[ad_1]
Hou, C. et al. DUF221 proteins are a family of osmosensitive calcium-permeable cation channels conserved across eukaryotes. Cell Res. 24, 632–635 (2014).
Zhao, X., Yan, X., Liu, Y., Zhang, P. & Ni, X. Co‐expression of mouse TMEM63A, TMEM63B and TMEM63C confers hyperosmolarity activated ion currents in HEK293 cells. Cell Biochem. Funct. 34, 238–241 (2016).
Murthy, S. E. et al. OSCA/TMEM63 are an evolutionarily conserved family of mechanically activated ion channels. eLife 7, e41844 (2018).
Yuan, F. et al. OSCA1 mediates osmotic-stress-evoked Ca2+ increases vital for osmosensing in Arabidopsis. Nature 514, 367–371 (2014).
Li, Y. et al. Genome-wide survey and expression analysis of the OSCA gene family in rice. BMC Plant Biol. 15, 261 (2015).
Ganie, S. A., Pani, D. R. & Mondal, T. K. Genome-wide analysis of DUF221 domain-containing gene family in Oryza species and identification of its salinity stress-responsive members in rice. PLoS ONE 12, e0182469 (2017).
Ding, S., Feng, X., Du, H. & Wang, H. Genome-wide analysis of maize OSCA family members and their involvement in drought stress. PeerJ 7, e6765 (2019).
Du, H. et al. The cation channel TMEM63B is an osmosensor required for hearing. Cell Rep. 31, 107596 (2020).
Li, S., Li, B., Gao, L., Wang, J. & Yan, Z. Humidity response in Drosophila olfactory sensory neurons requires the mechanosensitive channel TMEM63. Nat. Commun. 13, 3814 (2022).
Kefauver, J., Ward, A. & Patapoutian, A. Discoveries in structure and physiology of mechanically activated ion channels. Nature 587, 567–576 (2020).
Douguet, D. & Honoré, E. Mammalian mechanoelectrical transduction: structure and function of force-gated ion channels. Cell 179, 340–354 (2019).
Yan, H. et al. Heterozygous variants in the mechanosensitive ion channel TMEM63A result in transient hypomyelination during infancy. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 105, 996–1004 (2019).
Li, Q. & Montell, C. Mechanism for food texture preference based on grittiness. Curr. Biol. 31, 1850–1861.e6 (2021).
Tábara, L. C. et al. TMEM63C mutations cause mitochondrial morphology defects and underlie hereditary spastic paraplegia. Brain 145, 3095–3107 (2022).
Jojoa-Cruz, S. et al. Cryo-EM structure of the mechanically activated ion channel OSCA1.2. eLife 7, e41845 (2018).
Liu, X., Wang, J. & Sun, L. Structure of the hyperosmolality-gated calcium-permeable channel OSCA1. 2. Nat. Commun. 9, 5060 (2018).
Zhang, M. et al. Structure of the mechanosensitive OSCA channels. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 25, 850–858 (2018).
Maity, K. et al. Cryo-EM structure of OSCA1. 2 from Oryza sativa elucidates the mechanical basis of potential membrane hyperosmolality gating. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 14309–14318 (2019).
Brunner, J. D., Lim, N. K., Schenck, S., Duerst, A. & Dutzler, R. X-ray structure of a calcium-activated TMEM16 lipid scramblase. Nature 516, 207–212 (2014).
Pedemonte, N. & Galietta, L. J. Structure and function of TMEM16 proteins (anoctamins). Physiol. Rev. 94, 419–459 (2014).
Kawashima, Y. et al. Mechanotransduction in mouse inner ear hair cells requires transmembrane channel–like genes. J. Clin. Invest. 121, 4796–4809 (2011).
Pan, B. et al. TMC1 forms the pore of mechanosensory transduction channels in vertebrate inner ear hair cells. Neuron 99, 736–753.e6 (2018).
Jeong, H. et al. Structures of the TMC-1 complex illuminate mechanosensory transduction. Nature 610, 796–803 (2022).
Hartzell, C., Putzier, I. & Arreola, J. Calcium-activated chloride channels. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 67, 719–758 (2005).
Martinac, B., Adler, J. & Kung, C. Mechanosensitive ion channels of E. coli activated by amphipaths. Nature 348, 261–263 (1990).
Zheng, W. et al. TMEM63 proteins function as monomeric high-threshold mechanosensitive ion channels. Neuron 111, 3195–3210.e7 (2023).
Cox, C. D., Zhang, Y., Zhou, Z., Walz, T. & Martinac, B. Cyclodextrins increase membrane tension and are universal activators of mechanosensitive channels. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2104820118 (2021).
Zhang, Y., Angiulli, G., Martinac, B., Cox, C. D. & Walz, T. Cyclodextrins for structural and functional studies of mechanosensitive channels. J. Struct. Biol. X 5, 100053 (2021).
Zhang, Y. et al. Visualization of the mechanosensitive ion channel MscS under membrane tension. Nature 590, 509–514 (2021).
Jojoa-Cruz, S., Dubin, A. E., Lee, W.-H. & Ward, A. Structure-guided mutagenesis of OSCAs reveals differential activation to mechanical stimuli. eLife 12, RP93147 (2023).
Zhang, M., Shan, Y., Cox, C. D. & Pei, D. A mechanical-coupling mechanism in OSCA/TMEM63 channel mechanosensitivity. Nat. Commun. 14, 3943 (2023).
Maingret, F., Patel, A. J., Lesage, F., Lazdunski, M. & Honoré, E. Lysophospholipids open the two-pore domain mechano-gated K+ channels TREK-1 and TRAAK. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 10128–10133 (2000).
Nomura, T. et al. Differential effects of lipids and lyso-lipids on the mechanosensitivity of the mechanosensitive channels MscL and MscS. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 8770–8775 (2012).
Guo, Y. R. & MacKinnon, R. Structure-based membrane dome mechanism for Piezo mechanosensitivity. eLife 6, e33660 (2017).
Yao, X., Fan, X. & Yan, N. Cryo-EM analysis of a membrane protein embedded in the liposome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 18497–18503 (2020).
Melville, Z., Kim, K., Clarke, O. B. & Marks, A. R. High-resolution structure of the membrane-embedded skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor. Structure 30, 172–180.e3 (2022).
Yang, X. et al. Structure deformation and curvature sensing of PIEZO1 in lipid membranes. Nature 604, 377–383 (2022).
Tao, X., Zhao, C. & MacKinnon, R. Membrane protein isolation and structure determination in cell-derived membrane vesicles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2302325120 (2023).
Qin, Y. et al. Cryo-EM structure of TMEM63C suggests it functions as a monomer. Nat. Commun. 14, 7265 (2023).
Brohawn, S. G., Campbell, E. B. & MacKinnon, R. Physical mechanism for gating and mechanosensitivity of the human TRAAK K+ channel. Nature 516, 126–130 (2014).
Kalienkova, V. et al. Stepwise activation mechanism of the scramblase nhTMEM16 revealed by cryo-EM. eLife 8, e44364 (2019).
Arndt, M. et al. Structural basis for the activation of the lipid scramblase TMEM16F. Nat. Commun. 13, 6692 (2022).
Falzone, M. E. et al. TMEM16 scramblases thin the membrane to enable lipid scrambling. Nat. Commun. 13, 2604 (2022).
Falzone, M. E. et al. TMEM16 scramblases thin the membrane to enable lipid scrambling. Biophys. J. 121, 305a–306a (2022).
Jojoa-Cruz, S., Burendei, B., Lee, W.-H. & Ward, A. B. Structure of mechanically activated ion channel OSCA2. 3 reveals mobile elements in the transmembrane domain. Structure 32, 157–167.e5 (2024).
Wu, X., Shang, T., Lü, X., Luo, D. & Yang, D. A monomeric structure of human TMEM63A protein. Proteins https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.26660 (2024).
Hamill, O. P. & Martinac, B. Molecular basis of mechanotransduction in living cells. Physiol. Rev. 81, 685–740 (2001).
Ballesteros, A., Fenollar-Ferrer, C. & Swartz, K. J. Structural relationship between the putative hair cell mechanotransduction channel TMC1 and TMEM16 proteins. eLife 7, e38433 (2018).
Lim, N. K., Lam, A. K. & Dutzler, R. Independent activation of ion conduction pores in the double-barreled calcium-activated chloride channel TMEM16A. J. Gen. Physiol. 148, 375–392 (2016).
Whitlock, J. M. & Hartzell, H. C. A Pore Idea: the ion conduction pathway of TMEM16/ANO proteins is composed partly of lipid. Pflügers Archiv. Eur. J. Physiol. 468, 455–473 (2016).
Jiang, T., Yu, K., Hartzell, H. C. & Tajkhorshid, E. Lipids and ions traverse the membrane by the same physical pathway in the nhTMEM16 scramblase. eLife 6, e28671 (2017).
Walujkar, S. et al. In silico electrophysiology of inner-ear mechanotransduction channel TMC1 models. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.09.17.460860 (2021).
Goehring, A. et al. Screening and large-scale expression of membrane proteins in mammalian cells for structural studies. Nat. Protoc. 9, 2574–2585 (2014).
Bayburt, T. H. & Sligar, S. G. Membrane protein assembly into nanodiscs. FEBS Lett. 584, 1721–1727 (2010).
Zheng, S. Q. et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 14, 331–332 (2017).
Rohou, A. & Grigorieff, N. CTFFIND4: fast and accurate defocus estimation from electron micrographs. J. Struct. Biol. 192, 216–221 (2015).
Zivanov, J. et al. New tools for automated high-resolution cryo-EM structure determination in RELION-3. eLife 7, e42166 (2018).
Punjani, A., Rubinstein, J. L., Fleet, D. J. & Brubaker, M. A. cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 14, 290–296 (2017).
Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).
Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004).
Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 2126–2132 (2004).
Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: building new software for automated crystallographic structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 58, 1948–1954 (2002).
Smart, O. S., Neduvelil, J. G., Wang, X., Wallace, B. A. & Sansom, M. S. P. HOLE: a program for the analysis of the pore dimensions of ion channel structural models. J. Mol. Graph Model 14, 354–360 (1996).
Pravda, L. et al. MOLEonline: a web-based tool for analyzing channels, tunnels and pores (2018). Nucleic Acids Res. 46, W368–W373 (2018).
Humphrey, W., Dalke, A. & Schulten, K. VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph Model 14, 33–38 (1996).
Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers. Protein Sci. 30, 70–82 (2021).
Colom, A. et al. A fluorescent membrane tension probe. Nat. Chem. 10, 1118–1125 (2018).
Delcour, A., Martinac, B., Adler, J. & Kung, C. Modified reconstitution method used in patch-clamp studies of Escherichia coli ion channels. Biophys. J. 56, 631–636 (1989).
Wu, E. L. et al. CHARMM-GUI Membrane Builder toward realistic biological membrane simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 35, 1997–2004 (2014).
Lomize, M. A., Pogozheva, I. D., Joo, H., Mosberg, H. I. & Lomize, A. L. OPM database and PPM web server: resources for positioning of proteins in membranes. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D370–D376 (2012).
Van Der Spoel, D. et al. GROMACS: fast, flexible, and free. J. Comput. Chem. 26, 1701–1718 (2005).
Huang, J. et al. CHARMM36m: an improved force field for folded and intrinsically disordered proteins. Nat. Methods 14, 71–73 (2017).
Hess, B., Bekker, H., Berendsen, H. J. C. & Fraaije, J. G. E. M. LINCS: a linear constraint solver for molecular simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 18, 1463–1472 (1997).
Darden, T., York, D. & Pedersen, L. Particle mesh Ewald—an N.log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J. Chem. Phys. 98, 10089–10092 (1993).
Verlet, L. Computer experiments on classical fluids. I. Thermodynamical properties of Lennard-Jones molecules. Phys. Rev. 159, 98 (1967).
Berendsen, H. J. C., Postma, J. P. M., Vangunsteren, W. F., Dinola, A. & Haak, J. R. Molecular-dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J. Chem. Phys. 81, 3684–3690 (1984).
Bussi, G., Donadio, D. & Parrinello, M. Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. J. Chem. Phys. 126, 014101 (2007).
Roux, B. The membrane potential and its representation by a constant electric field in computer simulations. Biophys. J. 95, 4205–4216 (2008).
Michaud-Agrawal, N., Denning, E. J., Woolf, T. B. & Beckstein, O. Software news and updates MDAnalysis: a toolkit for the analysis of molecular dynamics simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 32, 2319–2327 (2011).
Wickham, H. A layered grammar of graphics. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 19, 3–28 (2010).
[ad_2]
Source link
