Parental histone transfer caught at the replication fork

[ad_1]

  • Zhou, K., Gaullier, G. & Luger, K. Nucleosome structure and dynamics are coming of age. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 26, 3–13 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sekine, S. I., Ehara, H., Kujirai, T. & Kurumizaka, H. Structural perspectives on transcription in chromatin. Trends Cell Biol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2023.07.011 (2023).

  • Yung, P. Y. K. & Elsasser, S. J. Evolution of epigenetic chromatin states. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 41, 36–42 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Du, W. et al. Mechanisms of chromatin-based epigenetic inheritance. Sci. China Life Sci. 65, 2162–2190 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Stewart-Morgan, K. R., Petryk, N. & Groth, A. Chromatin replication and epigenetic cell memory. Nat. Cell Biol. 22, 361–371 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, W., Feng, J. & Li, Q. The replisome guides nucleosome assembly during DNA replication. Cell Biosci. 10, 37 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shan, Z. et al. The patterns and participants of parental histone recycling during DNA replication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Sci. China Life Sci. 66, 1600–1614 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Attali, I., Botchan, M. R. & Berger, J. M. Structural mechanisms for replicating DNA in eukaryotes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 90, 77–106 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bell, S. P. & Labib, K. Chromosome duplication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 203, 1027–1067 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yao, N. Y. & O’Donnell, M. E. The DNA replication machine: structure and dynamic function. Subcell. Biochem. 96, 233–258 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gao, Y. & Yang, W. Different mechanisms for translocation by monomeric and hexameric helicases. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 61, 25–32 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yeeles, J. T. P., Janska, A., Early, A. & Diffley, J. F. X. How the eukaryotic replisome achieves rapid and efficient DNA replication. Mol. Cell 65, 105–116 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kurat, C. F., Yeeles, J. T. P., Patel, H., Early, A. & Diffley, J. F. X. Chromatin controls DNA replication origin selection, lagging-strand synthesis, and replication fork rates. Mol. Cell 65, 117–130 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yeeles, J. T., Deegan, T. D., Janska, A., Early, A. & Diffley, J. F. Regulated eukaryotic DNA replication origin firing with purified proteins. Nature 519, 431–435 (2015).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Formosa, T. The role of FACT in making and breaking nucleosomes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1819, 247–255 (2013).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Safaric, B. et al. The fork protection complex recruits FACT to reorganize nucleosomes during replication. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, 1317–1334 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ehara, H., Kujirai, T., Shirouzu, M., Kurumizaka, H. & Sekine, S. I. Structural basis of nucleosome disassembly and reassembly by RNAPII elongation complex with FACT. Science 377, eabp9466 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Farnung, L., Ochmann, M., Engeholm, M. & Cramer, P. Structural basis of nucleosome transcription mediated by Chd1 and FACT. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 28, 382–387 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liu, Y. et al. FACT caught in the act of manipulating the nucleosome. Nature 577, 426–431 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Georgescu, R. et al. Structure of eukaryotic CMG helicase at a replication fork and implications to replisome architecture and origin initiation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E697–E706 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Douglas, M. E., Ali, F. A., Costa, A. & Diffley, J. F. X. The mechanism of eukaryotic CMG helicase activation. Nature 555, 265–268 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sun, J. et al. The architecture of a eukaryotic replisome. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 22, 976–982 (2015).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Baretić, D. et al. Cryo-EM structure of the fork protection complex bound to CMG at a replication fork. Mol Cell 78, 926–940 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jones, M. L., Baris, Y., Taylor, M. R. G. & Yeeles, J. T. P. Structure of a human replisome shows the organisation and interactions of a DNA replication machine. EMBO J. 40, e108819 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rzechorzek, N. J., Hardwick, S. W., Jatikusumo, V. A., Chirgadze, D. Y. & Pellegrini, L. CryoEM structures of human CMG-ATPγS-DNA and CMG-AND-1 complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, 6980–6995 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Xu, Z. et al. Synergism between CMG helicase and leading strand DNA polymerase at replication fork. Nat. Commun. 14, 5849 (2023).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Huang, H. et al. A unique binding mode enables MCM2 to chaperone histones H3-H4 at replication forks. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 22, 618–626 (2015).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, H., Wang, M., Yang, N. & Xu, R. M. Structure of the quaternary complex of histone H3-H4 heterodimer with chaperone ASF1 and the replicative helicase subunit MCM2. Protein Cell 6, 693–697 (2015).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Evrin, C., Maman, J. D., Diamante, A., Pellegrini, L. & Labib, K. Histone H2A-H2B binding by Pol α in the eukaryotic replisome contributes to the maintenance of repressive chromatin. EMBO J. https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.201899021 (2018).

  • Li, Z. et al. DNA polymerase α interacts with H3-H4 and facilitates the transfer of parental histones to lagging strands. Sci. Adv. 6, eabb5820 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Petryk, N. et al. MCM2 promotes symmetric inheritance of modified histones during DNA replication. Science 361, 1389–1392 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gan, H. et al. The Mcm2-Ctf4-Polα axis facilitates parental histone H3-H4 transfer to lagging strands. Mol. Cell 72, 140–151 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yu, C. et al. A mechanism for preventing asymmetric histone segregation onto replicating DNA strands. Science 361, 1386–1389 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Flury, V. et al. Recycling of modified H2A-H2B provides short-term memory of chromatin states. Cell 186, 1050–1065 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jenkyn-Bedford, M. et al. A conserved mechanism for regulating replisome disassembly in eukaryotes. Nature 600, 743–747 (2021).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tsunaka, Y., Fujiwara, Y., Oyama, T., Hirose, S. & Morikawa, K. Integrated molecular mechanism directing nucleosome reorganization by human FACT. Genes Dev. 30, 673–686 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jones, M. L., Aria, V., Baris, Y. & Yeeles, J. T. P. How Pol α-primase is targeted to replisomes to prime eukaryotic DNA replication. Mol. Cell 83, 2911–2924 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yu, C. et al. Strand-specific analysis shows protein binding at replication forks and PCNA unloading from lagging strands when forks stall. Mol. Cell 56, 551–563 (2014).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Xu, M. et al. Partitioning of histone H3-H4 tetramers during DNA replication-dependent chromatin assembly. Science 328, 94–98 (2010).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Groth, A. et al. Regulation of replication fork progression through histone supply and demand. Science 318, 1928–1931 (2007).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zivanov, J. et al. New tools for automated high-resolution cryo-EM structure determination in RELION-3. eLife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.42166 (2018).

  • Zheng, S. Q. et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 14, 331–332 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rohou, A. & Grigorieff, N. CTFFIND4: Fast and accurate defocus estimation from electron micrographs. J. Struct. Biol. 192, 216–221 (2015).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bepler, T. et al. Positive-unlabeled convolutional neural networks for particle picking in cryo-electron micrographs. Nat. Methods 16, 1153–1160 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bepler, T., Kelley, K., Noble, A. J. & Berger, B. Topaz-Denoise: general deep denoising models for cryoEM and cryoET. Nat. Commun. 11, 5208 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 213–221 (2010).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers. Protein Sci. 30, 70–82 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 486–501 (2010).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chen, V. B. et al. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 12–21 (2010).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, Q. et al. Acetylation of histone H3 lysine 56 regulates replication-coupled nucleosome assembly. Cell 134, 244–255 (2008).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120 (2014).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2012).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, Y. et al. Model-based analysis of ChIP-seq (MACS). Genome Biol. 9, R137 (2008).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chen, K. et al. DANPOS: dynamic analysis of nucleosome position and occupancy by sequencing. Genome Res. 23, 341–351 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • [ad_2]

    Source link

    Comments

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    More posts