the planet.

    But the thing that everybody is giving us credit for is backside power, this new way of delivering power into the device, which gives you better current resistance performance, but it’s also improving the density of the chip. That means the same wafer, instead of producing 100 chips, can produce 120 chips. It’s a huge value proposition.

    You announced Microsoft as a customer of your foundry business. But Intel previously fell behind the competition in this market. How will you convince customers that things are different this time?

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Breaking through new research barriers with iPSC technology

    Breaking through new research barriers with iPSC technology

    [ad_1]

    In this interview, we speak to Keith Olson and Coby Carlson from FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics about their iPSC technology and how it is making breakthroughs in blood-brain barrier research. 

    Please can you introduce yourself and tell us about your role at FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics?

    Coby Carlson: My name is Coby Carlson, and I lead the Applications Team at FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics. Our team is separate from the R&D scientists, staff, and experts focusing on stem cell culture and differentiations to create unique, specialized cell types. Our role is to test the functionality of these cells, demonstrate their performance on various platform technologies, and develop applications.

    Keith Olson: My name is Keith Olson, and I am the Executive Vice President for Commercial Operations at FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics.

    FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics is a global leader in developing and manufacturing human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC). Please can you tell us more about some of your core aims and missions as a company?

    Coby Carlson: Fujifilm’s core technologies include reprogramming, engineering, and iPSC culture and differentiation to create unique cell types. Our mission is to bring these technologies to an industrial scale. The technology was first invented over 15 years ago, and since then, we have continuously improved and optimized it to launch it on a large scale. Our goal is to make different cell types accessible all over the world.

    Keith Olson: I believe that we were pioneers of iPSC technology in the United States. We successfully brought it to market, commercialized it, and built a business around it. Our reputation is now based on our core expertise, quality, and ability to manufacture at scale for our clients in the pharmaceutical, biotech, and academic sectors.

    induced pluripotent stem cells

    Image Credit: metamorworks/Shutterstock.com

    iPSC technology can be used to revolutionize scientific research and cell therapy. Why is this, and in what application areas within scientific research does this technology benefit the most?

    Coby Carlson: The primary focus of people working with iPSC technology is toxicology/safety pharm, disease modeling, and cell therapy. Safety is crucial because we can generate cardiomyocytes from iPS cells, and these cells spontaneously beat in a dish while responding to known cardiotoxic molecules.

    To measure the safety and effectiveness of drugs in a dish, we use iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes in safety toxicology. We have also participated in the CiPA (Comprehensive in Vitro Proarrhythmia Aassay) initiative to standardize this process across various labs globally. The recent FDA Modernization Act has suggested using alternatives to animal testing, making iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes a crucial component of measuring the safety and effectiveness of drugs going forward.

    Keith Olson: iPSC delivers a specific gap in the market by providing customers with high-quality human cells. Instead of researching animal models or transformed cell lines, researchers can now use real human cardiomyocytes or neurons for more biologically relevant results.

    At FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics, you offer a range of iPSC cells, including neural and cardiac cells. Can you tell us more about some of the products you offer and how they are generated?

    Coby Carlson: The uniqueness of iPSC technology lies in the fact that there are not many human donors who can offer their brain cells. This technology provides access to different cell types, and we can differentiate highly specialized cells to obtain unique features such as excitatory neurons and microglia. These unique cells are essential for in vitro assays, where we can test them differently than we would in an animal model. For instance, mouse models are different from human models.

    Keith Olson: Everything starts from a core iPS cell bank, and we have developed specific differentiation protocols for each terminal phenotype of the cell. Whether it is a cardiomyocyte, neuron, or hepatocyte, we have a differentiation protocol that takes us from the core stem cell bank to a finished product that customers can purchase and use as an assay-ready sample.

    Blood brain barrier concept

    Image Credit: Magic mine/Shutterstock.com

    The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is vital in understanding how the brain functions, and its dysfunction can lead to neurological conditions such as MS, stroke, and epilepsy. Why did you choose to focus on this area, and how can your iPSC technology help to accelerate breakthroughs? 

    Coby Carlson: Researchers and drug developers have long struggled with the blood-brain barrier, a critical cell structure separating the blood from the brain. The barrier keeps out harmful pathogens and toxins while allowing vital nutrients to enter the brain. However, it also prevents drugs from crossing over and treating neurological diseases such as neurodegenerative disorders.

    The main challenge has been replicating this barrier in vitro. One of the reasons we pursued iPSC cell technology is that we developed ways to distinguish specialized cell types from the same donor to create the blood-brain barrier. Additionally, we can cryopreserve these cells and generate media that allows them to be functional and reanimated from the thaw, enabling us to test them in an in vitro assay.

    Keith Olson: We chose to develop a highly relevant human model for studying the blood-brain barrier for several reasons. The industry bottleneck and challenge in understanding how some large molecules cannot pass through the barrier made it necessary. We needed a system that truly replicated what happens in the human brain. We helped revolutionize the market by making the cell type, which was particularly difficult to cryopreserve and develop as an assay-ready product. We were able to deliver a fully isogenic solution with all cell types, and now customers can build their own real human BBB in an assay plate.

    At Neuroscience 2022, you showcased research surrounding the establishment of a BBB model using iPSC-derived human cells. Can you tell us more about this research and the potential to integrate this BBB system with emerging organ-on-a-chip technologies to advance the field of drug discovery?

    Coby Carlson: Generating the BBB is a significant challenge that requires assembling three different cell types. We validated our model using a Transwell assay, which measures the function of the cells on both the top and bottom of the barrier. However, we recognize that the BBB is a complex system, and microfluidic and organ-on-a-chip technologies offer a unique environment for the cells to function. Combining iPSC technology and OoC technologies will enhance cell function in these systems by providing unique environments with microfluidics and dynamic flow similar to the bloodstream. This will allow us to demonstrate the advantages of these models in a more comprehensive manner.

    Keith Olson: The system is perfect for 3D modeling because it is a 3D system. It is a multi-layer, multi-cell-type organ or part of an organ, and using it as an organoid or spheroid in a complex model brings you closer to that model system. Building the barrier is crucial, and 3D modeling is the best way to achieve this. Our released product is flexible enough for clients to conduct assays in a Transwell plate or as a spheroid. They can even use more sophisticated organ-on-a-chip systems to create a comprehensive model for this biology.

    What challenges are faced when generating new leads in neurological drug discovery? How can your 3D neural spheroids help to tackle these?

    Coby Carlson: When we started the company, we differentiated cells from iPS lines to create highly purified neurons. While they were unique and visually pleasing, we discovered that some of their functionality was lacking. Ten years later, we have developed various products, intending to combine them to create multicellular cultures, not just in 2D systems but also in 3D systems.

    Our approach involves mixing different cell types to increase complexity and biological relevance, which we believe will help improve testing and facilitate the development of new therapies and the identification of new compounds.

    Keith Olson: In neurobiology, it is well-established that a human system is essential. Animal model systems simply do not replicate human biology, and studying true human biology requires a 3D system. We are not flat figures but 3D beings, and building a real neural system allows us to observe neural connections, communication, and the impact of glia on neurons, studying how cells interact as they would in the body. This is where the true value lies in what we are delivering.

    Drug Discovery

    Image Credit: Naumova Marina/Shutterstock.com

    Are you hopeful that with continued research surrounding the BBB, we will see new advancements being made surrounding health and disease? What would this mean for both patients suffering from neurological diseases as well as clinical settings?

    Coby Carlson: As a technology, the use of human iPS drive cell types is still in its infancy, with significant advances still being made. We believe that some major discoveries will be made by using this technology, whether that be by us or others. This technology has the potential to facilitate the discovery of new treatments, and we are excited about its future potential.

    Keith Olson: I think anything that any of our competitors, colleagues, friends, and neighbors are doing in this space will help push the field forward. The more vendors and researchers working on creating relevant model systems for humans, the better. With the FDA Modernization Act and the desire for better test systems and models, everyone working together will likely result in better systems and, hopefully, faster, cheaper, and easier drug discovery for companies.

    You were exhibiting at SLAS US 2024, an international exhibition and tradeshow bringing together both world-leading researchers and industry professionals. Can you tell us what you were exhibiting at SLAS and the importance of attending these in-person conferences?

    Coby Carlson: The SLAS conference is significant as it brings together various customers, collaborators, friends, and former colleagues operating in this field. The past years have seen challenges due to the pandemic and remote work, with limited ability to collaborate effectively. The opportunity to meet face-to-face is essential when pushing these models forward and persuading companies and groups to invest significant time and resources. Having these conversations in person allows for quick decision-making and improves the efficiency of the process.

    Keith Olson: The SLAS conference seems to have finally returned to normality after the pandemic. The number of attendees and vendors is impressive, and the human-to-human interaction is just unbeatable, especially when it comes to answering queries and gaining an understanding of something first-hand. Our focus remains on highlighting our entire portfolio, but we also showcased some new systems, such as the iCell® Macrophage, which is the first of its kind.

    Additionally, we continued to promote our BBB system and highlighted other 3D model systems we have developed, including in the neuro and cardio spheres. Overall, it was an opportunity to build awareness for our company and its offerings.

    Industrial Scale Cell Engineering – FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics at SLAS 2023

    On your website, you also offer a variety of resources for your customers, including research posters, webinars, and videos. How important are these resources in building customer relationships?

    Coby Carlson: Reviews and testimonials are popular among our customers, who are primarily scientists requiring supporting evidence. We understand that content is essential, so we offer it in various formats, including small bites, digital graphical abstracts, and detailed protocols. We aim to cater to the diverse needs of our customers, providing them with the relevant information to make informed decisions about our products.

    Keith Olson: We all learned a valuable lesson during the pandemic that content is king. As a result, we had to adapt and utilize various means such as websites, LinkedIn, and other portals to disseminate information to our customers and clients. Due to the absence of trade shows, these platforms were our only options. However, now that trade shows are seemingly back in full swing and everyone is attending, it presents a more effective way to communicate to a large audience at once, which is always more enjoyable.

    With so many breakthroughs and technological advancements being made within the life sciences, what are you personally looking forward to the most in the coming years?

    Coby Carlson: While we did not discuss it much, our cell therapy is where the truly exciting developments will take place and capture the general public’s attention. For instance, curing blindness by using retinal cells is something that could happen in our lifetime. Although I cannot speculate on the exact timeline, I believe it is inevitable. Our in vitro work behind the scenes in drug discovery and other aspects aligns well with this goal, as the same cells used in our research could be used as drugs in the future.

    Keith Olson: An exciting prospect on the horizon is the potential replacement of animal model systems with validated human models within the next year or five years. If this were to happen, and the FDA, pharma companies, and biotechs were on board, it would be a major advancement for everyone. This could result in faster, cheaper, and more efficient processes. One of the main challenges in this field is the high rate of failure, and any improvements made in this area could potentially save billions of dollars for the industry.

    What is next for FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics? Are you involved in any exciting upcoming projects?

    Coby Carlson: We always strive to advance our field, evaluating new technologies and creating new products. We want to expand our collaborations and work with others to achieve our scientific goals. While we can conduct R&D, we recognize that partnering with other experts, sharing information, and collaborating can lead to even greater success.

    Keith Olson: Our company is constantly exploring new cell backgrounds, and we are committed to launching two to three new cell types each year. Currently, we are focused on introducing three new cell types, all of which will be launched by June or July of this year. Simultaneously, we have begun developing the next three cell types for 2024. Our goal is to continue expanding our offerings, and we hope to return next year with news of three entirely new cell lines.

    About Dr. Keith R. Olson

    Keith Olson is the senior commercial executive for FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics, where we have developed the market-leading portfolio of differentiated human cells derived from iPSC.Keith

    Keith has previously served in leadership roles for Life Science products at Corning Inc, Life Technologies, DiscoveRx and Cellomics, and has launched over 700 Life Science products in his career. Keith received his bachelor’s degree in Molecular Cell Biology from Carnegie-Mellon University and his Ph.D. in the same from the University of Rochester.

     

    About Dr. Coby Carlson

    Coby Carlson is the Director of Applications Development at FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics where his team focuses on advancing the use of human iPSC-derived cell types for drug screening, toxicity testing, and disease modeling.Coby

    He joined the company in 2012 and has extensive experience developing applications with iCell products, characterizing their functional performance on various technology platforms, and building co-culture systems in both 2D and 3D format.  Coby received his PhD from the Univ. of Utah followed by a postdoctoral fellowship at UW-Madison.

    [ad_2]

    Source link