Tag: Science

  • Good at Reading? Your Brain May Be Structured Differently

    Good at Reading? Your Brain May Be Structured Differently

    [ad_1]

    THIS ARTICLE IS republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license.

    The number of people who read for fun appears to be steadily dropping. Fifty percent of UK adults say they don’t read regularly (up from 42 percent in 2015) and almost one in four young people aged 16 to 24 say they’ve never been readers, according to research by The Reading Agency.

    But what are the implications? Will people’s preference for video over text affect our brains or our evolution as a species? What kind of brain structure do good readers actually have? My new study, published in NeuroImage, has found out.

    I analyzed open source data from more than 1,000 participants to discover that readers of varying abilities had distinct traits in brain anatomy.

    The structure of two regions in the left hemisphere, which are crucial for language, were different in people who were good at reading.

    One was the anterior part of the temporal lobe. The left temporal pole helps associate and categorize different types of meaningful information. To assemble the meaning of a word such as leg, this brain region associates the visual, sensory and motor information conveying how legs look, feel and move.

    The other was Heschl’s gyrus, a fold on the upper temporal lobe which hosts the auditory cortex (the cortex is the outermost layer of the brain). Better reading ability was linked to a larger anterior part of the temporal lobe in the left hemisphere compared to the right. It makes sense that having a larger brain area dedicated to meaning makes it easier to understand words and, therefore, to read.

    What might seem less intuitive is that the auditory cortex would be related to reading. Isn’t reading mainly a visual skill? Not only. To pair letters with speech sounds, we first need to be aware of the sounds of the language. This phonological awareness is a well-established precursor to children’s reading development.

    A thinner left Heschl’s gyrus has previously been related to dyslexia, which involves severe reading difficulties. My research shows that this variation in cortical thickness does not draw a simple dividing line between people with or without dyslexia. Instead, it spans the larger population, in which a thicker auditory cortex correlates with more adept reading.

    Why Size Matters

    Is thicker always better? When it comes to cortical structure, no, not necessarily. We know the auditory cortex has more myelin in the left hemisphere of most people. Myelin is a fatty substance that acts as an insulator for nerve fibers. It increases neural communication speed and can also insulate columns of brain cells from each other. Neural columns are believed to function as small processing units.

    Their increased isolation and rapid communication in the left hemisphere can be thought to enable the fast, categorical processing necessary for language. We need to know if a speaker uses the category d or t when saying dear or tear rather than detecting the exact point where the vocal folds start vibrating.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Mega-Farms Are Driving the Threat of Bird Flu

    Mega-Farms Are Driving the Threat of Bird Flu

    [ad_1]

    In the West, where herds of thousands of cattle are common, researchers are seeing cases rise at poultry and dairy operations. More than 50 workers have contracted the virus.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • 3D printing method creates fantastic plastic

    3D printing method creates fantastic plastic

    [ad_1]

    Stretchable, flexible, recyclable. This plastic is fantastic
    Unlike similar materials that require complex processing, the plastic can be created with a 3D printer. Credit: Sameer A. Khan/Fotobuddy

    Princeton engineers have developed an easily scalable 3D printing technique to manufacture soft plastics with programmed stretchiness and flexibility that are also recyclable and inexpensive—qualities not typically combined in commercially manufactured materials.

    In an article in the journal Advanced Functional Materials, a team led by Emily Davidson reported that they used a class of widely available polymers called thermoplastic elastomers to create soft 3D printed structures with tunable stiffness.

    Engineers can design the print path used by the 3D printer to program the plastic’s physical properties so that a device can stretch and flex repeatedly in one direction while remaining rigid in another. Davidson, an assistant professor of chemical and biological engineering, said this approach to engineering soft architected materials could have many uses, such as soft robots, medical devices and prosthetics, strong lightweight helmets, and custom high-performance shoe soles.

    The key to the material’s performance is its internal structure at the tiniest level. The research team used a type of block copolymer which forms stiff cylindrical structures that are 5-7 nanometers thick (for comparison, human hair measures about 90,000 nanometers) inside a stretchy polymer matrix.

    The researchers used 3D printing to orient these nanoscale cylinders, which leads to a 3D printed material that is hard in one direction but soft and stretchy in nearly all others. Designers can orient these cylinders in different directions throughout a single object, leading to soft architectures which exhibit stiffness and stretchiness in different regions of an object.

    “The elastomer we are using forms nanostructures that we are able to control,” Davidson said. This allows designers a great degree of control over finished products. “We can create materials that have tailored properties in different directions.”







    Princeton University. Credit: Sameer A. Khan/Fotobuddy

    The first step in developing this process was choosing the right polymer. The researchers chose a thermoplastic elastomer, which is a block copolymer that can be heated and processed as a polymer melt, but which solidifies into an elastic material when it cools.

    At the molecular level, polymers are long chains of linked molecules. Traditional homopolymers are long chains of one repeating molecule, whereas block copolymers are made of different homopolymers connected to each other. These different regions of a block copolymer chain are like oil and water- they separate instead of mixing. The researchers used this property to produce material with stiff cylinders within a stretchy matrix.

    The researchers used their knowledge of how these block copolymer nanostructures form and how they respond to flow to develop a 3D printing technique that effectively induces alignment of these stiff nanostructures. The researchers analyzed the way that printing rate and controlled under-extrusion could be used to control the physical properties of the printed material.

    Alice Fergerson, a graduate student at Princeton and the article’s lead author, spoke about the technique and the key role played by thermal annealing—the controlled heating and cooling of a material.

    Discover the latest in science, tech, and space with over 100,000 subscribers who rely on Phys.org for daily insights.
    Sign up for our free newsletter and get updates on breakthroughs,
    innovations, and research that matter—daily or weekly.

    “I think one of the coolest parts of this technique is the many roles that thermal annealing plays— it both drastically improves the properties after printing, and it allows the things we print to be reusable many times and even self-heal if the item gets damaged or broken.”

    Stretchable, flexible, recyclable. This plastic is fantastic
    By controlling the material’s internal structure, engineers can create objects with a range of properties. Credit: Sameer A. Khan/Fotobuddy

    Davidson said that one of the goals of the project was to create soft materials with locally tunable mechanical properties in a way that is both affordable and scalable for industry. It is possible to create similar structures with locally controlled properties using materials such as liquid crystal elastomers.

    But Davidson said those materials are both expensive (upwards of $2.50 per gram) and require multi-stage processing involving carefully controlled extrusion followed by exposure to ultraviolet light. The thermoplastic elastomers used in Davidson’s lab cost about a cent per gram and can be printed with a commercial 3D printer.

    The researchers have shown their technique’s ability to incorporate functional additives into the thermoplastic elastomer without reducing the ability to control material properties. In one example, they added an organic molecule developed by Professor Lynn Loo’s group that makes the plastic glow red after exposure to ultraviolet light. They also demonstrated the printer’s ability to produce complex and multi-layered structures including a tiny plastic vase and printed text that used sharp turns to spell out PRINCETON.

    Annealing plays a key role in their process by increasing the perfection of the order of internal nanostructures. Davidson said annealing also enables self-healing properties of the material. As part of the work, the researchers can cut a flexible sample of the printed plastic and reattached it by annealing the material. The repaired material demonstrated the same characteristics as the original sample. The researchers said they observed “no significant differences” between the original and the repaired material.

    As a next step, the research team expects to being exploring new 3D printable architectures that will be compatible with applications such as wearable electronics and biomedical devices.

    More information:
    Alice S. Fergerson et al, Reprocessable and Mechanically Tailored Soft Architectures Through 3D Printing of Elastomeric Block Copolymers, Advanced Functional Materials (2024). DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202411812

    Provided by
    Princeton University


    Citation:
    Stretchable, flexible, recyclable: 3D printing method creates fantastic plastic (2024, December 13)
    retrieved 13 December 2024
    from https://phys.org/news/2024-12-stretchable-flexible-recyclable-3d-method.html

    This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
    part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.



    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Hydrogen’s dual nature helps reveal hidden catalytic processes

    Hydrogen’s dual nature helps reveal hidden catalytic processes

    [ad_1]

    Scientists use a chemical peculiarity of hydrogen to amplify signals of magnetic resonance spectroscopy
    Credit: Nature Catalysis (2024). DOI: 10.1038/s41929-024-01262-w

    Microorganisms have long used hydrogen as an energy source. To do this, they rely on hydrogenases that contain metals in their catalytic center. In order to use these biocatalysts for hydrogen conversion, researchers are working to understand the catalysis process.

    A team from three Max Planck Institutes (MPI), the Center for Biostructural Imaging of Neurodegeneration (BIN) at the University Medical Center Göttingen (UMG), the University of Kiel, and the FACCTs GmbH used a chemical peculiarity of hydrogen to amplify the signals of magnetic resonance spectroscopy. In this way, the scientists were able to visualize previously unknown intermediate steps in the conversion of hydrogen. The study is published in Nature Catalysis.

    As a substitute for fossil fuels, energy source, or catalyst in chemical processes—hydrogen is considered a good candidate for a sustainable energy economy. On Earth, the element occurs mainly in bound form, in water, as hydrogen gas, or in fossil raw materials such as natural gas and crude oil. To obtain hydrogen in its pure form, it must be split from the chemical compound using energy.

    The most common method of producing hydrogen today is the steam methane reforming of natural gas. However, this also produces climate-damaging carbon dioxide (CO₂). In the catalytic production of hydrogen from water, electrodes made of the precious metal platinum have mostly been used up to now. This makes hydrogen production by means of catalysis comparatively expensive.

    Many microorganisms are a step ahead of these production processes. To split off hydrogen to generate energy, they use three different types of hydrogenases that function without precious metals and do not release CO2: [NiFe] hydrogenases from archaea and bacteria, [FeFe] hydrogenases from bacteria, some algae, and some anaerobic archaea, as well as [Fe] hydrogenases found only in archaea.

    The latter play a key role in methanogenesis, in which CO2 is reduced to methane (CH4). The homodimeric [Fe] hydrogenase contains one redox-inactive iron (Fe) per subunit, which is bound to a guanylylpyridinol cofactor.

    While intermediates in the catalytic cycle of [NiFe] hydrogenases and [FeFe] hydrogenases have already been well studied, the catalytic intermediates of [Fe] hydrogenases were not observable—until now. A research team has now succeeded in detecting the intermediates in the [Fe]-hydrogenases catalysis cycle for the first time.

    The team was led by Stefan Glöggler (Max Planck Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences (MPI-NAT) and the Center for Biostructural Imaging of Neurodegeneration (BIN) at the University Medical Center Göttingen (UMG), Lukas Kaltschnee (MPI-NAT and BIN at UMG, currently at the TU Darmstadt), Christian Griesinger (MPI-NAT), and Seigo Shima (MPI for Terrestrial Microbiology), and included colleagues from the MPI für Kohlenforschung, Kiel University, and the FAccTs GmbH.

    The researchers made use of the fact that hydrogen occurs as so-called parahydrogen and orthohydrogen, depending on its nuclear spin. The researchers showed that nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy results in signal amplification when the [Fe] hydrogenase reacts with parahydrogen. This so-called parahydrogen-induced polarization (PHIP) made it possible to identify the reaction intermediates and visualize how the [Fe] hydrogenase binds hydrogen during catalysis.

    The scientists’ data indicate that a hydride is formed at the iron center during catalysis. The new method also made it possible to study the binding kinetics. Due to its high sensitivity, PHIP is particularly promising for application to living cells and for investigating hydrogen metabolism in vivo. The results could help to develop (bio)catalysts for hydrogen conversion with higher productivity in the future.

    More information:
    Lukas Kaltschnee et al, Parahydrogen-enhanced magnetic resonance identification of intermediates in the active [Fe]-hydrogenase catalysis, Nature Catalysis (2024). DOI: 10.1038/s41929-024-01262-w. www.nature.com/articles/s41929-024-01262-w

    Provided by
    Max Planck Society


    Citation:
    Hydrogen’s dual nature helps reveal hidden catalytic processes (2024, December 13)
    retrieved 13 December 2024
    from https://phys.org/news/2024-12-hydrogen-dual-nature-reveal-hidden.html

    This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
    part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.



    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • How chemical reactions deplete nutrients in plant-based drinks

    How chemical reactions deplete nutrients in plant-based drinks

    [ad_1]

    How chemical reactions deplete nutrients in plant-based drinks
    Plant-based drinks in the lab. Credit: Jakob Helbig

    Over the last decade, the global market for plant-based beverages has seen remarkable growth, with oat, almond, soy and rice drinks emerging as popular alternatives to cow’s milk in coffee and oatmeal during this time.

    One of the likely reasons for millions of liters of plant-based drinks ending up in the shopping baskets of consumers is that their climate footprint is often lower than that of cow’s milk. But consumers would be mistaken if they considered plant-based beverages healthier than cow’s milk. This is highlighted in a new study conducted by the University of Copenhagen in collaboration with the University of Brescia, Italy.

    In the study, published in the journal Food Research International, researchers examined how chemical reactions during processing affect the nutritional quality of 10 different plant-based drinks, comparing them with cow’s milk. The overall picture is clear.

    “We definitely need to consume more plant-based foods. But if you’re looking for proper nutrition and believe that plant-based drinks can replace cow’s milk, you’d be mistaken,” says Department of Food Science professor Marianne Nissen Lund, the study’s lead author.

    Long shelf life at the expense of nutrition

    While milk is essentially a finished product when it comes out of a cow, oats, rice, and almonds require extensive processing during their conversion to a drinkable beverage. Moreover, each of the plant-based drinks tested underwent “Ultra High Temperature” (UHT) treatment, a process that is widely used for long-life milks around the world. In Denmark, milk is typically found only in the refrigerated sections of supermarkets and is low-pasteurized, meaning that it receives a much gentler heat treatment.

    “Despite increased plant-based drink sales, cow milk sales remain higher. Consequently, plant-based drinks undergo more intense heat treatments than the milk typically sold in Denmark, in order to extend their shelf life. But such treatment comes at a cost,” says Lund.

    UHT treatment triggers a so-called “Maillard reaction,” a chemical reaction between protein and sugar that occurs when food is fried or roasted at high temperatures. Among other things, this reaction impacts the nutritional quality of the proteins in a given product.

    “Most plant-based drinks already have significantly less protein than cow’s milk. And the protein, which is present in low content, is then additionally modified when heat treated. This leads to the loss of some essential amino acids, which are incredibly important for us. While the nutritional contents of plant-based drinks vary greatly, most of them have relatively low nutritional quality,” explains the professor.

    For comparison, the UHT-treated cow’s milk used in the study contains 3.4 grams of protein per liter, whereas eight of the 10 plant-based drinks analyzed contained between 0.4 and 1.1 grams of protein. The levels of essential amino acids were lower in all plant-based drinks. Furthermore, seven out of 10 plant-based drinks contained more sugar than cow’s milk.

    Discover the latest in science, tech, and space with over 100,000 subscribers who rely on Phys.org for daily insights.
    Sign up for our free newsletter and get updates on breakthroughs,
    innovations, and research that matter—daily or weekly.

    Heat treatment may produce carcinogens

    Besides reducing nutritional value, heat treatment also generates new compounds in plant-based drinks. One such compound measured by the researchers in four of the plant-based drinks made from almonds and oats is acrylamide, a carcinogen that is also found in bread, cookies, coffee beans and fried potatoes, including French fries.

    How chemical reactions deplete nutrients in plant-based drinks
    Professor Marianne Nissen Lund. Credit: Claus Boesen

    “We were surprised to find acrylamide because it isn’t typically found in liquid food. One likely source is the roasted almonds used in one of the products. The compound was measured at levels so low that it poses no danger. But, if you consume small amounts of this substance from various sources, it could add up to a level that does pose a health risk,” says Lund.

    Additionally, the researchers detected α-dicarbonyl compounds and hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) in several of the plant-based drinks. Both are reactive substances that could potentially be harmful to human health when present in high concentrations, although this is not the case here.

    While professor of nutrition Lars Ove Dragsted is not particularly concerned about the findings either, he believes that the study highlights how little we know about the compounds formed during food processing:

    “The chemical compounds that result from Maillard reactions are generally undesirable because they can increase inflammation in the body. Some of these compounds are also linked to a higher risk of diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. Although our gut bacteria break down some of them, there are many that we either do not know of or have yet to study,” says Dragsted of the Department of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports.

    Professor Dragsted adds, “This study emphasizes why more attention should be paid to the consequences of Maillard reactions when developing plant-based foods and processed foods in general. The compounds identified in this study represent only a small fraction of those we know can arise from Maillard reactions.”

    Make your own food

    According to Professor Lund, the study highlights broader issues with ultra-processed foods: “Ideally, a green transition in the food sector shouldn’t be characterized by taking plant ingredients, ultra-process them, and then assuming a healthy outcome. Even though these products are neither dangerous nor explicitly unhealthy, they are often not particularly nutritious for us either.”

    Her advice to consumers is to “generally opt for the least processed foods and beverages, and to try to prepare as much of your own food as possible. If you eat healthily to begin with, you can definitely include plant-based drinks in your diet—just make sure that you’re getting your nutrients from other foods.”

    At the same time, Professor Lund hopes that the industry will do more to address these issues: “This is a call to manufacturers to further develop their products and reconsider the extent of processing. Perhaps they could rethink whether UHT treatment is necessary or whether shorter shelf lives for their products would be acceptable.”

    More information:
    Mariachiara Pucci et al, Investigation of Maillard reaction products in plant-based milk alternatives, Food Research International (2024). DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2024.115418

    Provided by
    University of Copenhagen


    Citation:
    How chemical reactions deplete nutrients in plant-based drinks (2024, December 13)
    retrieved 13 December 2024
    from https://phys.org/news/2024-12-chemical-reactions-deplete-nutrients-based.html

    This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
    part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.



    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Proteomics method identifies ligand-binding proteins and binding sites in complex systems

    Proteomics method identifies ligand-binding proteins and binding sites in complex systems

    [ad_1]

    New proteomics method enables sensitive identification of ligand-binding proteins and their binding sites in complex system
    PELSA allows for systematic analysis of ligand-binding proteins, their binding sites, and local binding affinities in cell lysate. Credit: LI Kejia

    In a study published in Nature Methods, a research group developed a highly sensitive proteomics method called peptide-centric local stability assay (PELSA), which enables the simultaneous identification of ligand-binding proteins and their binding sites in complex systems. PELSA is broadly applicable to diverse ligands including metabolites, drugs, and pollutants.

    The biochemical functions of proteins invariably involve interactions with ligands of some type, which act as enzyme substrates or inhibitors, signaling molecules, allosteric modulators, structural anchors, etc. Monitoring protein-ligand interactions is thus essential for characterizing proteins with unknown functions, for investigating regulatory mechanisms in cell metabolism, and for elucidating drug mechanisms of action. Knowledge of the ligand-binding regions is also extremely valuable for structure-based drug design and biological hypothesis generation.

    Traditional methods for determining binding sites and affinities typically require the purification of recombinant proteins, which can be both time-consuming and labor-intensive. In addition, purified proteins may not fully replicate their native cellular state, resulting in inaccurate affinity measurements.

    Modification-based proteomics methods offer a powerful solution for identifying ligand-binding proteins and their sites directly in native cellular lysates. However, they often require ligand modification, which can affect ligand activity and cannot be applicable to ligands that cannot be modified.

    In the method proposed in this study, the researchers led by Prof. Ye Mingliang from the Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), collaborating with Prof. Luo Cheng’s group from the Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica of CAS, used a large amount of trypsin (E/S ratio of 1:2) to directly generate small peptides from native proteins.

    As these peptides are generated under native conditions, their abundance represents a measurement of proteins’ local stability. The large amount of trypsin ensured that even protein segments in low energy states could be cleaved, resulting in the generation of a large number of peptides reflecting a protein’s local stability.

    These peptides were separated from the partially-digested proteins, collected and directly analyzed by mass spectrometry. By measuring the peptide abundance in ligand-treated and vehicle-treated samples, the ligand-binding regions and the corresponding binding proteins can then be determined.

    PELSA has showed superior sensitivity in target protein identifications. For example, in identifying the target proteins of a pan-kinase inhibitor staurosporine, PELSA showed a 12-fold increase in kinase target identification compared to the state-of-art modification-free method, LiP-MS.

    Compared to the widely-used thermal proteome profiling (TPP) technique, which lacks binding site information, PELSA identified 2.4-fold more kinase targets. Dose-dependent PELSA experiments can measure local affinity, providing insights into the dynamic protein structural changes upon ligand binding under physiological conditions.

    Metabolites, known for their structural diversity and often low-affinity binding to proteins, pose challenges. PELSA proved particularly effective for the systematic identification of metabolite-binding proteins.

    Discover the latest in science, tech, and space with over 100,000 subscribers who rely on Phys.org for daily insights.
    Sign up for our free newsletter and get updates on breakthroughs,
    innovations, and research that matter—daily or weekly.

    For example, PELSA identified 40 candidate target proteins for alpha-ketoglutarate in HeLa cell lysates, 30 of which were well-known binding proteins of alpha-ketoglutarate, demonstrating the method’s high sensitivity and reliability. In addition, PELSA identified binding proteins for other metabolites, such as folate, leucine, fumarate, and succinate, showcasing its broad applicability.

    PELSA can directly detect ligand-induced local stability shifts of proteins in total cell lysate without the need for chemical modification of ligands.

    It is broadly applicable to diverse ligands, and allows for systematic analysis of ligand-binding proteins, their binding sites, and local binding affinities in cell lysate, where proteins carry physiological post-translational modifications and are associated with interacting proteins.

    More information:
    Kejia Li et al, A peptide-centric local stability assay enables proteome-scale identification of the protein targets and binding regions of diverse ligands, Nature Methods (2024). DOI: 10.1038/s41592-024-02553-7

    Provided by
    Chinese Academy of Sciences


    Citation:
    Proteomics method identifies ligand-binding proteins and binding sites in complex systems (2024, December 13)
    retrieved 13 December 2024
    from https://phys.org/news/2024-12-proteomics-method-ligand-proteins-sites.html

    This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
    part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.



    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • How Elon Musk’s partnership with Trump could shape science in the US — and beyond

    How Elon Musk’s partnership with Trump could shape science in the US — and beyond

    [ad_1]

    U.S. President-elect Donald Trump walks with Elon Musk to attend a viewing of the SpaceX Starship rocket in Texas, U.S.

    Billionaire and entrepreneur Elon Musk (left) has become a confidante for US president-elect Donald Trump (right).Credit: Brandon Bell/Getty

    Billionaire Elon Musk earned his reputation as an innovator at the forefront of science and technology, revolutionizing electric vehicles and space travel. But in the past several months, he has emerged as a major political figure in the United States, pouring more than US$250 million into Republican Donald Trump’s presidential campaign and using his social-media platform X (formerly Twitter) to question vaccine safety and climate science.

    Now the entrepreneur is joining forces with president-elect Trump on a mission to downsize the US government — including potentially slashing the budgets and workforces of science agencies, which Musk’s companies Tesla and SpaceX relied on for government contracts to grow and thrive. It has left many in the research community raising questions about his political influence and what it means for science in the United States and beyond.

    Although details about the US advisory body that Musk will help to lead, named the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), are scant, the billionaire, along with his co-chair, biotech entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy, laid out some of their intentions in a guest editorial in the Wall Street Journal last month. “Unelected bureaucrats” — a category that includes tens of thousands of scientists and other specialists — represent an “existential threat to our republic” owing to the unnecessary regulations on industry that they have helped to implement, the duo wrote. The pair then promised “mass headcount reductions across the federal bureaucracy”.

    Musk has not responded to repeated requests for comment from Nature.

    DOGE will undoubtedly face headwinds in achieving its cuts, policy observers who spoke to Nature say. Few, however, doubt that Musk will have far-reaching influence on science in the United States and beyond.

    Shrinking the government

    Conflicts of interest abound for Musk as a government adviser. The world’s richest man, Musk heads companies rooted in science, including private aerospace firm SpaceX, electric-vehicle company Tesla and brain-implant firm Neuralink. He has complained that US innovation is being held back by a “mountain of choking regulations” — government rules on everything from labour practices to data privacy that have repeatedly ensnared his own companies. In February 2022, for instance, Tesla agreed to pay a $275,000 fine after inspectors at the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) found that one of its manufacturing plants in Fremont, California, violated air-pollution regulations.

    Musk’s deregulatory vision aligns with that of president-elect Trump. For instance, many expect Trump to roll back or weaken rules designed to curb pollution, protect public health and limit climate change when he takes office, much as he did during his first term in 2017–21. Whether government regulation actually hinders economic and technological innovation is a complex question, however.

    Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, who are leading U.S. President-elect Donald Trump's proposed new Department of Government Efficiency.

    Musk (left) transports his son as he and biotech entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy (right) visit Capitol Hill to meet with members of the US Congress on 5 December.Credit: Benoit Tessier/Reuters

    Some research supports the idea that it can discourage growth or make it harder for big firms to acquire too much power by snapping up technology from start-up firms1,2. Many venture capitalists in places such as Silicon Valley, California, have focused on the latter restriction, and hope that the incoming Trump administration will relax rules governing mergers and acquisitions.

    There are areas in which streamlining regulations makes sense, says Robert Atkinson, an economist and president of the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation in Washington DC. Environmental regulations, for instance, might protect public health by requiring firms to study the environmental impacts of their activities and limiting pollution, but they can also slow deployment of crucial clean-energy projects and infrastructure.

    The real question lies in how regulations are crafted, says Scott Stern, an economist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge. “Clear and stable regulation arguably provides the right incentives for innovation,” he says. For instance, clear rules governing drug development protect both public health and intellectual property, fostering private investment.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Inhere, Outthere

    Inhere, Outthere

    [ad_1]

    Although the overhead fans hissed tirelessly, I swear I could feel it — the heat from outthere crawling through the cracks, threatening to do us all in. “Be my guest,” I dared the sliver of sun between the boarding bridge and the train. My hands itched as I rushed past business class, but when I snagged a seat, I found no rash on my palms. Not even a flush.

    Of course not.

    “Thank you for choosing …” the train speakers chased passengers to empty seats. If heat prickled their skin, their expressions did not betray it, although half the railcar hid behind masks. I made a game of guessing which dangers they sought to parry with polypropylene. For my part, the stench of gas — motor and human — had me reaching for my respirator.

    Instead, I pulled up my hood.

    “This seat taken?”

    I turned to the stranger — you — with a flat frown. Coach wasn’t a place for courtesy. “Clearly it’s not.”

    You grinned. “Gorge.”

    As if to emphasize my incredulity, the speakers announced: “If you cannot find a seat, please wait for the next train.”

    While I skimmed my e-book, you and your silver curls settled into the seat across. The black shimmer across your lids sharpened your eyes from curious to knowing. I couldn’t resign myself to your distraction so I searched my backpack for my pills.

    You smirked like we shared a secret.

    “They’re authorized.”

    “I’m sure.” When I didn’t respond to your teasing tone, you added, “Whatever it takes to reach tomorrow, right?”

    “Tickets!” The conductor emerged, eyes tired, and squinted at your ID. “Damn.”

    You laughed. “I know right!”

    My own name inspired a similar sigh, but the speakers cut off the conductor’s wisecrack: “Thank you for choosing …”

    “So wanna guess what name my parents cursed me with? I’ll give you a hint: celestial.”

    My own snort surprised me. “That’d apply to me too.” I quickly added, “But I’m not one to talk to strangers.”

    “Wouldn’t be strangers if we knew each other’s names.”

    The hum of the train’s departure stole your attention and my medication mine. I turned up my phone’s brightness, determined to make it to the next page.

    “Gorgeous,” you expanded your first abbreviation. My eyes darted up to clarify what, exactly, you were referencing. Not me — the view. Fields of sunflowers in perfect bloom.

    “Almost too good to be true,” I muttered at the rows of golden-yellow.

    Your gaze turned fond as if my cynicism was charming. “Is it so bad that I don’t want to see the real thing? There’s nothing we can do so I’d rather … pretend.”

    “Pretend,” I repeated.

    “That sounds horrible, doesn’t it?”

    “No,” I said quietly. “Sounds like you’re trying to reach tomorrow.”

    When you leaned forwards, I tightened my grip on my backpack — but you only pushed my hood away. “We’re safe inhere.”

    Keystrokes and slow conversation filled our silence, and I wiggled on my sticky seat, trying to fold my long legs. You caught my ankles and stretched me into your space, then curled into a ball to sleep.

    I managed a dozen pages and a dozen glances in your direction before the train made its first stop. “We’re having some technical issues, please remain seated.”

    Five pages. Behind us, two teenagers flirted in low tones. I wondered if they thought the same of us. Ten pages. “Thank you for choosing …” Twenty pages. “We apologize for this delay. Feel free to get a ticket for the next train.” An elderly passenger scoffed, launching into a rant, while I pulled up the ticket prices on my phone.

    You woke up with a pout. “What’s happening?”

    “Delays. We can get on the next train though.”

    “Are you?”

    I sighed. “I can’t afford to.”

    Five pages. An old couple told their love story to a chatty businessman. I caught your eye, by accident, and our frustrations softened. “That’s sweet.”

    “Mm.”

    Ten pages. Some left, many stayed. You sat awake, watching me. “Did you know that today used to be a holiday?” you made polite conversation. Only I wasn’t polite. “They called it May Day …” I worked hard not to listen.

    Twenty pages. The conductor walked through the aisles, fielding questions and complaints. Every page or so, the speakers crackled, until at last: “We thank you for your patience, the journey will resume shortly.”

    My mouth twisted up. The faces in the railcar were bewildered, sharing smiles of relief and irritation. You gifted me a wink, and god help me, my cheeks itched for it. This time, I didn’t blame the flush on delusions of heat.

    “Aurora.”

    “W — what?” I stammered.

    “Your name, I’m trying to guess.”

    I got one page in before you tried again. By attempt seven, the train began to slow, metal groaning beneath us. “Come on, it’s not Luna? You look like a Luna —”

    The windows flickered, and all at once, sunflower fields gave way to truth. You hushed at the sight of outthere — a scorched wasteland of brittle weeds. The scattered carrion were more bones than flesh, and although the horizon blurred from heat, I could swear three figures stumbled across the ruins.

    “Oh.” The breath punched out of you like a hiss. Or was that the heat at last crawling inhere? If the engine and displays had malfunctioned, could other systems in the train have failed? My hand hovered over the edges of the window as if I might wave to the three wanderers, until something — you — snatched it away.

    You sat back in your seat with a squint, forcing yourself to bear witness.

    “Hecate,” I whispered my name, desperate to pretend again.

    But it only made the hiss louder.

    “I’m Eos.”

    Neither one of us knew what else to say. And when tears streaked through your black shimmer, all I could do was swipe my screen to the next page.

    “Thank you for choosing …”

    The story behind the story

    Miranda Jensen reveals the inspiration behind Inhere, Outthere

    Years ago, I took the infamous Amtrak train between Washington DC and New York City. I was wildly unprepared for the adventure: seasoned commuters sprinting to snag window seats, ceiling ventilation duelling East Coast humidity, and a series of technical difficulties that had us deboarding somewhere near Baltimore, Maryland. I was far too hangry for coherence, and yet, the circumstances only sharpened my writer’s eye. I observed my fellow passengers, eavesdropping on their small talk — and flirting — until I found myself joining in, gratefully accepting the Oreos being passed around our little section. With each delay announced over the train’s speakers, our camaraderie swelled. It was strange, I realized after the fact, how swiftly we shifted from individuals to people.

    I recently experienced something similar on a train in Spain — a coincidence too strange not to write about. Particularly after the floodings that devastated Valencia, climate change was at the forefront of my mind. And so, with sunflower fields cradling me, and the chatter of Basque, Catalan and Castellano in my ears, I wrote the story’s first draft in one sitting. For a notorious outliner like me, constructing a story spontaneously was a challenge befitting the transportation anomaly.

    That said, this genre is one close to my heart; my father taught me a love for science fiction before even literacy. All the stories I tell are predicated on sparking change — thus, the ambiguous, ruinous world of Hecate and Eos. It is a tale in sight of climate justice, of course, but more than that, it is a dystopian interrogation of our modern logic. Nature is but one victim of many in the dichotomy of us versus them. Of in here versus out there.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • First sighting of ‘neutrino fog’ sparks excitement – but is it bad news for dark matter?

    First sighting of ‘neutrino fog’ sparks excitement – but is it bad news for dark matter?

    [ad_1]

    An image showing the bright light of a solar flare on the left side of the sun.

    Most neutrinos that stream through Earth are produced by fusion reactions in the Sun.Credit: NASA/Goddard/SDO

    Physicists in Italy and China have for the first time observed glimmers of the ‘neutrino fog’, signals from neutrinos that mimic those expected to be produced by dark matter.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • US and China sign new science pact — but with severe restrictions

    US and China sign new science pact — but with severe restrictions

    [ad_1]

    U.S. President Joe Biden shakes hands with Chinese President Xi Jinping ahead of a summit in 2024.

    US President Joe Biden (left) shakes hands with China’s President Xi Jinping (right) at an economic summit in November.Credit: Leah Millis/AFP via Getty

    The United States and China have signed a brand-new, five-year agreement that dictates how the nations will cooperate on science and technology research. The pact is narrower in scope than its predecessor, covering only collaboration on basic science projects between departments and agencies of the two governments and excluding work on ‘critical and emerging technologies’ potentially important to national security, such as artificial intelligence and semiconductors. Unlike its predecessor, the pact does not include any information about collaboration among Chinese and US universities and private companies.

    Experts in US–China relations welcome the agreement, saying that it will enable scientists to pursue projects with confidence.

    “I am relieved to see this pact renewal,” says Duan Yibing, a science-policy researcher at the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing, who hopes the pact will do what it’s designed to: promote collaboration in basic research between the two countries.

    “It appears they scrubbed everything and started from scratch,” says Caroline Wagner, a specialist in science, technology and international affairs at The Ohio State University in Columbus. The narrow focus “seems appropriate” given China’s new status as a scientific and economic power. “The United States has recognized its relationship with China is now more symmetrical” than when the original agreement was signed 45 years ago, she says.

    The agreement, “demonstrates a pragmatic, if constrained, approach to maintaining scientific collaboration amid geopolitical rivalry”, says Marina Zhang, an innovation researcher who focuses on China at the University of Technology Sydney in Australia.

    A modernized agreement

    The original pact was forged in 1979 to thaw diplomatic relations between China and the United States. It is normally renewed every five years, but it expired on 27 August last year amid rising tensions. Although the two nations recognized that new terms were needed in the agreement, they were unable to finalize the details before the deadline. Instead, they extended the old pact and kept negotiating.

    Researchers and other specialists warned that without the agreement, which is symbolic and doesn’t provide any funding, research cooperation and programmes between the two governments could flounder.

    A US Department of State official said at a briefing on 12 December that the government recognized that failure to have an agreement would have a chilling effect on areas of science and technology that are important to the United States. The new agreement is “modernized, with built-in protections”, the official said.

    The state department will now vet all research projects to ensure that they don’t pose national security concerns before they are approved. Proposals will also be reviewed by other US agencies led by the White House.

    Aside from specifying that critical and emerging technologies are off the table for collaboration, the pact does not further limit which scientific areas are fair game. But a US state department official suggested permissible projects might include research on the weather, oceanography and geology, as well as collecting influenza and air-quality data.

    The revamped pact addresses concerns from the United States that China did not always meet its obligation to share data under the previous agreement. The United States has been frustrated, for instance, that China has not been more transparent about data collected by a virology laboratory in Wuhan, where the first COVID-19 cases were detected. Some think that a virus could have leaked from that lab to trigger the pandemic.

    The agreement now includes wording that commits both the United States and China to sharing data, and being open and transparent. It also lays out a dispute-resolution mechanism by which both nations can iron out difficulties encountered in projects. If either side does not uphold its commitments, a termination clause allows the nations to end the agreement.

    Many of the concerns about the old pact came from the United States, given China’s rise in power. So in these negotiations, China has been “the passive side”, Duan says.

    An uncertain future

    Because of the timing of the new pact’s signing, one uncertainty hanging over it is whether the incoming administration of president-elect Donald Trump, who will take office in about a month, will uphold it. Researchers who spoke to Nature say they don’t expect the Trump administration to declare the agreement weak and reverse it, given that it already represents a compromise. Also, the agreement was last renewed in 2018 during Trump’s first presidency, Duan points out. Still, he adds, “we have to see what he will do”.

    Denis Simon, a non-resident fellow at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, a foreign-policy think tank in Washington DC, says that the new agreement provides “clear guardrails and a path to negotiate disputes”.

    Wagner adds that, because they have been excluded from the agreement, universities and private companies will need additional guidance from the two governments on the kinds of cooperation permitted.

    Overall, “it’s good news we still have an agreement”, Simon says. “It has been modified to reflect US concerns, but it’s better than no agreement.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link